Literature
Home医源资料库在线期刊动脉硬化血栓血管生物学杂志2003年第23卷第2期

Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and Vascular Function

来源:动脉硬化血栓血管生物学杂志
摘要:20,21InthisissueofArteriosclerosis,Thrombosis,andVascularBiology,Capellandcolleagues22describetheeffectoffenofibrate-inducedreductionsintriglyceridesonvascularfunction。Functionalimprovementprecedesstructuralregressionofatherosclerosis。Vascularfunctioninthefore......

点击显示 收起

The epidemic of obesity in the developed and developing world has resulted in a considerable increase in the number of patients with high plasma triglyceride concentrations. There has been considerable debate about the role of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) in atherosclerosis. These lipoproteins include chylomicrons, VLDL, IDL, and various remnant particles. Although elevated triglyceride levels are common in patients with atherosclerotic disease, establishing a clear link has been made difficult by a number of factors.

See page 307

 

First, elevated triglycerides are usually found in lipoprotein particles that also contain cholesterol. A role for cholesterol in these particles is supported by the fact that non-HDL cholesterol appears to be a more powerful marker of cardiovascular risk than even LDL cholesterol.1 Second, elevated TRLs are strongly associated with low HDL cholesterol concentrations. This association is so powerful that it is very difficult to dissect out the relative contributions of HDL and TRLs, although low HDL is commonly believed to have a greater impact on the atherosclerotic process. Third, triglyceride concentrations have high biological variability, which obscures the statistical strength of any association with cardiovascular disease, particularly when compared with the less variable HDL. Fourth, patients with high TRL levels often possess other risk factors that may explain their predisposition to atherosclerosis, especially those that comprise the metabolic syndrome.2 Finally, the lack of an established pathophysiological mechanism linking TRLs to atherosclerosis has hindered consideration of triglycerides as a cause of atherosclerosis, as opposed to being a marker for other risk factors (ie, insulin resistance, visceral obesity, or hypertension). Identification of a plausible mechanism would help resolve this debate.

Meta-analyses of observational studies have suggested that a 1-mmol/L (89 mg/dL) elevation in triglycerides is associated with a 14% to 37% higher incidence of cardiovascular disease independent of other risk factors, with the highest risk in women.3 However, given the variability in plasma triglyceride concentrations, observational studies may considerably underestimate the cardiovascular consequences of elevated TRLs. Unfortunately, large-scale randomized outcome trials examining pharmacological interventions that alter triglycerides have not provided a clear resolution of this issue. The benefits of fibrate therapy in the Helsinki Heart study and Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial have been attributed to decreases in non-HDL cholesterol or increases in HDL.4,5 Similar findings have been observed for therapy with niacin.6 One difficulty in interpreting outcome trials has been that the relatively limited number of cardiovascular events, even in large studies, makes detailed subgroup analyses underpowered and prone to error. Thus, it has been difficult to identify substantial numbers of patients who manifest changes in only one lipid parameter with an intervention and then track their cardiovascular events.

An alternative experimental approach is to focus on a plausible quantitative intermediate phenotype for atherosclerosis that exhibits changes in a relatively short period of time. Relatively small studies with sophisticated analysis of intermediate phenotypes can then test the effects of pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia. When patients are carefully selected (ie, isolated hypertriglyceridemia), these studies can provide mechanistic and clinical insights that large-scale outcome trials cannot.

One potentially powerful intermediate phenotype is vascular function. During experimental induction of atherosclerosis in monkeys, changes in endothelial function precede structural lesions.7 Conversely, dietary regression of experimental atherosclerosis in monkeys is preceded by improvements in endothelial function.8 In humans, endothelium-dependent dilatation is impaired in hypercholesterolemia,911 hypertension,12 tobacco use,13 and in patients with established coronary atherosclerosis.14 Patients with diabetes exhibit impaired vascular smooth muscle function, possibly related to reduced NO activity.15,16 Normalization of risk factors produces rapid improvements in vascular function.17,18 Most importantly, impaired vascular function appears to predict complications of atherosclerosis, independently of atherosclerosis burden or other risk factors. This is true for endothelium-dependent,19 as well as endothelium-independent, responses.20,21

In this issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Capell and colleagues22 describe the effect of fenofibrate-induced reductions in triglycerides on vascular function. Patients were selected to have elevated triglycerides, but relatively normal cholesterol (including LDL and HDL). As a result, two weeks of therapy with fenofibrate had most effect on triglyceride concentrations (reduced by 45%) with no change in HDL or LDL cholesterol. Total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B concentrations decreased by 15%, consistent with reduction in TRLs. Fenofibrate produced a global improvement in vascular function, with significantly increased forearm vasodilatation to brachial artery infusion of acetylcholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator. Interestingly, endothelium-independent vascular smooth muscle dilatation to nitroprusside and verapamil also improved after fenofibrate treatment. Fenofibrate modestly reduced free fatty acid concentrations, particularly after activation of lipoprotein lipase by heparin infusion. However, insulin sensitivity was not changed by fenofibrate, and its benefits did not differ between hypertriglyceridemic subjects with and without evidence of the metabolic syndrome.

There have been only a few other reports of the vascular effects of stimulation of nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated (PPAR)- receptors by fibrates. Two of these studies were performed in patients with type 2 diabetes and showed improvements in endothelial function.23,24 One study was performed in patients with combined hyperlipidemia; like the current study, this showed improvement in endothelium-dependent and -independent dilatation.25 Interestingly, HMG-CoA reductase therapy in the same population only improved endothelium-dependent dilatation.25 However, in all three previous studies, there were substantial increases in HDL cholesterol,2325 making it difficult to prove that the vascular effects were due to reduction in TRLs.

The findings in the present and previous studies with PPAR- agonists are consistent with the concept that triglycerides directly impair dilatation of vascular smooth muscle. Capell and colleagues22 suggest one potential triglyceride-mediated mechanism may have been reduction in formation of free fatty acids from TRLs by endothelial lipoprotein lipase. This explanation is strengthened by the fact that severely hypertriglyceridemic patients with lipoprotein lipase deficiency do not exhibit endothelial dysfunction.26 In addition, genetic variation in lipoprotein lipase is associated with coronary artery disease.27 However, there are several alternative explanations. Fenofibrate may have had triglyceride-independent effects to improve vascular function. For example, the decrease in apolipoprotein B concentrations suggests that there was a reduction in potentially atherogenic cholesterol-containing particles. Also, changes in the number, density, or size of LDL particles could alter atherogenicity of LDL without changing LDL cholesterol concentrations. Fibrates are known to reduce LDL density and increase LDL particle size.2830 In addition, fibrates have been shown to reduce inflammation, as evidenced by decreases in highly sensitive C-reactive protein,31,32 and inflammation may contribute to endothelial dysfunction. Finally, as the authors point out, it is possible that stimulation of PPAR- receptors by fenofibrate directly improves vascular smooth muscle function. It would be valuable to include normotriglyceridemic subjects in future studies to explore the role of PPAR- agonism.

Nonetheless, evidence from studies that use non–PPAR- triglyceride–lowering drugs is consistent with the concept that reduction in TRLs, and thus LPL-mediated formation of free fatty acids, improves vascular function. For example, niacin has been shown to improve endothelium-dependent dilatation in patients with low-to-normal LDL.33 Although niacin increases HDL, it also substantially suppresses lipolysis and free fatty acid concentrations.34,35 More compelling data come from studies of omega-3 fish oil supplementation, in which there are improvements in vascular function in both hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects, without changes in HDL or LDL cholesterol.3639 Fish oils have also been demonstrated to reduce circulating free fatty acids.40,41 It is certainly plausible that increased free fatty acids may cause vascular smooth muscle dysfunction, given that they increase endothelial layer permeability to proteins and oxidized lipoproteins and may also potentiate oxidant stress.

In conclusion, there are increasing data supporting a role for elevated TRLs in the pathophysiology of vascular disease. Some of the previous epidemiological studies may have underestimated the role of TRLs because they did not take into account the effects of lipoprotein lipase activity and free fatty acid formation. As demonstrated by Capell et al,22 treatment with PPAR- agonists, such as fenofibrate, improves vascular function in patients with high TRL levels, although the exact mechanism by which this occurs is still unproven. However, the weight of experimental evidence appears to support a role for lipoprotein lipase–mediated formation of free fatty acids in the vascular dysfunction associated with hypertriglyceridemia.

Acknowledgments

Original studies by the author were supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NHLBI: HL-14388, HL55006, HL58972; NINDS: NS55105; NCRR General Clinical Research Centers program: RR00059), the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation.

References

 

  1. Cui Y, Blumenthal RS, Flaws JA, Whiteman MK, Langenberg P, Bachorik PS, Bush TL. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161: 1413–1419.

  2. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002; 288: 2709–2716.

  3. Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996; 3: 213–219.

  4. Manninen V, Elo MO, Frick MH, Haapa K, Heinonen OP, Heinsalmi P, Helo P, Huttunen JK, Kaitaniemi P, Koskinen P. Lipid alterations and decline in the incidence of coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. JAMA. 1988; 260: 641–651.

  5. Robins SJ, Collins D, Wittes JT, Papademetriou V, Deedwania PC, Schaefer EJ, McNamara JR, Kashyap ML, Hershman JM, Wexler LF, Rubins HB, VA-HIT Study Group. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. Relation of gemfibrozil treatment and lipid levels with major coronary events: VA-HIT—a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1585–1591.

  6. Coronary Drug Project Investigators. Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1975; 231: 360–381.

  7. Lopez JAG, Armstrong ML, Piegors DJ, Heistad DD. Effect of early and advanced atherosclerosis on vascular responses to serotonin, thromboxane A2 and ADP. Circulation. 1989; 79: 698–705.

  8. Benzuly KH, Padgett RC, Kaul S, Piegors DJ, Armstrong ML, Heistad DD. Functional improvement precedes structural regression of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1810–1818.

  9. Creager MA, Cooke JP, Mendelsohn ME, Gallagher SJ, Coleman SM, Loscalzo J, Dzau VJ. Impaired vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Clin Invest. 1990; 86: 228–234.

  10. Drexler H, Zeiher A, Meinzer K, Just H. Correction of endothelial dysfunction in coronary microcirculation of hypercholesterolemic patients by L-arginine. Lancet. 1991; 338: 1546–1550.

  11. Chowienczyk PJ, Watts GF, Cockcroft JR, Ritter JM. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemia. Lancet. 1992; 340: 1430–1432.

  12. Panza JA, Garcia CE, Kilcoyne CM, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in patients with essential hypertension: evidence that nitric oxide abnormality is not localized to a single signal transduction pathway. Circulation. 1995; 91: 1732–1738.

  13. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, Bull C, Thomas O, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults. Circulation. 1993; 88: 2149–2155.

  14. Hirooka Y, Egashira K, Imaizumi T, Tagawa T, Kai H, Sugimachi M, Takeshita A. Effect of L-arginine on acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation differs between the coronary and forearm vasculatures in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 948–955.

  15. Calver A, Collier J, Vallance P. Inhibition and stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis in the human forearm arterial bed of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90: 2548–2554.

  16. Williams SB, Cusco JA, Roddy MA, Johnstone MT, Creager MA. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 567–574.

  17. Lyons D, Webster J, Benjamin N. The effect of anti-hypertensive therapy on responsiveness to local intra-arterial NG-monomethyl-L-arginine in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1994; 12: 1047–1052.

  18. Stroes ESG, Koomans HA, de Bruin TWA, Rabelink TJ. Vascular function in the forearm of hypercholesterolemic patients off and on lipid-lowering medication. Lancet. 1995; 346: 467–471.

  19. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 948–954.

  20. Schächinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1899–1906.

  21. Heitzer T, Schlinzig T, Krohn K, Meinertz T, Münzel T. Endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2673–2678.

  22. Capell WH, DeSouza CA, Poirier P, Bell ML, Stauffer BL, Weil KM, Hernandez TL, Eckel RH. Short-term triglyceride lowering with fenofibrate improves vasodilator function in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 307–313.

  23. Evans M, Anderson RA, Graham J, Ellis GR, Morris K, Davies S, Jackson SK, Lewis MJ, Frenneaux MP, Rees A. Ciprofibrate therapy improves endothelial function and reduces postprandial lipemia and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1773–1779.

  24. Avogaro A, Miola M, Favaro A, Gottardo L, Pacini G, Manzato E, Zambon S, Sacerdoti D, de Kreutzenberg S, Piliego T, Tiengo A, Del Prato S. Gemfibrozil improves insulin sensitivity and flow-mediated vasodilatation in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Inv. 2001; 31: 603–609.

  25. Sebestjen M, Zegura B, Keber I. Both cerivastatin and fenofibrate improve arterial vasoreactivity in patients with combined hyperlipidaemia. J Int Med. 2002; 251: 77–85.

  26. Chowienczyk PJ, Watts GF, Wierzbicki AS, Cockcroft JR, Brett SE, Ritter JM. Preserved endothelial function in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia and low functional lipoprotein lipase activity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 964–968.

  27. Hokanson JE. Lipoprotein lipase gene variants and risk of coronary disease: a quantitative analysis of population-based studies. Int J Clin Lab Res. 1997; 27: 24–34.

  28. Ruotolo G, Ericsson CG, Tettamanti C, Karpe F, Grip L, Svane B, Nilsson J, de Faire U, Hamsten A. Treatment effects on serum lipoprotein lipids, apolipoproteins and low density lipoprotein particle size and relationships of lipoprotein variables to progression of coronary artery disease in the Bezafibrate Coronary Atherosclerosis Intervention Trial (BECAIT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 1648–1656.

  29. Yoshida H, Ishikawa T, Ayaori M, Shige H, Ito T, Suzukawa M, Nakamura H. Beneficial effect of gemfibrozil on the chemical composition and oxidative susceptibility of low density lipoprotein: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 139: 179–187.

  30. Stalenhoef AF, de Graaf J, Wittekoek ME, Bredie SJ, Demacker PN, Kastelein JJ. The effect of concentrated n-3 fatty acids versus gemfibrozil on plasma lipoproteins, low density lipoprotein heterogeneity and oxidizability in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Atherosclerosis. 2000; 153: 129–138.

  31. Rizos E, Kostoula A, Elisaf M, Mikhailidis DP. Effect of ciprofibrate on C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels. Angiology. 2002; 53: 273–277.

  32. Jonkers IJ, Mohrschladt MF, Westendorp RG, van der Laarse A, Smelt AH. Severe hypertriglyceridemia with insulin resistance is associated with systemic inflammation: reversal with bezafibrate therapy in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med. 2002; 112: 275–280.

  33. Kuvin JT, Ramet ME, Patel AR, Pandian NG, Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. A novel mechanism for the beneficial vascular effects of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: enhanced vasorelaxation and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression. Am Heart J. 2002; 144: 165–172.

  34. Landau C, Chen YD, Skowronski R, Hollenbeck CB, Jaspan JB, Reaven GM. Effect of nicotinic acid on plasma glucose concentration in normal individuals. Horm Metab Res. 1992; 24: 424–428.

  35. Wang W, Basinger A, Neese RA, Shane B, Myong SA, Christiansen M, Hellerstein MK. Effect of nicotinic acid administration on hepatic very low density lipoprotein-triglyceride production. Am J Physiol. 2001; 280: E540–E547.

  36. McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, McDermott BJ, McGrath LT, Henry WR, Andrews JW, Hayes JR. Dietary fish oil augments nitric oxide production or release in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1993; 36: 33–38.

  37. Chin JP, Dart AM. HBPRCA Astra Award: therapeutic restoration of endothelial function in hypercholesterolaemic subjects: effect of fish oils. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1994; 21: 749–755.

  38. Goode GK, Garcia S, Heagerty AM. Dietary supplementation with marine fish oil improves in vitro small artery endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2802–2807.

  39. Goodfellow J, Bellamy MF, Ramsey MW, Jones CJ, Lewis MJ. Dietary supplementation with marine omega-3 fatty acids improve systemic large artery endothelial function in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 265–270.

  40. Rivellese AA, Maffettone A, Iovine C, Di Marino L, Annuzzi G, Mancini M, Riccardi G. Long-term effects of fish oil on insulin resistance and plasma lipoproteins in NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19: 1207–1213.

  41. Bordin P, Bodamer OA, Venkatesan S, Gray RM, Bannister PA, Halliday D. Effects of fish oil supplementation on apolipoprotein B100 production and lipoprotein metabolism in normolipidaemic males. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998; 52: 104–109.

作者: William G. Haynes 2007-5-18
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具