点击显示 收起
Mycotic Diseases Branch and Biostatistics and Information Management Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix
University of Arizona Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona Valley Fever Center for Excellence
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson
Background.
Reports of coccidioidomycosis cases in Arizona have increased substantially. We investigated factors associated with the increase.
Methods.
We analyzed the National Electronic Telecommunications System for Surveillance (NETSS) data from 1998 to 2001 and used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to map high-incidence areas in Maricopa County. Poisson regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of climatic and environmental factors on the number of monthly cases; a model was developed and tested to predict outbreaks.
Results.
The overall incidence in 2001 was 43 cases/100,000 population, a significant (P < .01, test for trend) increase from 1998 (33 cases/100,000 population); the highest age-specific rate was in persons 65 years old (79 cases/100,000 population in 2001). Analysis of NETSS data by season indicated high-incidence periods during the winter (NovemberFebruary). GIS analysis showed that the highest-incidence areas were in the periphery of Phoenix. Multivariable Poisson regression modeling revealed that a combination of certain climatic and environmental factors were highly correlated with seasonal outbreaks (R2 = 0.75).
Conclusions.
Coccidioidomycosis in Arizona has increased. Its incidence is driven by seasonal outbreaks associated with environmental and climatic changes. Our study may allow public-health officials to predict seasonal outbreaks in Arizona and to alert the public and physicians early, so that appropriate preventive measures can be implemented.
Coccidioidomycosis is caused by Coccidioides species (C. immitis and C. posadasii). Clinical manifestations can range from self-limited, community-acquired pneumonia to disseminated infection that can involve the central nervous system, skin, bones, joints, and other organs throughout the body [1, 2]. Approximately 60% of infected persons are asymptomatic [3, 4]. Infection by Coccidioides species can follow inhalation of the fungal arthrospores, which exist in the soil of endemic areas [5]. Endemic areas include Mexico, parts of Central and South America, and the southwestern United States, particularly the desert areas of Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties in Arizona and Kern, Tulare, and Fresno Counties in California [69].
Outbreaks of coccidioidomycosis have been associated with soil disruption, archaeological digs, construction, and even earthquakes [1013]. In endemic areas, coccidioidomycosis has been linked to climatic conditions. Previous studies have postulated that Coccidioides species arthrospores are most abundant in the soil after heavy rains and may be most effectively dispersed during dry, hot periods, such as prolonged droughts [1, 10, 14]. Incidence in California is thought to be seasonal, with peak incidence occurring during the winter months [15]. Studies of specific groups have suggested that seasonal disease occurs in Arizona, although this has not been shown by use of state surveillance data [16, 17].
Surveillance of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona before 1995 was based on voluntary physician reporting and was done only at the state level [18]. In 1995, a clear case definition for coccidioidomycosis, incorporating laboratory confirmation, was adopted by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists [19]. At this time, it was made a nationally notifiable disease at the southwest regional level. The annual incidence of coccidioidomycosis in 1995 was estimated to be 15 cases/100,000 population [18].
In 1997, the state of Arizona made coccidioidomycosis a mandatory reportable disease for laboratories, and, as a result, reporting of coccidioidomycosis increased dramatically [18]. Initially, this increase was presumed to be a result of improved reporting (K.K., personal communication); however, incidence continued to increase. In 2001, 2203 cases were reported to the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). We conducted an investigation to better describe the populations affected by the epidemic and to determine which host or environmental factors were associated with the increase.
METHODS
Description of the epidemic.
To determine the incidence of disease and hospitalizations related to coccidioidomycosis, we analyzed the National Electronic Telecommunications System for Surveillance (NETSS) data and the Arizona Hospital Discharge Database for 19982001. An incident case was defined by use of the NETSS case definition, which requires the presence of clinical and laboratory criteria [19]. These criteria included the presence of cultural, histopathologic, or molecular evidence of Coccidiodes species or a serological test result positive for coccidioidal antibodies in serum or cerebrospinal fluid, as determined by (1) detection of coccidioidal IgM by immunodiffusion, EIA, latex agglutination, or tube precipitin or (2) detection of an increasing titer of coccidioidal IgG by immunodiffusion, EIA, or complement fixation. Not all cases were tested by use of all methods. Hospitalizations were identified in the Arizona Hospital Discharge Database by use of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for coccidioidomycosis (114.0114.3 and 114.5114.9). Only incident hospitalizations were included, to avoid counting readmissions for chronic complications related to coccidioidomycosis. Direct hospital charges were totaled by use of the numbers reported in the database.
Denominators for rate calculations were obtained from the 2000 US Census and included estimates for noncensus years. Since accurate census counts of the transient winter population have not been performed, to account for this population, we adjusted denominators using population estimates from previous studies. By use of these data, we estimated an annual statewide winter migration of 300,000 visitors between the months of December and March [20]. Analysis was performed by use of Microsoft Excel 2000 and Epi Info (version 6.02; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
To describe the geographic areas of high incidence of disease, we used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze the Phoenix metropolitan area (Maricopa County), where most case patients resided. Residences of incident case patients were mapped by use of addresses entered in the NETSS database. Boundaries within Maricopa County were defined by use of US Postal Service zip codes, and population estimates from the 2000 US Census were used as denominators, to calculate zip codespecific rates. These rates were age adjusted to the 2000 US Census standard population, to account for geographic differences in elderly populations in Maricopa County. GIS analysis was performed by use of ArcView 3.2 (ESRI).
Determination of factors associated with the increase.
To help explain the factors associated with the increase, 2 separate studies were performed. First, we performed a cohort study of case patients, to evaluate whether differences in recalled exposures or host factors were associated with either periods of high incidence or periods of low incidence. We randomly selected case patients from the NETSS database on the basis of whether their disease occurred during a period of high or low incidence. We calculated the minimum sample size to detect a 20% difference in exposures with 80% power and a 95% confidence level, which estimated a total sample size of 180. Phone numbers were available for 50% of case patients in the NETSS database; we attempted to obtain unavailable phone numbers using the local telephone directory and the Internet (http://www.whitepages.com). Trained personnel conducted phone surveys over the course of 5 days, including evenings and weekends, and asked questions about comorbidities, exposures, diagnosis, and outcome. Data were recorded on standard data-collection forms and were entered into Microsoft Access. The cohort was analyzed according to inclusion in high-incidence and low-incidence groups, to evaluate which factors were statistically more prevalent among case patients during the periods of high incidence. Univariate analysis and multivariable analysis were conducted by use of SAS (version 8.2; SAS Institute).
Next, we conducted a climatologic study to help determine whether changes in environmental or climatic conditions were associated with the increase. Using Poisson regression analysis, we determined the association between the number of monthly cases reported in Maricopa County through NETSS and monthly environmental and climatologic factors. Information on rainfall, drought indices, wind speed, and temperature was obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (Asheville, NC). Dust measurements were obtained from the Maricopa County Department of Environmental Quality. Environmental and climatic variables were chosen on the basis of plausibility of contribution to fungal growth or dissemination. To determine the significance of a recent short drought, we created variables that incorporated the amount of rain that fell recently (within 1 or 2 months) divided by the amount that fell over a longer period (6 or 7 months). Because the exact relationship between climate, environment, and disease has not been determined, we evaluated numerous such variables by univariate analysis. Variables were time lagged by 1 month to account for the time between exposure and onset of illness. Variables significant in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariable Poisson regression model. Multiple models were created and tested for the ability to reproduce actual monthly cases. Interactions between significant variables were assessed, and correlation of variables, to evaluate for colinearity, was performed. A final model was chosen on the basis of a high R2 value, few interactions, and low colinearity. Poisson regression analysis was conducted by use of SAS.
RESULTS
Description of the Epidemic
Overall, 7599 total cases were reported to the ADHS during 19982001. The majority of case patients were from Maricopa County (5399; 72% of total); 1391 case patients (19%) were from Pima County (Tucson metropolitan area). The median age was 52 years, and 58% were males. Of the 2239 case patients (29%) for whom reported data on race were available, 81% were white, 5% were African American, and 14% were Hispanic.
The annual incidence of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona increased from 33 cases/100,000 population in 1998 to 43 cases/100,000 population in 2001 (P < .001, test for trend). Persons 65 years old had the highest overall incidence (79 cases/100,000 population in 2001), although the greatest increases during the study period were seen in younger patients (figure 1). The 12-month composite incidence displayed a seasonal pattern, with peaks occurring from November to February of each year (figure 2). This pattern persisted after adjustment of the denominator for an estimate of the increased winter population.
Hospitalizations also increased throughout the study period; 69 patients (1.4/100,000 population) were hospitalized during 1998 with a new diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis, and 598 (11.8/100,000 population) were hospitalized during 2001 (P < .001, test for trend). Persons 65 years old composed 34% of all hospitalized patients during the study period and had the highest rate of hospitalization29/100,000 population in 2001. Overall, 26% of hospitalized patients had disseminated disease, including 10% with coccidioidal meningitis. Direct hospital charges for patients who had received primary or secondary diagnoses of coccidioidomycosis increased from $2,079,236 in 1998 to $19,342,776 in 2001. Hospital charges for the 19982001 period totaled $33,154,571 ($33,762/hospitalized patient).
A map of the incidence in Maricopa County shows a great degree of geographic variation (figure 3). The highest age-adjusted rates were primarily in the periphery of Phoenix (figure 3).
Determination of Factors Associated with the Increase
Cohort study.
Of 208 persons contacted by telephone, 196 (94%) agreed to participate. Fifty-five percent were males, and 86% were white. The median age was 63 years. The median time to diagnosis was >4 weeks from the onset of symptoms, and the median time that people felt ill was >2 months. Once the diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis was established, 70% received treatment with an antifungal medication, but 59% also received antibacterial agents at some time during their illness; 46% reported being hospitalized. Prior knowledge of coccidioidomycosis was limited: 33% of survey participants had not heard of coccidioidomycosis (or its common name, valley fever) before diagnosis. Persons of nonwhite race were more likely to not have heard about coccidioidomycosis before diagnosis (relative risk [RR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.033.07]; P = .01), and patients with a lack of knowledge about coccidioidomycosis were more likely to have received a diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis >2 weeks after the onset of symptoms (91% vs. 72%; RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.11.5]; P = .01).
Known risk factors for coccidioidomycosis were not statistically more prevalent during the periods of high incidence than during the periods of low incidence. For example, living for <1 year in Arizona was reported by 10% of case patients infected during periods of high incidence, compared with 14% of case patients infected during periods of low incidence (P = .5). Other variables not statistically significant included being in a dust storm during the month before illness (30% vs. 28%; P = .8), having diabetes (18% vs. 17%; P = .8), having a condition or taking medication resulting in immunosuppression (8% vs. 10%; P = .6), and being a smoker at the time of illness (21% vs. 22%; P = .8). As we were unable to find any variables significant at P < .1, no multivariable analysis was performed.
Climatologic study.
The association between the number of monthly cases of coccidioidomycosis in Maricopa County and selected climatic and environmental variables is shown in table 1. Statistically significant climatic and environmental variables included drought indices (Palmer Z Index and Palmer Drought Severity Index), wind, mean temperature, dust (measured by concentration of suspended particulate matter <10 m), and rainfall (table 1).
DISCUSSION
Coccidioidomycosis has been causing increasing morbidity in Arizona, and the related public-health burden to the state of Arizona is considerable: it is currently the fourth most commonly reported condition to the ADHS; only gonorrhea, chlamydia, and chronic hepatitis C are reported more frequently (K.K., personal communication). The present study has described an epidemic of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona that has been driven by seasonal peaks in incidence associated with climatic changes.
Although coccidioidomycosis has previously been described as having a seasonal pattern in select groups, the present study is the first statewide report of this pattern. Mandatory laboratory reporting in 1997 improved the timeliness and completeness of the surveillance system and probably helped to reveal the seasonal pattern. These seasonal outbreaks do not seem to be related to changes in population characteristics, exposures, or comorbidities. Adjusting for the yearly winter migration of elderly persons did not account for the outbreaks. Similarly, we found no exposure differences between case patients during periods of high incidence and case patients during periods of low incidence that could explain the seasonal peaks.
GIS analysis identified high age-adjusted rates in areas undergoing high rates of construction activity and development around the periphery of metropolitan Phoenix. However, in the Poisson regression model, the number of monthly building permits issued was not statistically associated with incidence of disease. This is likely because the timing of building-permit issuance does not correlate with the time of the actual construction and digging. Although the present study has suggested a relationship between high incidence of disease and areas with high rates of construction, further risk-factor studies should be performed to thoroughly address this relationship. For example, persons who live in or move to areas with high rates of construction and development may not have had prior exposure to Coccidioides species and may subsequently be at higher risk for disease. Another potential explanation for this geographic distribution is that some of these areas also have large retirement communities with a potentially immunonaive population. Although the rates have been age adjusted to account for differences in distribution of the elderly population, these areas may also have high rates because of a large proportion of recent migrants to the region.
Climatic variables describing hot, dry conditions had the strongest association with incidence. A Poisson regression model successfully recreated the observed seasonality during 19982001, including the large peak beginning in November 2001. Although the model correctly did not predict a peak during the winter of 2000, it incorrectly predicted a small peak in September 2000. This incorrect prediction is likely a reflection of the complicated relationship between climate and disease and underlines the need for future studies to refine the interaction between these factors.
Other models have found similar relationships between coccidioidomycosis and climate [14, 21]. One model, which incorporated data from California, found that length of drought and mean annual rainfall during the current year were the most predictive of cases, with an R2 value of 0.45. However, this model relied on old surveillance data starting from 1956. In addition, it tested yearly incidence changes and did not explain seasonal variation. The model developed in the present study uses current surveillance data and real-time predictors and accurately describes 75% of the monthly fluctuations seen.
An important component of the epidemic in Arizona is the large burden of disease in older populations. Persons 65 years old had the highest rate of disease and hospitalization related to coccidioidomycosis. Given the continued migration of such persons to the area, this population is likely to continue to be highly affected. However, we found that the incidence in younger populations is increasing, particularly in those 018 years old. Physicians should be aware of this emerging infection in patients of all age groups who are living in or who have traveled to an endemic area.
Although the cohort study did not identify host factors or exposures that were associated with the periods of high incidence, it nonetheless highlighted some important aspects of the epidemic in Arizona. Median time to diagnosis was long (>4 weeks), and many patients had not heard of coccidioidomycosis before their illness. Additionally, the cohort study identified that nonwhites were more likely to not have heard about coccidioidomycosis before becoming ill, and, therefore, they may be suitable candidates for public-awareness campaigns. These groups may be particularly important to target, since some nonwhites, particularly African Americans and Filipinos, are at increased risk for developing severe or disseminated disease [7].
The present study was subject to some limitations. The cohort study was subject to recall bias, since patients were asked about past exposures and risk factors. However, since all groups had disease, the recall bias of remembering certain exposures should have been equal in all groups. Another limitation of the cohort study was that the phone survey was conducted during October, before many winter visitors had arrived. Therefore, the proportion of winter visitors in the study was probably underrepresented in all groups. The respondents in the cohort were generally older than those in the surveillance group, probably because younger persons are less likely to maintain a phone number. The high proportion of persons who reported being hospitalized is likely a reflection of this.
Preventive measures for coccidioidomycosis may not be readily available, especially if seasonal outbreaks are due to climatic changes. Some measures are currently in place to reduce dustfor example, construction companies often wet the soil before digging, and many dirt roads are being paved. Despite these measures, however, our study has shown that incidence and associated morbidity have been increasing substantially in Arizona. If abnormally hot and dry conditions continue in Arizona, incidence could increase further.
A vaccine that is currently in development may provide adequate immunity to infection in the future [2224], but, until such measures for prevention are available, public-health officials should implement measures and programs to increase awareness to improve diagnosis and proper treatment. Identification of climatic patterns that could predispose to epidemics should allow public-health officials to warn physicians about large "cocci seasons," thereby heightening clinical suspicion and leading to more-timely diagnosis and more-appropriate management, avoiding overuse of antibiotics. Such appropriate management may include use of oral antifungals, which may decrease the risk of developing severe pulmonary disease [7]. In addition, susceptible patients, such as the immunocompromised or elderly, may be warned to avoid activities that may potentially put them at higher risk. Future studies should focus on strategies to improve timely diagnosis as well as on methods to prevent severe or disseminated disease.
References
1. Smith CE, Beard RR, Rosenberger HG, Whiting EG. Effect of season and dust control on coccidioidomycosis. JAMA 1946; 132:8338. First citation in article
2. Einstein HE, Johnson RH. Coccidioidomycosis: new aspects of epidemiology and therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16:34956. First citation in article
3. Smith CE, Beard RR, Whiting EG, Rosenberger HG. Varieties of coccidioidal infection in relation to the epidemiology and control of the diseases. Am J Public Health 1941; 36:1394402. First citation in article
4. Leake JA, Mosley DG, England B, et al. Risk factors for acute symptomatic coccidioidomycosis among elderly persons in Arizona, 19961997. J Infect Dis 2000; 181:143540. First citation in article
5. Pappagianis D. Epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis. Curr Top Med Mycol 1988; 2:199238. First citation in article
6. Edwards PQ, Palmer CE. Prevalence of sensitivity to coccidioidin, with special reference to specific and nonspecific reactions to coccidioidin and to histoplasmin. Dis Chest 1957; 31:3560. First citation in article
7. Rosenstein NE, Emery KW, Werner SB, et al. Risk factors for severe pulmonary and disseminated coccidioidomycosis: Kern County, California, 19951996. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32:70815. First citation in article
8. Galgiani JN. Coccidioidomycosis: a regional disease of national importance. Rethinking approaches for control. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:293300. First citation in article
9. Woods CW, McRill C, Plikaytis BD, et al. Coccidioidomycosis in human immunodeficiency virusinfected persons in Arizona, 19941997: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. J Infect Dis 2000; 181:142834. First citation in article
10. Schneider E, Hajjeh RA, Spiegel RA, et al. A coccidioidomycosis outbreak following the Northridge, Calif, earthquake. JAMA 1997; 277:9048. First citation in article
11. Cairns L, Blythe D, Kao A, et al. Outbreak of coccidioidomycosis in Washington state residents returning from Mexico. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:614. First citation in article
12. Petersen LR, Marshall SL, Barton-Dickson C, et al. Coccidioidomycosis among workers at archeological site, northeastern Utah. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10:63742. First citation in article
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coccidioidomycosis in travelers returning from MexicoPennsylvania, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000; 49:10046. First citation in article
14. Kolivras K, Comrie A. Modeling valley fever (coccidioidomycosis) incidence on the basis of climate conditions. Int J Biometeorol 2003; 47:87101. First citation in article
15. Kirkland TN, Fierer J. Coccidioidomycosis: a reemerging infectious disease. Emerg Infect Dis 1996; 2:1929. First citation in article
16. Kerrick SS, Lundergan LL, Galgiani JN. Coccidioidomycosis at a university health service. Am Rev Resp Dis 1985; 131:1002. First citation in article
17. Hugenholtz PG. Climate and coccidioidomycosis. In: Proceedings of symposium on coccidioidomycosis, Phoenix, AZ. Public Health Service Publication no. 575. Atlanta: US Public Health Service, 1957:13643. First citation in article
18. Ampel NM, Mosley DG, England B, Vertz PD, Komatsu K, Hajjeh RA. Coccidioidomycosis in Arizona: increase in incidence from 1990 to 1995. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:152830. First citation in article
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46:155. First citation in article
20. Hogan TD, Happel SK. Survey finds little change in winter resident population. Arizona Business 2001; 28:57. First citation in article
21. Fisher MC, Koenig G, White TJ, Taylor JW. Pathogenic clones versus environmentally driven population increase: analysis of an epidemic of the human fungal pathogen Coccidioides immitis. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:80713. First citation in article
22. Pappagianis D. Seeking a vaccine against Coccidioides immitis and serologic studies: expectations and realities. Fungal Genet Biol 2001; 32:19. First citation in article
23. Cole GT, Xue JM, Okeke CN, et al. A vaccine against coccidioidomycosis is justified and attainable. Med Mycol 2004; 42:189216. First citation in article
24. Barnato AE, Sanders GD, Owens DK. Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for Coccidioides immitis. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:797806. First citation in article