Literature
Home医源资料库在线期刊中风学杂志2005年第36卷第10期

Small Vessel Disease and General Cognitive Function in Nondisabled Elderly

来源:中风学杂志
摘要:GeneralcognitivefunctionwasassessedusingtheMiniMentalStateExamination(MMSE)andthemodifiedAlzheimerDiseaseAssessmentScale(ADAS)。Smallvesseldiseaseisimplicatedinvasculardementia。Forthepresentstudy,generalcognitivefunctionwasmeasuredusingtheMiniMentalState......

点击显示 收起

    the Alzheimer Center (W.M.v.d.F., E.C.W.v.S., F.B., P.S.) and the Departments of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., E.C.W.v.S., P.S.) and Radiology (F.B.), and the Image Analysis Centre (IAC) (E.C.W.v.S., F.B.), Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    the Servio de Neurologia (A.V., S.M.), Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal
    the Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences (L.P., D.I.), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
    the Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences (T.E.), Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
    the Neurotec Department, Section of Clinical Geriatrics (M.C.), Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
    the Memory Disorders Research Unit, Department of Neurology (F.W.), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    the Department of Neurology and MRI Institute (R.S., F.F.), Medical University, Graz, Austria.

    Abstract

    Background and Purpose— On cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and lacunes are generally viewed as evidence of small vessel disease. The clinical significance of small vessel disease in terms of global cognitive function has as yet not been completely clarified. We investigated the independent contribution of WMH and lacunes to general cognitive function in a group of independently living elderly with varying degrees of small vessel disease.

    Methods— Data were drawn from the multicenter, multinational Leukokraurosis and Disability (LADIS) study. There were 633 independently living participants. General cognitive function was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the modified Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS). On MRI, WMH was rated as mild, moderate, or severe. Lacunes were rated as none, few (1 to 3), or many (4 or more).

    Results— In the basic analysis, increasing severity of both WMH and lacunes was related to deteriorating score on the MMSE and ADAS. When WMH and lacunes were entered simultaneously, both MRI measures remained significantly associated with MMSE score. Increasing severity of WMH remained associated with ADAS score, whereas the association with lacunes became less prominent. These associations were independent of other risk factors for dementia, like education, depression, vascular risk factors, or stroke.

    Conclusion— We found WMH and lacunes to be independently associated with general cognitive function in a sample of independently living elderly. These results highlight the fact that WMH and lacunes should both be evaluated when assessing small vessel disease in relation to cognitive function.

    Key Words: cognition  elderly  lacunes  small vessel disease  white matter hyperintensities

    Introduction

    Cerebrovascular disease encompasses both (large vessel) cortical ischemic and hemorrhagic infarcts and subcortical small vessel disease. Although it is generally accepted that cortical stroke may cause cognitive impairment, the clinical significance of small vessel disease in terms of global cognitive function has as yet not been completely clarified. On cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and lacunes, both of which are frequently observed in the elderly, are generally viewed as evidence of small vessel disease.1–4 Associations with vascular risk factors have been shown for both WMH and lacunes, providing circumstantial support for the view that these MRI abnormalities reflect small vessel disease.5–10

    There is increasing attention for the importance of small vessel disease as a predictor of cognitive decline and dementia. Small vessel disease is implicated in vascular dementia.11,12 Moreover, it seems to amplify the effects of pathologic changes of Alzheimer disease.13–15 Subtle associations between WMH and cognitive impairment have been reported in nondemented elderly.5,16,17 The cognitive correlates of lacunes have received less attention. Results are conflicting, because some authors report associations with cognitive impairment, whereas others do not.9,18,19 In addition, the relative impact of WMH and lacunes on cognitive impairment is not known.

    In the present study, we investigated the independent contribution of WMH and lacunes to general cognitive function in a group of independently living elderly with varying degrees of small vessel disease.

    Materials and Methods

    Data were drawn from the multicenter, multinational Leukoaraiosis and Disability (LADIS) study. The LADIS project prospectively studies the role of WMH as an independent predictor of the transition to disability in nondisabled elderly.20 In short, 639 elderly subjects, who had no or only mild disability in their instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and were stratified for grade of WMH severity, were enrolled. Subjects presented for evaluation in the following settings: stroke units or stroke departments, cerebrovascular disease clinics, memory or dementia clinics, neurologic or geriatric wards/clinics, population studies on aging, and controls in other studies. Among the reasons for presentation were mild memory loss, minor motor disturbances, minor focal cerebrovascular events, or nonspecific reasons for undergoing a cranial neuroimaging study (WMH as incidental finding). To be included, subjects had to have: (1) age between 65 and 84 years; (2) WMH on MRI of any degree, according to the categorization into the 3 severity classes of the Fazekas scale,21 (3) no or only mild disability as determined by the IADL scale22; (4) presence of a regularly contactable informant; and (5) agreement to sign an informed consent. Exclusion criteria were: (1) likely dropout because of the presence of severe illnesses (cardiac, hepatic, or renal failure, cancer or other relevant systemic diseases), (2) severe unrelated neurologic diseases, (3) leukoencephalopathy of nonvascular origin (immunologic–demyelinating, metabolic, toxic, infectious, other), (4) severe psychiatric disorders, (5) inability to give informed consent, and (6) inability or refusal to undergo cerebral MRI. Subjects are currently followed up for 3 years with repeated clinical and MRI studies. The present article is based on the baseline data of the LADIS project.

    All subjects were assessed using clinical and functional tests, including global functioning, cognitive, motor, psychiatric, and quality-of-life measures. For the present study, general cognitive function was measured using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)23 and a modified version of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS).24 The ADAS was slightly modified to include the item "delayed word recall." A higher MMSE score indicates better performance, whereas a higher ADAS score corresponds to worse performance. ADAS score was missing in 6 subjects, so 633 subjects had available data for the present study. The following variables were evaluated as confounders: age, sex, education (years), depressive symptoms,25 motor function,26,27 hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and history of stroke.

    All subjects were studied by MRI following a standard protocol on the same day as the clinical investigation. Scans were made on a 0.5-T (one center) or 1.5-T scanner (10 centers) and were collected centrally at the Image Analysis Centre (IAC) of the Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam. Imaging guidelines were distributed among all centers, specifying naming convention and scan positioning. To check and maintain quality, dummy runs were requested before the beginning of the study and in case of upgrades. Data transfer was electronic through FTP. The MR protocol included the following sequences: T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE (magnetization prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo, scan parameters: coronal or sagittal plane, field of view 250 mm, matrix 256x256 or 512x512, slice thickness: 1 mm [isotropic voxels], TE: 2 to 7 ms, TR: 9 to 26 ms, FA 10% to 30%), T2-weighted FSE (fast spin echo, scan parameters: axial plane, FOV 250 mm, matrix 256x256 or 512x512, slice thickness: 5 mm, interslice gap 0.5 mm, TE: 100 to 130 ms, TR: 4000 to 8000 ms), and FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, scan parameters: axial plane, FOV 250 mm, matrix 256x256 or 512x512, slice thickness: 5 mm, interslice gap 0.5 mm, TE: 100 to 160 ms, TR: 6000 to 10000 ms, TI: 2000 to 2400). Visual ratings of WMH and counts of lacunes were performed centrally by a single rater (ECWvS) who was blind to clinical details. The degree of WMH severity was rated visually on axial FLAIR images using the Fazekas scale as grade 1 (punctate), grade 2 (early confluent), or grade 3 (confluent).21 Lacunes were defined as hypointense foci of 3 mm on MPRAGE that were surrounded by white matter or subcortical gray matter and not located in areas with a high prevalence of widened perivascular spaces (eg, anterior commissure, vertex).28 The number of lacunes was recoded into none, few (1 to 3 lacunes), and many (4 lacunes or more). The intrarater reliability of rating of WMH was determined on 18 randomly selected scans that were scored twice (weighted Cohen =0.84). Interrater reliabilities and intrarater reliability of lacunes were not determined.

    Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for windows (release 11.5). Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between WMH and lacunes. The strength of the associations between small vessel disease and cognitive measures was assessed using partial correlations, correcting for age and sex. Associations between small vessel disease and general cognitive function were assessed using general linear models for MMSE and ADAS separately. WMH and lacunes were entered as continuous variables. Age and sex were entered as covariates in all models. First, basic associations between general cognitive function and WMH and between general cognitive function and lacunes were assessed. Subsequently, WMH and lacunes were entered simultaneously to assess their independent contribution to cognitive function. The interaction between WMH and lacunes was tested. Because 11 different centers participate in the LADIS project, it is conceivable that center of origin acts as a confounder in the association between small vessel disease and cognition. Therefore, center of origin was entered as a factor in the GLM. Additional corrections were made for education, depressive symptoms, motor function, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and a history of stroke.

    Results

    Characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The number of lacunes increased with the severity of WMH (Spearman r=0.25, P<0.001; Figure 1).

    General linear models were performed for WMH and lacunes separately, correcting for age and sex and with the MMSE and the ADAS as dependent variable. In these basic models, WMH and lacunes each were associated with score on the MMSE and ADAS (MMSE-WMH: [se]=–0.48 [0.12], P<0.001; MMSE-lacunes: [se]=–0.62 [0.14]), P<0.001, ADAS-WMH: [se]=1.31 [0.35], P<0.001; ADAS-lacunes: [se]=1.12 [0.41], P=0.007, Figure 2). Partial correlations corrected for age and sex were –0.16 and –0.18 (both P<0.001) for MMSE with WMH and lacunes, respectively, and 0.15 (P<0.001) and 0.11 (P=0.007) for ADAS with WMH and lacunes.

    To assess the independent effect of WMH and lacunes on general cognitive function, both variables were entered simultaneously into general linear models (Table 2). Increasing WMH and lacunes were independently associated with a lower score on the MMSE. With increasing severity of WMH, the performance on the ADAS deteriorated. In the multivariate model, increasing severity of lacunes tended to be associated with worse performance on the ADAS, but this association was less prominent. There was no interaction between lacunes and WMH. The interaction term was therefore left out of subsequent analyses. Correction for possible confounders left results largely unaltered. Results did not change after exclusion of subjects with an infarct other than a lacune on MRI.

    Discussion

    The main finding of the current study is that WMH and lacunes are independently associated with general cognitive function in a large sample of nondisabled elderly subjects.

    Small vessel disease is prevalent among the elderly.29,30 Several population-based studies have shown before that, small vessel disease may cause subtle cognitive deficits in nondemented subjects.5,9,16,17 In the present study, we demonstrated that both WMH and lacunes independently influence cognitive function. We found only a moderate correlation between WMH and lacunes, supporting the view that they are 2 distinct expressions of small vessel disease. Lacunar infarcts are produced when the ischemic damage is focal and of sufficient severity to result in a small area of necrosis.12 They are largely confined to the cerebral white matter and subcortical structures, including the basal ganglia, thalamus, and brain stem. In contrast, diffuse WMH, considered to be a form of rarefaction or incomplete infarction, are usually widespread.

    In the present study, we defined small vessel disease as WMH and lacunes on MRI. Although these MRI abnormalities are generally considered as measures of small vessel disease, they have in fact variable pathologic correlates.1–3,31 Arteriolosclerosis has been reported to be the primary factor in the pathogenesis of WMH in the elderly. Alternatively, WMH may have as diverse pathologic correlates as loss of myelin, axons, and oligodendroglial cells, dilatation of perivascular spaces, and mild reactive astrocytic gliosis.

    There have been a few studies evaluating the simultaneous effect of WMH and lacunes in a sample of subjects with a broad range of cognitive impairment.19,32,33 In these studies, WMH were found to be related to cognitive impairment, but there were no independent associations between lacunes and cognitive dysfunction. In addition, there has been a large population-based study assessing risk factors and functional consequence of lacunes that showed associations between lacunes and cognitive function, even after correction for WMH.9 In the present study, we demonstrated both lacunes and WMH to be associated with general cognitive function as measured using the MMSE. Scores on the ADAS were related to WMH and lacunes in the basic analysis. However, the association between ADAS score and lacunes was not independent of WMH, although associations remained borderline significant. Insufficient power may be partly responsible for the disappearance of the significant association, because the variability in ADAS is larger than the variability in MMSE. Furthermore, ADAS and MMSE are both widely used tests of general cognitive function. The fact that even with these relatively crude measures, clear associations with small vessel disease were observed, underlines the clinical relevance of both WMH and lacunes. However, it is conceivable that tests of cognitive functions specifically associated with small vessel disease such as mental speed and executive function may yield even stronger associations with WMH and lacunes.

    Among the strengths of the present study is the large sample size. Each subject underwent MRI scanning. All scans were analyzed centrally, which guaranteed reliability of MRI measures. Patients were selected to represent a broad range of WMH, enabling us to assess the subtle associations of small vessel disease and cognitive function. Among the limitations of the study may be the subject selection. Subjects were identified mainly in a hospital or secondary/tertiary referral setting. The study sample was selected to represent the full range of severity of WMH. Although stratification by WMH may hamper the generalizability of the results to the general population, the reasons for referral were those commonly leading to discover WMH in elderly persons, so that the LADIS sample likely reflects the assorted patient population with WMH encountered in everyday clinical practice. Because subjects were selected to be nondisabled, we were not able to evaluate the full spectrum of cognitive impairment. Subjects were allowed to have minor problems such as mild memory loss or minor motor disturbances. However, because subjects were required to be nondisabled, subjects with fullfledged dementia were not eligible. Consequently, we may even have underestimated the strength of the associations between small vessel disease and cognitive function. Another limitation is the fact that we did not include a measure of cerebral gray matter volume. Therefore, it is conceivable that the reported associations are the result of global or regional atrophy rather than ischemic changes. The cross-sectional setting of the present study prevents inferences on the causality of the reported associations. Further research is currently being performed to determine the contribution of small vessel disease to cognitive decline over time.

    In conclusion, we found WMH and lacunes to be independently associated with cognitive function in a sample of independently living elderly. These results provide further evidence for the importance of small vessel disease in cognitive impairment at old age, and they highlight the fact that WMH and lacunes should both be evaluated when assessing small vessel disease in relation to cognitive function.

    Appendix

    List of Participating Centers and Personnel

    Helsinki, Finland (Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Helsinki University): Timo Erkinjuntti, MD, PhD, Tarja Pohjasvaara, MD, PhD, Pia Pihanen, MD, Raija Ylikoski, PhD, Hanna Jokinen, LPsych, Meija-Marjut Somerkoski, Mpsych, Riitta Mntyl, MD, PhD; Graz, Austria (Department of Neurology and MRI Institute, Medical University): Franz Fazekas, MD, Reinhold Schmidt, MD, Stefan Ropele, PhD, Alexandra Seewann, MD, Katja Petrovic, MagPsychol, Ulrike Garmehi; Lisboa, Portugal (Servio de Neurologia, Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Hospital de Santa Maria): José M. Ferro, MD, PhD, Ana Verdelho, MD, Sofia Madureira, PsyD; Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Department of Neurology, VU Medical Center): Philip Scheltens, MD, PhD, Ilse van Straaten, MD, Wiesje van der Flier, PhD, Alida Gouw, MD, Frederik Barkhof, MD, PhD; Goteborg, Sweden (Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Goteborg University): Anders Wallin, MD, PhD, Michael Jonsson, MD, Karin Lind, MD, Arto Nordlund, PsyD, Sindre Rolstad, PsyD, Kerstin Gustavsson, RN; Huddinge, Sweden (Neurotec Department, Section of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset): Lars-Olof Wahlund, MD, PhD, Militta Crisby, MD, PhD, Anna Pettersson, physiotherapist, Kaarina Amberla, PsyD; Paris, France (Department of Neurology, Hopital Lariboisiere): Hugues Chabriat, MD, PhD, Ludovic Benoit, MD, Karen Hernandez, Solene Pointeau, Annie Kurtz, Daniel Reizine, MD; Mannheim, Germany (Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Klinikum Mannheim): Michael Hennerici, MD, Christian Blahak, MD, Hansjorg Baezner, MD, Martin Wiarda, PsyD, Susanne Seip, RN; Copenhagen, Denmark (Copenhagen University Hospital: Memory Disorders Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Rigshopitalet, and the Danish Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Hvidovre Hospital): Gunhild Waldemar, MD, DMSc, Egill Rostrup, MD, MSc, Charlotte Ryberg, Tim Dyrby; Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K. (Institute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle): John O’Brien, DM, Sanjeet Pakrasi, MRCPsych, Thais Minnet, PhD, Michael Firbank, PhD, Jenny Dean, PhD, Pascale Harrison, BSc, Philip English, DCR. The coordinating center is in Florence, Italy (Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence): Domenico Inzitari, MD (Study Coordinator); Leonardo Pantoni, MD, PhD, Anna Maria Basile, MD, Michela Simoni, MD, Giovanni Pracucci, MD, Monica Martini, MD, Luciano Bartolini, PhD, Emilia Salvadori, PhD, Marco Moretti, MD, Mario Mascalchi, MD, PhD.

    The LADIS Steering Committee is formed by Domenico Inzitari, MD (study coordinator), Timo Erkinjuntti, MD, PhD, Philip Scheltens, MD, PhD, Marieke Visser, MD, PhD, and Kjell Asplund, MD, PhD.

    Acknowledgments

    The LADIS Study is supported by the European Union within the V European Framework Programme "Quality of life and management of living resources" (1998–2002), contract no. QLRT—2000-00446 as a concerted action.

    References

    van Swieten JC, van den Hout JH, van Ketel BA, Hijdra A, Wokke JH, van Gijn J. Periventricular lesions in the white matter on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. A morphometric correlation with arteriolosclerosis and dilated perivascular spaces. Brain. 1991; 114: 761–774.

    Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Payer F, Radner H, Lechner H. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993; 43: 1683–1689.

    Pantoni L, Garcia JH. Pathogenesis of leukokraurosis: a review. Stroke. 1997; 28: 652–659.

    Boiten J, Lodder J. Lacunar infarcts. Pathogenesis and validity of the clinical syndromes. Stroke. 1991; 22: 1374–1378.

    Longstreth WT Jr, Manolio TA, Arnold A, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Enright PL, O’Leary D, Fried L. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1274–1282.

    DeCarli C, Miller BL, Swan GE, Reed T, Wolf PA, Garner J, Jack L, Carmelli D. Predictors of brain morphology for the men of the NHLBI twin study. Stroke. 1999; 30: 529–536.

    de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Oudkerk M, Witteman JC, Hofman A, van Gijn J, Breteler MM. Hypertension and cerebral white matter lesions in a prospective cohort study. Brain. 2002; 125: 765–772.

    Jeerakathil T, Wolf PA, Beiser A, Massaro J, Seshadri S, D’Agostino RB, DeCarli C. Stroke risk profile predicts white matter hyperintensity volume: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1857–1861.

    Longstreth WT Jr, Bernick C, Manolio TA, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Price TR. Lacunar infarcts defined by magnetic resonance imaging of 3660 elderly people: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55: 1217–1225.

    Vermeer SE, van Dijk EJ, Koudstaal PJ, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Clarke R, Clarke R, Breteler MM. Homocysteine, silent brain infarcts, and white matter lesions: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol. 2002; 51: 285–289.

    Román GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH, Amaducci L, Orgogozo JM, Brun A, Hofman A, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology. 1993; 43: 250–260.

    Kalaria RN, Kenny RA, Ballard CG, Perry R, Ince P, Polvikoski T. Towards defining the neuropathological substrates of vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2004; 226: 75–80.

    Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease. The Nun Study. JAMA. 1997; 277: 813–817.

    Nagy Z, Esiri MM, Jobst KA, Morris JH, King EM, McDonald B, Joachim C, Litchfield S, Barnetson L, Smith AD. The effects of additional pathology on the cognitive deficit in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997; 56: 165–170.

    Wolf H, Ecke GM, Bettin S, Dietrich J, Gertz HJ. Do white matter changes contribute to the subsequent development of dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment A longitudinal study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000; 15: 803–812.

    de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, van Gijn J, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol. 2000; 47: 145–151.

    Garde E, Mortensen EL, Krabbe K, Rostrup E, Larsson HB. Relation between age-related decline in intelligence and cerebral white-matter hyperintensities in healthy octogenarians: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2000; 356: 628–634.

    Kramer JH, Reed BR, Mungas D, Weiner MW, Chui HC. Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 72: 217–220.

    Mungas D, Jagust WJ, Reed BR, Kramer JH, Weiner MW, Schuff N, Norman D, Mack WJ, Willis L, Chui HC. MRI predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001; 57: 2229–2235.

    Pantoni L, Basile AM, Pracucci G, Asplund K, Bogousslavsky J, Chabriat H, Erkinjuntti T, Fazekas F, Ferro JM, Hennerici M, O’brien J, Scheltens P, Visser MC, Wahlund LO, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Inzitari D. Impact of age-related cerebral white matter changes on the transition to disability—the LADIS study: rationale, design and methodology. Neuroepidemiology. 2005; 24: 51–62.

    Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 149: 351–356.

    Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179–186.

    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189–198.

    Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984; 141: 1356–1364.

    Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988; 24: 709–711.

    Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994; 49: M85–M94.

    Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 556–561.

    Van Straaten EC, Scheltens P, Knol DL, van Buchem MA, van Dijk EJ, Hofman PA, Karas G, Kjartansson O, de Leeuw FE, Prins ND, Schmidt R, Visser MC, Weinstein HC, Barkhof F. Operational definitions for the NINDS-AIREN criteria for vascular dementia. An interobserver study. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1907–1912.

    de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Achten E, Oudkerk M, Ramos LM, Heijboer R, Hofman A, Jolles J, van Gijn J, Breteler MM. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 70: 9–14.

    Neuropathology Group. Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Aging Study. Pathological correlates of late-onset dementia in a multicentre, community-based population in England and Wales. Neuropathology Group of the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). Lancet. 2001; 357: 169–175.

    Brun A, Englund E. A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study. Ann Neurol. 1986; 19: 253–262.

    Reed BR, Eberling JL, Mungas D, Weiner M, Kramer JH, Jagust WJ. Effects of white matter lesions and lacunes on cortical function. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61: 1545–1550.

    Wen HM, Mok VC, Fan YH, Lam WW, Tang WK, Wong A, Huang RX, Wong KS. Effect of white matter changes on cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarcts. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1826–1830.

作者: Wiesje M. van der Flier, PhD; Elizabeth C.W. van S 2007-5-14
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具