点击显示 收起
Department of Life Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9NN,1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Genitourinary Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA,2 Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool L14 3PE, United Kingdom,4 Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, California 940633
Received 18 December 2002/ Returned for modification 13 February 2003/ Accepted 28 April 2003
ABSTRACT |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
INTRODUCTION |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
Currently, the bacterial pathogens in CF airways are characterized through cultivation of expectorated sputum samples on selective media. Such culture-based analysis can, however, be problematic since the process is time-consuming (41), potentially inaccurate (32), and requires species-specific selective media. Cultivation also only allows at best a semiquantitative assessment of the load of the targeted pathogen. More fundamentally, it excludes the detection of unculturable bacteria that may predominate in many environments (2).
By assessing nucleic acids extracted from clinical samples directly, molecular biology-based assays obviate the requirement for cultivation. As such, these approaches are becoming increasingly important and are finding more applications in clinical microbiology. Some PCR-based assays have already been developed to detect specific CF bacterial pathogen species (23, 28, 41, 42). Although valuable, these assays by definition, however, do not characterize the total bacterial community. As such, potentially clinically important pathogens can remain unidentified (11, 23, 27, 41). Methodologies, however, have been developed that allow the total bacterial community in a given environment to be characterized (24). Such studies typically exploit phylogenetically informative 16S rRNA sequences. Previous studies have enabled a range of specific pathogens to be detected in clonal libraries comprised of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) PCR products amplified from DNA extracted directly from sputa (38). However, the same study also indicated that many clones did not hybridize to the pathogen-specific probes used, thus indicating that there may be many other bacterial species present in CF sputa.
It is therefore important to develop a means of rapidly characterizing the total CF bacterial community. A number of approaches have been effective in characterizing complex microbial communities, including length heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR) analysis (33, 36) and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis (4, 7, 13, 24). The first step in such community analyses, common to both LH-PCR and T-RFLP, is the amplification of ribosomal sequences from nucleic acids extracted directly from clinical samples. LH-PCR resolves amplicons generated from different bacterial species on the basis of length (36). T-RFLP generates fragments that differ in length due to the variation in the position of the first specific restriction endonuclease site in ribosomal sequences amplified from individual bacterial species. These informative fragments are typically fluorescently labeled and so allow their detection on automated DNA sequencing machines (7). Therefore, both LH-PCR and T-RFLP allow complex bacterial communities to be profiled rapidly in a single electrophoretic track.
The aim of the present study was to examine the composition and diversity of bacterial communities within sputa and bronchoscopies sampled from CF patients. Profiling data generated by using LH-PCR and T-RFLP were also compared to information derived from 16S rRNA clone libraries prepared from the same samples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
16S rRNA genes from 15 different strains of P. aeruginosa (accession numbers AJ536419, AF502423, AB073312, AB062598, AF094720, AB037563, AB037562, AB037558, AB037545, AJ249451, AF157689, M34133, AB037546, AB037560, and AB037549) were used, in addition to the genome sequence strain PAO1 (accession numbers AE004091 [rrs, 722096 to 723631], AE004091 [rrs, 4792196 to 4793731], AE004091 [rrs, 5267724 to 52692590], and AE004091 [rrs, 6043208 to 6044743]).
DNA extraction. (i) DNA extraction from bacterial cultures. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, B. cepacia (genomovar III), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia were cultured from clinical specimens by the routine Diagnostic Laboratories at the Royal Liverpool Hospital. The remaining strains, H. influenzae NCTC12699 and S. aureus NCTC12232 used were obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures (London, United Kingdom). Bacterial strains were cultured at 37°C on 2.8% (wt/vol) nutrient agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom).
DNA was extracted from bacterial cells by a previously described method (30). The extracted DNA was verified by Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE)-agarose gel electrophoresis on 0.8% (wt/vol) TAE-agarose gels stained in ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/liter) and images captured by using a Herolab image analyzer with E.A.S.Y STOP win 32 software (Herolab, Wiesloch, Germany).
(ii) DNA extraction from clinical specimens. Sputa and bronchoscopy samples were obtained from adult CF patients at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital under full ethical approval. Of these, 10 were sputum samples (patients 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14), and 4 were bronchoscopy samples (patients 3, 4, 6, and 9). One additional sputum sample was obtained to develop the approaches used here. All samples were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (Oxoid) prior to DNA extraction. Sputum samples were treated with Sputasol (Oxoid) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, followed by centrifugation for 5 min at 12,000 x g. Pellets were resuspended in 1.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and then centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000 x g. This step was repeated three times.
DNA was isolated from clinical specimens by a modification of a procedure described previously (7). Approximately 0.2 ml of each clinical sample was resuspended in 800 µl of 200 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and 100 µl of guanidinium thiocyanate-EDTA-Sarkosyl (as described above). Then, 0.2 g of 0.18-mm-diameter glass beads (B. Braun Biotech International GmbH, Melsungen, Germany) was added, and homogenization performed for 30 s at 30 Hz in a Qiagen Mixer Mill 300 (Qiagen, Crawley, United Kingdom). Samples were heated to 70°C for 20 min and then placed on ice for 20 min, and beads and other debris were pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh microfuge tube, and NaCl (to a final concentration of 0.5 M) and polyethylene glycol (to a final concentration of 15%) were added. Samples were left to precipitate at 4°C for 1 h. DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature, and the pellet was resuspended in 300 µl of sterile distilled water. Next, 0.3 ml of Tris-buffered phenol (pH 8.0) was added to each sample before the tubes were vortexed vigorously. After centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 min, supernatants were transferred to fresh microfuge tubes. A further 0.3 ml of Tris-buffered phenol (pH 8.0)-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added, and the mixture was vortexed vigorously. After centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min, supernatants were precipitated by using an equal volume of isopropanol and a 1/10 volume of 10 M ammonium acetate for 1 h at -20°C. The pellets formed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature were washed three times in 70% ethanol. After being dried, pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of sterile distilled water and stored at -20°C. The extracted DNA was verified by TAE-agarose gel electrophoresis as described above.
DNA quantification. Extracted DNA was quantified on a CytoFluor series 4000 multiwell plate reader (PerSeptive Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) by using the PicoGreen DS DNA quantitation kit (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
LH-PCR amplification and profiling. (i) LH-PCR amplification. PCR products for LH-PCR analysis were amplified with the universal bacterial primers 8f-700IR (5'-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3') and 338r (5'-GCT GCC TCC CGT AGG AGT-3'), obtained from MWG-Biotech (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom), which are specific for 16S rDNA from 20 ng of extracted DNA (24, 33). Using these primers, an LH-PCR product size of 330 bases would be generated from E. coli (accession no. NC_000913). Primer 8f-700IR was labeled at the 5' end with IRD700; primer 338r was unlabeled. PCR mixtures were composed of 1x PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM concentrations of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 0.2 µM concentrations of each primer, and 1 U of REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, United Kingdom) in a final volume of 50 µl. After an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 2 min, samples were subjected to 32 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 56°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Amplification was carried out by using a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer, Beaconsfield, United Kingdom) with LH-PCR products stored at -20°C. Prior to LH-PCR analysis, the amplified PCR products were verified by TAE-agarose gel electrophoresis as described above.
(ii) LH-PCR analysis. Approximately 0.7 µg of the LH-PCR products was separated by length with a 25-cm SequagelXR denaturing acrylamide gel (National Diagnostics, Ashby de la Zouch, United Kingdom) prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions with the addition of 8.3 M urea and 10% (final concentration) formamide and a LI-COR IR2 automated DNA sequencer (LI-COR Biosciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at 55°C and 1,200 V. The gels were analyzed by using GeneimageIR v.3.56 (Scanalytics, Fairfax, Va.). When profile data were assessed, only peaks of >0.5% of the total lane signal were classified as bands for further analysis. The positions of these individual bands were calculated in relation to microSTEP 15a (700-nm) size marker (Microzone, Lewes, United Kingdom).
Cloning and sequence analysis of LH-PCR products. Samples of the LH-PCR products generated for LH-PCR analysis, as described above, were cloned with a pGEM-T Easy Vector system (Promega, Southampton, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was extracted from clones as follows: a single white colony was resuspended in 200 µl of sterile distilled water and then boiled for 10 min, with the cell debris pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 min. Then, 15 µl of the supernatant was added to a 50-µl (final volume) PCR mixture, comprising 1x PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.2 mM, each primer at a concentration of 0.2 µM, and 1 U of REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) in a final volume of 50 µl. Amplification was carried out with the primers gemsp6 (5'-GCT GCG ACT TCA CTA GTG AT-3') and gemt7-700IR (5'-GTG GCA GCG GGA ATT CGA T-3') (designed for the present study). Primer gemt7-700IR was labeled at the 5' end with IRD700; primer gemsp6 was unlabeled. An initial denaturation step of 94°C for 2 min was followed by 32 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 56°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Amplification was carried out by using a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer) with LH-PCR products stored at -20°C. Sequencing of individual clones was carried out by the Genetics Core Facility, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England. Sequences were analyzed by BLAST (1) (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) and by using the Ribosomal Database Project II (http://www.rdp.cme.msu.edu/html/). Sequences obtained in the present study are stored under accession numbers AJ491776 to AJ491780 and accession numbers AJ496326 to AJ496330.
T-RFLP amplification and profiling. (i) T-RFLP PCR product amplification. PCR products for T-RFLP analysis were amplified with the universal bacterial primers 8f-700IR and 926r (5'-CCG TCA ATT CCA TTT RAG TTT-3') specific for 16S rDNA from 20 ng of extracted DNA (24). Primer 8f700 was labeled at the 5'end with IRD700; primer 926r was unlabeled. PCR mixtures comprised 1x PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.2 mM, each primer at a concentration of 0.2 µM, and 1 U of REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) in a final volume of 50 µl. An initial denaturation step of 94°C for 2 min was followed by 32 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 56°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Amplification was carried out by using a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer) with PCR products for T-RFLP analysis stored at -20°C after verification on TAE-agarose gels as described above.
(ii) T-RFLP analysis. PCR products (ca. 20 ng) were digested by using the restriction endonuclease CfoI (Roche, Lewes, United Kingdom) for 3 h at 37°C with the reaction buffer supplied by the manufacturer. All restriction endonuclease digestions were carried out to complete digestion as shown by comparing PCR products after various digestion incubation times (data not shown). The restriction endonuclease was inactivated by heating at 90°C for 20 min. An approximately 0.7-µg portion of T-RFLP PCR products was separated by length by using a 25-cm SequagelXR denaturing acrylamide gel (National Diagnostics) prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, with the addition of 8.3 M urea and 10% (final concentration) formamide, and with a LI-COR IR2 automated DNA sequencer (LI-COR Biosciences) at 55°C and 1,200 V. The T-RFLP product size that would be generated under these conditions from E. coli (accession no. NC_000913) is 373 bases. The gels were analyzed with GeneimageIR v.3.56 (Scanalytics). When we assessed the profile data, only peaks of >0.5% of the total lane signal were classified as bands for further analysis. The positions of these individual bands were calculated in relation to the microSTEP 15a (700-nm) size marker (Microzone).
RESULTS |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
The DNA extracted from eight bacterial species was used to verify both LH-PCR and T-RFLP assays. The results of the LH-PCR analyses and the T-RFLP analyses for these eight species are shown in Fig. 1 and 2, respectively. Only one LH-PCR peak was produced by these bacterial strains (Fig. 1). The size of each bacterial species LH-PCR peak corresponded to the value for that species determined by in silico analysis (Table 1). Similarly, only one T-RFLP peak was produced by these bacterial strains (Fig. 2). The size of each bacterial T-RFLP species peak corresponded to the value for that species determined by in silico analysis (Table 1). These analyses were in addition performed for five clinical strains of both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. In each case, the LH-PCR and T-RFLP band sizes generated matched that obtained for each species by in silico analysis (data not shown). The same LH-PCR and T-RFLP protocols were then applied to the study of bronchoscopy and sputum samples taken from CF patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16S rDNA clone data. Table 3 shows the bacterial species that were identified through sequencing 16S rDNA PCR products amplified from DNA extracted directly from sputum samples and bronchoscopies sampled from five CF patients within the group of 14 studied above. Of these five samples, four were sputa and one was a bronchoscopy specimen. In all, 103 clones were examined. P. aeruginosa was the species most commonly identified; it was found in 61 of the 103 clones (59%) and also in every individual studied (Table 3). This finding correlates well with T-RFLP data that indicated that P. aeruginosa was present in each patient. S. maltophilia was also commonly detected by cloning (patients 8, 13, and 14 [Table 3]). Patients 13 and 14 were also found to have a band corresponding to S. maltophilia based on T-RFLP data generated from the same samples. Eight distinct bacterial species were detected in the 17 non-P. aeruginosa or non-S. maltophilia clones. Patients 8, 13, and 14, who had more than two bacterial species identified by 16S rDNA clone sequencing, were found to have more T-RFLP bands than patients 6 and 10.
|
DISCUSSION |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
T-RFLP profiling has been used to examine the total bacterial community in ecosystems as diverse as sludge, sand, termite guts (24), soil (13), a phenol bioreactor (17), the rhizosphere (35), and feces (21). Although T-RFLP profiling has been used in many different contexts, as far as we are aware the present study is the first application of this technique to a clinically important scenario.
Before these approaches were used to study the bacteria present in clinical samples, both T-RFLP and LH-PCR methodologies were verified by analyzing pure cultures of a range of bacterial species derived from clinical specimens. These preliminary studies showed that for both approaches, empirically derived data matched those derived from in silico analyses; for each species and approach, single discrete bands were generated that matched the size predicted by computer program (MapSort)-driven analyses. Other preliminary studies demonstrated that T-RFLP profiling could detect species when they were present at a level of 1% of the original template DNA (data not shown). This finding is in line with the detection limits observed in other molecular biological profiling studies; for example, a member of the total community present at 1% would be detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (29).
Of the two profiling approaches, T-RFLP provided much greater resolution of the bacterial community than did LH-PCR. Although LH-PCR has been used to examine the bacterial community in soil samples (33), this approach was of limited efficacy in determining either the bacterial species present or the overall diversity of bacteria in CF clinical samples, primarily due to the relatively small differences in amplicon length generated from different bacterial species. This finding also indicates that the diversity of the CF lung bacterial community is likely to be significantly lower than that found in soil bacterial communities. In addition to greater resolution of the bacterial community, T-RFLP analysis was able to assign a tentative bacterial species identity based on the sizes of the individual T-RFLP bands generated. These tentative bacterial species assignments could be strengthened either by performing T-RFLP with restriction endonucleases of distinct recognition sequences other than the CfoI used here or by comparison with 16S rDNA data from the same samples. The latter approach, sequence analysis of 16S rDNA clones generated from the same clinical samples, provided the main means of comparison with CfoI T-RFLP data. It is important that although analyzing individual bacterial 16S rDNA sequences cloned from mixed pools of PCR products has been extremely informative regarding the composition of a wide range of clinical and nonclinical environments, the clones that are sequenced can only represent a fraction of the total bacterial community in each sample. Profiling approaches are therefore valuable since they allow the range of sequence types to be displayed in a single electrophoretic run.
Species that were detected in these samples included those previously identified as CF pathogens, including P. aeruginosa. This species was present in every set of 16S rDNA clones studied. Moreover, a band corresponding to that produced by P. aeruginosa was present in every T-RFLP track. Bands corresponding to those produced by a range of other CF pathogens, including B. cepacia, S. aureus, H. influenzae, and S. maltophilia, were also detected by T-RFLP in a number of the CF patients sampled. In the case of S. maltophilia, it is possible that these bands may all or in part be due to F. gonidoformans, a species for which no pathogenic role in CF lung disease has yet been described. No evidence, however, except for S. maltophilia or F. gonidoformans, was found in the corresponding CF patient 16S rDNA cloning data for these species. This may indicate that, as has been shown in earlier studies, cloning can introduce biases when mixed pools of PCR products are used (39). It has, for example, been demonstrated that discrepancies between the numerical distribution of subgroups of methanogen sequences identified by either cloning or by T-RFLP analysis can occur (19).
Analysis of 16S rDNA clones did, however, identify a number of other bacterial species, namely, P. oris, F. gonidoformans, Bacteroides fragilis, Leptotrichia-like sp., A. defectiva, C. murliniae, Lautropia mirabilis, and Sarcina ventriculi. Certain of these organisms are considered to be oral-associated microbes (e.g., P. oris, Leptotrichia-like sp., etc.), others (e.g., L. mirabilis) have been reported as CF pathogens previously (3), and one species (A. defectiva) is associated with many different body sites (8). However, certain species, including C. murliniae, F. gonidoformans, B. fragilis (6), and S. ventriculi are considered to be of gut origin typically and are, as such, not associated with the lung. C. murliniae, in particular, has not been associated with CF patients with previously human-associated strains being isolated from stool, wound, blood, and urine samples (5). These species may therefore be "novel" potential CF pathogens. Whereas these species were found comparatively infrequently compared to Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas spp., these data support the conclusion drawn from T-RFLP analyses that diverse communities of bacteria are not uncommon in these environments. This may be particularly important given that mixed populations may be able to regulate gene expression in a coordinated manner within the bacterial biofilm in the CF lung (9, 22).
Many of the observed T-RFLP band positions could not be assigned to a bacterial species. This result may reflect the general lack of characterization of this ecosystem. Ongoing studies are currently characterizing these unassigned bands. The numbers of T-RFLP bands observed varied markedly between different patients, indicating that the bacterial communities present in these individuals were typically distinct. Further, it implies that there is no evidence for identically composed bacterial communities to be shared within this patient group. This raises interesting questions that will require further study to determine whether the variation in bacterial community diversity observed among these patients can be explained in terms of clinical parameters and in relation to the development of lung disease (34).
Two types of clinical samples, bronchoscopy and sputa, from CF patients were evaluated here. As with any process of recovering clinical samples from the lung, it is possible that sample contamination occurred with microbes from other body sites either during expectoration or, potentially less so, through introduction and removal of the bronchoscope. Efforts were taken to minimize this potential error by, for example, washing samples prior to DNA extraction. Moreover, it has been shown that the contribution of oropharyngeal bacteria to the analysis by cultivation of sputa sampled from CF patients is not significant (15). More diversity was observed in T-RFLP profiles from sputum samples compared to bronchoscopy samples. This cannot be interpreted as meaning that sputa were inherently more diverse however because of the overall low number of samples and the particular lack of paired sputum and bronchoscopy samples from the same patient.
As with all PCR-based methods, biases can be introduced in terms primarily of the initial DNA extraction step and the PCR process itself. To minimize these biases, we used protocols here that have already been used successfully to extract DNA and amplify sequences from complex microbial communities (7). It is also important to note that data from any analytical technique that examines 16S rDNA can be influenced by the different number of copies of ribosomal operons in different species in terms of the number of clones or relative intensities of bands profiled (14).
Compared to traditional culture-based analyses, however, T-RFLP is much more rapid in providing information on the composition of the bacterial community: DNA extraction, PCR, restriction endonuclease digestion, and electrophoretic separation and analysis can be completed within a 12-h period. There are many cases in which this rapidity could be of critical importance in terms of clinical diagnosis. Moreover, the speed and accuracy of T-RFLP will allow the impact of therapeutic interventions to be assessed and altered as required. The additional strength of this approach over other molecular biology-based diagnostic tools, such as gene microarrays, is that it allows any novel or "unexpected" species to be detected and as such is not limited by preconceptions as to what bacteria are important in a given system. Recent studies have shown the importance of this in analyzing CF-associated bacteria (10, 31).
Culturing bacteria from CF specimens remains important both diagnostically and as a resource for subsequent genotypic analyses. It is likely, however, that combined culture and molecular biology-based methodologies will become increasingly important. Of these molecular methodologies, T-RFLP analysis has been shown here to be valuable in determining bacterial community diversity in samples from CF patients. Moreover, it is a flexible technique that will have many applications to the study of other important infections.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
We also acknowledge the generous support of the Molecular Psychiatry Unit of University College London.
REFERENCES |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|