Literature
首页医源资料库在线期刊美国临床营养学杂志2005年81卷第1期

Inhibition of carcinogenesis by polyphenols: evidence from laboratory investigations

来源:《美国临床营养学杂志》
摘要:Forexample,teaandteapreparationshavebeenshowntoinhibittumorigenesisinavarietyofanimalmodelsofcarcinogenesis,involvingorgansitessuchastheskin,lungs,oralcavity,esophagus,stomach,liver,pancreas,smallintestine,colon,andprostate。Insomeofthesemodels,inhibito......

点击显示 收起

Joshua D Lambert, Jungil Hong, Guang-yu Yang, Jie Liao and Chung S Yang

1 From the Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey

2 Presented at the 1st International Conference on Polyphenols and Health, held in Vichy, France, November 18–21, 2004.

3 Supported by NIH grant CA88961.

4 Address reprint requests and correspondence to CS Yang, Susan Lehman Cullman Laboratory for Cancer Research, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, 164 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854. E-mail: csyang{at}rci.rutgers.edu.

ABSTRACT

Many plant polyphenolic compounds have been shown to have cancer-preventing activities in laboratory studies. For example, tea and tea preparations have been shown to inhibit tumorigenesis in a variety of animal models of carcinogenesis, involving organ sites such as the skin, lungs, oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, small intestine, colon, and prostate. In some of these models, inhibitory activity was demonstrated when tea was administered during the initiation, promotion, or progression stage of carcinogenesis. The cancer-preventing activities of these and other polyphenols, such as curcumin, genistein, and quercetin, are reviewed. In studies in vitro, many of these compounds have been shown to affect signal transduction pathways, leading to inhibition of cell growth and transformation, enhanced apoptosis, reduced invasive behavior, and slowed angiogenesis. However, the concentrations used in cell culture studies were much higher than those found in vivo. If we propose mechanisms for cancer prevention on the basis of cell line experiments, then these activities must be demonstrated in vivo. The bioavailability, ie, tissue and cellular concentrations, of dietary polyphenols is a determining factor in their cancer-preventing activity in vivo. For example, compounds such as curcumin are effective when applied topically to the skin or administered orally to affect the colon but are not effective in internal organs such as the lungs. More in-depth studies on bioavailability should facilitate correlation of mechanisms determined in vitro with in vivo situations, increase our understanding of dose-response relationships, and facilitate extrapolation of results from animal studies to human situations.

Key Words: Tea polyphenols • green tea • curcumin • genistein • quercetin • tumorigenesis

INTRODUCTION

Polyphenolic compounds constitute one of the largest and most ubiquitous group of phytochemicals. They are formed to protect plants from photosynthetic stress, reactive oxygen species, and herbivory. Polyphenolic compounds are an important part of the human diet, with flavonoids and phenolic acids being the most commonly occurring ones in food. Early interest in polyphenols was related to their "antinutritional" effects, ie, decreasing absorption and digestibility of food through their ability to bind proteins and minerals. The astringency of many fruits and beverages is attributable to the precipitation of salivary proteins by plant polyphenols. Current interest is focusing on the beneficial health effects of dietary polyphenols, because these compounds may have antioxidative, antiinflammatory, and anticarcinogenic activities. The chemical properties, biochemical properties, and bioavailabilities of many polyphenolic compounds have been reviewed (1). This article updates these subjects, with emphasis on the potential cancer-preventing activities of dietary polyphenols and the possible mechanisms involved. We review the data on the tea polyphenols, curcumin, genistein, and quercetin (Figure 1). A more extensive discussion of the tea polyphenols is used to illustrate the key issues related to cancer prevention.


View larger version (13K):
FIGURE 1.. Structures of some potentially cancer-preventing dietary polyphenols.

 
TEA AND ITS CANCER-PREVENTING ACTIVITIES

Tea constituents
Tea (Camellia sinensis) is a warm-weather evergreen. In the making of green tea, the tea leaves are heated to inactivate the enzymes. Therefore, the constituents are preserved in the dried tea leaves. A typical brewed green tea beverage (eg, 2.5 g tea leaves in 250 mL hot water) contains 240–320 mg of catechins and 20–50 mg of caffeine. The catechins include (–)-epicatechin, (–)-epigallocatechin, (–)-epicatechin-3-gallate, and (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), with EGCG being the major catechin in tea (Figure 1). Tea leaves also contain flavonols such as quercetin and myricetin, as well as the nitrogenous compounds caffeine (2–5% by wt) and theobromine (2). During the production of black tea, the tea leaves are withered, crushed, and allowed to undergo an enzyme-mediated oxidation commonly referred to as fermentation. During this process, much of the catechin content of the tea leaves is converted to dimeric theaflavin molecules and polymeric thearubigins. In brewed black tea, catechins, theaflavins, and thearubigins account for 3–10%, 2–6%, and > 20% of the dry weight, respectively (Figure 1). Theaflavins are responsible for the color of and contribute to the taste of black tea.

Inhibition of carcinogenesis in animal models by tea and its constituents
Cancer-preventing activity has been demonstrated for green tea, black tea, and their constituents in many animal models of tumorigenesis, including the skin, lung, oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, bladder, small intestine, colon, and prostate gland (3–5). Table 1 summarizes the results of some of those studies.


View this table:
TABLE 1. Tea and cancer prevention: results of studies with animal models

 
In most studies, different preparations of tea or tea constituents were administered in drinking water; these included freshly brewed green or black tea (eg, 5-20 g of leaves brewed in 1 L of water, referred to as 0.5-2% tea); green or black tea solids (dehydrated tea extracts), usually reconstituted with distilled water at concentrations of 0.4% or 0.6%; decaffeinated green or black tea solids prepared as described above; or green tea or black tea polyphenol preparations (which are enriched in tea polyphenols but also may contain some caffeine). The tea preparations were administered either during or after the carcinogen treatment period or during the entire experimental period. Tea preparations were found to be effective in inhibiting 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice with all 3 of the dosing schedules listed above (5). Inhibition of tumor multiplicity (number of tumors per mouse) was observed in most of the studies, although inhibition of tumor incidence (number of animals with tumors) was reported in some publications. In the NNK-induced lung tumorigenesis model, administration of a black tea preparation to adenoma-bearing mice significantly inhibited tumor cell proliferation and the progression of adenoma to carcinoma (24). Inhibition of tumor invasion and metastasis in transplanted and spontaneous metastasis models by orally administered green tea infusion or EGCG was also reported (25, 26).

Other experiments did not demonstrate inhibition of lung tumorigenesis by tea preparations. For example, Witschi et al (27) reported that green tea extract did not reduce lung tumor multiplicity in male A/J mice treated with a single dose of NNK or in a cigarette smoke-induced lung tumorigenesis model.

Whereas most of the studies were conducted with chemical- or ultraviolet (UV) light–induced tumorigenesis models, tea has also been shown to inhibit spontaneous tumorigenesis. For example, administration of 1% or 2% freshly brewed green or black tea significantly inhibited the spontaneous development of lung adenoma and rhabdomyosarcoma in A/J mice (28). In that experiment, as well as in some other experiments, the tea-treated groups had lower body weight and body fat than did the control group, although food consumption was not significantly different between the groups. For example, with 1% green tea in the aforementioned experiment, the body weights and retroperitoneal fat pad weights were 14% and 35% lower, respectively, than those for the control group (28). It remains unclear whether these differences in body weight and fat are related to the mechanisms of cancer prevention or are simply coincidental.

With the TRAMP mouse model of prostate carcinogenesis, it was recently demonstrated that oral consumption of 0.1% green tea polyphenols decreased tumor incidence by 65%. In contrast to water-treated animals, which demonstrated a high rate of distal metastasis (25–95%), tea-treated mice showed no distal metastasis. Biochemical and histologic analyses showed a significant decrease in proliferating cell nuclear antigen and a 10-fold increase in tumor cell apoptosis (6). Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9, as well as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was also observed (29).

The bioavailability of tea constituents is apparently a key factor determining the effectiveness of tea in inhibiting tumor formation. In this respect, the oral cavity and digestive tract, which have direct contact with orally administered tea, may represent good targets for chemoprevention. In the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced oral carcinogenesis hamster model, treatment with 0.6% green tea, as the sole source of drinking fluid, reduced the number of visible tumors by 35% and reduced tumor volume by 57%. In addition, immunohistochemical analyses showed that tea increased the apoptotic index of the tumors while decreasing the proliferation index and microvessel density (20). Tea preparations were also shown to inhibit esophageal, forestomach, and intestinal cancer (5). Inhibition of colon cancer was observed by some investigators but not others (5).

Purified tea constituents have also been reported to inhibit tumorigenesis. For example, EGCG inhibited lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice induced by NNK and cisplatin (30, 31). Theaflavins (a mixture of theaflavin, theaflavin-3-gallate, theaflavin-3-gallate, and theaflavin-3,3-digallate ) reduced NNK-induced lung tumor multiplicity and volume in A/J mice (32). These findings are interesting, given the extremely poor bioavailability of theaflavins, and may suggest that the theaflavins are metabolized to a more-bioavailable active metabolite. In NNK-treated F344 rats, the inhibitory activity of black tea could be fully accounted for by the caffeine content of the tea (33). Caffeine has also been shown to play an important role in the inhibition of skin carcinogenesis. For example, Huang et al (34) reported that, whereas orally administered green tea and black tea were effective in reducing the incidence and multiplicity of UVB light-induced skin tumors, orally administered decaffeinated teas were much less effective. The addition of caffeine restored the activity of the decaffeinated teas. A recent study showed that topical application of caffeine or EGCG to SKH-1 hairless mice that had been pretreated twice weekly for 20 wk with UVB light decreased the multiplicity of skin tumors by 44-72% or 55-66%, respectively. In addition, both compounds were shown to increase the apoptotic index of the tumors by 56–92%, as measured with immunohistochemical assays for caspase-3–positive cells (21). The inhibition of skin tumorigenesis by caffeine or tea was shown to be closely correlated with the reduction of body fat (24).

Mechanistic studies in vitro
Antioxidant/prooxidant activity
Numerous potential mechanisms have been proposed for the cancer-preventing activity of tea and tea constituents, on the basis of studies with cancer cell lines. One problem encountered in most studies is that the concentrations of tea compounds used usually exceed those found in animal or human plasma or tissues after tea consumption.

Tea polyphenols have been shown to have strong antioxidant activity in vitro, but such activity was associated with inhibition of tumorigenesis in only a few cases (30, 35). The importance of this potential mechanism in vivo remains unclear. In contrast, some studies suggested that the cell-killing activity of these compounds, at least in vitro, might be related to their prooxidant activity. For example, we showed that EGCG-induced apoptosis, but not growth inhibition, in H661 lung cancer cells and Ras-transformed human bronchial cells was completely or partially blocked with the inclusion of catalase in the medium (36, 37). When EGCG was added to cell culture systems (eg, HT29 cells in McCoy's 5A medium), production of H2O2 was observed (38). Preincubation of cells with EGCG (before the addition of a growth factor) was shown to block the epidermal growth factor (EGF)- and platelet-derived growth factor–induced signaling systems (39). Our recent results with KYSE510 esophageal squamous cells indicated that inhibition of the EGF signaling system was associated with degradation or inactivation of the EGF receptor, and the effect could be abolished with the inclusion of superoxide dismutase (Z Hou and CS Yang, unpublished results, 2004). The addition of superoxide dismutase also stabilized EGCG, suggesting that the effect was not attributable to competition between EGCG and EGF for the EGF receptor or inhibition of the activated receptor tyrosine kinase activity by EGCG. These observations suggest a role for EGCG prooxidation in some of the observed activities of EGCG in vitro. It is unclear whether such reactions occur in vivo.

Specific protein kinases
Enhanced activity of the transcription factors activator protein 1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor B (NF-B) is key in carcinogenesis. EGCG and other tea polyphenols have been shown to inhibit the activation of AP-1 and NF-B. Although antioxidative mechanisms have been implicated in this activity, the results can be better explained by the direct inhibition of specific protein kinases by these tea polyphenols.

Treatment of 30.7b Ras 12, Ras-transformed, mouse epidermal cells with 20 µmol/L EGCG and theaflavins was shown to decrease amounts of phosphorylated Erk1/2 and Mek1/2 (40), as well as the association between Raf-1 (an upstream protein kinase) and Mek1. TFdiG and EGCG were also shown to directly inhibit the kinase activity of Erk1/2 by competing with Elk-1 for access to the active site (40). Similar results were observed after treatment of Ras-transformed human bronchial cells with EGCG and TFdiG (37).

EGCG and TFdiG were shown to inhibit the activity inhibitor B (IB) kinase in tumor necrosis factor--stimulated IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages (41, 42). EGCG and theaflavins were also reported to inhibit cdk2 and cdk4, leading to the hyperphosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein, which is expected to result in G0/G1 phase arrest (43).

Enhancement of apoptosis
EGCG was reported to induce apoptosis of cultured cells (5). As discussed previously, the H2O2 generated in the cell culture system through autooxidation of EGCG could account for a large proportion of the reported activity. A recent study suggested that certain green and black tea polyphenols bind to the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL and thus may induce apoptosis (44). The study used a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance binding assays, fluorescence polarization assays, and computational docking studies. The results, with very low (nanomolar) concentrations of EGCG, were very impressive but must be confirmed in whole cells. To date, apoptosis has been observed only with much higher doses of EGCG (20–100 µmol/L) (5).

Inhibition of angiogenesis
Cao and Cao (45) demonstrated inhibition of endothelial growth and angiogenesis in the chorioallantoic membrane assay with EGCG (20 µmol/L). Those authors also showed that oral administration of 1.25% green tea to mice inhibited corneal neovascularization stimulated by VEGF (45). EGCG was also shown to inhibit the expression of VEGF by head and neck squamous cell, breast, and colon carcinoma cells (13, 46, 47).

Inhibition of other enzymes
EGCG was shown to selectively inhibit the activity of topoisomerase I, but not topoisomerase II, in human colon cancer cell lines at concentrations that effectively inhibit cell growth (48). Inhibition of MMP-2 and MMP-9 by EGCG was also demonstrated at relatively low doses (49). Others showed that EGCG similarly inhibited the activity and expression of membrane type 1 MMP, a protein responsible for the activation of MMPs (50). Because of the physiologically achievable concentrations used, these activities represent an attractive mechanism for the observed antiangiogenic activity of EGCG and green tea in vivo (5).

EGCG has been reported to inhibit the chymotryptic activity of 20S proteasome in leukemic, breast cancer, and prostate cancer cell lines (51). This inhibition causes accumulation of p27Kip1 and IB, which results in G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest and inhibition of NF-B activity, respectively. The 50% inhibitory concentration for EGCG-mediated inhibition of proteasomes in cells (1–10 µmol/L) is 10-fold higher than the 50% inhibitory concentration in a cell-free system (86-194 nmol/L). This is likely attributable to the nonspecific binding of EGCG to other cellular components. Such nonspecific binding may lead to a higher dose requirement in vivo.

CURCUMIN

Topical application of 10 mmol curcumin to the cheek pouch of Syrian golden hamsters was shown to reduce the number of visible DMBA-induced oral tumors by 39.6% and the tumor volume by 61.3% (20). Administration of 4% curcumin in the diet of azoxymethane-treated mice during the initiation period reduced the number of colon tumors by 66%. If treatment was started after initiation, then tumor number was reduced by 25% (52). In APCmin mice given 0.2% or 0.5% curcumin in the diet, intestinal adenoma multiplicity was reduced by 39–40% and hematocrit amounts, which were reduced in untreated mice, were partially restored (53). Topical application of curcumin has also been shown to reduce tumor incidence and multiplicity in both the benzo[a]pyrene/12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and DMBA/TPA models of skin carcinogenesis in mice (34, 54).

As with the tea polyphenols, the poor bioavailability of curcumin limits its cancer-preventing activity. Curcumin was found to be ineffective in preventing NNK-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice and liver and kidney tumorigenesis in Long-Evans Cinnamon rats (55, 56). All of these tissues require systemic bioavailability for cancer prevention.

Studies with cell lines have shown that curcumin possesses both antioxidant and prooxidant activities. Curcumin-induced, Akt-mediated apoptosis of Caki renal cells was partially inhibited by cotreatment with N-acetylcysteine, which suggests the involvement of oxidative stress (57). Cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase have also been reported as potential targets for curcumin (58, 59). Treatment of lipopolysaccharide-treated mice with curcumin (92 µg/kg, administered intragastrically) reduced hepatic inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression by 50–70% (60).

Curcumin has also been shown to inhibit activation of the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-B in human leukemia cell lines (61, 62). Ablation by curcumin of AP-1 and NF-B activation has been demonstrated in TPA-treated mouse skin. Chun et al (63) reported that topical curcumin application to mouse skin inhibited TPA-mediated activation of Erk and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and subsequent activation of NF-B.

It is unclear from the currently available data what the primary target (or targets) of curcumin is. Many but not all of the animal models studied involve inflammatory mediators such as TPA or lipopolysaccharide, which indicates that curcumin may act primarily as an antiinflammatory agent. Additional studies with in vivo biomarkers are needed.

GENISTEIN

Genistein and daidzein (isoflavones derived from soybeans) have been shown to inhibit the development of both hormone-related and non–hormone-related cancers, including mouse models of breast, prostate, and skin cancer. Treatment of TRAMP mice with 100–500 mg genistein/kg diet reduced the incidence of advanced-stage prostate tumors, in a dose-dependent manner (64). A high-isoflavone diet was also shown to inhibit methylnitrosourea-induced prostate tumors in Lobund-Wistar rats (65).

Topically applied genistein was shown to reduce the incidence and multiplicity of skin tumors in the DMBA-initiated and TPA-promoted Sencar mouse model by 20% and 50%, respectively (66). In the UVB light-induced complete carcinogenesis model, topical pretreatment of SKH-1 mice with 10 µmol genistein significantly reduced the formation of H2O2 and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine but not pyrimidine dimers in the epidermis (66).

Treatment of mouse mammary tumor virus-neu mice with diet containing 250 mg/kg genistein or daidzein significantly increased the latency for spontaneous breast tumors but did not affect tumor size or multiplicity (67). In contrast, it was reported that treatment of mice in the DMBA-initiated and medroxyprogesterone acetate-promoted model with diet containing 1 g/kg genistein increased progression of mammary adenomas, compared with control animals (68).

The ability of genistein to inhibit colon cancer in animals remains unclear. In carcinogen-treated rats, both positive and null effects on the formation of aberrant crypt foci have been reported. No inhibitory effect on intestinal carcinogenesis was observed with APCmin mice fed a Western-style (high-fat/low-fiber/low-calcium) diet containing 16–475 mg/kg soy isoflavones (69).

Several mechanisms have been proposed for genistein. Genistein and other isoflavones have demonstrated weak estrogenic activity at lower concentrations but are estrogen receptor antagonists at higher concentrations. At 40 µmol/L, genistein inhibited proliferation of LNCaP prostate cancer cells and enhanced apoptosis. Treatment of human bladder cancer cells with genistein resulted in inhibition of cdc2 kinase activity and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest (70). Genistein has been shown to inhibit 20S proteasomal activity in LNCaP and MCF7 cells, resulting in accumulation of p27Kip-1, IB, and Bax (71). Genistein has also been shown to inhibit tyrosine kinase and topoisomerase activity (72). The relative importance of each of these mechanisms remains to be determined in vivo.

The bioavailability of genistein appears to be better than that of the green tea polyphenols or curcumin (73, 74). Plasma concentrations of genistein in tumor-bearing nude mice fed a diet containing 1 mg/g genistein were 3.4 µmol/L (75). Among humans, a single oral dose of 460 mg resulted in peak plasma concentrations of 20–25 µmol/L (76). The concentrations achieved in the target tissues must still be accurately determined.

QUERCETIN

Studies with animal models of carcinogenesis have yielded mixed results regarding the cancer-preventing activity of quercetin. For example, it was reported that 2% dietary quercetin inhibited azoxymethane-induced hyperproliferation and focal dysplasia in mice (77). Quercetin also reduced tumor incidence by 76% and tumor multiplicity by 48%. However, no inhibitory effects were observed in APCmin mice treated with quercetin (78). Similarly, although quercetin inhibited local, UVB light-induced immunosuppression in SKH-1 hairless mice, it had no effect on skin tumorigenesis (79). Quercetin did inhibit N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced lung tumorigenesis in mice when administered during the initiation phase (80).

Mechanistic studies have shown that treatment of colon cancer cells with quercetin results in reduced expression of Ras protein (81). Inhibition of cell growth in pancreatic and colon cancer cells has been correlated with inhibition of EGF receptor expression and tyrosine kinase activity (82, 83). In HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells, it was found that the ability of quercetin to damage DNA was largely attributable to the formation of H2O2 (84).

POSSIBLE MECHANISMS FOR INHIBITION OF CARCINOGENESIS

Although many biological actions of polyphenols have been described, the mechanisms responsible for inhibition of carcinogenesis in animals remain unclear. One of the problems with extrapolating results of in vitro studies to animals is that the concentrations of test compounds used in vitro usually exceed those found in plasma or tissues after polyphenol consumption; genistein may be an exception. Even when physiologically achievable concentrations are effective, as has been reported for some enzyme systems (44, 49, 51), caution is still needed in the extrapolation from purified enzymes to animals, as we previously discussed. Therefore, any proposed mechanisms must be verified in animal models or human tissues.

Multiple mechanisms appear to be involved in the inhibition of carcinogenesis by dietary polyphenols (Figure 2). The relative importance of these mechanisms depends on the model system used. Tea polyphenols and curcumin have been shown to inhibit key signal transduction protein kinases, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, IB, and certain cyclin-dependent kinases. This action would inhibit cell growth and transformation, induce apoptosis, and inhibit angiogenesis. As mentioned above, inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis by tea polyphenols, curcumin, genistein, and quercetin have been noted in one or more of the following tissues: skin, prostate, colon, and lung. Tea consumption and genistein demonstrated antiangiogenic activity in NNK-induced lung adenoma (J Liao and CS Yang, unpublished observations, 2004) and Lewis lung xenograft (85) mouse models, respectively. Inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism by tea polyphenols and curcumin has been reported (86–90), and such activity may contribute to the inhibition of carcinogenesis. Other mechanisms, such as inhibition of topoisomerase or inhibition of proteasome, remain to be validated in vivo.


View larger version (17K):
FIGURE 2.. Proposed mechanistic scheme for the prevention of cancer by dietary polyphenols.

 
CONCLUSIONS

Because of the extensive consumption of polyphenols in the diet, the biological activity of these compounds is an important topic of scientific investigation. Given the potential cancer-preventing activities of these compounds, we would expect to observe these activities in human populations. However, epidemiologic studies have not provided sufficient evidence for such conclusions. On the basis of what is known about the bioavailabilities of different dietary polyphenols, it is likely that organ sites that are most accessible to dietary polyphenols experience the protective effects of these compounds. Future studies, especially carefully designed, mechanism-based, animal studies, may facilitate better understanding of the potential health benefits of dietary polyphenols.

REFERENCES

  1. Yang CS, Landau JM, Huang MT, Newmark HL. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by dietary polyphenolic compounds. Annu Rev Nutr 2001;21:381–406.
  2. Balentine DA, Wiseman SA, Bouwens LC. The chemistry of tea flavonoids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1997;37:693–704.
  3. Katiyar SK, Elmets CA. Green tea polyphenolic antioxidants and skin photoprotection. Int J Oncol 2001;18:1307–13.
  4. Weisburger JH. Tea and health: the underlying mechanisms. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1999;220:271–5.
  5. Yang CS, Maliakal P, Meng X. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by tea. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2002;42:25–54.
  6. Gupta S, Hastak K, Ahmad N, Lewin JS, Mukhtar H. Inhibition of prostate carcinogenesis in TRAMP mice by oral infusion of green tea polyphenols. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10350–5.
  7. Nyska A, Suttie A, Bakshi S, et al. Slowing tumorigenic progression in TRAMP mice and prostatic carcinoma cell lines using natural anti-oxidant from spinach, NAO: a comparative study of three anti-oxidants. Toxicol Pathol 2003;31:39–51.
  8. Zhou JR, Yu L, Zhong Y, Blackburn GL. Soy phytochemicals and tea bioactive components synergistically inhibit androgen-sensitive human prostate tumors in mice. J Nutr 2003;133:516–21.
  9. Liao S, Umekita Y, Guo J, Kokontis JM, Hiipakka RA. Growth inhibition and regression of human prostate and breast tumors in athymic mice by tea epigallocatechin gallate. Cancer Lett 1995;96:239–43.
  10. Kavanagh KT, Hafer LJ, Kim DW, et al. Green tea extracts decrease carcinogen-induced mammary tumor burden in rats and rate of breast cancer cell proliferation in culture. J Cell Biochem 2001;82:387–98.
  11. Sartippour MR, Heber D, Ma J, Lu Q, Go VL, Nguyen M. Green tea and its catechins inhibit breast cancer xenografts. Nutr Cancer 2001;40:149–56.
  12. Zhou JR, Yu L, Mai Z, Blackburn GL. Combined inhibition of estrogen-dependent human breast carcinoma by soy and tea bioactive components in mice. Int J Cancer 2004;108:8–14.
  13. Jung YD, Kim MS, Shin BA, et al. EGCG, a major component of green tea, inhibits tumour growth by inhibiting VEGF induction in human colon carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer 2001;84:844–50.
  14. Jia X, Han C. Effects of green tea on colonic aberrant crypt foci and proliferative indexes in rats. Nutr Cancer 2001;39:239–43.
  15. Orner GA, Dashwood WM, Blum CA, et al. Response of APCmin and A33 (Nß-cat) mutant mice to treatment with tea, sulindac, and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). Mutat Res 2002;506–507:121–7.
  16. Ohishi T, Kishimoto Y, Miura N, et al. Synergistic effects of (–)-epigallocatechin gallate with sulindac against colon carcinogenesis of rats treated with azoxymethane. Cancer Lett 2002;177:49–56.
  17. Hirose M, Hoshiya T, Mizoguchi Y, Nakamura A, Akagi K, Shirai T. Green tea catechins enhance tumor development in the colon without effects in the lung or thyroid after pretreatment with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine or 2,2-dihydroxy-di-n-propylnitrosamine in male F344 rats. Cancer Lett 2001;168:23–9.
  18. Orner GA, Dashwood WM, Blum CA, Diaz GD, Li Q, Dashwood RH. Suppression of tumorigenesis in the APCmin mouse: down-regulation of ß-catenin signaling by a combination of tea plus sulindac. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:263–7.
  19. Hirose M, Yamaguchi T, Mizoguchi Y, Akagi K, Futakuchi M, Shirai T. Lack of inhibitory effects of green tea catechins in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat intestinal carcinogenesis model: comparison of the different formulations, administration routes and doses. Cancer Lett 2002;188:163–70.
  20. Li N, Chen X, Liao J, et al. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced oral carcinogenesis in hamsters by tea and curcumin. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:1307–13.
  21. Lu YP, Lou YR, Xie JG, et al. Topical applications of caffeine or (–)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibit carcinogenesis and selectively increase apoptosis in UVB-induced skin tumors in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:12455–60.
  22. Sato D, Matsushima M. Preventive effects of urinary bladder tumors induced by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)-nitrosamine in rat by green tea leaves. Int J Urol 2003;10:160–6.
  23. Kemberling JK, Hampton JA, Keck RW, Gomez MA, Selman SH. Inhibition of bladder tumor growth by the green tea derivative epigallocatechin-3-gallate. J Urol 2003;170:773–6.
  24. Yang G, Wang ZY, Kim S, et al. Characterization of early pulmonary hyperproliferation and tumor progression and their inhibition by black tea in a 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced lung tumorigenesis model with A/J mice. Cancer Res 1997;57:1889–94.
  25. Sazuka M, Murakami S, Isemura M, Satoh K, Nukiwa T. Inhibitory effects of green tea infusion on in vitro invasion and in vivo metastasis of mouse lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 1995;98:27–31.
  26. Liu JD, Chen SH, Lin CL, Tsai SH, Liang YC. Inhibition of melanoma growth and metastasis by combination with (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and dacarbazine in mice. J Cell Biochem 2001;83:631–42.
  27. Witschi H, Espiritu I, Yu M, Willits NH. The effects of phenethyl isothiocyanate, N-acetylcysteine and green tea on tobacco smoke-induced lung tumors in strain A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:1789–94.
  28. Landau JM, Wang ZY, Yang GY, Ding W, Yang CS. Inhibition of spontaneous formation of lung tumors and rhabdomyosarcomas in A/J mice by black and green tea. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:501–7.
  29. Adhami VM, Ahmad N, Mukhtar H. Molecular targets for green tea in prostate cancer prevention. J Nutr 2003;133:2417S–24S.
  30. Xu Y, Ho CT, Amin SG, Han C, Chung FL. Inhibition of tobacco-specific nitrosamine-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice by green tea and its major polyphenol as antioxidants. Cancer Res 1992;52:3875–9.
  31. Mimoto J, Kiura K, Matsuo K, et al. (–)-Epigallocatechin gallate can prevent cisplatin-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:915–9.
  32. Yang GY, Liu Z, Seril DN, et al. Black tea constituents, theaflavins, inhibit 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:2361–5.
  33. Chung FL, Schwartz J, Herzog CR, Yang YM. Tea and cancer prevention: studies in animals and humans. J Nutr 2003;133:3268S–74S.
  34. Huang MT, Xie JG, Wang ZY, et al. Effects of tea, decaffeinated tea, and caffeine on UVB light-induced complete carcinogenesis in SKH-1 mice: demonstration of caffeine as a biologically important constituent of tea. Cancer Res 1997;57:2623–9.
  35. Frei B, Higdon JV. Antioxidant activity of tea polyphenols in vivo: evidence from animal studies. J Nutr 2003;133:3275S–84S.
  36. Yang GY, Liao J, Kim K, Yurkow EJ, Yang CS. Inhibition of growth and induction of apoptosis in human cancer cell lines by tea polyphenols. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:611–6.
  37. Yang GY, Liao J, Li C, et al. Effect of black and green tea polyphenols on c-Jun phosphorylation and H2O2 production in transformed and non-transformed human bronchial cell lines: possible mechanisms of cell growth inhibition and apoptosis induction. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:2035–9.
  38. Hong J, Lu H, Meng X, Ryu JH, Hara Y, Yang CS. Stability, cellular uptake, biotransformation, and efflux of tea polyphenol (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res 2002;62:7241–6.
  39. Masuda M, Suzui M, Weinstein IB. Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on growth, epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways, gene expression, and chemosensitivity in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:4220–9.
  40. Chung JY, Park JO, Phyu H, Dong Z, Yang CS. Mechanisms of inhibition of the Ras-MAP kinase signaling pathway in 30.7b Ras 12 cells by tea polyphenols (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and theaflavin-3,3-digallate. FASEB J 2001;15:2022–4.
  41. Yang F, Oz HS, Barve S, de Villiers WJ, McClain CJ, Varilek GW. The green tea polyphenol (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate blocks nuclear factor-B activation by inhibiting IB kinase activity in the intestinal epithelial cell line IEC-6. Mol Pharmacol 2001;60:528–33.
  42. Pan MH, Lin-Shiau SY, Ho CT, Lin JH, Lin JK. Suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced nuclear factor-B activity by theaflavin-3,3-digallate from black tea and other polyphenols through down-regulation of IB kinase activity in macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol 2000;59:357–67.
  43. Liang YC, Lin-Shiau SY, Chen CF, Lin JK. Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases 2 and 4 activities as well as induction of Cdk inhibitors p21 and p27 during growth arrest of human breast carcinoma cells by (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. J Cell Biochem 1999;75:1–12.
  44. Leone M, Zhai D, Sareth S, Kitada S, Reed JC, Pellecchia M. Cancer prevention by tea polyphenols is linked to their direct inhibition of antiapoptotic Bcl-2-family proteins. Cancer Res 2003;63:8118–21.
  45. Cao Y, Cao R. Angiogenesis inhibited by drinking tea. Nature 1999;398:381.
  46. Masuda M, Suzui M, Lim JT, Deguchi A, Soh JW, Weinstein IB. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate decreases VEGF production in head and neck and breast carcinoma cells by inhibiting EGFR-related pathways of signal transduction. J Exp Ther Oncol 2002;2:350–9.
  47. Sartippour MR, Shao ZM, Heber D, et al. Green tea inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induction in human breast cancer cells. J Nutr 2002;132:2307–11.
  48. Berger SJ, Gupta S, Belfi CA, Gosky DM, Mukhtar H. Green tea constituent (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits topoisomerase I activity in human colon carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;288:101–5.
  49. Garbisa S, Sartor L, Biggin S, Salvato B, Benelli R, Albini A. Tumor gelatinases and invasion inhibited by the green tea flavanol epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Cancer 2001;91:822–32.
  50. Annabi B, Lachambre MP, Bousquet-Gagnon N, Page M, Gingras D, Beliveau R. Green tea polyphenol (–)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate inhibits MMP-2 secretion and MT1-MMP-driven migration in glioblastoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1542:209–20.
  51. Nam S, Smith DM, Dou QP. Ester bond-containing tea polyphenols potently inhibit proteasome activity in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 2001;276:13322–30.
  52. Huang MT, Lou YR, Ma W, Newmark HL, Reuhl KR, Conney AH. Inhibitory effects of dietary curcumin on forestomach, duodenal, and colon carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Res 1994;54:5841–7.
  53. Perkins S, Verschoyle RD, Hill K, et al. Chemopreventive efficacy and pharmacokinetics of curcumin in the min/+ mouse, a model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:535–40.
  54. Huang MT, Wang ZY, Georgiadis CA, Laskin JD, Conney AH. Inhibitory effects of curcumin on tumor initiation by benzo[a]pyrene and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:2183–6.
  55. Hecht SS, Kenney PM, Wang M, et al. Evaluation of butylated hydroxyanisole, myo-inositol, curcumin, esculetin, resveratrol and lycopene as inhibitors of benzo[a]pyrene plus 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice. Cancer Lett 1999;137:123–30.
  56. Frank N, Knauft J, Amelung F, Nair J, Wesch H, Bartsch H. No prevention of liver and kidney tumors in Long-Evans Cinnamon rats by dietary curcumin, but inhibition at other sites and of metastases. Mutat Res 2003;523–4:127–35.
  57. Woo JH, Kim YH, Choi YJ, et al. Molecular mechanisms of curcumin-induced cytotoxicity: induction of apoptosis through generation of reactive oxygen species, down-regulation of Bcl-XL and IAP, the release of cytochrome c and inhibition of Akt. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:1199–208.
  58. Zhang F, Altorki NK, Mestre JR, Subbaramaiah K, Dannenberg AJ. Curcumin inhibits cyclooxygenase-2 transcription in bile acid- and phorbol ester–treated human gastrointestinal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:445–51.
  59. Goel A, Boland CR, Chauhan DP. Specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression by dietary curcumin in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2001;172:111–8.
  60. Chan MM, Huang HI, Fenton MR, Fong D. In vivo inhibition of nitric oxide synthase gene expression by curcumin, a cancer preventive natural product with anti-inflammatory properties. Biochem Pharmacol 1998;55:1955–62.
  61. Singh S, Aggarwal BB. Activation of transcription factor NF-B is suppressed by curcumin (diferuloylmethane) . J Biol Chem 1995;270:24995–5000.
  62. Han SS, Keum YS, Seo HJ, Surh YJ. Curcumin suppresses activation of NF-B and AP-1 induced by phorbol ester in cultured human promyelocytic leukemia cells. J Biochem Mol Biol 2002;35:337–42.
  63. Chun KS, Keum YS, Han SS, Song YS, Kim SH, Surh YJ. Curcumin inhibits phorbol ester-induced expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in mouse skin through suppression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity and NF-B activation. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:1515–24.
  64. Mentor-Marcel R, Lamartiniere CA, Eltoum IE, Greenberg NM, Elgavish A. Genistein in the diet reduces the incidence of poorly differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice (TRAMP). Cancer Res 2001;61:6777–82.
  65. Wang J, Eltoum IE, Lamartiniere CA. Dietary genistein suppresses chemically induced prostate cancer in Lobund-Wistar rats. Cancer Lett 2002;186:11–8.
  66. Wei H, Bowen R, Zhang X, Lebwohl M. Isoflavone genistein inhibits the initiation and promotion of two-stage skin carcinogenesis in mice. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:1509–14.
  67. Jin Z, MacDonald RS. Soy isoflavones increase latency of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice. J Nutr 2002;132:3186–90.
  68. Day JK, Besch-Williford C, McMann TR, Hufford MG, Lubahn DB, MacDonald RS. Dietary genistein increased DMBA-induced mammary adenocarcinoma in wild-type, but not ER KO, mice. Nutr Cancer 2001;39:226–32.
  69. Sorensen IK, Kristiansen E, Mortensen A, et al. The effect of soy isoflavones on the development of intestinal neoplasia in APCmin mouse. Cancer Lett 1998;130:217–25.
  70. Su SJ, Yeh TM, Lei HY, Chow NH. The potential of soybean foods as a chemoprevention approach for human urinary tract cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:230–6.
  71. Kazi A, Daniel KG, Smith DM, Kumar NB, Dou QP. Inhibition of the proteasome activity, a novel mechanism associated with the tumor cell apoptosis-inducing ability of genistein. Biochem Pharmacol 2003;66:965–76.
  72. McCabe MJ Jr, Orrenius S. Genistein induces apoptosis in immature human thymocytes by inhibiting topoisomerase-II. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993;194:944–50.
  73. Record IR, Broadbent JL, King RA, Dreosti IE, Head RJ, Tonkin AL. Genistein inhibits growth of B16 melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro and promotes differentiation in vitro. Int J Cancer 1997;72:860–4.
  74. Franke AA, Cooney RV, Custer LJ, Mordan LJ, Tanaka Y. Inhibition of neoplastic transformation and bioavailability of dietary flavonoid agents. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;439:237–48.
  75. Ju YH, Allred CD, Allred KF, Karko KL, Doerge DR, Helferich WG. Physiological concentrations of dietary genistein dose-dependently stimulate growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) tumors implanted in athymic nude mice. J Nutr 2001;131:2957–62.
  76. Izumi T, Piskula MK, Osawa S, et al. Soy isoflavone aglycones are absorbed faster and in higher amounts than their glucosides in humans. J Nutr 2000;130:1695–9.
  77. Deschner EE, Ruperto J, Wong G, Newmark HL. Quercetin and rutin as inhibitors of azoxymethanol-induced colonic neoplasia. Carcinogenesis 1991;12:1193–6.
  78. Mahmoud NN, Carothers AM, Grunberger D, et al. Plant phenolics decrease intestinal tumors in an animal model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:921–7.
  79. Steerenberg PA, Garssen J, Dortant PM, et al. The effect of oral quercetin on UVB-induced tumor growth and local immunosuppression in SKH-1. Cancer Lett 1997;114:187–9.
  80. Khanduja KL, Gandhi RK, Pathania V, Syal N. Prevention of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced lung tumorigenesis by ellagic acid and quercetin in mice. Food Chem Toxicol 1999;37:313–8.
  81. Ranelletti FO, Maggiano N, Serra FG, et al. Quercetin inhibits p21-RAS expression in human colon cancer cell lines and in primary colorectal tumors. Int J Cancer 2000;85:438–45.
  82. Lee LT, Huang YT, Hwang JJ, et al. Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity by quercetin and luteolin leads to growth inhibition and apoptosis of pancreatic tumor cells. Anticancer Res 2002;22:1615–27.
  83. Richter M, Ebermann R, Marian B. Quercetin-induced apoptosis in colorectal tumor cells: possible role of EGF receptor signaling. Nutr Cancer 1999;34:88–99.
  84. Yamashita N, Kawanishi S. Distinct mechanisms of DNA damage in apoptosis induced by quercetin and luteolin. Free Radic Res 2000;33:623–33.
  85. Wietrzyk J, Boratynski J, Grynkiewicz G, Ryczynski A, Radzikowski C, Opolski A. Antiangiogenic and antitumour effects in vivo of genistein applied alone or combined with cyclophosphamide. Anticancer Res 2001;21:3893–6.
  86. Ju J, Liu Y, Hong J, Huang MT, Conney AH, Yang CS. Effects of green tea and high-fat diet on arachidonic acid metabolism and aberrant crypt foci formation in an azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis mouse model. Nutr Cancer 2003;46:172–8.
  87. Hong J, Smith TJ, Ho CT, August DA, Yang SC. Effects of purified green and black tea polyphenols on cyclooxygenase- and lipoxygenase-dependent metabolism of arachidonic acid in human colon mucosa and colon tumor tissues. Biochem Pharmacol 2001;62:1175–83.
  88. Hong J, Bose M, Ju J, Ryu JH, Chen X, Sang S, Lee MJ, Yang CS. Modulation of arachidonic acid metabolism by curcumin and related beta-diketone derivatives: effects on cytosolic phospholipase A2, cyclooxygenases and 5-lipoxygenase. Carcinogenesis 2004;25:1671–9.
  89. Zhang F, Altorki NK, Mestre JR, Subbaramaiah K, Dannenberg AJ. Curcumin inhibits cyclooxygenase-2 transcription in bile acid- and phorbol ester-treated human gastrointestinal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:445–51.
  90. Goel A, Boland CR, Chauhan DP. Specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression by dietary curcumin in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2001;172(2):111–8.

作者: Joshua D Lambert
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具