点击显示 收起
From the School of Dentistry and Department of Periodontology (N.B., D.D., S.O., J.B., P.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (E.P.M., D.A.B., T.C.N.), and the Department of Biostatistics (D.S., Y.-L.C., G.K.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Center of Oral and Systemic Diseases, Chapel Hill, NC.
Correspondence to Timothy C. Nichols, MD, Francis Owen Blood Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, CB#3114, 125 University Lake Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3114. E-mail tnichols@med.unc.edu
Abstract
Objectives— The aim of this study was to determine whether recurrent intravenous injections with Porphyromonas gingivalis (P gingivalis), mimicking periodontitis-associated bacteremia, promotes coronary artery and aortic atherosclerosis in pigs.
Methods and Results— Pigs (n=36) fed low- or high-fat chow were divided into P gingivalis–sensitized and P gingivalis–challenged groups or P gingivalis–sensitized controls and saline-treated controls. Pigs were sensitized with 109 killed P gingivalis subcutaneously. Four weeks later all sensitized pigs in the group to be challenged started intravenous injections thrice weekly for 5 months with 106 to 107 colony forming units of P gingivalis while controls received saline. Anti–P gingivalis antibody, serum cholesterol, and complete blood counts were assayed monthly. Pigs were euthanized 2 weeks after the last injection, and coronary arteries and aortas were analyzed by histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. Anti–P gingivalis antibody was increased by P gingivalis exposure. P gingivalis–challenged pigs developed a significantly greater amount of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis than controls in the normocholesterolemic group and nearly significant in the hypercholesterolemic group. P gingivalis was detected by polymerase chain reaction in arteries from most (94%, 16 of 17) P gingivalis–challenged pigs but not controls.
Conclusions— Recurrent P gingivalis bacteremia induces aortic and coronary lesions consistent with atherosclerosis in normocholesterolemic pigs and increases aortic and coronary atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic pigs.
To determine whether recurrent intravenous injections with Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes coronary artery and aortic atherosclerosis, pigs fed low- or high-fat chow were divided into P gingivalis–challenged or control groups. P gingivalis–challenged pigs developed significantly greater amount of atherosclerosis in the normocholesterolemic group and nearly significant in the hypercholesterolemic group.
Key Words: coronary and aortic atherosclerosis ? Porphyromonas gingivalis ? periodontitis ? pig model ? bacteremia
Introduction
Periodontitis has been associated with cardiovascular disease in many, but not all, epidemiological studies.1–15 Mild forms of periodontal disease affect 75% of the population, and more severe forms affect 20% to 30% of adults in the United States.8 The mechanism by which periodontitis could contribute to cardiovascular disease is unknown but likely relates to the associated intense local and systemic inflammation and the virulence properties of the causative organisms.16–21 Porphyromonas gingivalis has been strongly associated with adult periodontitis. This bacteria is a Gram-negative, nonmotile, obligate anaerobe that can invade and infect epithelium, endothelium, and vascular smooth muscle cells22–29 and appears to alter endothelial function.30 The capacity for invasion is in part mediated by fimbriae,31,32 and the virulence of P gingivalis may vary among individual strains.33 Recurrent bacteremias with P gingivalis and a mixture of other oral bacteria can occur in periodontitis patients during simple mastication.34–36 P gingivalis has been detected by immunostaining and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in some human carotid and coronary atheromas.27,37 In addition, P gingivalis produces arginine-specific cysteine proteases, called gingipain Rs, that can activate both the cellular and humoral coagulation systems. These gingipain Rs activate protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 (PAR-1 and PAR-4) on platelets to a degree sufficient to support ex vivo aggregation.38–42 Moreover, gingipain Rs can activate coagulation factors II, IX, and X by protease cleavage.43–45 In vitro studies have shown that gingipains R and K produced by P gingivalis degrade plaque constituents and that cultured monocytes exhibit foam cell phenotypes when exposed to P gingivalis FDC 381.31 The combination of intense oral and systemic inflammation and frequent bacteremias with an invasive prothrombotic organism suggests that periodontitis could contribute to atherosclerosis and its thrombotic complications by several mechanisms.
The purpose of this study was to develop a useful animal model for examining the potential atherogenic effects ofP gingivalis in normocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic pigs with a mixed genetic background. An important facet of the rationale for choosing pigs is the fact that they develop coronary lesions that closely simulate human disease.46–50
Methods
Please see supplemental Methods, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org and summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Experimental groups and protocols and study timeline. Four weeks after sensitization with heat-killed P gingivalis, the pigs in Groups 1, 2, and 5 were injected intravenously thrice weekly with 106 to 107 CFU of the respective strains for a period of 5 months. Monthly plasma and serum (P+S) and complete blood count (CBC) samples were taken. The P gingivalis–sensitized and –unsensitized control pigs in Groups 3, 4, and 6 were injected intravenously with sterile saline thrice weekly. The high-fat diet was started week –4 in Groups 5 and 6; all other pigs received low-fat diet continuously. After completion of injections, a washout period of 2 weeks was allowed. All samples were collected again and all pigs were euthanized. Tissue samples were taken for histomorphometry, immunohistochemistry, and PCR.
Results
Clinical Assessment
No clinical signs of infection were noted in any pig during this study. Although the pigs in Groups 1 to 4 differed in weight on entry, there were no significant differences in body weight between the 6 groups of pigs at the end of the study (Table I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). No gross abnormalities were noted at necropsy in any organ. Specifically, no abnormalities were detected on heart valves, nor were any abscesses found. No specific analysis of lymphoid tissues or other cells was performed.
Liver Enzymes and Function Values, White Blood Cell Counts, Anti–P gingivalis Antibody Level, and Serum Cholesterol
No group had liver enzymes or other function values (AST, ALT, total bilirubin, GGTP, or alk phos) outside the reference range except for a slight elevation of GGTP in pigs from Groups 5 and 6 after receiving the high-fat diet (Table I). In addition, white blood cell counts were intermittently slightly above the reference range in all groups (Table I). Minor differences that achieved statistical significance even though within the reference range are indicated in Table I. The pigs that received intravenous P gingivalis challenges demonstrated a >100-fold increase in anti–P gingivalis antibody levels (Groups 1, 2, and 5; Table II, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). There was no significant difference in the level of the anti–P gingivalis antibody level between pigs receiving the A7436 or FDC 381 strains. Control pigs that were sensitized to P gingivalis exhibited an increase in anti–P gingivalis antibody levels but to a lesser degree than that seen in the P gingivalis–challenged pigs (Group 3; Table II). Pigs fed the low-fat diet did not show significant changes in cholesterol throughout the study period (Groups 1 to 4; Table III, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Pigs fed a high-fat diet exhibited a significant increase in serum cholesterol from their respective baseline values that was not different between the P gingivalis–challenged and saline controls (Groups 5 and 6; Table III).
Morphometric Analysis of Aortas and Coronary Arteries
Low-Fat Diet
When P gingivalis–challenged pigs (Groups 1 and 2) were compared with their respective control groups individually (Groups 3 and 4) or as pooled data, the differences were significant (P=< 0.001 for the pooled data; Table 1, see also Table IV, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). When compared with each other, pigs in Group 1 challenged with P gingivalis A7436 had significantly greater aortic intimal area as a percent medial area when compared with Group 2 pigs challenged with FDC 381 (P=0.0317). Otherwise, Group 1 and 2 pigs challenged with the 2 strains of P gingivalis had no significant differences in the intimal area of aortic atherosclerosis or the 3 measures of coronary atherosclerosis (P>0.05). In the P gingivalis–sensitized pigs fed a low-fat diet (Group 3), the coronary intimal area and the intimal area as a percent of medial area was significantly smaller than the unsensitized pigs (Group 4; P=0.026 and P=0.0411, respectively). The percent luminal narrowing by intima of the coronary arteries was not significantly different between Groups 3 and 4 (P=0.0649). In addition, the aortic intimal area and the intimal area as a percent medial area were not significantly different between these sensitized and unsensitized control pigs (P=0.0649 and 0.2403, respectively).
TABLE 1. Aortic and Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis Morphometry in Pigs Fed a Low-Fat Diet
High-Fat Diet
Pigs sensitized and challenged with P gingivalis (Group 5) had nearly significantly greater intimal plaque area and raised lesions of aortic atherosclerosis than the control unsensitized pigs (Group 6, P=0.053; Tables 2 and 3; see also Tables V & VI, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Also, there was a trend toward a greater amount of coronary atherosclerosis in P gingivalis–challenged hypercholesterolemic pigs (Group 5) when compared with the unsensitized hypercholesterolemic pigs (Group 6; Table 2; see also Table V).
TABLE 2. Aortic and Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis Morphometry in Pigs Fed a High-Fat Diet
TABLE 3. Percent Abdominal Aortic Surface With Raised Atherosclerotic Lesions
Detection of P gingivalis Ribosomal DNA in Aortas and Carotids by Nested PCR
P gingivalis ribosomal DNA was detected in the carotids (5 of 5) and the aortas (4 of 5) from the 5 P gingivalis-treated pigs (A7436, n=2; FDC 381, n=3) on the low-fat diet and the aortas of all 7 P gingivalis–challenged pigs on the high-fat diet. None of the aortas or carotids from saline-challenged control pigs, whether sensitized or not, had amplifiable P gingivalis ribosomal DNA.
Discussion
Our goal was to develop a useful animal model for examining the potential atherogenic effects of P gingivalis bacteremia mimicking that found in clinical periodontitis. Our data show that normocholesterolemic pigs challenged with recurrent P gingivalis bacteremia develop significantly larger coronary and aortic atherosclerotic lesions (Table 1; see also Table IV). The average coronary and aortic intimal areas were 5.9 times and 3 times larger than controls, respectively. These lesions were predominantly composed of smooth muscle cells consistent with early atherosclerosis (Figure 2). In addition, hypercholesterolemic pigs likewise challenged with recurrent P gingivalis bacteremia develop larger coronary and aortic atherosclerotic lesions, both having an intimal area that was 2.2 times larger than controls (Figure 2 and Table V). Relative to controls, the difference in lesion size approached significance in the hypercholesterolemic group (P=0.053). A larger sample size of pigs fed a high-fat diet would likely have achieved statistical significance. Hypercholesterolemia then was the primary atherogenic stimulus in these unsensitized control pigs fed a high fat diet and not exposed to P gingivalis. Notably, the involvement of the coronary arteries in P gingivalis–challenged animals is of particular significance as the coronary lesions seen in the pig closely simulate human disease.46–50
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical staining of right coronary artery atherosclerosis from study pigs. A and B, Coronary artery from a P gingivalis sensitized and challenged pig (Group 1) fed low-fat diet is stained with an anti– smooth muscle cell actin antibody. Smooth muscle cells comprise the majority of cells in the lesion. The area identified by the rectangle inserted on A is shown at higher magnification in B. Arrow indicates positive staining cell (A, bar=50 μm; B, bar=25 μm, hematoxylin counterstain). C and D, Coronary arteries are shown from pigs fed a high-fat diet in the saline control, Group 6, (C) and P gingivalis–challenged, Group 5 (D). Both pigs fed a high fat diet had lesions with foam cells and fibrous caps as seen in previous studies.46–50 E, Coronary artery from a P gingivalis sensitized pig fed low-fat diet, Group 3 (hematoxylin counterstain). AP indicates atherosclerotic plaque; L, lumen. Bar in C, D, and E=1 mm.
Elegant studies with inbred heterozygous and homozygous apoE-deficient mice exhibited increased aortic atherosclerosis when challenged orally or intravenously with invasive strains of P gingivalis.32,51–53 Our data confirm and extend these findings as well as highlight important differences. First, P gingivalis challenges increased aortic atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice in a hypercholesterolemic background only, whereas our normocholesterolemic pigs developed both coronary and aortic lesions with P gingivalis challenges.32,51–53 This finding suggests that P gingivalis sensitization and bacteremia may exert an atherogenic stimulus independent of hypercholesterolemia in pigs. Second, assuming a mouse weight of 25 g, the apoE-deficient mice received 4x109 CFU/kg intravenously51,53 weekly, 8x1010 CFU po/kg weekly,52 or 4x108 CFU po/kg weekly.32 We administered a dose of 106 to 107 CFU per pig or 5x103 /kg intravenously thrice weekly assuming an average pig weight of 200 kg. The clinically relevant dose is unknown at present and probably varies greatly.54–56 Furthermore, although oral administration is essential for determining the influence of oral inflammation in these models, the significance of the different routes of administration or access to the vasculature is unknown. Importantly, P gingivalis challenges consistently increased the amount of atherosclerosis despite these different routes of administration and dosing regimens in both species. Third, P gingivalis 16 ribosomal DNA was detected by PCR in some but not all of these mutant mice. We also detected P gingivalis in 16 of 17 (94%) arteries from P gingivalis–challenged pigs by PCR. Our samples were collected after a 2-week washout period to allow for P gingivalis clearance from blood. In this manner, any P gingivalis detected by PCR on necropsy samples would be more likely to come from tissue invasion and not persistent bacteremia. The coronary arteries were not tested for P gingivalis amplification by PCR. The data to date suggest that both the host response and the degree of virulence of the specific P gingivalis strains are two of the most important variables in these models.9,12,29,32,57,58
In humans, P gingivalis colonization of the periodontal tissues is ubiquitous by the time an individual reaches adolescence and serum antibody to this pathogen remains present throughout adulthood, even persisting after tooth loss.59,60 Periodontal disease is a chronic infection that occurs as a consequence of P gingivalis emergence in the periodontal flora in susceptible individuals and results in frequent daily low-level bacteremic showers with P gingivalis and other organisms.36,54–56 Thus periodontitis and its associated bacteremia develop in humans who have been immunologically sensitized to organisms such as P gingivalis. We chose to sensitize the pigs in this study with strains known to cause disease in humans to model this chronic bacteremic exposure in a sensitized host. The data from the sensitized control pigs (Group 3) were obtained to provide a control for the pigs that received P gingivalis sensitization and intravenous challenges. Considered together, the control and experimental data support the hypothesis that P gingivalis sensitization and intravenous challenges induce coronary and aortic atherosclerosis. The unsensitized controls suggest that the intravenous challenges by themselves do not explain the observed differences. Importantly, prior immunization decreased periodontitis and atherosclerosis in apoE–/– mice.32 We also chose to study only strain A7436 in pigs fed a high-fat diet because the response to the 2 strains appeared similar in pigs fed a low-fat diet. We cannot exclude the possibility that pigs fed a high-fat diet would respond differently to FDC 381.
Two potential study limitations deserve note. First is that our pig model does not replicate the likely oral origin of bacteremia from inflamed human periodontal tissues.52 Nonetheless, as seen previously in rodents, the P gingivalis–challenged pigs developed an anti–P gingivalis antibody response as a consequence of P gingivalis challenges in association with increased atherosclerosis.32,51,52 Second, the number of pigs was not sufficient to exclude an effect of sex in our study. Notably, recent data that was not available at the time this study was designed suggest that human males have a greater prevalence of asymptomatic carotid disease than females with comparable severity of periodontitis.58,61
Our data support the hypothesis P gingivalis bacteremia promotes coronary and aortic atherogenesis in pigs with or without significant hypercholesterolemia. Confirmation of this hypothesis will require determining the relative contributions of the virulence properties intrinsic to P gingivalis, the degree of systemic inflammation, or other host responses to the experimental protocol. At present, the mechanism by which P gingivalis contributes to atherogenesis or comes to reside in atherosclerotic plaques is unknown. Pigs are a promising species for investigating mechanisms by which P gingivalis exerts a coronary and aortic atherogenic effect in a normocholesterolemic or hypercholesterolemic background.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a research grant from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. 1-P60-DE 13079. The authors gratefully acknowledge Robin Raymer and Kent Passingham and their staff for the outstanding care given to the animals used in this study.
References
Syrjanen J, Peltola J, Valtonen V, Iivanainen M, Kaste M, Huttunen JK. Dental infections in association with cerebral infarction in young and middle-aged men. J Intern Med. 1989; 225: 179–184.
Mattila KJ, Nieminen MS, Valtonen VV, Rasi VP, Kesaniemi YA, Syrjala SL, Jungell PS, Isoluoma M, Hietaniemi K, Jokinen MJ. Association between dental health and acute myocardial infarction. Bmj. 1989; 298: 779–781.
Mattila KJ, Valle MS, Nieminen MS, Valtonen VV, Hietaniemi KL. Dental infections and coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1993; 103: 205–211.
Mattila KJ, Valtonen VV, Nieminen M, Huttunen JK. Dental infection and the risk of new coronary events: prospective study of patients with documented coronary artery disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1995; 20: 588–592.
Paunio K, Impivaara O, Tiekso J, Maki J. Missing teeth and ischaemic heart disease in men aged 45–64 years. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14 Suppl K: 54–56.
Grau AJ, Buggle F, Ziegler C, Schwarz W, Meuser J, Tasman AJ, Buhler A, Benesch C, Becher H, Hacke W. Association between acute cerebrovascular ischemia and chronic and recurrent infection. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1724–1729.
Arbes SJ Jr, Slade GD, Beck JD. Association between extent of periodontal attachment loss and self-reported history of heart attack: an analysis of NHANES III data. J Dent Res. 1999; 78: 1777–1782.
DeStefano F, Anda RF, Kahn HS, Williamson DF, Russell CM. Dental disease and risk of coronary heart disease and mortality. BMJ. 1993; 306: 688–691.
Beck J, Garcia R, Heiss G, Vokonas PS, Offenbacher S. Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease. J Periodontol. 1996; 67: 1123–1137.
Joshipura KJ, Rimm EB, Douglass CW, Trichopoulos D, Ascherio A, Willett WC. Poor oral health and coronary heart disease. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1631–1636.
Hujoel PP, Drangsholt M, Spiekerman C, DeRouen TA. Periodontal disease and coronary heart disease risk. JAMA. 2000; 284: 1406–1410.
Nakib SA, Pankow JS, Beck JD, Offenbacher S, Evans GW, Desvarieux M, Folsom AR. Periodontitis and coronary artery calcification: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 505–510.
Grau AJ, Becher H, Ziegler CM, Lichy C, Buggle F, Kaiser C, Lutz R, Bultmann S, Preusch M, Dorfer CE. Periodontal disease as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2004; 35: 496–501.
D’Aiuto F, Parkar M, Andreou G, Brett PM, Ready D, Tonetti MS. Periodontitis and atherogenesis: causal association or simple coincidence? J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31: 402–411.
Desvarieux M, Demmer RT, Rundek T, Boden-Albala B, Jacobs DR Jr, Sacco RL, Papapanou PN. Periodontal microbiota and carotid intima-media thickness: the Oral Infections and Vascular Disease Epidemiology Study (INVEST). Circulation. 2005; 111: 576–582.
Zambon JJ, Bochacki V, Genco RJ. Immunological assays for putative periodontal pathogens. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1986; 1: 39–47.
Ogawa T, Kono Y, McGhee ML, McGhee JR, Roberts JE, Hamada S, Kiyono H. Porphyromonas gingivalis-specific serum IgG and IgA antibodies originate from immunoglobulin-secreting cells in inflamed gingiva. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991; 83: 237–244.
Kweider M, Lowe GD, Murray GD, Kinane DF, McGowan DA. Dental disease, fibrinogen and white cell count; links with myocardial infarction? Scott Med J. 1993; 38: 73–74.
Ebersole JL, Machen RL, Steffen MJ, Willmann DE. Systemic acute-phase reactants, C-reactive protein and haptoglobin, in adult periodontitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1997; 107: 347–352.
Loos BG, Craandijk J, Hoek FJ, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, van der Velden U. Elevation of systemic markers related to cardiovascular diseases in the peripheral blood of periodontitis patients. J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 1528–1534.
Wu T, Trevisan M, Genco RJ, Falkner KL, Dorn JP, Sempos CT. Examination of the relation between periodontal health status and cardiovascular risk factors: serum total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and plasma fibrinogen. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 273–282.
Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Microbial etiological agents of destructive periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 1994; 5: 78–111.
Madianos PN, Papapanou PN, Nannmark U, Dahlen G, Sandros J. Porphyromonas gingivalis FDC381 multiplies and persists within human oral epithelial cells in vitro. Infect Immun. 1996; 64: 660–664.
Lamont RJ, Oda D, Persson RE, Persson GR. Interaction of Porphyromonas gingivalis with gingival epithelial cells maintained in culture. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1992; 7: 364–367.
Duncan MJ, Nakao S, Skobe Z, Xie H. Interactions of Porphyromonas gingivalis with epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1993; 61: 2260–2265.
Sandros J, Papapanou P, Dahlen G. Porphyromonas gingivalis invades oral epithelial cells in vitro. J Periodontal Res. 1993; 28: 219–226.
Haraszthy VI, Zambon JJ, Trevisan M, Zeid M, Genco RJ. Identification of periodontal pathogens in atheromatous plaques. J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 1554–1560.
Dorn BR, Dunn WA Jr, Progulske-Fox A. Invasion of human coronary artery cells by periodontal pathogens. Infect Immun. 1999; 67: 5792–5798.
Deshpande RG, Khan MB, Genco CA. Invasion of aortic and heart endothelial cells by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun. 1998; 66: 5337–5343.
Amar S, Gokce N, Morgan S, Loukideli M, Van Dyke TE, Vita JA. Periodontal disease is associated with brachial artery endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1245–1249.
Kuramitsu HK, Kang IC, Qi M. Interactions of Porphyromonas gingivalis with host cells: implications for cardiovascular diseases. J Periodontol. 2003; 74: 85–89.
Gibson FC3rd, Hong C, Chou HH, Yumoto H, Chen J, Lien E, Wong J, Genco CA. Innate immune recognition of invasive bacteria accelerates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2801–2806.
Genco CA, Cutler CW, Kapczynski D, Maloney K, Arnold RR. A novel mouse model to study the virulence of and host response to Porphyromonas (Bacteroides) gingivalis. Infect Immun. 1991; 59: 1255–1263.
Geerts SO, Nys M, De MP, Charpentier J, Albert A, Legrand V, Rompen EH. Systemic release of endotoxins induced by gentle mastication: association with periodontitis severity. J Periodontol. 2002; 73: 73–78.
Loesche WJ. Association of the oral flora with important medical diseases. Curr Opin Periodontol. 1997; 4: 21–28.
Loesche WJ. Periodontal disease: link to cardiovascular disease. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000; 21: 463–466,468, 470 passim; quiz 484.
Chiu B. Multiple infections in carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Am Heart J. 1999; 138: S534–S536.
Herzberg MC, Meyer MW. Effects of oral flora on platelets: possible consequences in cardiovascular disease. J Periodontol. 1996; 67: 1138–1142.
Curtis MA, Macey M, Slaney JM, Howells GL. Platelet activation by Protease I of Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993; 110: 167–173.
Lourbakos A, Yuan YP, Jenkins AL, Travis J, Andrade-Gordon P, Santulli R, Potempa J, Pike RN. Activation of protease-activated receptors by gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis leads to platelet aggregation: a new trait in microbial pathogenicity. Blood. 2001; 97: 3790–3797.
Pham K, Feik D, Hammond BF, Rams TE, Whitaker EJ. Aggregation of human platelets by gingipain-R from Porphyromonas gingivalis cells and membrane vesicles. Platelets. 2002; 13: 21–30.
Sharma A, Novak EK, Sojar HT, Swank RT, Kuramitsu HK, Genco RJ. Porphyromonas gingivalis platelet aggregation activity: outer membrane vesicles are potent activators of murine platelets. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2000; 15: 393–396.
Imamura T, Potempa J, Tanase S, Travis J. Activation of blood coagulation factor X by arginine-specific cysteine proteinases (gingipain-Rs) from Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 16062–16067.
Imamura T, Banbula A, Pereira PJ, Travis J, Potempa J. Activation of human prothrombin by arginine-specific cysteine proteinases (Gingipains R) from porphyromonas gingivalis. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 18984–18991.
Imamura T, Tanase S, Hamamoto T, Potempa J, Travis J. Activation of blood coagulation factor IX by gingipains R, arginine-specific cysteine proteinases from Porphyromonas gingivalis. Biochem J. 2001; 353: 325–331.
Gerrity RG, Naito HK, Richardson M, Schwartz CJ. Dietary induced atherogenesis in swine. Morphology of the intima in prelesion stages. Am J Pathol. 1979; 95: 775–792.
Griggs TR, Bauman RW, Reddick RL, Read MS, Koch GG, Lamb MA. Development of coronary atherosclerosis in swine with severe hypercholesterolemia: Lack of influence of von Willebrand factor or acute intimal injury. Arteriosclerosis. 1986; 6: 155–165.
Nichols TC, Bellinger DA, Tate DA, Reddick RL, Read MS, Koch GG, Brinkhous KM, Griggs TR. von Willebrand factor and occlusive arterial thrombosis: A study in normal and von Willebrand’s disease pigs with diet-induced hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis. 1990; 10: 449–461.
Nichols TC, Bellinger DA, Davis KE, Koch GG, Reddick RL, Read MS, Rapacz J, Hasler-Rapacz J, Brinkhous KM, Griggs TR. Porcine von Willebrand disease and atherosclerosis. Influence of polymorphism in apolipoprotein B100 genotype. Am J Pathol. 1992; 140: 403–415.
Gerrity RG, Natarajan R, Nadler JL, Kimsey T. Diabetes-induced accelerated atherosclerosis in swine. Diabetes. 2001; 50: 1654–1665.
Li L, Messas E, Batista EL Jr, Levine RA, Amar S. Porphyromonas gingivalis infection accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in a heterozygous apolipoprotein E-deficient murine model. Circulation. 2002; 105: 861–867.
Lalla E, Lamster IB, Hofmann MA, Bucciarelli L, Jerud AP, Tucker S, Lu Y, Papapanou PN, Schmidt AM. Oral infection with a periodontal pathogen accelerates early atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1405–1411.
Chi H, Messas E, Levine RA, Graves DT, Amar S. Interleukin-1 receptor signaling mediates atherosclerosis associated with bacterial exposure and/or a high-fat diet in a murine apolipoprotein E heterozygote model: pharmacotherapeutic implications. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1678–1685.
Daly CG, Mitchell DH, Highfield JE, Grossberg DE, Stewart D. Bacteremia due to periodontal probing: a clinical and microbiological investigation. J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 210–214.
Haynes WG, Stanford C. Periodontal disease and atherosclerosis: from dental to arterial plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1309–1311.
Ide M, Jagdev D, Coward PY, Crook M, Barclay GR, Wilson RF. The short-term effects of treatment of chronic periodontitis on circulating levels of endotoxin, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-6. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 420–428.
Njoroge T, Genco RJ, Sojar HT, Hamada N, Genco CA. A role for fimbriae in Porphyromonas gingivalis invasion of oral epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1997; 65: 1980–1984.
Beck JD, Elter JR, Heiss G, Couper D, Mauriello SM, Offenbacher S. Relationship of periodontal disease to carotid artery intima-media wall thickness: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1816–1822.
Pussinen PJ, Jousilahti P, Alfthan G, Palosuo T, Asikainen S, Salomaa V. Antibodies to periodontal pathogens are associated with coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1250–1254.
Elter JR, Offenbacher S, Toole JF, Beck JD. Relationship of Periodontal Disease and Edentulism to Stroke/TIA. J Dent Res. 2003; 82: 998–1001.
Desvarieux M, Schwahn C, Volzke H, Demmer RT, Ludemann J, Kessler C, Jacobs DR Jr, John U, Kocher T. Gender differences in the relationship between periodontal disease, tooth loss, and atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2029–2035.