Literature
首页医源资料库在线期刊美国临床营养学杂志2001年74卷第4期

The search continues for a tool to evaluate dietary quality

来源:《美国临床营养学杂志》
摘要:Nutritionalscientistshavebeensearchingforatoolthatcanlinkdietaryornutrientintakestochronicdiseaseincidenceandperhapseventomorbidityandmortality。Becauseofthelackofvalidatedresearchtoolsandmethodstocapturepatternsoffoodintake,thedefaulthasbeentodocume......

点击显示 收起

Ann M Coulston

1 From the Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

See corresponding article on page 479.

2 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to AM Coulston, 27 Big Tree Road, Woodside, CA 94062. E-mail: acoulst{at}attglobal.net.

Nutritional scientists have been searching for a tool that can link dietary or nutrient intakes to chronic disease incidence and perhaps even to morbidity and mortality. Much of what has been published focuses on individual nutrients, with dietary fat receiving the trophy for being the most explored. However, most nutritionists believe that the answer lies not in the intake of a specific nutrient but in dietary patterns or the intake of foods or food groups (1). Because of the lack of validated research tools and methods to capture patterns of food intake, the default has been to document specific nutrient intakes and to relate the data to disease incidence.

A major advance in this quest for such a tool was accomplished by the nutrition staffs of several offices from the US Department of Agriculture under the direction of Kennedy et al (2). They developed the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) as a tool to evaluate overall diet quality. The HEI is composed of 10 food components adapted from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (3) and the Food Guide Pyramid (4) and is now available online (5).

The most recent validation study of the HEI, reported in this issue of the Journal by Hann et al (6), compares HEI scores with plasma biomarkers. Nutrient intakes, obtained from 3-d food intake records, were analyzed by using a popular nutrient analysis program (NUTRITIONIST IV, version 4.1, 1997; First DataBank, The Hearst Corporation, San Bruno, CA), and servings were enumerated by using the Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals database (7), which classifies food records into Food Guide Pyramid servings.

The report by Hann et al showed that diets with a high HEI score correlate with plasma concentrations of several carotenoids and vitamin C. Certainly, the dietary intake of fruit and vegetables, the primary source of carotenoids and vitamin C, is associated with a reduced disease risk. Biomarker data support prior suggestions from epidemiologic studies that associate a reduced disease risk with increased plasma carotenoid concentrations. However, elevated concentrations of these biomarkers do not necessarily indicate a reduced disease risk, and the correlation between food intakes, plasma biomarkers, and disease outcomes awaits further study.

Studies such as Hann et al's that correlate HEI scores with plasma biomarkers support the concept that food choices based on the Food Guide Pyramid lead to a healthier diet. However, not all studies have had such positive results. The recent use of the HEI as a tool for evaluating food-frequency data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study showed a nonsignificant correlation or only a weak association between HEI scores and chronic disease risk, particularly cardiovascular disease and cancer (8, 9). Although we still have a long way to go to define a reliable and valid tool for the evaluation of dietary quality, the HEI appears to be adequate for this purpose.

REFERENCES

  1. Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:57–64.
  2. Kennedy ET, Ohls J, Carlson S, Fleming K. The Healthy Eating Index: design and applications. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:1103–8.
  3. US Department of Agriculture/US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: 1990. (Home and Garden Bulletin no. 232.)
  4. US Department of Agriculture, Human Nutrition Information Service. The food guide pyramid. Washington, DC: USDA, 1992. (Home and Garden Bulletin no. 252.)
  5. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Interactive Healthy Eating Index. Version current 12 June 2001. Internet: http://www.usda.gov/cnpp (accessed 28 June 2001).
  6. Hann CS, Rock CL, King I, Drewnowski A. Validation of the Health Eating Index with use of plasma biomarkers in a clinical sample of women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:479–86.
  7. Food Surveys Research Group, Agriculture Research Service. 1994 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) 1994, pyramid servings. Washington, DC: USDA Agriculture Research Service, 1994 (database on CD-ROM).
  8. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, et al. Adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and risk of major chronic disease in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1214–22.
  9. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Rimm EB, et al. Adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and risk of major chronic disease in men. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1223–31.

作者: Ann M Coulston
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具