Literature
首页医源资料库在线期刊美国临床营养学杂志2002年76卷第1期

Body composition in children with sickle cell disease

来源:《美国临床营养学杂志》
摘要:ABSTRACTBackground:Impairedgrowth,poornutritionalstatus,anddelayedskeletalandsexualmaturationarecommoninchildrenwithsicklecelldisease(SCD),yetthenatureofassociatedbody-compositiondeficitshasnotbeenfullydescribed。Objective:Theobjectivewastoassessgrowth,nutr......

点击显示 收起

Elizabeth M Barden, Deborah A Kawchak, Kwaku Ohene-Frempong, Virginia A Stallings and Babette S Zemel

1 From the Department of Public Health, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston (EMB), and the Divisions of Gastroenterology and Nutrition (DAK, VAS, and BSZ) and Hematology (KO-F), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

2 Supported in part by the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center (NHLBI 38633-06), the General Clinical Research Center (M01RR00240), and the Nutrition Center at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to BS Zemel, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: zemel{at}email.chop.edu.


ABSTRACT  
Background: Impaired growth, poor nutritional status, and delayed skeletal and sexual maturation are common in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), yet the nature of associated body-composition deficits has not been fully described.

Objective: The objective was to assess growth, nutritional status, and body composition in 36 African American children with type SS SCD (20 females and 16 males) and 30 healthy control children (15 females and 15 males) of similar age (5–18 y) and ethnicity.

Design: Height, weight, bone age, pubertal status, skinfold thickness, and arm circumference were assessed. Height and weight were converted to z scores by comparison with national reference data and skinfold-thickness measurements were converted to z scores by comparison with African American– specific reference data. Fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) were estimated by using 4 methods. Prepubertal children, pubertal males, and pubertal females were analyzed separately.

Results: Relative to the control subjects and to a national sample, children with SCD had significantly lower z scores for weight, height, arm circumference, and upper arm fat and muscle areas. Relative skeletal maturation was significantly delayed. After adjustment for age, children with SCD had significantly lower FM (prepubertal children and pubertal males only) and FFM (all 3 groups).

Conclusions: Children with SCD have impaired growth, delayed puberty, and poor nutritional status. Low z scores for upper arm fat area indicate deficits in fat (energy) stores, and low FFM coupled with low upper arm muscle area indicate muscle wasting and low protein stores. These body-composition abnormalities suggest that the nutritional needs of the African American children with SCD were not being met.

Key Words: Sickle cell disease • growth • nutritional status • body composition • children • African Americans


INTRODUCTION  
Poor growth and nutritional status in combination with delayed sexual and skeletal maturation are common clinical features of sickle cell disease (SCD), particularly in persons with type SS SCD. Accordingly, the growth of tissue compartments is likely to be altered in children with SCD and has not been fully described. In addition, metabolic studies have indicated elevated resting energy expenditure and elevated protein turnover associated with SCD (1–6), both of which may have negative effects on the accretion of body weight, particularly fat-free mass (FFM). The nature and magnitude of body-compartment deficits are important in understanding the nutritional needs of children with SCD and for monitoring the outcomes of nutrition interventions.

Body composition in children and adolescents traditionally has been difficult to measure with accuracy, partly because of age-associated differences in the composition of body compartments, such as the bone mineral component of FFM, or in the distribution of total body water (TBW). The most commonly used methods use a 2-compartment model that divides the body into FFM and fat mass (FM). Inherent in these models are systematic biases because of varying assumptions about the composition of FFM. Possible sources of bias include altered tissue composition in children with SCD (eg, lower bone density; 7), ethnic differences between the study population and the populations from whom the prediction equations were developed, and problems inherent in measuring body composition in children (eg, variations in the timing of sexual maturation). These sources of bias are particularly important in children with chronic disease, for whom several sources of bias may operate simultaneously (eg, delayed puberty associated with deficiencies of gonadal secretion of steroids in combination with low bone density). Therefore, measurements are somewhat method dependent (8). In the present study, body composition was measured with the use of 4 different methods to avoid the bias from a single method.


SUBJECTS AND METHODS  
Subjects
Subjects with SCD were recruited from among the children and adolescents aged 5–18 y cared for at the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. All children with SCD who were seen in the clinic and who met the following criteria were invited to participate: type SS SCD, no history of stroke, no hydroxyurea or long-term transfusion therapy, and no hospitalizations or intercurrent illnesses within 2 wk of the study. Healthy control subjects were recruited from community sources and were mainly referred by subjects with SCD and hospital clerical staff; were of comparable age, sex, and ethnicity; had negative sickle cell trait status; and had weights and heights above the 5th and below the 95th percentiles compared with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) reference. None of the children were taking medications known to affect growth or nutritional status. All subjects were of African or African American ancestry on the basis of parental report or self-report. The protocol was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Internal Review Board at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Informed, written consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each subject, and assent was obtained from the subject. Data were collected during a 24-h overnight admission to the General Clinical Research Center.

Growth, maturation, and assessment of nutritional status
Growth was assessed with the use of standard methods (9,10) as previously described (4). Height and weight measurements were compared with NCHS reference standards for age and sex (11). Standardized scores (z scores) were calculated by using a computerized program (12); z scores were calculated as the difference between the observed value and the median value for the reference population, divided by the SD of the population, with the use of age- and sex-specific values for the reference population.

Skeletal maturation was assessed by one observer (BSZ) from a radiograph of the left hand and wrist and scored according to the method of Tanner et al (13). Skeletal age was based on the 20 bone score, and relative skeletal maturation was calculated as skeletal age minus chronologic age. Sexual maturation was evaluated by a self-assessment pictorial questionnaire (14) illustrating the 5 stages of development as described by Tanner (15). In a previous study, this self-assessment questionnaire showed excellent agreement with physician assessment in children with Crohn disease (16). A composite pubertal score was calculated as the mean of individual scores for breast and pubic hair development in females and for genital and pubic hair development in males.

The assessment of nutritional status was based on triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses and midupper arm circumference (MUAC). Measures of MUAC were combined with the triceps skinfold thickness to calculate upper arm fat area (UAFA) and upper arm muscle area (UAMA) (17,18). Elbow breadth was measured as an indicator of frame size. We computed z scores for these nutritional status indexes (elbow breadth, MUAC, triceps skinfold thickness, subscapular skinfold thickness, UAMA, and UAFA) on the basis of African American reference data collected in the first and second National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (18).

Body composition
Whole-body measures of FFM, FM, and percentage body fat (%BF) were estimated from published age- and sex-specific prediction equations that use skinfold-thickness measurements at 2 (2SF) (19) or 4 (4SF) (20,21) sites. Body composition was also measured by using the method of total-body electrical conductivity (TOBEC, HA-2 instrument; EM-Scan, Springfield, IL; 22–24). The TOBEC estimates whole-body FFM, FM, and %BF based on the conductive properties of the water and electrolytes in the body. Subjects were measured in a fasted state in the morning in light clothing and socks. Five replicate measurements were taken and the average was used in the analysis. Measurements for which motion artifact or poor cooperation were noted were excluded from the average (24).

In addition, body composition was calculated from TBW (25) with the isotope-dilution method (26). A urine sample was collected from each subject on admission for a baseline measurement of the enrichment of the naturally occurring stables isotopes 2H and 18O. The subjects were administered 0.3 g H218O/kg and 0.14 g 2H2O/kg estimated body water, respectively. After an overnight equilibration period during which the subjects fasted, samples from the second urine void on the following day (time 0) were portioned, and the abundances of 2H and 18O were measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (Metabolic Solutions Corporation, Merrimack, NH). The pool size of body water was estimated from the change in isotopic dilution from baseline to time 0 as described by Speakman et al (27). The TBW values based on 2H and 18O were averaged and used in the analyses. FFM was estimated by using age-appropriate hydration factors (28) that estimate the fraction of the TBW in FFM.

Data analysis
Student's unpaired t test, assuming equal variances, was used to compare the SCD and control groups for differences in growth, bone age delay, nutritional status, and body composition. The pubertal status between groups was compared by using Fisher's exact test. Because of the extensive changes in body composition associated with puberty, separate analyses were performed for prepubertal children and pubertal children. Prepubertal children were defined as children who had not yet achieved stage 2 for their composite pubertal score. The pubertal group included all children with pubertal scores of 2–5 because there was an insufficient number of children in stage 5 to separate postpubertal from peripubertal children. In further analyses, multiple linear regression was used to test for differences between the SCD and control groups after adjustment for the effects of age on FFM, FM, and %BF. Data were analyzed by using SYSTAT for WINDOWS (version 6.0, 1997; SPSS Inc, Chicago). The results were considered statistically significant at a P value 0.05.


RESULTS  
Subject characteristics
Thirty-six children with SCD (20 females and 16 males) and 30 control children (15 females and 15 males) were enrolled. Age, bone age, and height were not significantly different between the SCD and the control groups (Table 1). Weight, weight-for-age z scores, and height-for-age z scores were significantly lower in the SCD group. The mean score for sexual development was not significantly different between the SCD and control groups; however, the age range of children who were prepubertal was 5–10.5 y for the control group and was 5.1–14.3 y for the SCD group (Table 2), although the difference was not significant.


View this table:
TABLE 1 . Comparison of growth status between children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and healthy control children1  

View this table:
TABLE 2 . Comparison of pubertal status between children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and healthy control children  
Bone age was not significantly different between the SCD and control groups, but the SCD group had significantly delayed skeletal maturation (P = 0.001). Relative skeletal maturation for the SCD group was -0.5 ± 1.4 y compared with 0.6 ± 1.2 y for the control group, representing a delay of 1 y in the SCD group (Figures 1 and 2). The largest delays in bone age were in older children, primarily males with SCD aged 8.0–14.5 y who had not yet achieved pubertal stage 2. In contrast, the healthy control group had advanced skeletal maturity in the pubertal age range.


View larger version (11K):
FIGURE 1. . Relative skeletal maturation in males with sickle cell disease (SCD) and in healthy control males, by pubertal stage. Control group: •, Tanner stage 1; , Tanner stages 2–4. SCD group: , Tanner stage 1; , Tanner stages 2–4. Skeletal age was not available for one subject.

 

View larger version (12K):
FIGURE 2. . Relative skeletal maturation in females with sickle cell disease (SCD) and in healthy control females, by pubertal stage. Control group: •, Tanner stage 1; , Tanner stages 2–5. SCD group: , Tanner stage 1; , Tanner stages 2–5. Skeletal age was not available for one subject.

 
Females with SCD had significantly lower z scores for elbow breadth, MUAC, UAMA, and UAFA than did the female control group (Table 3). These same z scores and MUAC, subscapular skinfold thickness, UAMA, and UAFA were significantly lower in males with SCD than in the male control group.


View this table:
TABLE 3 . Comparison of nutritional status between children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and healthy control children1  
Body composition
Prepubertal children
There were no significant group differences in FFM, FM, or %BF between groups, except when TOBEC was used. With the use of TOBEC, the prepubertal SCD group had significantly lower FM and %BF than did the control group (Table 4). Subsequent analysis used multiple regression analysis to adjust for the effects of age on body composition in this prepubertal group (Table 5). Age was significantly associated with FFM by all methods, and age was significantly associated with FM by 2 methods (TOBEC and 4SF). After adjustment for the effects of age, the SCD group had significantly lower FFM (4SF, 2SF, and TBW) and FM (TOBEC, 4SF, and 2 SF) than did the control group. The age-adjusted group differences in FFM ranged from 0.6 to 2.0 kg depending on the body-composition-assessment method used; for FM the differences ranged from 1.6 to 2.5 kg. Significant age-adjusted differences in %BF were detected only with the use of the TOBEC and 4SF methods (data not shown). There was no significant effect of relative skeletal maturation on these body-composition differences.


View this table:
TABLE 4 . Group differences in fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and percentage body fat determined with 4 body-composition-assessment methods in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and in healthy control children1  

View this table:
TABLE 5 . Regression models testing for differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) between prepubertal children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and healthy control children with the use of 4 body-composition-assessment methods after adjustment for age1  
Pubertal males
For pubertal males, mean FFM, FM, and %BF were lower in the SCD group than in the control group regardless of the body-composition-assessment method used, although the differences were not significant (Table 4). After adjustment for age, FFM and FM with all methods (except TBW) were significantly lower in males with SCD (Table 6). The age-adjusted group differences in FFM ranged from 8.4 to 14.0 kg depending on the method used; for FM the differences ranged from 5.5 to 6.7 kg. %BF did not increase significantly with age in males in either group but was significantly lower in the SCD group by 5.7% and 5.1%, respectively, with the 2SF and 4SF methods. There was no significant effect of relative skeletal maturation on these body-composition differences.


View this table:
TABLE 6 . Regression models testing for group differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) between pubertal males with sickle cell disease (SCD) and healthy control males with the use of 4 body-composition-assessment methods after adjustment for age1  
Pubertal females
For pubertal females, there were no significant group differences in FFM, FM, or %BF, although for each measure, females with SCD had lower mean values than did the control females (Table 4). After adjustment for age, FFM was significantly lower by 5.6–5.9 kg in females with SCD than in the control females by the TBW, 2SF, and 4SF methods (Table 7). There was no significant effect of age on and no group differences in FM or %BF and no significant effect of relative skeletal maturation on any of the body-composition measures.


View this table:
TABLE 7 . Regression models testing for group differences in fat-free mass (FFM) between pubertal females with sickle cell disease (SCD) and healthy control females with the use of 4 body-composition-assessment methods after adjustment for age1  

DISCUSSION  
This is the first study with a large sample size and control group that examined body composition in children with SCD in the United States. Previous studies showed that children with SCD have delayed sexual and skeletal maturation, fat and muscle wasting, and impaired growth (29–41). Consistent with these earlier studies, our study indicated poor growth and nutritional status in children with SCD compared with national reference data and with a contemporary healthy African American control group. The control group in this study was of similar age and ethnicity, which is important because of reported differences in growth, maturation, and fat patterning between healthy African Americans and healthy white Americans on whom the growth reference data are largely based (19,42–47). Some of the multiple factors that have been suggested to account for the growth deficit in SCD include tissue hypoxia caused by severe anemia, the chronic and acute effects of vasoocclusion, endocrine dysfunction associated with anemia, chronic organ damage caused by sickling, low dietary intake or elevated energy requirements, and low socioeconomic status (37).

In the present sample of children there was an overlap between the SCD and control groups in unadjusted measures of growth and nutritional status. This was expected because of the broad SDs that occur in growing children over this large age range (5–18 y). When these measures were converted to z scores, which are more sensitive indicators of growth and nutritional status relative to a subject's age and sex peers, children with SCD showed marked deficits in z scores for weight-for-age, height, elbow breadth, MUAC, triceps skinfold thickness, subscapular skinfold thickness, UAMA, and UAFA. These findings indicate global deficits in growth and energy reserves. Among the children with SCD, the anthropometric z scores were lower for males than for females, suggesting that relative to the NCHS reference from which the z scores were computed, muscle and FM depletion were more severe in males with SCD. However, relative to the healthy control subjects, males and females with SCD had deficits of similar magnitude.

Relative skeletal maturation was delayed in the SCD group, similar to the findings reported by Stevens et al (35) and by Olambiwonnu et al (48), who proposed transient impairment in gonadal function to account for the variation in sexual maturation. In contrast, relative skeletal maturation was advanced in the control group, which was likely due to the current trend of earlier maturation among healthy African American females (43,45,49). This underscores the importance of comparing children with SCD with a contemporary group of similar ethnicity and geographic origin.

Consistent with our findings, others have reported deficits in nutritional status among subjects with SCD. Singhal et al (5) reported significantly lower weight, MUAC, and body mass index (BMI) in 20 Jamaican children with SCD between the ages of 15.0 and 17.4 y. Another study of adults with SCD aged 17–35 y from Nigeria reported significant differences in weight, BMI, skinfold thicknesses, and MUAC for males but not for females with SCD compared with control subjects (38), illustrating possible sex-related differences. The authors suggested that hormonal causes may have been associated with the different degree of growth retardation found among males because males with SCD often have severe hypogonadism and females with SCD have no comparable hormonal deficiency.

A previous study of children (aged 3–17 y) in Philadelphia also reported, in 1976, delayed skeletal maturation at all chronologic ages, coupled with lower weight, biacromial breadth, and smaller body measurements in males (sitting height, MUAC, calf circumference, bicondylar femur breadth, and triceps skinfold thickness) and females (all body measurements except for triceps skinfold thickness) with SCD than in a healthy control group (31). These authors suggested that the delay in skeletal maturation was associated with smaller body dimensions in the children with SCD, who also had significantly leaner body extremities than did sex-matched control subjects.

Previously, we reported a significantly greater (10.5%) resting energy expenditure (adjusted for FFM and sex) and a significantly lower activity energy expenditure in this sample of children with SCD than in a control group (4). Total energy expenditure was not different between groups because of the opposing effects of resting energy expenditure and activity energy expenditure, and voluntary physical activity was significantly lower in the children with SCD. Others found similar patterns with respect to resting (1,3,5) and total (6) energy expenditure in subjects with SCD. In addition, elevated protein turnover was reported in children and adults with SCD (1–3). These studies suggest that children with SCD have increased protein requirements and are at risk of protein-energy malnutrition, which is consistent with our finding of significantly lower UAMA z scores and FFM in these children (50). Micronutrient deficiencies, such as zinc, also are associated with reduced lean or fat tissue stores in SCD (51).

Our findings of low FFM in the entire sample and lower FM in prepubertal males and females and pubertal males provide further evidence that the nutritional needs of children with SCD were not being met. The magnitude of these deficits was most pronounced in pubertal males, in whom FFM was 14 kg less and FM was 6 kg less than in control males. A study using bioelectrical impedance analysis in 48 Nigerian children aged 3–20 y reported no significant differences in FFM, FM, or %BF between children aged <10 y with SCD and a control group, but significantly lower weight, BMI, and FFM in males and %FFM in females with SCD aged >10 y (41). These authors also reported greater FM and %BF in males and females aged >10 y with SCD than in a control group, which they suggested may have been due to differences in activity levels between the children with SCD and the healthy control subjects.

The findings reported here may be somewhat limited by the use of 2-compartment models to assess body composition, because these models cannot distinguish between lean body mass and skeletal mass in the FFM component, and by interindividual and developmental differences in the hydration of FFM (52). Differences in fat distribution and skinfold compressibility vary by age, sex, and ethnicity (46,47) and may limit the applicability of generalized skinfold-thickness equations (45). The 2SF method has the advantage of including pubertal status and ethnicity (for either white American or African American children) in the calculation. The 4SF method is not ethnic-specific, but has been validated in the younger age range (1–11 y). Because of the extreme leanness of children with SCD, there may be a bias in the TOBEC method associated with increased conductivity at the surface of the bone relative to total conductivity. In addition, the TBW method may involve errors associated with the conversion of TBW to FFM because of low bone density and low FFM in SCD. Because of these limitations, 4 different body-composition methods were used in the present study. Although the absolute levels of FM and FFM differed depending on the method used, the pattern and magnitude of differences were similar between the 2 groups across methods, and the conclusions were based on these consistent findings.

In summary, the results of the present study showed that children with SCD, on average, do not grow like contemporary healthy African American children. This finding is supported by the findings of previous studies (31,53,54), ie, that delayed skeletal maturation during adolescence may allow for a longer growth period in the long bones of the extremities, resulting in normal adult height among surviving adults with SCD. Importantly, growth in children refers to more than just height and weight patterns but to increases in the body tissue compartments of fat and muscle. Children with SCD show marked reductions in FFM and reduced body fat, indicating reduced energy stores. Because weight is a composite value of the components FFM and FM, weight alone does not fully characterize the growth deficit in children because of the difference in relative proportions of FFM and FM. In addition, because body composition is altered in many children with SCD, clinical activities that use weight for calculations (eg, estimated energy requirements, transfusion volume, dietary intake, or medication dosage) may deviate from actual requirements because of differences in relative proportions of body compartments.

The clinical and functional implications of the body-composition profile observed in the present study are unclear, and the long-term health implications of low FFM in SCD also are not known. To date, no evidence links FM or FFM to health outcomes in SCD. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether improved growth in the FM and FFM compartments will have long-term benefits. The low activity energy expenditure observed in this same sample (4) may have been the cause or consequence of the low FFM in the SCD group; children who are less physically active are less likely to gain as much FFM as are their peers who are more active. The low FFM in this sample may be the most easily quantifiable measure of restricted physical activity in children with SCD. Intervention studies targeting energy and nutrient intakes and physical activity are needed to further define this relation and to potentially improve the quality of life of children with SCD by supporting normal childhood activities.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  
We express our deepest appreciation to the children and their families for their participation and commitment to our research. Additionally, we thank the staff of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center and the General Clinical Research Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for their assistance with the project.


REFERENCES  

  1. Badaloo A, Jackson AA, Jahoor F. Whole body protein turnover and resting metabolic rate in homozygous sickle cell disease. Clin Sci 1989;77:93–7.
  2. Borel MJ, Buchowski MS, Turner EA, Peeler BB, Goldstein RE, Flakoll PJ. Alterations in basal nutrient metabolism increase resting energy expenditure in sickle cell disease. Am J Physiol 1998;274: E357–64.
  3. Salman EK, Haymond MW, Bayne E, et al. Protein and energy metabolism in prepubertal children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Res 1996;40:34–40.
  4. Barden EM, Zemel BS, Kawchak DA, Goran MI, Ohene-Frempong K, Stallings VA. Total and resting energy expenditure in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr 2000;136:73–9.
  5. Singhal A, Davies P, Sahota A, Thomas PW, Serjeant GR. Resting metabolic rate in homozygous sickle cell disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:32–4.
  6. Singhal A, Davies P, Wierenga KJJ, Thomas P, Serjeant G. Is there an energy deficiency in homozygous sickle cell disease? Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:386–90.
  7. Brinker MR, Thomas KA, Meyers SJ, et al. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur is decreased in children with sickle cell anemia. Am J Orthop 1998;27:43–9.
  8. Wells JCK, Fuller NJ, Dewit O, Fewtrell MS, Elia M, Cole TJ. Four-component model of body composition in children: density and hydration of fat-free mass and comparison with simpler models. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:904–12.
  9. Cameron N. The methods of auxological anthropometry. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM, eds. Human growth: a comprehensive treatise. 2nd ed. Vol 2. New York: Plenum Press, 1986:3–46.
  10. Lohman T, Roche AR, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988.
  11. Hamill P, Drizd T, Johnson C, Reed R, Roche A, Moore W. Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am J Clin Nutr 1979;32:607–27.
  12. Centers for Disease Control. CASP anthropometric software package. CDC standard deviation–derived growth reference curves derived from NCHS/CDC reference population. NCHS growth curves for children, birth to 18 years, United States. Atlanta: Division of Nutrition, CCDPHP, Centers for Disease Control, 1988. [DHEW publication number (PHS) 78-1650.]
  13. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 Method). London: Academic Press, 1975.
  14. Morris NN, Udry JR. Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development. J Youth Adolesc 1980;9: 271–80.
  15. Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell, 1962.
  16. Schall J, Semeao E, Stallings V, Zemel B. Self-assessment of sexual maturity status in children with chronic disease: Crohn's disease as an example. J Pediatr (in press).
  17. Frisancho AR. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:2540–5.
  18. Frisancho A. Anthropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1990.
  19. Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, et al. Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol 1988;60:709–23.
  20. Brook CGD. Determination of body composition of children from skinfold measurements. Arch Dis Child 1971;46:182–4.
  21. Durnin JVGA, Rahaman MM. The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness. Br J Nutr 1967;21:681–9.
  22. Van Loan MD. Assessment of fat-free mass in teen-agers: use of TOBEC methodology. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:586–90.
  23. Van Loan MD, Keim NL, Belko AZ. Body composition assessment of a general population using total body electrical conductivity (ToBEC). In: Hermans GPH, ed. Sports, medicine and health. Geneva: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1990:665–70.
  24. Baumgartner RN. Electrical impedance and total body electrical conductivity. In: Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, eds. Human body composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1996:79–107.
  25. Boileau RA, Lohman TG, Slaughter MH, Ball TE, Going SB, Hendrix MK. Hydration of the fat-free body in children during maturation. Hum Biol 1984;56:651–66.
  26. Schoeller DA, van Santen E, Peterson DW, Dietz W, Jaspan J, Klein PD. Total body water measurements in humans using 18O and 2H labeled water. Am J Clin Nutr 1980;33:2686–93.
  27. Speakman JR, Nair KS, Goran MI. Revised equations for calculating CO2 production from doubly labeled water in humans. Am J Physiol 1993;264:E912–7.
  28. Fomon SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE. Body composition of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 35:1169–75.
  29. Whitten CF. Growth status of children with sickle cell anemia. Am J Dis Child 1961;102:355–64.
  30. Jimenez CT, Scott RB, Henry L, Sampson CC, Ferguson AD. Studies in sickle cell anemia: the effects of homozygous sickle cell disease on the onset of menarche, pregnancy, fertility, pubescent changes, and body growth in Negro subjects. Am J Dis Child 1966; 111:497–504.
  31. McCormack MK, Dicker L, Katz SH, et al. Growth patterns of children with sickle-cell disease. Hum Biol 1976;48:429–37.
  32. Lowry M, Desai P, Ashcroft M, Serjeant B, Serjeant G. Heights and weights of Jamaican children with homozygous sickle cell disease. Hum Biol 1977;49:429–36.
  33. Platt OS, Rosenstock W, Espeland MA. Influence of sickle hemoglobinopathies on growth and development. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:7–12.
  34. Phebus CK, Gloninger MF, Maciak BJ. Growth patterns by age and sex in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr 1984;105:28–33.
  35. Stevens MC, Maude GH, Cupidore L, Jackson H, Hayes RJ, Serjeant GR. Prepubertal growth and skeletal maturation in children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr 1986;78:124–32.
  36. Phebus CK, Maciak BJ, Gloninger MF, Paul HS. Zinc status of children with sickle cell disease: relationship to poor growth. Am J Hematol 1988;29:67–73.
  37. Zago MA, Kerbauy J, Souza HM, et al. Growth and sexual maturation of Brazilian patients with sickle cell disease. Trop Geogr Med 1992;44:317–21.
  38. Modebe O, Ifenu SA. Growth retardation in homozygous sickle cell disease: role of calorie intake and possible gender-related differences. Am J Hematol 1993;44:149–54.
  39. Henderson RA, Saavedra JM, Dover GJ. Prevalence of impaired growth in children with homozygous sickle cell anemia. Am J Med Sci 1994;307:405–7.
  40. Singhal A, Thomas P, Cook R, Wierenga K, Serjeant G. Delayed adolescent growth in homozygous sickle cell disease. Arch Dis Child 1994;71:404–8.
  41. VanderJagt DJ, Okolo SN, Rabasa AI, Glew RH. Bioelectrical impedance analysis of the body composition of Nigerian children with sickle cell disease. J Trop Pediatr 2000;46:67–72.
  42. Bell NH, Shary J, Stevens J, Garza M, Gordon L, Edwards J. Demonstration that bone mass is greater in black than in white children. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:719–23.
  43. Wang MC, Aguirre M, Bhudhikanok GS, et al. Bone mass and hip axis length in healthy Asian, black, Hispanic, and white American youths. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1922–35.
  44. Conway NM. Ethnicity and energy stores. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62(suppl):1067S–71S.
  45. Zillikens MC, Conway JM. Anthropometry in blacks: applicability of generalized skinfold equations and differences in fat patterning between blacks and whites. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:45–51.
  46. Norgan N. The assessment of the body composition of populations. In: Davies PSW, Cole TJ, eds. Body composition techniques in health and disease. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1995:195–221.
  47. Harrison GG, Buskirk ER, Carter JEL, et al. Skinfold thicknesses and measurement technique. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, eds. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books, 1988:55–69.
  48. Olambiwonnu NO, Penny R, Frasier SD. Sexual maturation in subjects with sickle cell anemia: studies of serum gonadotropin concentration, height, weight, and skeletal age. J Pediatr 1975;87:459–64.
  49. Herman-Giddens ME, Slora EJ, Wasserman RC, et al. Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. Pediatrics 1997;99:505–12.
  50. Gibson R. Principles of nutritional assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
  51. Leonard MB, Zemel BS, Kawchak DA, Ohene-Frempong K, Stallings VA. Plasma zinc status, growth, and maturation in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr 1998;132:467–71.
  52. Withers RT, Laforgia J, Heymsfield SB. Critical appraisal of the estimation of body composition via two-, three-, and four-compartment models. Am J Hum Biol 1999;11:175–85.
  53. Ashcroft MT, Serjeant GR. Body habitus of Jamaican adults with sickle cell anemia. South Med J 1972;65:579–82.
  54. Ashcroft MT, Serjeant GR, Desai P. Heights, weights, and skeletal age of Jamaican adolescents with sickle cell anaemia. Arch Dis Child 1972;47:519–24.
Received for publication February 13, 2001. Accepted for publication July 6, 2001.


作者: Elizabeth M Barden
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具