Literature
Home医源资料库在线期刊中风学杂志2005年第36卷第2期

Blood Pressure and Vessel Recanalization in the First Hours After Ischemic Stroke

来源:中风学杂志
摘要:Recanalizationwasdeterminedoncerebralarteriographyafterthrombolysisusingthrombolysisinmyocardialinfarctiongrades。Bloodpressurelevelsarepositivelyandcontinuouslyassociatedwiththeriskofstrokeinalog-linearfashionforfirst-everandrecurrentstroke。Bloodpressure(BP......

点击显示 收起

    the Departments of Neurology (H.P.M., L.K., M.A., U.F.), Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (K.N., L.R., G.S.), and Intensive Care Medicine (S.M.J.), University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

    Abstract

    Background and Purpose— Transient elevation of arterial blood pressure (BP) is frequent in acute ischemic stroke and may help to increase perfusion of tissue jeopardized by ischemia. If this is true, recanalization may eliminate the need for this BP elevation.

    Methods— We analyzed BP in 149 patients with acute ischemic stroke on admission to the hospital and 1 and 12 hours after intraarterial thrombolysis. BP values of patients with adequate recanalization were compared with BP values of patients with inadequate recanalization. Recanalization was determined on cerebral arteriography after thrombolysis using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grades.

    Results— Systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial BP decreased significantly from admission to 12 hours after thrombolysis in all patients (P<0.001). Before thrombolysis, patients with adequate and inadequate recanalization showed equal systolic (147.4 and 148.0 mm Hg), mean (102.1 and 104.1 mm Hg), and diastolic (79.5 and 82.1 mm Hg) BP values. Twelve hours after thrombolysis, patients with adequate recanalization had lower values than those with inadequate recanalization (systolic BP, 130 versus 139.9 mm Hg; mean BP, 86.8 versus 92.2 mm Hg; and diastolic, BP 65.2 versus 68.3 mm Hg). Two-way repeated ANOVA analysis showed a significant group x time interaction for systolic BP, indicating a larger systolic BP decrease when recanalization succeeded (P=0.019).

    Conclusion— The course of elevated systolic but not diastolic BP after acute ischemic stroke was found to be inversely associated with the degree of vessel recanalization. When recanalization failed, systolic BP remained elevated longer than when it succeeded.

    Key Words: blood pressure  stroke, acute

    Introduction

    Hypertension is the most prevalent modifiable risk factor for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Approximately two-thirds of the cerebrovascular disease burden are attributable to nonoptimum blood pressure (BP). Blood pressure levels are positively and continuously associated with the risk of stroke in a log-linear fashion for first-ever and recurrent stroke.1,2 Lowering BP reduces the risk, both in primary and secondary prevention, and larger reductions in BP produce larger reductions in stroke risk.3

    Up to 80% of patients show elevated BP values within the first 24 to 48 hours after stroke onset, which subside over the next few days or weeks.4 However, unlike the well-established knowledge of BP management to prevent stroke, few data are available about handling BP in the acute setting. The pathophysiology of high BP in acute stroke is complex and poorly understood, and there is a lack of adequate evidence to guide therapeutic decisions. Thrombotic or embolic occlusion of a cerebral artery is the cause of acute ischemic stroke and therefore also the first link in the pathogenetic chain of BP elevation. Therefore, the reverse should also be true. If the occluded vessel is recanalized, BP should decline more rapidly than with persistent occlusion. To verify or reject this hypothesis, we correlated BP values and the grade of recanalization in a series of patients who were treated with intraarterial thrombolysis.

    See Editorial Comment, page 268

    Materials and Methods

    January 2000 to December 2003, 160 patients with acute ischemic stroke were treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) at our institution. Many aspects of some of these patients and the technique used for IAT have been published previously.5–7 All patients were evaluated by a neurologist after arrival at the emergency department and a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan was obtained to rule out hemorrhage or other nonischemic causes of the ictus, patients underwent arteriography, and, if feasible (and visible artery occlusion on arteriography), thrombolysis. When BP exceeded 185/110 mm Hg antihypertensive agents were given. The first-line agent was labetalol. Second-line drugs were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists and rarely nitroglycerine or nitroprusside. After thrombolysis, all patients were transferred to the intensive care unit and usually 1 day later (mean, 1.2 days) to the department of neurology, internal medicine, or a regional hospital.

    For this study we collected BP recordings of the 160 patients at admission and at 1 and 12 hours after thrombolysis. BP was measured with the traditional Riva Rocci method using an arm cuff and a sphygmomanometer. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) values were noted and mean BP (MBP) values were calculated according to the formula MBP=DBP+1/3 (SBP–DBP).8 The BP values were correlated with the degree of vessel recanalization as seen on the angiographic films at the end of thrombolysis. Eleven of the 160 patients had to be excluded from this analysis, because the BP recordings at admission (n=4) or after thrombolysis could not be retrieved (n=6), or because of death before 12 hours after thrombolysis (n=1). After exclusion of the patients with missing data, 149 patients remained in the study (72 women and 77 men). In 17 patients the internal carotid artery, in 64 the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, in 25 the M2 segment, and in 17 the M3/M4 segments, in 1 the anterior cerebral artery, in 1 the posterior cerebral artery, and in 24 patients the basilar artery were occluded. The BP values at admission were extracted from the patient records of the emergency department before thrombolysis. The intensive care unit documents furnished the 1- and 12-hour BP readings after thrombolysis. In addition, all the patient records including the documents from the emergency department and the intensive care unit were screened for use of antihypertensive agents given before, during, or within 12 hours after thrombolysis. The admitting neurologist at the emergency room who assessed the patient before therapy provided the information about the severity of the stroke based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The neurologist also noted whether patients had a history of hypertension and whether they were taking antihypertensive agents. The historical information on hypertension was double-checked with the charts of all the patients during their subsequent hospital stay, and for patients who were unable to provide details on hypertension in the course of the emergency situation, this information was collected from the charts during their subsequent hospital stay, from family members, or from the family physician.

    The effect of thrombolysis, ie, the degree of vessel recanalization as seen on arteriography, was classified according to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grades: TIMI 0=no recanalization, TIMI 1=minimal recanalization, TIMI 2=partial recanalization, and TIMI 3=complete recanalization.9 For comparison of recanalization and BP course, we divided patients into 2 groups. Patients with TIMI grades 2 and 3 were classified into the group with "adequate recanalization" and patients with TIMI grades 0 and 1 as "inadequate recanalization."

    Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 10 for MacIntosh statistical software (SPSS Inc, 2001). To analyze BP course from admission to 12 hours after thrombolysis in general, the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used. After separating patients according to vessel recanalization, the homogeneity of the 2 groups was checked with Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables and 2 tests for categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the admission BP values of patients with adequate and those with inadequate recanalization. To investigate the time course of BP values, we performed a repeated measure variance analysis (2-way repeated ANOVA; between: group [adequate recanalization/inadequate recanalization]; within: time [admission/1 hour/12 hours]) with tests of within-subject contrasts as post-hoc test. To test a possible influence of previous hypertension in the groups with adequate and inadequate recanalization, a covariance analysis with correction for preexisting hypertension was performed. To rule out the effect of antihypertensive agents, some analyses were performed separately for patients who did not receive such agents before, during, or after thrombolysis. Last, a logistic regression analysis was performed to search for predictors of outcome.

    Results

    The demography of the patients is given in Table 1. The mean and median intervals from symptom onset to intra-arterial treatment were 271 and 262 minutes, respectively. Fourteen patients were treated within <180 minutes and 12 (9 with basilar artery and 3 anterior circulation strokes) were treated >360 minutes after symptom onset. Mean SBP at admission was 148 mm Hg (SD, 24.8), mean MBP was 103 mm Hg (SD, 16.4), and mean DBP was 80 mm Hg (SD, 15.1). SBP was elevated (>140 mm Hg) in 92 and DBP was elevated (>90 mm Hg) in 46 patients. SBP or DBP or both were increased in 95 patients (63.8%). The strokes were on average fairly severe (mean NIHSS score, 15.8). Thrombolysis achieved adequate recanalization in 98 patients (65.8%). Patients with adequate and inadequate recanalization did not differ regarding age, sex, stroke severity, time from symptom onset to treatment, frequency of hypertension, or use of antihypertensive agents. The localization of vessel occlusions did not show any association with the BP.

    The SBP, MBP, and DBP of the 149 patients decreased significantly from admission to 12 hours after thrombolysis (P<0.001) (Table 2 and Figure). The BP decline was 14.2, 14.2, and 14.1 mm Hg for the 3 variables. At admission there was no significant difference of SBP, MBP, or DBP between patients with adequate and those with inadequate recanalization (P>0.05 for all 3 variables). One hour after thrombolysis, patients with adequate recanalization tended to have lower BP values than patients with inadequate recanalization. The absolute SBP decline from admission to 12 hours after thrombolysis was larger in patients with adequate recanalization compared with patients with inadequate recanalization. The 2-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant group x time interaction for SBP, indicating a larger SBP decline in the group with adequate recanalization within 12 hours after therapy (P=0.019). With 2-way repeated measures ANOVA with tests of within-subject contrasts as post-hoc test, the resulting probability values were P=0.034 for SBP and P=0.871 for DBP. After correction for previous hypertonia, the group x time interaction term for SBP remained significant in covariance analysis (P=0.019). For MBP and DBP, the result was not significant.

    Blood pressure (BP) course after acute ischemic stroke (black=patients with inadequate recanalization; gray=patients with adequate recanalization). Systolic, mean, and diastolic BP decreased significantly from admission to 12 hours after thrombolysis (P<0.001). Two-way repeated ANOVA analysis showed a significant group x time interaction for systolic BP (P=0.019) but not for diastolic BP. This indicates a larger systolic BP decline within 12 hours after treatment when recanalization succeeded.

    Of the 149 patients, 123 (84 [85.7%] with adequate and 39 [76.5%] with inadequate recanalization) did not receive any antihypertensive drugs from admission to 12 hours after thrombolysis (Table 3). The BP decline showed the same characteristics as in the whole group of 149 patients. There was no association between BP at admission or 12 hours after thrombolysis and severity of stroke measured with the NIHSS. Clinical outcome assessed with the modified Rankin scale 3 months after the stroke was better in patients with adequate recanalization (P=0.005, Mann-Whitney test). However, there was no association between the absolute BP decline and outcome (P>0.05). A logistic regression analysis found that independent predictors of poor outcome (Rankin, 3 to 6) were age (P=0.014), NIHSS at admission (P<0.001), and the degree of vessel recanalization (P=0.041). BP, BP on admission, BP 12 hours after therapy, and BP decline between admission and 12 hours after thrombolysis did not predict outcome (P>0.05 for all parameters).

    Discussion

    A systematic review of high BP in acute stroke and subsequent outcome showed that death, dependency, and the risk of stroke recurrence were more likely in ischemic stroke patients with higher BP values.10 In addition, low BP is an independent prognostic risk factor for poor outcome after stroke. Prognosis is worse in patients with extreme BP values at both ends of the spectrum, indicating a J- or U-shaped relationship between BP and outcome in acute stroke.11 The relationship appears to be mediated above all by increased rates of early recurrence and early death resulting from presumed cerebral edema in patients with high BP and noncerebral mechanisms such as increased coronary heart disease events in those with low BP.12

    A transient elevation of arterial BP is observed in up to 80% of patients with acute ischemic stroke.10,12,–15 In our series, BP at admission was elevated in 95 patients (63.8%). In addition, in acute stroke the circadian BP rhythm is disrupted, and there is a reduced physiological night-time pressure decline.16 The underlying mechanisms of this BP elevation and dysregulation are poorly understood. One of many possible reasons might be a locally disturbed autoregulation of cerebral blood flow within the ischemic penumbra.17 If cerebrovascular autoregulation is lost, perfusion becomes a linear function of BP.18,19 In this case, poststroke hypertension may aim to enhance the perfusion in the penumbra to save the tissue jeopardized by ischemia. From this we derived the hypothesis that recanalization, which will likely help to reperfuse the ischemic tissue, lowers BP elevation more rapidly than BP declines in patients with persistent occlusion of the cerebral vessel.

    Our results indicate a relationship between BP course and vessel recanalization. When thrombolysis succeeded to reopen the occluded vessel responsible for the stroke, SBP 12 hours after thrombolysis declined significantly faster than when recanalization failed. Recanalization also improved the clinical outcome of our patients, a relationship that has been shown previously by other investigators as well.5,7,20–22 Therefore, our results may explain clinical observations published earlier. First, poor recanalization, slower BP decline, and subsequent unfavorable outcome are related to each other. Second, a greater decline of mean arterial BP from admission to the second day increased the chances of full recovery.8 Because a full recovery is more likely with recanalization, our findings of a greater BP decline associated with adequate recanalization are in line with this observation. Third, elevated 24-hour SBP values in the acute stroke period were shown to be associated with brain edema and brain edema with poor recanalization.8,23 However, brain edema was less frequent in patients with a greater BP decline, which is consistent with our finding that the downhill course of elevated BP after stroke is accelerated with recanalization.23

    The natural response of the organism to persistent vessel occlusion in the acute stroke phase seems to keep the BP elevated, whereas the physiological course after recanalization is a pressure decline and more rapid return toward prestroke levels than in stroke victims with persistent vessel occlusions. A cautious conclusion is that BP elevation may be needed to help perfuse salvageable tissue and to minimize the ischemic damage, as has been supposed decades ago.19 This supports current guidelines of acute stroke management that caution BP lowering in the acute phase of stroke. An adverse effect of BP-lowering has been observed in a recent case series in which 59% of the patients received antihypertensive medication within 24 hours of stroke onset.24 Acute stroke trials using vaso-active drugs such as beta-receptor antagonists and calcium channel blockers have resulted in neurological worsening with lowering BP.25,26 Furthermore, our findings support advocates who stop antihypertensive agents in acute stroke or even raise BP. Both animal studies and small randomized trials in humans that induced BP elevation seem to be promising to reduce the ischemic damage. They encourage larger-scale trials.27,28

    In conclusion, our study demonstrates a relationship between SBP elevation in the first hours after stroke and patency of the initially occluded vessel. In acute stroke patients, elevated SBP at admission shows a downward course in the following hours, which is accelerated by recanalization, and recanalization increases the chances of a favorable outcome.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Pietro Ballinari, PhD, for statistical advice.

    This study was supported by a grant of the stroke section of the Swiss Heart Foundation and also by the Stiftung zur Frderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung an der Universitt Bern.

    References

    MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, Abbott R, Godwin J, Dyer A, Stamler J. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease—part 1. Prolonged differences in blood pressure. Prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990; 355: 765–774.

    Rodgers A, MacMahon S, Gamble G, Slattery J, Sandercock P, Warlow C, for the United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack Collaborative Group. Blood pressure and risk of stroke in patients with cerebrovascular disease. BMJ. 1996; 313: 147.

    Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003; 362: 1527–1535.

    Bath P, Chalmers J, Powers W, Beilin L, Davis S, Lenfant C, Mancia G, Neal B, Whitworth J, Zanchetti A, for the International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. International Society of Hypertension (ISH): statement on the management of blood pressure in acute stroke. J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 665–672.

    Arnold M, Schroth G, Nedeltchev K, Loher TJ, Stepper F, Remonda L, Sturzenegger M, Mattle H. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 100 patients with acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1828–1833.

    Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Mattle HP, Loher TJ, Stepper F, Schroth G, Brekenfeld C, Sturzenegger M, Remonda L. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 24 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery T-occlusions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 2003; 74: 739–742.

    Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Schroth G, Baumgartner RW, Remonda L, Loher TJ, Stepper F, Sturzenegger M, Schuknecht B, Mattle HP. Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalization and outcome in 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75: 857–862.

    Chamorro A, Vila N, Ascaso C, Elices E, Schonewille W, Blanc R. Blood pressure and functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1850–1853.

    The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 932–936.

    Willmot M, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PMW. High blood pressure in acute stroke and subsequent outcome. A systematic review. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 18–24.

    Farnett L, Mulrow CD, Linn WD, Lucey CR, Tuley MR. The J-curve phenomenon and the treatment of hypertension: is there a point beyond which pressure reduction is dangerous JAMA. 1991; 265: 489–495.

    Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PMW, Phillips SJ, Sandercock PAG for the IST Collaborative Group. Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1315–1320.

    Wallace JD, Levy LL. Blood pressure after stroke. JAMA. 1981; 246: 2177–2180.

    Britton M, Carlsson A, de Faire U. Blood pressure course in patients with acute stroke and matched controls. Stroke. 1986; 17: 861–864.

    Jrgensen HS, Nakayama H, Christensen HR, Raaschou HO, Kampmann JP, Olsen TS. Blood pressure in acute stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002; 13: 204–209.

    Dawson SL, Evans SN, Manktelow BN, Fotherby MD, Robinson TG, Potter JF. Diurnal blood pressure change varies with stroke subtype in the acute phase. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1519–1524.

    Baron JC. Perfusion thresholds in human cerebral ischemia: historical perspective and therapeutic implications. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 11 (Suppl 1): 2–8.

    Meyer JS, Shimazu K, Fukuuchi Y, Ohuchi T, Okamoto S, Koto A, Ericsson AD. Impaired neurogenic cerebrovascular control and dysautoregulation after stroke. Stroke. 1973; 4: 169–186.

    Skyhj Olsen T, Larsen B, Herning M, Skriver EB, Lassen N. Blood flow and vascular reactivity in collaterally perfused brain tissue. Stroke. 1983; 14: 332–401.

    Jansen O, Schellinger P, Fiebach J, Hacke W, Sartor K. Early recanalisation in acute ischaemic stroke saves tissue at risk defined by MRI. Lancet. 1999; 353: 2036–2037.

    Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, Pessin M, Ahuja A, Callahan F, Clark MW, Silver F, Rivera F, for the PROACT investigators. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial: Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2003–20011.

    Neumann-Haefelin T, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Fiebach JB, Gass A, Nolte C, Kucinnski T, Rther J, Siebler M, Singer OC, Szabo K, Villringer A, Schellinger PD, for the Kompetenznetz Schlaganfall. Effect of incomplete (spontaneous and postthrombolytic) recanalization after middle cerebral artery occlusion. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2004; 35: 109–115.

    Vemmos KN, Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K, Vassilopoulos D, Mavrikakis M. Association between 24-h blood pressure monitoring variables and brain oedema in patients with hyperacute stroke. J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 2167–2173.

    Oliveira-Filho J, Silva SCS, Trabuco CC, Pedreira BB, Sousa EU, Bacellar A. Detrimental effect of blood pressure reduction in the first 24 hours after stroke onset. Neurology. 2003; 61: 1047–1051.

    Barer DH, Cruickshank JM, Ebrahim SB, Mitchell JR. Low dose beta blockade in acute stroke (‘BEST trial’): An evaluation. BMJ. 1988; 296: 737–741.

    Ahmed N, Nsman P, Wahlgren NG. Effect of intravenous nimodipine on blood pressure and outcome after acute stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1250–1255.

    Rordorf G, Koroshetz W, Ezzedine MA, Segal AZ, Buonanno FS. A pilot study of drug-induced hypertension for treatment of acute stroke. Neurology. 2001; 56: 1210–1213.

    Hillis AE, Ulatowski JA, Barker PB, Torbey M, Ziai W, Beauchamp NJ, Oh S, Wityk RJ. A pilot randomized trial of induced blood pressure elevation: effects on function and focal perfusion in acute and subacute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 16 236–246.

作者: Heinrich P. Mattle, MD; Liliane Kappeler, MD; Marc 2007-5-14
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具