点击显示 收起
Italian State Railways CP 1011, 35100 Padua Italy E-mail: baschetti{at}shineline.it
Dear Sir:
In Parks and Hellerstein's (1) extensive review article on carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia, there is ample discussion about future research, which probably will be influenced, at least in part, by their excellent article. In view of this probability, to avoid additional misleading studies that cannot be usefully compared (2, 3), it is important to integrate Parks and Hellerstein's data (1) with the recommendation that all future studies on the effects of high-carbohydrate diets should specify whether sugars are consumed in physiologic concentrations <or >4.18 MJ/L. In fact, although sugars in concentrations 4.18 MJ/L leave the stomach progressively more slowly as concentrations increase, thereby allowing energy to be delivered to the intestine at physiologically constant rates per unit of time, sugars in concentrations >4.18 MJ/L leave the stomach more rapidly than do sugars in lower concentrations, thus causing the delivery of unphysiologically high amounts of energy to the intestine per unit of time (4). This recommendation applies especially to studies using liquid-formula diets (5).
Unfortunately, researchers have not yet realized that carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia may simply reflect the unnaturally high concentrations in which sugars are usually ingested and not the effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet per se (5). When starch accounts for most of the carbohydrates ingested, triacylglycerolemia can be drastically reduced, even in patients with familial endogenous hypertriacylglycerolemia (6).
Considering that the metabolic physiology of our ancestors, who practically lived on fruit for millions of years, was largely molded by the sugars present in fruit (4), which never exceed 4.18 MJ/L, it is hardly surprising that the consumption of sugars in concentrations above this natural limit can result in undesirable consequences (4, 5, 7).
REFERENCES