Literature
首页医源资料库在线期刊美国临床营养学杂志2003年77卷第6期

Advances in nutritional modifications of infant formulas

来源:《美国临床营养学杂志》
摘要:ABSTRACTModificationstoinfantformulasarecontinuallybeingmadeasthecomponentsofhumanmilkarecharacterizedandasthenutrientneedsofdiversegroupsofinfantsareidentified。infantsfedtheseformulasorhumanmilkhavehighertissueconcentrationsoflong-chainpolyunsaturatedfa......

点击显示 收起

Jane D Carver

1 From the Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa.

2 Presented at the symposium Innovaciones en Fórmulas Infantiles (Innovations in Infant Formula), held in Cancun, Mexico, May 23–24, 2002.

3 The author’s participation in the symposium was underwritten by Wyeth Nutrition, Philadelphia.

4 Address reprint requests to JD Carver, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida College of Medicine, 17 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200, Tampa, FL 33606. E-mail: jcarver{at}hsc.usf.edu.


ABSTRACT  
Modifications to infant formulas are continually being made as the components of human milk are characterized and as the nutrient needs of diverse groups of infants are identified. Formulas with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids added in amounts similar to those in human milk have recently become available in the United States; infants fed these formulas or human milk have higher tissue concentrations of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and reportedly have better visual acuity than do infants fed nonsupplemented formulas. Selenium, an important antioxidant, is present in higher concentrations in human milk than in nonfortified cow milk–based formula, and the selenium intakes of infants fed nonfortified formulas are reported to be at or below recommended levels. Blood selenium concentrations and plasma glutathione peroxidase activity are higher in infants fed selenium-supplemented formulas or human milk than in infants fed nonfortified formulas. Nucleotides and their related products play key roles in many biological processes. Although nucleotides can be synthesized endogenously, they are considered "conditionally essential." Nucleotide concentrations in human milk are higher than in unsupplemented cow milk–based formulas, and studies in animals and human infants suggest that dietary nucleotides play a role in the development of the gastrointestinal and immune systems. Formulas for preterm infants after hospital discharge are designed to meet the needs of a population in whom growth failure is common. Several studies have shown that preterm infants fed nutrient-enriched formulas after hospital discharge have higher rates of catch-up growth than do infants fed standard term-infant formulas.

Key Words: Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids • selenium • nucleotides • preterm infants • nutrition


INTRODUCTION  
Remarkable improvements have been made to infant formulas over the past 50 y. In the mid-20th century, formula-fed infants were usually given cow milk–based infant formulas or homemade formulations of evaporated milk, sugar, and water. Today, options include soy formulas, lactose-free formulas, formulas with added fiber or rice starch, protein hydrolysates, preterm infant formulas, and formulas for infants with special conditions such as metabolic disorders. New formulas continue to be developed, and existing formulas undergo frequent modifications as more components of human milk are characterized and their physiologic functions are determined. Human milk contains hormones, immune factors, growth factors, enzymes, and viable cells, most of which cannot practically be added to infant formulas. Furthermore, the complex interactions of these bioactive substances should be understood before they are added to formula. Modifications that have resulted in formulas with compositions and functions closer to those of human milk include the addition of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPs) and nucleotides and the enrichment of formula with selenium (Table 1). The introduction of nutrient-enriched formulas for preterm infants after hospital discharge is an example of a new type of formula designed to meet the needs of infants with special nutrient requirements.


View this table:
TABLE 1 . Summary of modifications made to infant formulas  

LONG-CHAIN POLYUNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS  
The predominant 20–22-carbon LCPs in human milk are arachidonic acid (AA; 20:4n-6) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3). Until recently, infant formulas contained only the 18-carbon precursors to AA and DHA, namely the essential fatty acids linoleic acid (18:2n-6) and -linolenic acid (18:3n-3), respectively. Formulas with AA and DHA added in amounts patterned after those in human milk are now commercially available. The milk of women from populations who consume large quantities of fish, such as the population of Japan, may contain > 1% of fatty acids as DHA, whereas milk from populations who consume lesser amounts, such as the population of the United States, may contain only 0.1–0.2%. The AA content of human milk is less variable and less dependent on maternal dietary intake. AA concentrations are similar across divergent populations and range from 0.4–0.6% of total fatty acids (1–3). LCP-supplemented formulas generally contain 0.3–0.6% AA and 0.2–0.4% DHA. Sources include microalgal and fungal oils, egg yolk–derived lipids, and marine oils (4).

LCPs play diverse physiologic and metabolic roles. AA is the precursor to the "2" series of eicosanoids, which are important biomediators. LCPs are also structural components of membranes. The fatty acid composition of membranes can affect tissue function by modifying membrane fluidity, and it can influence signal transduction cascades by altering the balance of eicosanoids synthesized and by affecting gene transcription (5, 6). AA and DHA are major components of cell membrane phospholipids and are the predominant LCPs of the central nervous system. LCPs accrue rapidly in the brain during the period of maximal brain growth, which lasts from the last trimester of pregnancy until 2 y of age in humans (6–8). Postnatally, infants obtain LCPs from the diet or by de novo synthesis. Although both term and preterm infants can synthesize AA and DHA from their 18-carbon precursors, factors such as prematurity and the ratios and amounts of precursors can affect the rate of synthesis (4). Infants fed formulas without added LCPs generally have lower blood LCP concentrations than do human milk–fed infants; this is especially true in infants born prematurely (4, 6, 8). Reports that term infants fed human milk have higher DHA concentrations in their cerebral tissues than do formula-fed infants led to speculation that the superior neurodevelopment of human milk–fed infants compared with that of formula-fed infants may be due, in part, to the higher dietary DHA intake of the milk-fed infants (9, 10). Because DHA is a major component of retinal photoreceptor membranes (4), reports of better visual acuity in human milk–fed infants than in formula-fed infants, particularly among infants whose mothers consumed high quantities of DHA (11), led to speculation that LCP-supplemented formula might enhance development of the visual system.

Over the past 10 y, > 2 dozen studies have reported effects of LCP supplementation in infants. Most of the studies focused on effects on growth, cognitive development, and visual acuity. Most of the studies reported normal growth in infants fed the newer LCP formulas that contain both AA and DHA and little or no eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3). Although studies of cognitive development do not show consistent effects, several studies of visual acuity show a benefit, particularly for infants born prematurely (1, 4, 6, 8). A meta-analysis and a systematic review of data from preterm (12) and term (13) infants, respectively, indicate advantages of DHA-supplemented formulas over unsupplemented formulas in both behaviorally based and electrophysiologically based measurements of visual acuity. The different results may be due, in part, to the different concentrations, ratios, and sources of LCPs used; to insufficient numbers of infants studied; and to different study designs. The long-term effects of feeding LCP-supplemented formula remain to be determined.

Relatively little attention has been paid to the effects of dietary LCPs on the immune system. Studies in animals showed significant effects of dietary LCPs on immune function, which are probably due to their role as eicosanoid precursors (14). Field et al (15) reported that infants fed LCP-supplemented formula had lymphocyte populations and values for cytokine production and antigen maturity that were more similar to those of human milk–fed infants than to those of infants who received unsupplemented formula.


SELENIUM  
Selenium is an essential micronutrient that functions mainly in association with proteins or as a constituent of them; 11 selenoproteins have been identified to date (4, 16). Selenium is best known for its role as an antioxidant. It is a component of the glutathione peroxidase group of enzymes that remove toxic peroxides and protect cell membranes from oxidative damage. Epidemiologic studies have identified selenium as a protective factor against oxidative stress in relation to heart disease and drug metabolism, and selenium is postulated to be a dietary factor that plays a role in cancer prevention. Although overt selenium deficiency is relatively rare, prolonged, inadequate intakes can impair biochemical functions and thus predispose persons to illnesses that are associated with metabolic stress but do not involve the development of overt disease (4, 16). Severe selenium deficiency in infants is associated with skeletal and cardiac myopathy and is generally associated with long-term hyperalimentation that contains little or no selenium (4, 16).

Selenium concentrations in human milk range from 15 to 20 µg/L depending on geographic location; concentrations are lower in the milk of women from geographic locations, including New Zealand and parts of China, that have low soil selenium concentrations. Selenium concentrations in unsupplemented cow milk–based infant formulas range from 2 to 13 µg/L and are dependent on the selenium intake of dairy cows. The selenium intakes of infants fed formulas without supplemental selenium are reported to be near or below recommended intakes (4, 17).

Selenium status is assessed by measuring total dietary intake, plasma or serum selenium concentrations, erythrocyte selenium concentrations, plasma and erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase concentrations, and urinary excretion. Plasma or serum selenium concentrations indicate short-term selenium status, whereas glutathione peroxidase concentrations indicate longer-term status. Blood selenium concentrations generally increase from birth to 6 mo of age in breastfed infants; however, in infants fed unsupplemented formulas, the concentrations remain stable or decrease for several months after birth (18–20). The postnatal decrease may be due to intakes that are inadequate to meet the needs of the rapidly growing infant (4, 18–20). Several studies showed that plasma and serum selenium concentrations and plasma glutathione peroxidase activity are higher in infants fed human milk or formula supplemented with selenium than in infants fed formulas that do not contain supplemental selenium (18–21).

Selenium supplementation of formulas may be particularly important for preterm infants because they experience rapid postnatal growth and have less fetal accretion, lower plasma concentrations of selenium and glutathione peroxidase at birth, and a higher risk of exposure to oxidative stress than do term infants (4, 22). It has been suggested that poor selenium status is a risk factor for the development of chronic lung disease. Plasma selenium concentrations decrease at a more rapid rate in preterm infants who develop chronic lung disease than in those who do not, and the decreasing concentrations are associated with higher respiratory morbidity (4). Several investigators have reported higher plasma concentrations of selenium and glutathione peroxidase in preterm infants fed selenium-supplemented formula than in infants fed unsupplemented formula (4, 22, 23).


NUCLEOTIDES  
The terms "semiessential" or "conditionally essential" have been used to describe the role of nucleotides in human nutrition. These nutrients may become essential when the endogenous supply is insufficient for normal function, even when their absence from the diet does not lead to a classic clinical deficiency syndrome. Conditions under which these nutrients may become essential include certain disease states, periods of limited nutrient intake or rapid growth, and the presence of regulatory or developmental factors that interfere with the full expression of endogenous synthetic capacity. Under these conditions, dietary intake of nutrients spares the organism the cost of de novo synthesis or salvage and may optimize tissue function (24, 25).

Nucleotides and their related metabolic products play key roles in many biological processes. They serve as nucleic acid precursors, physiologic mediators, constituents of coenzymes, and sources of cellular energy. De novo nucleotide synthesis is metabolically costly, and nucleotides can be obtained more efficiently from the diet or through the nucleotide salvage pathway. Although most dietary nucleotides are catabolized and excreted, up to 5% are incorporated into tissues, particularly during periods of rapid growth and limited food intake (24, 25).

Nucleotides are abundant in the diets of adults and weaned infants. However, concentrations of nucleotides in unsupplemented cow milk–based formulas are lower than those in human milk. A wide range of nucleotide concentrations, from 30 to > 70 mg/L, has been reported in human milk. Nucleotide-supplemented formulas generally contain between 20 and 70 mg/L (25, 26).

Data suggest that dietary nucleotides play a role in the growth and differentiation of the gastrointestinal tract. The intestinal tissues of animals fed nucleotide-supplemented diets have more mucosal protein and DNA, higher villus height and disaccharidase activities, and better recovery after intestinal injury than do those of animals fed nucleotide-free diets (24, 25, 27). LeLeiko et al (28) reported that dietary nucleotides affect the gene expression of gastrointestinal enzymes. Two studies in infants indicate that dietary nucleotides may protect against diarrheal disease (29, 30), and a recent study reported that dietary nucleotides may affect blood flow velocities in the mesenteric arteries of infants after a meal (31).

Dietary nucleotides also affect the immune system. Compared with feeding nucleotide-free diets, feeding nucleotide-supplemented diets has been associated with higher values for the following immune responses in animals: graph versus host disease mortality, rejection of allogeneic grafts, delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity, alloantigen- and mitogen-induced lymphoproliferation, natural killer cell activity, macrophage activation and phagocytic capacity, resistance to microbial challenge, and spleen and lymph node production of cytokines (25). Although the mechanisms remain unclear, Nagafuchi et al (32) speculate that dietary nucleotides up-regulate the immune response of type 1 T helper cells in systemic immunity. Several studies in infants also indicate an effect of dietary nucleotides on the immune system. Infants fed nucleotide-supplemented formula had higher serum concentrations of antibodies to Haemophilus influenzae type b and diphtheria after immunization than did infants fed standard formula (30). Other investigators reported greater natural killer cell activity (33) and higher concentrations of immunglobulin G antibody to ß-lactoglobulin in infants fed nucleotide-supplemented formula than in those fed standard formula (34). Although most studies of dietary nucleotides did not report effects on somatic growth, Cosgrove et al (35) found that small-for-gestational-age term infants who were fed formula supplemented with nucleotides had higher growth rates to 6 mo of age than did those who were fed unsupplemented formula.


FORMULAS FOR PRETERM INFANTS AFTER HOSPITAL DISCHARGE  
As the rate of survival of preterm infants increases, their nutritional needs after hospital discharge are becoming an increasingly important issue. Many preterm infants are discharged from the hospital with significant growth restriction and morbidities that can affect nutrient intake and growth. The National Institute for Child Health and Development Neonatal Research Network reported that from 1991 to 1996, increases in survival were particularly apparent for infants weighing < 1000 g at birth (36). Growth failure, defined as a weight below the 10th percentile at 36 wk postmenstrual age, was present in 99% of these infants.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that preterm infants be fed sufficient amounts of all nutrients to achieve postnatal rates of growth and nutrient accretion that approximate those of a normal fetus during the same period (37). However, this goal is rarely met because of factors such as metabolic instability, gastrointestinal immaturity, clinical setbacks, and withholding of feedings because of intolerance, operations, or procedures (36, 38). Embleton et al (39) reported that by the end of the fifth week of life, infants born at ≤ 30 wk of gestation had cumulative energy and protein deficits of 813 ± 542 kcal/kg and 23 ± 12 g/kg, respectively, and z scores for weight of -1.14 ± 0.6. Other investigators also reported low body stores of nutrients and deficient bone mineralization in preterm infants at hospital discharge (38, 40, 41).

Most preterm infants experience significant catch-up growth after hospital discharge. However, their mean gestation-corrected growth measurements during infancy and childhood are lower than those of infants born at term (42, 43). The significance of catch-up growth for long-term development is unclear. However, poor somatic growth during the first year of life is associated with delays in the neurodevelopment of preterm infants (44, 45). Small head-circumference measurements, in particular, may have long-term prognostic significance for very-low-birth-weight infants. Hack et al (46) reported that subnormal head size at 8 mo of age predicted the Bayley Mental Development Index score at 20 mo of age, and Gross et al (47) reported that infants with the greatest growth in head circumference in the first 6 wk of life had better neurodevelopment to 15 mo of age than did those with less growth in head circumference. Hack et al (48) have suggested that the first year of life provides an important opportunity for human somatic and brain growth to compensate for earlier deprivation.

Although the role of nutrition in improving developmental outcomes is unclear, accumulating data suggest that feeding nutrient-enriched formulas after hospital discharge can increase the rate of catch-up growth. Several investigators reported that preterm infants fed nutrient-enriched formulas after hospital discharge had significantly greater increases in weight (49–51), length (49–52), head circumference (50–52), and bone mineralization (40, 41, 50) than did those fed standard term-infant formulas. In several of those studies, volume intakes were lower among the infants fed the enriched formulas (50–52), indicating some ability of infants to self-regulate intakes on the basis of nutrient density. However, despite the lower volume intakes, protein and energy intakes were higher. The most significant growth-enhancing effects of the enriched feedings were generally seen within the first few months after discharge and were most evident among male infants and infants with the lowest birth weights. The effects of nutrient-enriched feedings on neurodevelopment were not measured, or there were no effects reported. Areas for additional study include the effects of nutrient-enriched formulas on the neurodevelopment of infants with conditions that may negatively affect rates of catch-up growth, such as chronic disease, in utero growth retardation, and extremely low birth weight.


CONCLUSION  
In summary, changes continue to be made to infant formulas, and these changes generally result in products with compositions and functions closer to those of human milk. In addition, new formulas are being developed to meet the needs of infants with special nutrient needs. Formulas with LCPs added in amounts similar to those in human milk are now available in the United States, and data suggest that they may benefit the development of the visual system. Fortification of formula with selenium results in higher blood selenium concentrations and is associated with higher glutathione peroxidase activity. Several studies suggest that nucleotides in formula enhance the development of the immune and gastrointestinal systems. Formulas for preterm infants after hospital discharge are designed to meet the needs of a population at risk of developing growth and nutrient deficiencies, and several studies reported that catch-up growth was greater in infants fed these new formulas than in those fed standard term-infant formulas. Through ongoing studies, researchers will continue to characterize the complex components of human milk and the specific nutrient needs of diverse groups of infants. Long-term studies with large groups of infants are needed to determine whether the biochemical effects associated with modifications to infant formulas are associated with functional outcomes.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  
The author had no conflict of interest.


REFERENCES  

  1. Lien EL, Steiner K, Wallingford JC. The proper balance of essential fatty acids for life. J Oleo Sci 2001;50:399–405.
  2. Jensen RG. Lipids in human milk. Lipids 1999;34:1243–71.
  3. Agostoni C, Marangoni F, Bernardo L, Lammardo AM, Galli C, Riva E. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human milk. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1999;88:68–71.
  4. Klein CJ, ed. Nutrient requirements for preterm infant formulas. A report from the American Society for Nutritional Sciences, Life Sciences Research Office. J Nutr 2002;132(suppl):1395S–577S.
  5. Wainwright PE. Dietary essential fatty acids and brain function: a developmental perspective on mechanisms. Proc Nutr Soc 2002;61:61–9.
  6. Innis SM. The role of dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids in the developing brain. Dev Neurosci 2000;22:474–80.
  7. Martinez M. Tissue levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids during human development. J Pediatr 1992;120:S129–38.
  8. Carlson SE, Neuringer M. Polyunsaturated fatty acid status and neurodevelopment: a summary and critical analysis of the literature. Lipids 1999;34:171–8.
  9. Farquharson J, Cockburn F, Patrick WA, Jamieson EC, Logan RW. Infant cerebral cortex phospholipid fatty acid composition and diet. Lancet 1992;340:810–3.
  10. Makrides M, Neumann MA, Byard RW, Simmer K, Gibson RA. Fatty acid composition of brain, retina and erythrocytes in breast- and formula-fed infants. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;60:189–94.
  11. Williams C, Birch EE, Emmett PM, Northstone K, The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Stereoacuity at age 3.5 y in children born full-term is associated with prenatal and postnatal dietary factors: a report from a population-based cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:316–22.
  12. SanGiovanni JP, Parra-Cabrera S, Colditz GA, Berkey CS, Dwyer JT. Meta-analysis of dietary essential fatty acids and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as they relate to visual resolution acuity in healthy preterm infants. Pediatrics 2000;105:1292–8.
  13. SanGiovanni JP, Berkey CS, Dwyer JT, Colditz GA. Dietary essential fatty acids, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, and visual resolution acuity in healthy full term infants: a systematic review. Early Hum Dev 2000;57:165–88.
  14. Miles EA, Calder PC. Modulation of immune function by dietary fatty acids. Proc Nutr Soc 1998;57:277–92.
  15. Field CJ, Thomson CA, Van Aerde JE, et al. Lower proportion of CD45RO+ cells and deficient interleukin-10 production by formula-fed infants, compared with human-fed, is corrected with supplementation of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;31:291–9.
  16. Chan S, Gerson B, Subramaniam S. The role of copper, molybdenum, selenium and zinc in nutrition and health. Clin Lab Med 1998;18:673–85.
  17. Smith AM, Picciano MF, Milner JA. Selenium intakes and status of human milk and formula fed infants. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;35:521–6.
  18. Kumpulainen J, Salmenperä L, Siimes MA, Koivistoinen P, Lehto J, Perheentupa J. Formula feeding results in lower selenium status than breast-feeding or selenium supplemented formula feeding: a longitudinal study. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;45:49–53.
  19. Lönnerdal B, Hernell O. Iron, zinc, copper and selenium status of breast-fed infants and infants fed trace element fortified milk-based infant formula. Acta Paediatr 1994;83:367–73.
  20. Darlow BA, Inder TE, Sluis KB, Nuthall G, Mogridge N, Winterbourn CC. Selenium status of New Zealand infants fed either a selenium supplemented or a standard formula. J Paediatr Child Health 1995;31:339–44.
  21. McGuire MK, Burgert SL, Milner JA, et al. Selenium status of infants is influenced by supplementation of formula or maternal diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;58:643–8.
  22. Tyrala EE, Borschel MW, Jacobs JR. Selenate fortification of infant formulas improves the selenium status of preterm infants. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64:860–5.
  23. Darlow BA, Winterbourn CC, Inder TE, et al. The effect of selenium supplementation on outcome in very low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. The New Zealand Neonatal Study Group. J Pediatr 2000;136:473–80.
  24. Uauy R. Dietary nucleotides and requirements in early life. In: Lebenthal E, ed. Textbook of gastroenterology and nutrition. New York: Raven Press, 1989:265–80.
  25. Carver JD. Dietary nucleotides: effects on the immune and gastrointestinal systems. Acta Paediatr 1999;430:83–8.
  26. Leach JL, Baxter JH, Molitor BE, Ramstack MB, Masor ML. Total potential available nucleosides of human milk by stage of lactation. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:1224–30.
  27. Walker WA. Exogenous nucleotides and gastrointestinal immunity. Transplant Proc 1996;28:2438–41.
  28. LeLeiko NS, Walsh MJ, Abraham S. Gene expression in the intestine: the effect of dietary nucleotides. In: Barness L, DeVivo D, Kaback M, Morrow G, Oski F, Rudolph A, eds. Advances in pediatrics. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1995:145–69.
  29. Brunser O, Espinoza J, Araya M, Cruchet S, Gil A. Effect of dietary nucleotide supplementation on diarrhoeal disease in infants. Acta Paediatr 1994;83:188–91.
  30. Pickering LK, Granoff DM, Erickson JR, et al. Modulation of the immune system by human milk and infant formula containing nucleotides. Pediatrics 1998;101:242–9.
  31. Carver JD, Saste M, Sosa R, Zaritt J, Kuchan M, Barness LA. The effects of dietary nucleotides on intestinal blood flow in preterm infants. Pediatr Res 2002;52:425–9.
  32. Nagafuchi S, Katayanagi T, Nakagawa E, et al. Effects of dietary nucleotides on serum antibody and splenic cytokine production in mice. Nutr Res 1997;17:1163–74.
  33. Carver JD, Pimentel B, Cox WI, Barness LA. Dietary nucleotide effects in formula-fed infants. Pediatrics 1991;88:359–63.
  34. Martinez-Augustin O, Boza JJ, Del Pino JI, Lucena J, Martinez-Valverde A, Gil A. Dietary nucleotides might influence the humoral immune response against cow’s milk proteins in preterm neonates. Biol Neonate 1997;7:215–23.
  35. Cosgrove M, Davies DP, Jenkins HR. Nucleotide supplementation and growth of term small for gestational age infants. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:F122–5.
  36. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics [serial online] 2001;107:E1. Internet: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/1/e1 (accessed 21 Mar 2003).
  37. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional needs of preterm infants. In: Kleinman R, ed. Pediatric nutrition handbook. 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1998:55–87.
  38. Fenton TR, McMillan DD, Sauve RS. Nutrition and growth analysis of very low birthweight infants. Pediatrics 1990;86:378–83.
  39. Embleton NE, Pang N, Cooke RJ. Postnatal growth retardation: an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants? Pediatrics 2001;107:270–3.
  40. Bishop NJ, King FJ, Lucas A. Increased bone mineral content of preterm infants fed with a nutrient enriched formula after discharge from hospital. Arch Dis Child 1993;68:573–8.
  41. Chan GM. Growth and bone mineral status of discharged very low birth weight infants fed different formulas or human milk. J Pediatr 1993;123:439–43.
  42. Hack M, Horbar JD, Malloy MH, Tyson JE, Wright E, Wright L. Very low birthweight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network. Pediatrics 1991;87:587–97.
  43. Casey PH, Kraemer HC, Bernbaum J, Yogman MW, Sells JC. Growth status and growth rates of a varied sample of low birth weight, preterm infants: a longitudinal cohort from birth to three years of age. J Pediatr 1991;119:599–605.
  44. Wocadlo C, Rieger I. Developmental outcome at 12 months corrected age for infants born less than 30 weeks gestation: influence of reduced intrauterine and postnatal growth. Early Hum Dev 1994;39:127–37.
  45. Ross G, Lipper EG, Auld P. Physical growth and developmental outcomes in very low birth weight premature infants at 3 years of age. J Pediatr 1985;107:284–6.
  46. Hack M, Breslau M, Fanaroff AA. Differential effects of intrauterine and postnatal brain growth failure in infants of very low birthweight. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:63–8.
  47. Gross SJ, Oehler JM, Eckerman CO. Head growth and developmental outcome in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1983;71:70–5.
  48. Hack M, Merkatz IR, Gordon D, Jones PK, Fanaroff AA. The prognostic significance of postnatal growth in very low-birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:693–9.
  49. Lucas A, Fewtrell MS, Morley R, et al. Randomized trial of nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for postdischarge preterm infants. Pediatrics 2001;108:703–11.
  50. Cooke RJ, Embleton ND, Griffin IJ, Wells JC, McCormick KP. Feeding preterm infants after hospital discharge: growth and development at 18 months of age. Pediatr Res 2001;49:719–22.
  51. Carver JD, Wu PYK, Hall RT, et al. Growth of preterm infants fed nutrient-enriched or term formula after hospital discharge. Pediatrics 2001;107:683–9.
  52. Wheeler RE, Hall RT. Feeding of premature infant formula after hospital discharge of infants weighing less than 1800 grams at birth. J Perinatol 1996;16:111–6.

作者: Jane D Carver
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具