点击显示 收起
【摘要】 The renal peptide transporter PEPT2 plays an important role in absorption of di- and tripetides in the proximal tubule; however, knowledge of regulation of PEPT2 by growth factors and hormones is limited. In the present study, we examined the effects of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on PEPT2 transport capacity and expression in the rat proximal tubule cell line SKPT0193 cl.2 (SKPT), which expresses rat PEPT2 (rPEPT2) in the apical membrane. Treatment of SKPT cells with EGF during cell culture growth caused a dose-dependent decrease in rPEPT2 transport capacity and expression, as determined by studies of apical uptake of [ 14 C]glycylsarcosine, rPepT2 mRNA levels, and immunostaining of SKPT cells with a rPEPT2-specific antibody. On the contrary, apical uptake of glucose and lysine was increased in EGF-treated cells, indicating that EGF was not acting generally to decrease apical nutrient uptake mechanisms in the proximal tubule cells. Our findings indicate that EGF decreases rPEPT2 expression by lowering transcription of the rat PepT2 gene or by decreasing rat PepT2 mRNA stability. Previous investigators routinely used SKPT cell culture media with a high (10 ng/ml) EGF concentration. Our study suggests that this might be disadvantageous when studying PEPT2-mediated transport phenomena. These findings demonstrate for the first time EGF-mediated regulation of PEPT2 expression in a kidney cell line. The relevance for kidney regulation of peptide transport activity in physiological and/or pathophysiological situations, where EGF and EGF receptor levels change drastically, remains to be established.
【关键词】 rat PEPT immunohistochemistry glycylsarcosine uptake reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction
DI / TRIPEPTIDES, FILTERED in the glomerulus or arising from hydrolysis of larger peptides, are reabsorbed from the tubular lumen by the action of two peptide transporters, PEPT1 and PEPT2. The transporters are located in the apical membrane of proximal kidney tubule cells and mediate the uptake of di/tripeptides in a proton-dependent manner ( 6 ). PEPT1 and PEPT2 are sequentially expressed with PEPT1 located in the proximal part and PEPT2 in the distal part of the proximal tubule ( 29 ). Renal cell lines have been used to study function of peptide transport activity. Confluent porcine kidney cells (LLC-PK 1 ) have been shown to express PEPT2 and display dipeptide transport activity ( 37 ). A proximal tubule cell line, SKPT0193 cl.2 (SKPT), has been established after simian virus-40 transformation of proximal tubule cells from spontaneously hypersensitive rats ( 3, 19 ). This cell line forms confluent monolayers when grown on permeable supports and expresses rat PEPT2 (rPEPT2) but not PEPT1 ( 3 ). A number of investigators have used this cell line to study PEPT2 function and substrate affinities ( 10 - 12, 30, 35 ).
PEPT2 has been well characterized in terms of substrate affinities. It has been shown to transport di/tripeptides and several drugs such as -lactam antibiotics, the anticancer drug bestatin, and valine esterprodrugs of acyclovir and gancyclovir ( 5, 10, 11, 17, 30, 33, 34 ). However, little is known about the regulation of PEPT2 in vivo or in cell culture models. Takahashi et al. ( 32 ) demonstrated an upregulation of rPEPT2, following nephrectomy. Wenzel et al. ( 38 ) showed that phorbol ester treatment decreased peptide uptake in LLC-PK 1 cells, implying a PKC-mediated downregulation of PEPT2 activity. We previously showed that the expression of hPEPT1 in Caco-2 cells is decreased following long-term treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF) ( 27 ). EGF is a 53-amino acid polypeptide, which is secreted into the lumen of the distal part of kidney tubules, the intestinal tract, and salivary ducts. EGF has a wide range of effects on cell growth and division, tissue proliferation, and nutrient absorption in the kidney ( 8 ). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether EGF (which normally was included in the culture medium of SKPT cells at a high concentration) is involved in the regulation of rPEPT2 expression. The present results showed a strong inhibitory effect of EGF on rPEPT2 transport capacity. This correlated with a decreased uptake rate of [ 14 C]-labeled glycylsarcosine (Gly-Sar), decreased rPepT2 mRNA levels, decreased rPEPT2 expression, and changes in tissue morphology. The present study is, to our knowledge, the first study demonstrating regulation of PEPT2 expression by a growth factor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials. If not otherwise stated, compounds were supplied by Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Cell culture. SKPT cells at passage 44, donated by Dr. M. Brandsch (Biozentrum, Halle, Germany) with kind permission of Dr. U. Hopfer (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH), were seeded in culture flasks and passaged in 1:1 DMEM/Nutrient mixture F-12 (F12), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 5 µg/ml insulin, 4 µg/ml dexamethasone, 5 µg/ml apotransferrin and varying amounts of EGF, all from Life Technologies (Taastrup, Denmark). When cells reached passages 45 - 63, they were seeded onto tissue culture-treated Transwells (1 cm 2, 0.4-mm pore size; Costar, Cambridge, MA) at a density of 5 x 10 4 cells/cm 2. Monolayers were grown in an atmosphere of 5% CO 2 -95% O 2 at 37°C. Growth media were replaced every other day.
Gly-Sar, D -( + )-glucose, and L -lysine uptake experiments. [ 14 C]Gly-Sar with a specific activity of 49.94 mCi/mmol, [ 3 H]mannitol with a specific activity of 51.50 mCi/mmol, D -2-[ 3 H]glucose with a specific activity of 12.4 mCi/mmol, and L -[4,5- 3 H(N)]-lysine with a specific activity of 84.80 mCi/mmol were obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar was measured in HBSS supplemented with 0.05% BSA. Apical media were buffered with 10 mM MES and pH was adjusted to 6.0. Basolateral media were buffered with 10 mM HEPES and adjusted to pH 7.4. Cells were placed on a shaking plate, preheated to 37°C (SWIP, EB), and allowed to equilibrate for 15 min in apical and basolateral buffer solutions. The experiment was started by adding fresh apical buffer containing the relevant Gly-Sar concentration and 0.5 µCi [ 14 C]Gly-Sar per well. In certain experiments, 0.5 µCi [ 3 H]mannitol per well was added to the apical solution, as a marker of extracellular space. Uptake experiments were terminated after 10 min, unless otherwise stated, by gentle suction of the uptake medium, followed by four washes of the monolayers with ice-cold HBSS. The filters were cut out and placed in scintillation vials. Radioactivity was determined in a Packard TriCarb liquid scintillation counter, using Ultima Gold scintillation fluid (Packcard, Canberra). Apical uptake experiments with D -(+)-glucose and L -lysine were performed in a similar manner. Fresh apical buffer containing 0.1 mM D -(+)-glucose or L -lysine marked with 0.5 µCi per well of [ 3 H]glucose or [ 3 H]lysine, respectively, was added to the apical chamber, and the rest of the protocol was identical to the Gly-Sar uptake experiments.
Kinetic analysis. Uptake of Gly-Sar as a function of apical Gly-Sar concentration was fitted to a Michaelis-Menten type equation as previously used in Nielsen et al. ( 27 ). The ED 50 value for EGF-mediated inhibition of Gly-Sar uptake was determined using the De Leans' equation ( 7 ).
Protein determination. Filters were placed in NP-40 lysis buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 2% NP-40) in Eppendorf tubes. Cells were removed from the filters by a gentle treatment with a pistil. The tubes were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min. The protein content in lysates free of cellular debris was determined by the method of Bradford ( 1 ), using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK).
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and PCR. RNA was isolated from SKPT cells grown for 4 days in the absence and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF using total RNA isolation reagent (Advanced Biotechnologies, Epsom, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg of total RNA and an anchored oligo(dT) primer using Reverse-iT First Strand Synthesis Kit (Advanced Biotechnologies). PCR was carried out using 5 µl of reverse-transcribed RNA added to a solution consisting of 0.5 µM of forward and reverse primers for rPepT2 and for the internal control glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD; DNA Technology, Aarhus, Denmark), 1.5 mM MgCl 2, 5 µl of PCR buffer, 200 µM of each dNTP, and 1.25 U of HotStar Taq DNA polymerase (all from Advanced Biotechnologies) in a total volume of 50 µl. Temperature cycling proceeded as follows: 1 cycle at 94°C for 15 min and 28 cycles at 94°C for 60 s, 58°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 90 s, followed by 72°C for 10 min. Linearity was observed until 28 cycles of amplification. rPepT2 expression was measured using the sense strand 5'-GCATCTCATCGCAGATGT-3' (corresponding to bases 1030 to 1048) and the antisense strand 5'-TGACTGGAATGTCCTCTG-3' (corresponding to bases 1953 to 1971) used previously by Fujita et al. ( 9 ), resulting in a 940-bp PCR product. The expression of G6PD was measured using the following primers: 5'-GGTACTTAGATGACCCCACA-3' (sense strand, corresponding to bases 1003-1023) and 5'-GTCCAGCTCAGACTCCTCAG-3' (antisense strand, corresponding to bases 1285-1305), resulting in a 302-bp PCR product. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.7% agarose gels. To confirm the identity of the rPepT2 PCR product, these were subjected to restriction enzyme digestion using Pst I, which should give two fragments of 806 and 135 bp. DNA from gel bands was purified using Gel Band Purification Kit (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified DNA was then subjected to the action of the restriction enzyme Pst I for 2 h using the appropriate buffers. A second PCR using nested primers was performed. Five microliters (in a total volume of 50 µl) of the first PCR product were used as template. Temperature cycling in this second PCR amplification proceeded as follows: 1 cycle at 94°C for 15 min and 15 cycles at 94°C for 60 s, 60°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 90 s, followed by 72°C for 10 min. rPepT2 expression was measured using the sense strand 5'-GCGTGCTTGGCTTTTGCA-3' (corresponding to bases 1318 to 1336) and the antisense strand 5'-AGTCTTTGCCCACGCTGA-3' (corresponding to bases 1771 to 1789), resulting in a 471-bp PCR product. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.7% agarose gels followed by staining with SYBR-Gold from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Images were obtained and analyzed on a Kodak Image Station 1000 (Kodak, Rochester, NY).
Confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cells grown on filters were fixed for 10 min in HBSS with 3% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized for 5 min in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and blocked for 30 min in a solution of 2% BSA in PBS. Cell morphology was visualized by staining actin filaments with Alexa 488-conjugated phalloidin and cell nuclei with propidium iodide, both from Molecular Probes. The cells were incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated phalloidin (1 IU in 200 µl of PBS + 2% BSA) for 30 min, treated with 100 µg/ml RNAse in 2 x SSC buffer solution (300 mM NaCl, 30 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0) for 20 min, and counterstained with 0.5 µM propidium iodide in 2 x SSC buffer solution for 5 min.
EGF receptor (EGF-R) localization was studied using an anti-EGF-R antibody raised against EGF-R of human origin but with reactivity toward EGF-R protein of rat, mouse, and human (determined by the manufacturer using Western blot analysis). Anti-EGF-R antibody and blocking peptide were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). After fixation and permeabilization, cells were incubated with rabbit anti-EGF-R antibody (1:200) for 2 h. The filters were rinsed twice in PBS and then incubated with the secondary antibody (Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG from Molecular Probes) for 90 min. Thereafter, the cells were treated with RNAse and stained with propidium iodide as described above. As a control, the antibody was preincubated with EGF-R blocking peptide (1:200) before the staining procedure.
The localization and expression level of rPEPT2 in SKPT cells were studied by immunostaining. Rabbit-anti-rPEPT2 antibody raised against the peptide sequence MNPFQKNESKETLFSC corresponding to the first 15 NH 2 -terminal amino acid residues of the rat PEPT2 protein plus a cysteine added for conjugation purposes was custom made by Sigma-Genosys (Cambridge, UK). After fixation and permeabilization, the SKPT cells were incubated with anti-rPEPT2 (1:200) antibody for 2 h. The filters were rinsed twice in PBS and incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG) for 90 min. Then, cells were treated with RNAse and counterstained with propidium iodide. As a control, the first antibody was preincubated with the rPEPT2 epitope for 2 h and then the staining procedure was followed. All preparation steps were performed at room temperature (20°C). After being washed in 2 x SSC, filters were mounted on coverslips and confocal imaging was performed on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning microscope, using a Zeiss plan apochromat x 63 oil immersion objective with a numerical aperture of 1.4 or a Zeiss C-apochromat x 40 water immersion objective with a numerical aperture of 1.2. Fluorophores were excited using an argon laser line at 488 nm and a HeNe laser line at 543 nm.
Statistical analysis. Experiments were performed using several SKPT cell passages ( n = 3-4) and in duplicates or triplicates ( N = 2-3) within each passage. Values are given as means ± SE. The statistical significance of the results was determined using a two-tailed Student's t -test, or an ANOVA test, when appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Apical Gly-Sar uptake was decreased in SKPT cells cultured in the presence of EGF. The transport capacity of rPEPT2, as estimated by the apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar at a Gly-Sar concentration of 25 µM, was followed over a time period of 8 days after seeding the SKPT cells ( Fig. 1 A ). Preliminary experiments showed that there was no significant transepithelial transport of Gly-Sar over the time period studied and only a very small uptake of Gly-Sar when isotope and substrate were added basolaterally, all [ 14 C]Gly-Sar uptake was therefore assumed to be apical. The cells were grown in the absence or presence of 10 ng/ml EGF in the culture media. On day 2 and throughout the remaining part of the culture period, the uptake of Gly-Sar was significantly reduced ( P < 0.05, n = 3) in the presence of 10 ng/ml EGF in the culture media. In SKPT cells, without added EGF, the maximum uptake values were found on days 3 - 5. When SKPT cells were grown in the presence of 10 ng/ml EGF, the Gly-Sar uptake remained approximately constant on days 3 - 8. Subsequent experiments were performed on day 3 or 4, unless otherwise stated.
Fig. 1. A : influence of culture time on apical glycylsarcosine (Gly-Sar) uptake in SKPT0193 cl.2 (SKPT) cells grown in the absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF). Apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar ([Gly-Sar] = 25 µM) was measured over 10 min. Each data point represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (compared with cells grown in EGF media). B : time course of EGF inhibition. EGF at a concentration of 10 ng/ml was added to the culture medium at various time periods before measuring apical uptake on day 3. Apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar ([Gly-Sar] = 25 µM) was measured over 10 min. Each bar represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages. * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001 (compared with cells grown in EGF-free media). C : influence of culture time on the protein content in SKPT cells grown in the absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 10 ng/ml EGF supplement. Each data point represents means ± SE of 2 individual passages. D : Gly-Sar uptake in SKPT cells in the absence (filled bars) or presence (shaded bars) of 20 mM Gly-Pro in EGF-treated or nontreated SKPT cells. Apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar ([Gly-Sar] = 70 µM) was measured over a 40-min incubation period. Each data point represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages. ** P < 0.01 (compared with Gly-Pro experiments). Inset : apical [ 14 C]Gly-Sar ([Gly-Sar] = 520 µM) accumulation as a function of incubation time in SKPT cells cultured in the absence ( ) and presence ( ) of 10 ng/ml EGF supplement. Each data point represents means ± SD of 3 separate wells.
Effect of EGF on peptide uptake was maximal after 48 h of stimulation. SKPT cells were seeded without EGF added to the culture media and the effect of introducing 10 ng/ml EGF to the culture media at different time points during a 3-day culture period was investigated ( Fig. 1 B ). Addition of EGF 24 h before measuring Gly-Sar uptake decreased the uptake compared with nontreated cells (3.44 ± 0.05 vs. 6.37 ± 0.93 pmol· cm -2 ·min -1, P < 0.05, n = 3). The maximal inhibition of Gly-Sar uptake was reached when SKPT cells were treated with EGF for 48 h (1.65 ± 0.34 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 ) or more.
EGF in the culture media did not affect protein content of the SKPT cells. The protein content of SKPT cells cultured in the absence and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF was followed over a time period of 8 days ( Fig. 1 C ). No significant difference was observed throughout the period studied. The protein content was 0.25 ± 0.02 mg·cm -2 ( n = 2) and 0.29 ± 0.05 mg·cm -2 ( n = 2) in SKPT cells grown for 4 days in the presence and absence of EGF supplement, respectively.
Apical uptake of Gly-Sar was linear up to at least 60 min. The apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar at a Gly-Sar concentration of 520 µM was linear for the time period studied both for SKPT cells grown in the absence and presence of 10 ng/ml of EGF supplement, and subsequent uptake experiments were performed using either 10- or 40-min incubation ( Fig. 1 D, inset ).
Apical uptake of Gly-Sar was inhibited by surplus of the competing substrate Gly-Pro in both nontreated and EGF-treated monolayers. Apical Gly-Sar uptake was determined in SKPT cells cultured during 4 days in media containing 10 ng/ml EGF or in EGF-free media ( Fig. 1 D ). The uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar at a Gly-Sar concentration of 70 µM was measured over 40 min in the absence and presence of 20 mM glycylproline (Gly-Pro), a competing substrate for rPEPT2-mediated transport. Apical solutions contained 0.5 µCi of the extracellular space marker [ 3 H]mannitol. When SKPT cells were cultured in media containing EGF, the Gly-Sar uptake values in the absence and presence of Gly-Pro were 3.46 ± 0.33 and 0.45 ± 0.22 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 ( P < 0.05, n = 3), respectively. Under these culture conditions, the component of apical Gly-Sar uptake that could not be inhibited by Gly-Pro represented 13% of the total uptake ( Fig. 1 D ). However, when the Gly-Sar present in the apical extracellular space was subtracted from the values, Gly-Sar uptake in the presence of 20 mM Gly-Pro was not significantly different from zero ( n = 3).
When EGF was removed from the culture media, only 3% of the total Gly-Sar uptake corresponded to a noninhibitable component. The [ 14 C]Gly-Sar uptake at 0.07 mM was 13.66 ± 0.88 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 in the absence of 20 mM Gly-Pro and 0.39 ± 0.20 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 when 20 mM Gly-Pro were present in the donor solution ( P < 0.05, n = 3). When corrections for extracellular space were performed, Gly-Sar uptake in the presence of 20 mM Gly-Pro was not significantly different from zero ( n = 3).
These data show that the uptake of Gly-Sar in both nontreated and EGF-treated cells can be completely abolished by adding surplus of a competing dipeptide substrate for the peptide transporter rPEPT2, indicating that the differences in uptake of radiolabel in nontreated and EGF-treated tissues are due to differences in peptide transporter capacity and not "unspecific" uptake. The remaining component of "uptake," measured in the presence of 20 mM Gly-Pro, was due to apical extracellular [ 14 C]Gly-Sar, which had not been removed during the washing of the cell monolayers.
EGF decreased peptide uptake when applied either apically or basolaterally. To investigate whether the observed effects of EGF on apical Gly-Sar uptake were mediated by apical or basolateral stimulation, a series of experiments was performed where media containing 10 ng/ml of EGF were added to the apical, basolateral, or both sides of the cells throughout the culture period and compared with controls without EGF added to the growth media. On day 3 after seeding of the SKPT cells, Gly-Sar uptake experiments were carried out. Apical, basolateral, or bilateral application of EGF decreased apical Gly-Sar uptake to the same extent, compared with nontreated controls, indicating that the effect of EGF is mediated by receptors located on both the apical and basolateral membranes of SKPT cells ( Fig. 2 A ).
Fig. 2. A : apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar ([Gly-Sar] = 25 µM) after basolateral, apical, or bilateral treatment with 10 ng/ml EGF throughout culture. Control cells were cultured in media without EGF supplements. Each data point represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages. * P < 0.05 (compared with untreated cells). B : EGF concentration dependence of inhibition of apical Gly-Sar uptake. SKPT cells were treated with varying concentrations of EGF in the culture media throughout the culture period. Apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar ([Gly-Sar] = 25 µM) was measured. Each data point represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages. ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (compared with untreated cells). Inset : data points were fitted to the De Leans' equation.
The expression of EGF-R was studied by anti-EGF-R immunostaining using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) ( Fig. 3 B ). SKPT cells grown for 4 days in the absence or presence of 10 ng/ml EGF were treated with primary EGF-R antibody, followed by labeling with a secondary Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody. As a control, the primary antibody was coincubated with EGF-R blocking peptide, which abolished staining (data not shown). As additional controls, omission of either primary or secondary antibody gave negative results (data not shown). The EGF-R was localized in both apical and basolateral membranes, and in vesicles just below, in both EGF-treated and untreated cells.
Fig. 3. A : morphology of SKPT cells cultured in the absence and presence of EGF. Cell nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide (red), and actin filaments were labeled with Alexa 488-conjugated phalloidin (green). Left : horizontal section through SKPT cells. Two filters, one treated ( left ) and the other untreated ( right ), were aligned on the same coverslip. Right : vertical sections of SKPT cells grown in presence ( top ) and absence ( bottom ) of 10 ng/ml EGF throughout the culture period. B : immunolocalization of EGF receptors ( x - z sections). After fixation and permeabilization, SKPT cells grown in the absence ( right ) and presence ( left ) of 10 ng/ml EGF were treated with EGF receptor antibody and labeled with a secondary Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit antibody (green). Cell nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide (red). C : immunolocalization of rPEPT2 by anti-rPEPT2 immunostaining. SKPT cells grown in the absence ( right ) and presence ( left ) of 10 ng/ml EGF supplement throughout the culture period. SKPT monolayers were treated with anti-rPEPT2 antibody followed by labeling with a secondary Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit antibody (green signal). Top : projected z series through the monolayers. Bottom : vertical section of SKPT cells grown in the absence and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF. All the images were performed 4 days after the SKPT cells were seeded. Top, right : monolayers treated with anti-rPEPT2 antibody and blocking peptide. All images were representative of 3-5 individual preparations, each performed on different cell passages.
EGF decreased apical Gly-Sar uptake in a dose-dependent manner. SKPT cells were grown in the presence of varying concentrations (0-50 ng/ml) of EGF in the culture medium for 4 days. The inhibition of apical Gly-Sar uptake by EGF showed a clear dose dependency ( Fig. 2 B ). The ED 50 for the EGF-mediated inhibition of apical Gly-Sar uptake in SKPT cells was estimated as 0.75 ± 0.20 ng/ml ( n = 3) using De Leans' equation ( Fig. 2 B, inset ), and the uptake at maximal inhibition was 0.51 ± 0.36 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 ( n = 3), corresponding to 8% of the uptake value obtained in cells grown in the absence of EGF in the culture media.
EGF-induced changes in SKPT cell morphology. The morphology of 4-day-old SKPT cells was investigated by labeling the cell nuclei with propidium iodide and actin with Alexa 488-conjugated phalloidin. The network of actin filaments underlies the plasma membrane and thereby visualizes the outline of the cells. Differences were observed between untreated cells and SKPT cells treated with 10 ng/ml EGF during 4 days of culture ( Fig. 3 A ). The vertical scans demonstrated that both groups of cells formed a monolayer when grown onto polycarbonate filters ( Fig. 3 A ). A significantly higher number of cells per area were found when the culture media contained EGF supplement (256 ± 24 vs. 173 ± 20 cells/ 20,000 µm 2, P < 0.05, n = 4).
EGF-treated cells appeared higher than untreated SKPT cells, with a height of 20.25 ± 1.31 and 12 ± 0.41 µm, respectively ( P < 0.01, n = 4). EGF treatment changed V max of apical Gly-Sar uptake. Apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar was measured over a concentration range of 30-520 µM Gly-Sar in the apical solution in control cells and cells treated throughout the culture period with 10 ng/ml EGF ( Fig. 4 ). The obtained values for Gly-Sar uptake were corrected for Gly-Sar present in the extracellular fluid using [ 3 H]mannitol as the extracellular space marker. The experimental data were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation, and kinetic constants were calculated. The apparent K m values for Gly-Sar were 90 ± 3 and 114 ± 8 µM for nontreated and EGF-treated SKPT cells, respectively (not significantly different, n = 3). These values were comparable to the value of 86 µM obtained by Brandsch et al. ( 3 ). SKPT cells grown in the traditional EGF-containing culture medium displayed a V max of 9.02 ± 1.16 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1. This value was lower than the value of 15 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 described in the publication by Bransch et al. ( 3 ); however, this was probably caused by differences in the experimental set-ups and in the correction methods used. A significantly higher V max was obtained in cells grown in the absence of EGF ( V max = 34.56 ± 4.14 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 ) compared with EGF-treated cells ( P < 0.001, n = 3).
Fig. 4. Gly-Sar concentration dependence of apical uptake of [ 14 C]Gly-Sar in SKPT cells grown in the absence of EGF ( ) and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF ( ) was measured over 40 min. The DPM values of Gly-Sar were corrected for Gly-Sar present in the extracellular spaces (see MATERIALS AND METHODS ). The corrected data points were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation. Each data point represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages.
SKPT cells cultured in the presence of EGF showed decreased expression of rPepT2 mRNA and rPEPT2 protein in the apical membrane. rPepT2 mRNA levels were investigated in 4-day-old SKPT cell monolayers cultured in the absence or presence of 10 ng/ml EGF ( Fig. 5 ). Whereas rPepT2 mRNA was undetectable in EGF-treated cells, a product of the expected size (a band at 941 bp) was detected in untreated SKPT cells ( Fig. 5 A ). Agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrated the presence of a PCR product of the expected size (band at 302 bp) for the internal control G6PD in EGF-treated and untreated SKPT cells ( Fig. 5 A ). Restriction enzyme digestion of the rPepT2 PCR product (941 bp) was performed to confirm its identity. Two fragments of the predicted sizes (806 and 135 bp) were observed when the purified DNA was incubated with Pst I (data not shown). Because functional data indicated the presence of PEPT2 in EGF-treated cells, nested PCR was performed to verify the presence of rPepT2 mRNA in the EGF-treated cells, as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. A band at 471 bp, corresponding to the rPepT2 nested primer product, was observed for both treated and untreated SKPT cells, showing that rPepT2 mRNA was present, although apparently at a lower amount, in treated cells ( Fig. 5 B ). The G6PD primers from the original reaction mixture resulted in a band at 300 bp, and an extra band was observed at 375 bp; however, this was due to an interaction between the G6PD primers and the nested primers and was not observed when either primer set was used alone (data not shown); the identity of this band was therefore not investigated further. The rPepT2 mRNA changes were not quantified, because no band was observed in the first PCR for SKPT cells grown in the presence of EGF; however, the absence of the band clearly indicates a lower amount of rPepT2 message after EGF treatment compared with the untreated cells.
Fig. 5. A : RT-PCR products of rPepT2 mRNA and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in SKPT cells cultured in the absence and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF. The PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with SYBR-Gold. Numbers to the left indicate the molecular weight (bp). B : PCR amplification products of rPepT2 mRNA using nested primers as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with SYBR-Gold. A and B : representative of 3 experiments, each performed on different cell passages.
The localization and expression of rPEPT2 were studied by CLSM in SKPT cells cultured for 4 days in the absence or presence of 10 ng/ml EGF supplements, using a rabbit anti-rPEPT2 antibody. Intense rPEPT2 staining was mainly localized in the apical membrane of EGF-treated or untreated SKPT monolayers; however, some cytosolic staining was also present ( Fig. 3 C ). The expression of rPEPT2 was lower in 4-day-old SKPT cells cultured in media containing 10 ng/ml EGF than in untreated SKPT cells. The degree of expression of rPEPT2 varied between individual cells, as judged by vertical x - y and horizontal x - z image stacks. However, there was a marked difference in fluorescence intensity between untreated and EGF-treated cells ( Fig. 3 C ). The mean pixel intensity of confocal stacks (maximal projections) was used as a semiquantitative measure of immunolabeling. The pixel intensity was calculated in four different images corresponding to different filters of the same passage. In SKPT cells grown in the absence of EGF, the mean pixel intensity was 101.02 ± 15.11, whereas in SKPT cells grown in media containing 10 ng/ml EGF the mean pixel intensity was 29.77 ± 8.54 ( P < 0.001, N = 4).
EGF treatment of SKPT cells increased the apical uptake of glucose and lysine transporters. To assess whether the effect of EGF was general on apical membrane transporters in the SKPT cells, apical uptake of glucose and lysine was measured in cells cultured for 4 days in the absence and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF ( Fig. 6 ). The apical uptake of glucose was significantly lower in untreated SKPT cells than in EGF-treated cells (3.11 ± 0.18 vs. 5.26 ± 0.28 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1, P < 0.05, n = 3; Fig. 6 A ). The apical uptake of lysine was significantly lower in SKPT cells grown in the absence of EGF than in cells cultured in the presence of EGF supplement (23.40 ± 0.62 vs. 35.03 ± 1.81 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1, P < 0.05, n = 3; Fig. 6 B ). This indicates that EGF treatment during the culture time increases the uptake of glucose and lysine via transport mechanisms and that the decrease in dipeptide uptake is not caused by a general decrease in apical membrane transport protein expression.
Fig. 6. Apical uptake of [ 3 H]glucose ( A ) and [ 3 H]lysine ( B ) in SKPT cells grown in the absence (control cells) and presence of 10 ng/ml EGF. Each data point represents means ± SE of 3 individual passages. ** P < 0.01 (compared with untreated cells).
DISCUSSION
The present study is to our knowledge the first demonstration of EGF-mediated regulation of PEPT2. EGF was shown to downregulate rPEPT2 in the rat kidney proximal tubule cell line SKPT. EGF in a concentration of 10 ng/ml in the culture media decreased the maximal uptake capacity to 25% of the value obtained in untreated cells without changing K m, suggesting that the EGF treatment reduced the number of active peptide transporters in the apical membrane of SKPT cells. This was not due to general changes in apical membrane transport protein expression, because the uptake of glucose and lysine actually decreased in cells grown in the absence of EGF. RT-PCR and immunostaining followed by confocal visualization confirmed that rPepT2 mRNA levels and rPEPT2 expression were increased when EGF was omitted from the culture media.
Regulation of PEPT2 by EGF. Little is known about regulation of PEPT2 transport activity. Wenzel et al. ( 38 ) demonstrated that the uptake of a dipeptide, D -Phe- L -Ala, in LLC-PK 1 was regulated by the cellular concentration of Ca 2+, and PKC was found to transmit this effect. Takahashi et al. ( 32 ) found that the high-affinity type H + -peptide cotransport activity in rat kidney was upregulated by 5/6 nephrectomy, accompanied by the increased expression of rPEPT2. However, regulation of PEPT2 by specific hormones and growth factors has not been studied previously. EGF is synthesized in a number of cell types and is inserted in the plasma membrane as proEGF, which can be cleaved, releasing soluble EGF. EGF acts via a tyrosine kinase receptor, EGF-R ( 23 ), which initiates a series of intracellular signaling events ( 13, 24 ). EGF is produced in the kidneys in the cells of the thick ascending limb of Henle and the early part of the distal convoluted tubules and is secreted in an exocrine manner in the urine. The EGF-R is present in the basolateral cell membrane in proximal tubules of mammalian kidney as evidenced by the presence of EGF-binding sites and EGF-R mRNA in rabbit proximal tubular cell cultures ( 4, 15 ) and immunostaining of rat kidney proximal tubules ( 22, 36 ). In the present study, we detected EGF-R immunolabeling in both the apical and basolateral membranes of SKPT cells. The effect of EGF on rPEPT2 activity was also shown to be independent of on which side EGF was added. This might imply that the SKPT cell line does not differentiate fully with respect to polarization of receptors. However, the ED 50 value found in this study, 0.75 ± 0.19 ng/ml (1.45 nM) is in a similar range as K d values found for EGF binding to the EGF-R in urothelial cells in humans (0.86 nM) ( 25 ). The concentration range in which EGF decreased rPEPT2 transport activity is thus in the physiological range of EGF-EGF-R interactions.
EGF has been reported to have numerous effects on a number of cellular events, ranging from short-term activation of sodium/proton exchangers to elongation of villi in intestinal cells. However, our data indicate that the changes in peptide uptake capacity and rPEPT2 protein expression observed in this study are caused by changes in rPepT2 mRNA levels. EGF-R activation has been reported to affect mRNA levels of various plasma membrane proteins involved in transport. Mischoulon et al. ( 26 ) demonstrated an EGF-mediated upregulation of GLUT-1 mRNA in cultured hepatocytes, and Ishida et al. ( 18 ) observed the same effect in cultured bovine corneal endothelial cells and presented evidence that PKC was involved. Kekuda et al. ( 20 ) showed that the serotonin transporter was upregulated by EGF in JAR human placental choriocarcinoma cells. In rat alveolar epithelial cells, EGF was shown to downregulate steady-state mRNA levels of rat epithelial Na + channel subunits ( 21 ). Xu et al. ( 39 ) demonstrated that EGF downregulates the intestinal sodium-phosphate cotransporter NaPi-II b via regulation of the NaPi-II b gene promoter and our group demonstrated previously that EGF downregulates hPEPT1 in the intestinal cell line Caco-2 via changes in hPepT1 mRNA ( 27 ). The signaling pathway leading from EGF-R activation to changes in PepT2 mRNA levels still remains to be elucidated but is likely to include either regulation of transcription of the PepT2 gene, possibly via an EGF-responsive element, or regulation of PepT2 mRNA stability. It will have to be investigated whether the regulation of PEPT1 and PEPT2 by EGF shares common features.
Role of EGF in kidney proximal tubule cells. The relationship between EGF and peptide transport activity in the kidney has not been investigated. Most of the EGF produced in the kidney is in the form of the membrane-bound precursor pro-EGF. Pro-EGF is situated in the apical membrane of EGF-producing cells in the thick ascending limb and in the distal tubules, and large amounts of EGF are secreted into the urine. EGF-Rs are present in the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells in the proximal tubule, the cortical and the inner medullary collecting duct ( 4 ). In normal kidneys, they appear to be predominantly immunolocalized in the proximal tubule ( 4, 36 ). Urinary EGF will therefore only come into contact with basolateral receptors when the urothelium is damaged, indicating a role in renal tissue regeneration (much similar to the suggested role of EGF in the GI tract). A number of studies therefore investigated the potential role of EGF and EGF-R activation in renal tissue under pathophysiological conditions. A general pattern observed after drug- or ischemia-induced kidney damage is a fast decrease in kidney total EGF expression and an upregulation of EGF-R mRNA and expression ( 14, 28 ). Leonard et al. ( 22 ) showed that the decrease in EGF immunoreactivity was due to an overall decrease in tissue-bound pro-EGF, probably caused by a release of EGF ( 16 ) and a decrease in EGF mRNA.
As mentioned previously, Takahashi et al. ( 32 ) reported an increase in rPEPT2 activity in rats 2 wk after 5/6 nephrectomy, a situation where EGF-R immunostaining has been reported to change ( 31 ). Given the data presented in this study, there might be a connection between the large changes in EGF and EGF-R expression observed in proximal tubule cells after nephrectomy and the observed increases in rPEPT2 activity. However, the exact spatiotemporal pattern of changes in EGF-R expression as well as basolateral levels of EGF, TGF-, and heparin-binding EGF in the vicinity of the EGF-Rs on proximal cells would have to be investigated and correlated with PEPT2 expression in vivo, thus investigating the in vivo relevance of the present findings.
Omission of EGF from standard SKPT cell culture media is favorable for rPEPT2 expression. The SKPT cell line has been used routinely to investigate PEPT2-mediated peptide and drug transport due to its ability to form confluent monolayers expressing rPEPT2 in the apical membrane ( 3 ). The cells have traditionally been cultured using standard supplements, as well as a cocktail of receptor agonists, i.e., EGF, insulin, dexamethasone, and apotransferrin ( 2, 3, 10, 19, 35 ). As demonstrated in the present paper, removal of EGF caused a drastic increase in peptide uptake activity and rPEPT2 protein and mRNA expression in SKPT cells grown for 4 days on permeable supports. The reasons for adding the supplements are not described in the original publication ( 3 ), but this was probably done to supply the cells with adequate amounts of growth factors and stimulants necessary for the cells to reach confluency quickly. However, we previously showed that when monolayers of the intestinal cell line Caco-2 are grown in the presence of EGF, the intestinal peptide transporter hPEPT1 is downregulated, accompanied by changes in tissue morphology, indicating that Caco-2 cells were kept in a proliferative state and did not fully differentiate when grown in the presence of 2 ng/ml EGF ( 27 ). The results from the present study indicate that this could be the case for the SKPT cell line as well. With removal of EGF from the culture medium, the V max of Gly-Sar uptake increased by a factor of about four, nicely followed by the expression of PEPT2, which increased by a factor of about three as judged by confocal staining. The number of cells per area decreased (indicating less growth/cell division). Peptide uptake capacity is fairly low in SKPT cells grown in the traditional EGF-containing culture medium. This necessitates corrections to be used when peptide uptake is measured in SKPT cells, i.e., corrections for isotope still present in the apical extracellular space after washing [corrections for a "nonsaturable component" ( 2 )]. An increased uptake, as seen in the non-EGF-treated cells, yields more tissue DPM per extracellular DPM and thereby less error introduced by the correction. Direct comparisons with peptide transport parameters obtained in previous studies are not possible, because most investigators grow SKPT cells in the bottom of dishes, compared with the permeable supports used in our study, and this might cause differences in cell behavior and PEPT2 expression. As an example, protein content values in our setup are approximately twice as high as the values originally published by Brandsch et al. ( 3 ). This is probably due to the differences in culture conditions (Brandsch et al. cultured cells in 9.62-cm 2 petri dishes, whereas we cultured cells on 1-cm 2 permeable filters) and differences in the protein assay (Brandsch et al. used the Lowry method, whereas we used the Bradford method). V max values of Gly-Sar uptake of SKPT cells grown in the traditional EGF-containing culture medium also differed between our study and the original characterization study; V max was estimated to be 9 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 in the present study, compared with the value of 15 pmol·cm -2 ·min -1 described in the publication by Bransch et al. ( 3 ). However, although we cannot predict how omission of EGF from the culture media will influence SKPT cells grown under different culture conditions, we suggest that investigators working with SKPT cells reevaluate the usefulness of the traditional EGF-containing SKPT culture media.
Conclusions. We demonstrated in the present study that long-term treatment with EGF in SKPT cells causes a decrease in Gly-Sar uptake. We showed that this effect was due to a decrease in rPEPT2 protein expression caused by a decrease in rPepT2 mRNA. Further studies are necessary to elucidate cellular events linking EGF-R activation and rPEPT2 expression in SKPT cells. The physiological significance of these findings also has to be investigated in native tissue.
GRANTS
The Carlsberg Foundation supported this work. The Alfred Benzon Foundation is acknowledged for supporting the research of S. A. Bravo.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the work of technicians B. Eltong, S. N. Sø-rensen, and B. Larsen.
【参考文献】
Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-254, 1976.
Brandsch M, Brandsch C, Ganapathy ME, Chew CS, Ganapathy V, and Leibach FH. Influence of proton and essential histidyl residues on the transport kinetics of the H + /peptide cotransport systems in intestine (PEPT 1) and kidney (PEPT 2). Biochim Biophys Acta 1324: 251-262, 1997.
Brandsch M, Brandsch C, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V, Hopfer U, and Leibach FH. Identification of a renal cell line that constitutively expresses the kidney-specific high-affinity H + /peptide cotransporter. FASEB J 9: 1489-1496, 1995.
Breyer MD, Redha R, and Breyer JA. Segmental distribution of epidermal growth factor binding sites in rabbit nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 259: F553-F558, 1990.
Daniel H and Adibi SA. Transport of -lactam antibiotics in kidney brush border membrane. Determinants of their affinity for the oligopeptide/H + symporter. J Clin Invest 92: 2215-2223, 1993.
Daniel H, Morse EL, and Adibi SA. The high and low affinity transport systems for dipeptides in kidney brush border membrane respond differently to alterations in pH gradient and membrane potential. J Biol Chem 266: 19917-19924, 1991.
De Lean A, Munson PJ, and Rodbard D. Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay, and physiological dose-response curves. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Gastrointest Physiol 235: E97-E102, 1978.
Fisher DA, Salido EC, and Barajas L. Epidermal growth factor and the kidney. Annu Rev Physiol 51: 67-80, 1989.
Fujita T, Kishida T, Okada N, Ganapathy V, Leibach FH, and Yamamoto A. Interaction of kyotorphin and brain peptide transporter in synaptosomes prepared from rat cerebellum: implication of high affinity type H + /peptide transporter PEPT2 mediated transport system. Neurosci Lett 271: 117-120, 1999.
Ganapathy ME, Brandsch M, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V, and Leibach FH. Differential recognition of -lactam antibiotics by intestinal and renal peptide transporters, PEPT 1 and PEPT 2. J Biol Chem 270: 25672-25677, 1995.
Ganapathy ME, Huang W, Wang H, Ganapathy V, and Leibach FH. Valacyclovir: a substrate for the intestinal and renal peptide transporters PEPT1 and PEPT2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246: 470-475, 1998.
Ganapathy ME, Prasad PD, Mackenzie B, Ganapathy V, and Leibach FH. Interaction of anionic cephalosporins with the intestinal and renal peptide transporters PEPT 1 and PEPT 2. Biochim Biophys Acta 1324: 296-308, 1997.
Gekle M, Freudinger R, Mildenberger S, and Silbernagl S. Rapid actions of aldosterone on cells from renal epithelium: the possible role of EGF-receptor signaling. Steroids 67: 499-504, 2002.
Hise MK, Liu L, Salmanullah M, Drachenberg CI, Papadimitriou JC, and Rohan RM. mRNA expression of transforming growth factor- and the EGF receptor following nephrotoxic renal injury. Ren Fail 22: 423-434, 2000.
Humes HD, Cieslinski DA, Johnson LB, and Sanchez IO. Triiodothyronine enhances renal tubule cell replication by stimulating EGF receptor gene expression. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 262: F540-F545, 1992.
Humes HD, Lake EW, and Liu S. Renal tubule cell repair following acute renal injury. Miner Electrolyte Metab 21: 353-365, 1995.
Inui K, Terada T, Masuda S, and Saito H. Physiological and pharmacological implications of peptide transporters, PEPT1 and PEPT2. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15, Suppl 6: 11-13, 2000.
Ishida K, Yamashita H, Katagiri H, and Oka Y. Regulation of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) gene expression by epidermal growth factor in bovine corneal endothelial cells. Jpn J Ophthalmol 39: 225-232, 1995.
Jin W and Hopfer U. Dipeptide-induced Cl - secretion in proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 273: C1623-C1631, 1997.
Kekuda R, Torres-Zamorano V, Leibach FH, and Ganapathy V. Human serotonin transporter: regulation by the neuroprotective agent aurintricarboxylic acid and by epidermal growth factor. J Neurochem 68: 1443-1450, 1997.
Kemp PJ, Borok Z, Kim KJ, Lubman RL, Danto SI, and Crandall ED. Epidermal growth factor regulation in adult rat alveolar type II cells of amiloride-sensitive cation channels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 277: C1058-C1065, 1999.
Leonard I, Zanen J, Nonclercq D, Toubeau G, Heuson-Stiennon JA, Beckers JF, Falmagne P, Schaudies RP, and Laurent G. Modification of immunoreactive EGF and EGF receptor after acute tubular necrosis induced by tobramycin or cisplatin. Ren Fail 16: 583-608, 1994.
Martin GS. The erbB gene and the EGF receptor. Cancer Surv 5: 199-219, 1986.
Meisenhelder J, Suh PG, Rhee PG, and Hunter T. Phospholipase C- is a substrate for the PDGF and EGF receptor protein-tyrosine kinases in vivo and in vitro. Cell 57: 1109-1122, 1989.
Messing EM and Reznikoff CA. Normal and malignant human urothelium: in vitro effects of epidermal growth factor. Cancer Res 47: 2230-2235, 1987.
Mischoulon D, Rana B, Kotliar N, Pilch PF, Bucher NL, and Farmer SR. Differential regulation of glucose transporter 1 and 2 mRNA expression by epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor- in rat hepatocytes. J Cell Physiol 153: 288-296, 1992.
Nielsen CU, Amstrup J, Steffansen B, Frokjaer S, and Brodin B. Epidermal growth factor inhibits glycylsarcosine transport and hPepT1 expression in a human intestinal cell line. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 281: G191-G199, 2001.
Schena FP. Role of growth factors in acute renal failure. Kidney Int Suppl 66: S11-S15, 1998.
Smith DE, Pavlova A, Berger UV, Hediger MA, Yang T, Huang YG, and Schnermann JB. Tubular localization and tissue distribution of peptide transporters in rat kidney. Pharm Res 15: 1244-1249, 1998.
Sugawara M, Huang W, Fei YJ, Leibach FH, Ganapathy V, and Ganapathy ME. Transport of valganciclovir, a ganciclovir prodrug, via peptide transporters PEPT1 and PEPT2. J Pharm Sci 89: 781-789, 2000. <a href="/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200006)89:6
Taira T, Yoshimura A, Iizuka K, Inui K, Oshiden K, Iwasaki S, Ideura T, and Koshikawa S. Expression of epidermal growth factor and its receptor in rabbits with ischaemic acute renal failure. Virchows Arch 427: 583-588, 1996.
Takahashi K, Masuda S, Nakamura N, Saito H, Futami T, Doi T, and Inui K. Upregulation of H + -peptide cotransporter PEPT2 in rat remnant kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F1109-F1116, 2001.
Terada T, Saito H, and Inui K. Interaction of -lactam antibiotics with histidine residue of rat H + /peptide cotransporters, PEPT1 and PEPT2. J Biol Chem 273: 5582-5585, 1998.
Terada T, Sawada K, Irie M, Saito H, Hashimoto Y, and Inui K. Structural requirements for determining the substrate affinity of peptide transporters PEPT1 and PEPT2. Pflügers Arch 440: 679-684, 2000.
Theis S, Knutter I, Hartrodt B, Brandsch M, Kottra G, Neubert K, and Daniel H. Synthesis and characterization of high affinity inhibitors of the H + /peptide transporter PEPT2. J Biol Chem 277: 7287-7292, 2002.
Toubeau G, Nonclercq D, Zanen J, Laurent G, Schaudies PR, and Heuson-Stiennon JA. Renal tissue expression of EGF and EGF receptor after ischaemic tubular injury: an immunohistochemical study. Exp Nephrol 2: 229-239, 1994.
Wenzel U, Diehl D, Herget M, and Daniel H. Endogenous expression of the renal high-affinity H + -peptide cotransporter in LLC-PK 1 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 275: C1573-C1579, 1998.
Wenzel U, Diehl D, Herget M, Kuntz S, and Daniel H. Regulation of the high-affinity H + /peptide cotransporter in renal LLC-PK 1 cells. J Cell Physiol 178: 341-348, 1999. <a href="/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199903)178:3
Xu H, Collins JF, Bai L, Kiela PR, and Ghishan FK. Regulation of the human sodium-phosphate cotransporter NaPi-IIb gene promoter by epidermal growth factor. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280: C628-C636, 2001.
作者单位:1 Department of Pharmaceutics, The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, DK-2100 Copenhagen; and 2 Department of Zoophysiology, August Krogh Institute, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark