点击显示 收起
Malecón Grau 260
Chorrillos
Lima 9
Perú
E-mail: epollitt{at}ucdavis.edu
Dear Sir:
The article by Black et al (1) provides insufficient information to claim that weekly administration of iron and zinc supplements benefits exploratory behavior. The iron and the iron-plus-zinc treatments had a significant effect on the orientation-engagement factor of the Bayley Behavior Rating Scale (2), which includes one item (out of 11) on exploration. This factor also includes items that assess "... arousal, positive affect, energy, initiative, enthusiasm, exploration, social engagement, and lack of fearfulness" (3). At issue is not a simple change of labels but whether the 11 items included in the orientation-engagement factor measure the concept of exploration. No evidence to this effect was presented, and the statement that "Orientation-engagement factor served as the measurement of exploration" trivializes both the scale and the very nature of construct validity (4). The definition of exploration should not be left to common sense; it requires careful consideration of the behavioral and developmental components of the concept.
There was no treatment effect on the Mental Development Index (MDI) from the Bayley Infant Development Scale II administered at 12 mo. This finding was not surprising. The MDI obtained at 12 mo has a track record of poor sensitivity to detect developmental delays secondary to micronutrient deficiencies, and its construct validity is questionable (5, 6). Accordingly, the authors could have predicted that the MDI would not discriminate among groups after treatment. The probabilities of detecting effects on the mental scale, if any were indeed present, would have increased if the authors had charted a developmental trajectory after age 12 mo (6, 7).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author had no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES