点击显示 收起
Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology
Hutzel Hospital
Wayne State University
4707 St Antoine Boulevard
Detroit, MI 48201
E-mail: wkoo{at}wayne.edu
Dear Sir:
We appreciate Klevay's interest in our report comparing the values obtained with the pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) techniques in piglets and human infants (1). It is true that the regression analysis indicated that the measurement by one technique had a strongly significant linear relation with the measurement by the other. However, it is important to reiterate our statement that a strong correlation does not necessarily indicate identical results, because the absolute values obtained from these 2 techniques differed significantly. Our data indicated that group comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam data is possible only if either set of data is adjusted, and caution is required in comparing individual data points. It is advisable that normative data be generated separately for each technique and that the same technique be used throughout longitudinal studies.
We did take the opportunity to perform other studies using the piglet model. We reported the validation of whole-body scans with the use of both the pencil-beam (2) and the fan-beam (3, 4) DXA techniques by using whole-carcass chemical analysis for ash, calcium, nitrogen, and fat. We also validated regional scans by using both DXA techniques with chemical measurements of humeri andfemora (5). Furthermore, we validated the DXA bone mass measurements with functional outcome by showing their strong predictability for bone strength (6).
REFERENCES