点击显示 收起
Epidemiology and Molecular Biology Unit, The Children's University Hospital,1 Perinatal Infections Laboratory, The Rotunda Hospital,2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland,3 Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland4
Received 17 October 2002/ Returned for modification 25 November 2002/ Accepted 2 May 2003
ABSTRACT |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
INTRODUCTION |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
Molecular studies have shown that these penicillin-resistant pneumococcal populations are highly dynamic and that resistance is a combination of the spread of resistant clones, the acquisition and loss of resistance genes within those clonal lineages, and the spread of resistance genes to new lineages (32, 36). The persistent threat of invasive pneumococcal infections highlights the need for increased surveillance, including phenotyping, genotyping, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The value of serological and molecular typing techniques in the epidemiological analysis of pneumococcal isolates has recently been illustrated by reports in the literature (15, 16, 20). These studies have highlighted the usefulness of national data in determining the prevalent strains and their antimicrobial resistance patterns and are also important in planning preventative strategies including the use of new conjugated vaccines.
The participation of Ireland in The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Survey (EARSS) provided the ideal framework for the collection, antimicrobial testing, and documenting of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Prior to this, there were no data available nationally on the prevalence of IPD. In the present study, hospital laboratories reporting cases of IPD were invited to submit isolates for further analysis. We investigated the epidemiology of pneumococcal disease in Ireland over the first year to determine the incidence of IPD and to examine the Irish population of S. pneumoniae isolates with regard to phenotype, genotype, and antimicrobial profile.
(This work was presented in part as a poster at the 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [abstr. 1814], 17 to 20 September 2000.)
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
Serotyping. All pneumococci were serotyped by slide agglutination with capsular typing sera (Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) by using the methodology routinely used by the staff at the Streptococcal Reference Laboratory of the Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Penicillin susceptibility. Isolates were assessed for their susceptibility to penicillin by the commercially available E-test method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) which was used and interpreted according to manufacturer's instructions. MIC breakpoints for defining susceptibility and resistance were in accordance with the EARSS guidelines. Pneumococcal isolates for which MICs of <0.1 µg/ml were defined as penicillin susceptible (PSP) and isolates for which MICs of 0.1 µg/ml were defined as penicillin nonsusceptible (PNSP) to include isolates with intermediate and high-level resistance to penicillin, i.e., for which the MICs were 2 µg/ml.
pbp fingerprinting. Total genomic DNA was prepared by using a modification of the Wizard Genomic DNA extraction kit for gram-positive organisms (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.). Briefly, the gram-positive specific lytic enzyme step was omitted and cell lysis was performed as described for gram-negative organisms. The pbp2B and pbp2X genes were amplified from chromosomal DNA by PCR with the primers and conditions described by Dowson et al. (10). The primers and PCR conditions used to amplify the pbp1A gene were designed and optimized during the course of the present study. The pbp1A gene was amplified with the primers 5'-GTTATCGCAGCCATTGTCTTAGG-3' and 5'-GACTGTGAAGTTGAACTATCTGATG-3' using the following PCR cycling conditions: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 60 s, 55°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 130 s. The final cycle was run at 72°C for 7 min. In order to perform restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of pbp genes, PCR products of pbp2B, pbp2X, and pbp1A were each digested separately with 10 U of HinfI (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting fragments were separated on 3% (wt/vol) agarose gels containing 5 µg of ethidium bromide/ml at 3.5 V/cm for 2 h and visualized on an UV transilluminator.
PFGE fingerprinting. Agarose-embedded chromosomal DNA plugs for PFGE analysis were prepared and digested with SmaI as described by Hall et al. (16). Macrorestriction fragments were separated on a 1.2% SeaKem agarose gel (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, Maine) by electrophoresis on a CHEF DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) at 5.6 V/cm, with the switch time ramped from 1 to 15 s over a 20-h period, with an included angle of 120°, in 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer at 14°C. Gels were stained for 20 min in 5 mg of ethidium bromide/ml and destained in 0.5x TBE for 1 h.
Computerized analysis of the pbp and PFGE fingerprints. All gel images were captured with a charge-coupled device camera to the AlphaImager computer program (Flowgen, Leicestershire, United Kingdom) and stored as tiff files (AlphaImager gel documentation system; Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, Calif.). Hard copies of the gels were also printed onto thermal imaging paper (UPP-110S; Sony) by using a digital graphic printer (UP-D890; Sony) for manual evaluation of the patterns. Isolates were grouped by visual estimation into molecular types based on the presence of common bands. Essentially, the criteria defined by Tenover et al. (47) were used to analyze the PFGE patterns. Isolates with identical fingerprints and/or PFGE profiles were considered to be the same. Isolates that had similar PFGE profiles (i.e., a 3-band difference) were defined as being clonally related and subtypes of each other. Isolates that differed by more than three bands were considered different and thus represented a different strain. Gels were evaluated independently by two people. Grouping was determined without any previous knowledge of epidemiological data.
In addition to visual inspection and comparison, the pbp fingerprints were also analyzed by using the Phoretix 1D Advanced (v5.2) and 1D Database (v2.0) software packages (Phoretix International, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) according to the methods and algorithms documented by the manufacturers. A 100-bp ladder (Gibco-BRL/Life Technologies, Paisley, Scotland) was used as a molecular weight standard on the pbp fingerprint gels. For pulsed-field gel profiles, the position of each band was interpreted as a binary code in to a spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel). This was done by comparing the position of each band in each profile to the position of each band within each of the other profiles and also in relation to the bands of the molecular weight standard included on each gel (within a grid of 34 possible band positions). This binary code reflected the presence or absence of a band in that position within that profile on the gel. This code was converted to a "gel" image by using the Scored Tiff (v1.0) software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) which was then read as an "ALF" gel by the Phoretix 1D Advanced (v5.01) software. A 50-kb Lambda ladder (Bio-Rad laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) was used as the molecular weight standard on all pulsed-field gels.
RESULTS |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
Epidemiological characteristics of the pneumococcal isolates. All 144 isolates were analyzed for their penicillin susceptibility pattern, serotype, pbp fingerprint, and PFGE profile. The results obtained by each method are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
|
|
(ii) Serotyping. The 144 IPD-associated isolates comprised 25 different serogroups or serotypes overall (Table 1). All isolates were serotypeable based on the available antisera. The ATCC 49619 strain was serotype 19F. The most prevalent serotypes were serotypes 14 and 9V, accounting for 30 (20.8%) and 22 (15.3%) of all isolates examined, respectively. The other most frequent serotypes were 4 (9%), 3 (6.9%), 12B (4.9%), 8 (5.6%), and 5 (4.9%). These predominant serotypes were reflected among the 117 PSP isolates since 26 (22.2%) were serotype 14. The capsular types of the 27 PNSP isolates were restricted to only four serotypes, in order of frequency 9V (74%), 14 (14.8%), 23F (7.4%), and 6B (3.7%).
(iii) pbp fingerprinting. Of the 144 isolates, three to nine distinct patterns were obtained for each of the pbp1A, pbp2B, and pbp2X genes (Fig. 1). For comparative pbp fingerprinting purposes, DNA from a strain representative of each of RFLP fingerprint obtained was sent to M. Sluijter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Therefore, in the present study the number assignments used to differentiate pbp gene fingerprints are arbitrary but correspond to the numbers and RFLP fingerprints of the pbp fingerprinting system documented previously (8, 19, 37, 38, 43). Three distinct patterns were observed with the pbp1A genes; these were designated A1, A2, and A4. RFLP analysis of the pbp2B gene yielded five distinct fingerprints: B1, B2, B3, B7, and B12. Two pbp1A and pbp2B patterns—A2-B2 and A1-B1—accounted for 116 (80.5%) and 26 (18.1%) of all isolates examined. Nine RFLP fingerprints of pbp2X were identified: X1, X2, X3, X5, X71, X98, X99, X100, and X101. As with the pbp1A and pbp2B genes, two pbp2X patterns—X1 and X3—accounted for the majority of the isolates: 26 (18.1%) and 97 (68%), respectively. Of the nine RFLP patterns observed for the pbp2X, four were not present in the database maintained by M. Sluijter. These novel patterns were designated X98 to X101 and were added to that database.
|
No particular association between serotype and pbp genotype A2-B2-X100 was noted since all isolates had different serotypes, i.e., 9V, 19A, 19F, and 29, although four of these were of serotype 19A. A similar situation was observed with isolates with pbp genotype A2-B2-X2, since all three isolates had different serotypes (6A, 7F, and 23F). However, all seven isolates with the pbp genotype A2-B2-X99 were serotype 5.
(iv) PFGE fingerprinting. Using the analysis criteria of a 3-band difference between profiles (47), i.e., with PFGE profiles that were >77% similar and considered to be closely related and probably part of the same outbreak, the 144 isolates yielded 34 individual PFGE types (Fig. 2). Among the 144 isolates studied, 24 PFGE types, each representing two or more isolates were observed (Table 2). A further 10 PFGE types differing by at least 23% from others were also observed, each of which were represented by a single isolate only.
|
In general, there was some correlation between pattern and serotype, since some isolates of the same serotype usually yielded indistinguishable PFGE profiles and at the very least belonged to no more than three groups, although some exceptions were observed (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Isolates belonging to certain serotypes were found to be more genotypically related as follows (serotype, percentage of isolates of the same PFGE group): 1, 100%; 3, 70%; 4, 61%; 5, 100%; 6B, 75%; 7F, 100%; 8, 100%; 9V, 73%; 12B, 57%; 14, 70%; 18C, 100%; 19A, 83%; 19F, 75%; 20, 100%; 22F, 75%; 23F, 40%; and 31, 100%. Isolates of serotypes 5, 18C, and 7F formed unique and exclusive groups. Isolates of serotypes 1, 8, 20, and 31 also formed single groups but along with isolates of other serotypes. In contrast, there also were instances in which isolates of different serotypes belonged to the same group and cases in which isolates with different serotypes had indistinguishable PFGE profiles (Table 2). No particular association could be inferred between PFGE profile and pbp genotype, given the predominance of the pbp genotypes A2-B2-X3 among the PSP isolates and A1-B1-X1 among the PNSP isolates.
DISCUSSION |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
Worldwide data on pneumococcal serotype distribution have shown that most pneumococcal disease is caused by 23 serotypes in adults (17), and in children 80% of pneumococcal disease is caused by 7 serotypes (7). In the present study, 25 different serotypes were represented among the 144 isolates analyzed. Isolates of serotypes 14 and 9V were the most common, with isolates of serotypes 3 and 4 also being commonly observed. These four serotypes accounted for 52.1% of all invasive pneumococcal isolates recovered in 1999 in the Republic of Ireland. These serotypes, among others, have been the most prevalent in studies of IPD in other countries (28, 39, 41), including England and Wales (34). However, in some countries serotypes 1, 6, 7, 8, 19, and 23, along with serotype 14, are the most prevalent (1, 5, 12, 22, 43, 46).
It has been documented that certain pneumococcal serotypes are known to be more virulent than others; bacteremia caused by serotypes 3, 6A, and 19A is considered to have the highest mortality rates compared to that caused by other serotypes (21, 33). In the present study, 6.9% of infections were associated with serotype 3 isolates, and 11.8% of all cases were associated with these three serotypes.
The prevalence and distribution of serotypes among a population of pneumococci is an important consideration, especially in the context of vaccine development and estimating vaccine efficacy. When all of the isolates are taken into consideration, both PSP and PNSP, 16 (11.1%) expressed one of eight serotypes that currently is not included in the current formulation of the 23-valent nonconjugated polysaccharide vaccine. These 16 isolates included 7 isolates of serotype 12B; single isolates of serotypes 6A, 15A, 16F, 29, and 34; and two isolates of serotypes 23A and 31. However, of these eight serotypes, protection would be afforded by cross-reactivity for four serotypes with similar, closely related serotypes that are present in the 23-valent vaccine. Although all of the serotypes recovered from infants 1 year old or younger are included in the 23-valent vaccine, this vaccine does not induce a protective immune response in this age group. However, the new 7-valent conjugate vaccine is effective in this population, but only 71.5% of the serotypes found in this age group are contained within this vaccine, findings similar to the rates observed in other European countries (5). Overall, only 56.3% of the 144 isolates expressed serotypes that are contained within the 7-valent vaccine. These included 10 of the 14 (71.4%) isolates that were recovered from infants who were 1 year old or younger. The remaining four isolates were serotypes 3 and 8, and 2 isolates were serotype 7F. However, it is possible that the vaccine may confer cross-protection against a further nine isolates, increasing the overall protection to 62.5% of the isolates. All of the PNSP isolates recovered as part of the present study had serotypes that are covered by the 7-valent vaccine.
Several examples of the international spread of PNSP clones have been reported (18, 46). Among the Irish isolates, 18.7% (27 of 144) had a reduced susceptibility to penicillin (PNSP). None of the isolates had penicillin MICs that were indicative of penicillin resistance. The proportion of PNSP isolates observed in the present study is comparable to that of other European countries, e.g., Portugal, Belguim, and Italy, but is considerably lower than that of Spain (34% [4]), Greece (30.4% [28]), and Turkey (54% [41]) and of some non-European countries, including Taiwan (56.4% [6]), Hong Kong (55% [23, 24]), and the United States (44% [9]).
Specific serotypes, predominantly serotypes 6B, 9V, 14, 19A, 19F, and 23F, have been associated with antibiotic resistance (31, 46). Of the 27 Irish PNSP four serotypes were observed: 9V, 14, 23F, and 6B. Serotype 9V accounted for 20 (74.1%) of the isolates, and serotype 14 accounted for another 4 (14.8%). Only two serotype 23F isolates and a single 6B isolate were observed. These are the same four serotypes as the extensively spread "penicillin-resistant" clones that have emerged in Spain. The "Spanish/French clone" usually classified as serogroup 9 or 14 has spread to several countries in Europe, the Far East, and North and South America (13, 35, 42). The "Spanish/Iceland clone," usually having serotype 6B, has become the dominant pneumococcus type isolated from children in Iceland, where it accounts for 75% of multiresistant pneumococci. Therefore, from a serological analysis, it would appear that the PNSP isolates in Ireland might be members of the already-documented multiresistant bacterial clones that have spread extensively worldwide.
PCR-RFLP analysis of the pbp1A and pbp2B genes yielded three and five distinct fingerprint patterns, respectively. Each of these patterns had been observed and documented previously in an international data library comprising of at least 30 RFLP patterns for each gene (18, 19, 36, 37, 43). Ten different RFLP patterns were observed with the pbp2X gene. Six of these had been observed previously, but the remaining four were novel and are not contained with the database that already contains 97 pbp2X RFLP patterns. This demonstrates the highly variable nature of the pbp2X gene, suggesting that it undergoes more recombination or that point mutations occur more frequently than in either of the other pbp genes (14). Variations in the RFLP patterns of the pbp2X gene only were responsible for six of the seven distinct genotypes observed among the PSP isolates. Genotype A2-B2-X3 was found most frequently among PSP isolates. This is the genotype that has been most commonly observed with PSP isolates in both the United States and The Netherlands (37, 43). There were no specific associations between pbp genotype and serotype except for serotype 5 isolates and the A2-B2-X99 genotype; only serotype 5 isolates had this genotype.
The predominant pbp genotype among the PNSP was A1-B1-X1. Isolates with three distinct serotypes—9V, 14, and 23F—displayed this genotype. As in other reports, this genotype was uniquely associated with the PNSP phenotype, and it is predominantly observed in strains of the pandemic clones 23F and 9V/14 (20, 36, 43). Only one other pbp genotype was observed within the PNSP, A1-B3-X5, a serotype 6B isolate. Previous studies have documented that genetic polymorphism, as observed by pbp fingerprinting, is restricted within isolates of the pandemic 6B-type penicillin resistant clone and that pbp2X type 13 was predominantly and almost exclusively present among members of this clone (18, 36).
It has been documented that, in contrast to the pbp genes of PNSP isolates, those of PSP isolates show very little sequence variation (10, 25, 48). This is not evident from the present study since all but one of the PNSP isolates had the same pbp genotype, whereas seven different genotypes were observed with the PSP isolates, albeit only varying by the pattern of the pbp2X gene. Four of these patterns were not observed previously (M. Sluijter, unpublished data). Studies have shown that alterations in pbp2X gene result in low-level penicillin resistance, whereas high-level penicillin resistance requires alterations in the pbp2B and pbp1A genes (3, 44, 45). Of the seven different RFLP patterns observed with the pbp2X gene (X3, X2, X71, X98, X99, X100, and X101) among the PSP isolates in the present study, the pbp1A and pbp2B gene patterns were A2-B2 for six of these (all but X98).
Several studies have already documented the use of PFGE analysis for studying clonal relationships, but comparisons of results between studies is difficult due to the different criteria used for the interpretation of banding patterns (11, 24, 27, 40, 49). In the present study, we used the criterion described by Tenover et al. (47). However, the criteria devised by Tenover et al. were to assist in the interpretation of types from an outbreak and not intended primarily to study large epidemiologically unrelated collections of isolates such as in the present study, where the isolates were distributed throughout one country with a population of 3.7 million people. Consequently, our conclusions based on these criteria must be considered tentative and may open to question. PFGE types did not appear to have a strict correlation with penicillin susceptibility and pbp genotype. However, the majority of PNSP isolates were clustered within a small number of PFGE types (i.e., 7 types), whereas PSP isolates were contained within many PFGE types (i.e., 29 types). This finding indicates that there is greater genetic diversity among the PSP isolates than among the PNSP isolates or that there are fewer PNSP than PSP clones associated with IPD in Ireland. Only two PFGE types contained both PSP and PNSP isolates.
From the data generated in the present study it is evident that the use of different typing methods for the characterization of pneumococci associated with IPD can yield several different epidemiological profiles. pbp fingerprinting relies on the alterations in the sequence of the genes encoding the binding protein targets of penicillin and, as such, can be related to the penicillin susceptibilities of the organisms examined. PFGE typing is dependent on the genomic distribution of restriction endonuclease cleavage sites, whereas serotyping requires that all of the genetic, enzymatic, and transport components necessary to produce an exopolysaccharide are expressed and functional. Several studies have shown PFGE fingerprinting to be highly informative in various epidemiological studies of pneumococci and of greater epidemiological value than either pbp fingerprinting or serotyping. Likewise, in the present study PFGE typing provided valuable information in relation to the clonal nature of pneumococci in Ireland and formed a basis on which the data from the other typing methods used could be compared and examined.
In conclusion, in the present study serotyping, pbp fingerprinting, and PFGE data suggest that the spread of pneumococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility in Ireland is probably due to both the horizontal spread of altered pbp genes and the clonal spread of certain strains of pneumococci already prevalent throughout Europe.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
This work was partly funded by grants (RP109/99) from the Health Research Board, Republic of Ireland and by a grant from the Charitable Infirmary Charitable Trust of the Republic of Ireland. This work was also partly supported by John Wyeth & Brothers Ltd., Wyeth Laboratories, United Kingdom, and we acknowledge the support of Pfizer (Ireland), Ltd., to the Department of Clinical Microbiology, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.
REFERENCES |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|