点击显示 收起
Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (J.B., J.A., E.D.C.)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Alcale? Alcale?de Henares, Spain (F.R.-B., F.G.)
Faculty of Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kortrijk Campus, Kortrijk, Belgium (A.C.)
Department of Organic Chemistry, Etvs Lored University, Budapest, Hungary (V.F.)
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy (F.C.-S., C.-F.P.)
Instituto de Que猰ica Meedica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Spain (C.G.-A., S.V., M.-J.C.)
Abstract
The highly conserved Asn136 is in close proximity to the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor (NNRTI)-specific lipophilic pocket of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RT. Site-directed mutagenesis has revealed that the catalytic activity of HIV-1 RT mutated at position Asn136 is heavily compromised. Only 0.07 to 2.1% of wild-type activity is retained, depending on the nature of the amino acid change at position 136. The detrimental effect of the mutations at position 136 occurred when the mutated amino acid was present in the p51 subunit but not in the p66 subunit of the p51/p66 RT heterodimer. All mutant enzymes could be inhibited by second-generation NNRTIs such as efavirenz. They were also markedly more sensitive to the inactivating (denaturating) effect of urea than wild-type RT, and the degree of increased urea sensitivity was highly correlated with the degree of (lower) catalytic activity of the mutant enzymes. Replacing wild-type Asn136 in HIV-1 RT with other amino acids resulted in notably increased amounts of free p51 and p66 monomers. Our findings identify a structural/functional role for Asn136 in stabilization of the RT p66/p51 dimer and provide hints for the rational design of novel NNRTIs or drugs targeting either Asn136 in the 7eC8 loop of p51 or its anchoring point on p66 (the peptide backbone of His96) so as to interfere with the RT dimerization process and/or with the structural support that the p51 subunit provides to the p66 subunit and which is essential for the catalytic enzyme activity.
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) is a key enzyme in HIV replication and therefore is an attractive target for HIV chemotherapy (De Clercq, 2002). The enzyme consists of two subunits. The p51 subunit is derived from p66 after removal of the p15 RNase H part of the p66 subunit. Although the substrate binding site is located in the p66 subunit, the p51 subunit of HIV RT is essential for loading the p66 subunit on the template primer (Harris et al., 1998). Three classes of anti-HIV compounds have been approved for the treatment of HIV infection that target the virus-encoded RT (De Clercq, 2000). They consist of the group of nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), a nucleotide RT inhibitor, and the non-nucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) (De Clercq, 2000). Drug resistance is a major problem for long-term chemotherapy targeting HIV-1 RT (Balzarini, 1999; Schinazi et al., 2001). In particular, NNRTIs easily select for drug-resistance mutations in this enzyme. The NNRTIs are specific for HIV-1 strains and bind to a lipophilic pocket in HIV-1 RT at an allosteric site that is close to, but distinct from, the substrate binding site (Kohlstaedt et al., 1992; Ding et al., 1995; Esnouf et al., 1995; Ren et al., 1995; Hopkins et al., 1996). The NNRTI-specific pocket mainly consists of amino acids that belong to the p66 subunit, but the bottom of the pocket is located close to a peptide stretch that is contributed by the p51 subunit (Kohlstaedt et al., 1992; Ding et al., 1995; Esnouf et al., 1995; Ren et al., 1995; Hopkins et al., 1996). Indeed, Glu138 and Thr139, as well as Ser134, Ile135, Asn136, and Asn137 from the p51 subunit, line the outer part of the NNRTI binding pocket in the p66 subunit and make up a portion of the dimerization interface (Fig. 1).
To date, two NNRTIs are known to select for amino acid mutations that are located at the p66/p51 interface. One is tert-butyldimethylsilyl aminooxathiole dioxide-m3T, which selects for the E138K mutation (Balzarini et al., 1993, 1994; Boyer et al., 1994; Jonckheere et al., 1994), and the other one is (+)-calanolide A, which selects for the T139I mutation in HIV-1 RT (Buckheit et al., 1995). Modeling studies and experimental results revealed that tert-butyldimethylsilyl aminooxathiole dioxide-m3T and its derivatives may interfere with the association of the p66 and p51 subunits, thereby destabilizing the HIV-1 RT heterodimeric enzyme (Arion et al., 1996; Sluis-Cremer et al., 2000; Rodriguez-Barrios et al., 2001; Camarasa et al., 2004). The fact that both Asn136 and Asn137 are highly conserved among the (heterodimeric) RTs of all HIV-1, HIV-2, simian immunodeficiency virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, and several other lentivirus strains that have been characterized so far (Table 1) points to a defined, but as yet unidentified, functional and/or structural role for these residues. Both Asn136 and Asn137 in the p66 subunit are exposed to the solvent, but the side-chain carboxamide group of Asn136 in the p51 subunit is engaged in two hydrogen bonds with the peptide backbone of His96 in the p66 subunit (Fig. 1). It is interesting that the monomeric RT of Moloney murine leukemia virus has no asparagine conservation at the 136 and 137 sites (Table 1).
The alignment for MMLV was generated automatically using T-COFFEE (http://igs-server.cnrs-mrs.fr/~cnotred/Projects_home_page/t_coffee_home_page.html) but manually corrected on the basis of 3D molecular superposition.
No mutations at amino acid position 136 of RT have ever been detected in NNRTI-exposed HIV-1eCinfected cell cultures. In patients infected with HIV-1 who have never received antiretroviral drugs, the presence of mutations at this position was completely absent (0 of 457 patients) and less than 1% in patients infected with HIV-1 who were treated using highly active antiretroviral therapy with NNRTIs (15 of 1556 patients) (Ceccherini-Silberstein et al., 2005). Thus, because of its highly conserved nature, Asn136 seems to play a crucial role in the integrity of HIV RT and/or its catalytic function.
Our studies revealed that Asn136 is essential to preserve the catalytic activity of HIV RT and plays a crucial role in the structure and stabilization of the enzyme heterodimer. We also provide evidence that the NNRTI pocket site in which the amino acid Asn136 from p51 binds can be a potential target in the design of novel NNRTIs endowed with higher antiviral potency and/or with a more favorable resistance profile than the current NNRTIs in clinical use.
Materials and Methods
Compounds. Delavirdine, efavirenz, and quinoxaline (GW420867) were kindly provided by Drs. R. Kirsh and J.-P. Kleim (Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Germany). Nevirapine was from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (Ingelheim, Germany), and ddGTP was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Site-Directed Mutagenesis of HIV-1 RT. Mutant RT enzymes containing the N136A, N136Q, N136Y, N136K, N136T, N136S, N136L, or N136D mutation were derived from the RT sequence cloned in pKRT2His (D'Aquila and Summers, 1989; Pelemans et al., 1998). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, Westburg, Leusden, The Netherlands) as described previously (D'Aquila and Summers, 1989). The two synthetic oligonucleotide primers (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) that were used contained the desired mutation at amino acid position 136 of HIV-1 RT. The presence of the desired mutation was confirmed by sequencing of the RT gene on an ABI Prism 3100 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), using the ABI Prism Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems).
Construction of Mutant Recombinant HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptases. Recombinant HIV-1 RT enzymes were expressed from a two-plasmid coexpression system described previously by Jonckheere et al. (1994). The p66 subunit of RT was expressed from pACYC66His and the p51 subunit from pKRT51. To construct wild-type and 136-mutated pACYC66His, wild-type and 136-mutated pKRT2His were digested with EcoRI and AviII, and the RT-containing fragments were ligated into pACYC184 digested with EcoRI and ScaI. To construct wild-type and 136-mutated pKRT51, wild-type and 136-mutated pKRT2His were digested with NcoI and KpnI, and the RT-containing fragment was ligated into pKRT51 digested with NcoI and KpnI. For all mutant enzymes, the mutation was introduced in both p66 and p51 subunits. Only for the mutant N136T RT, the mutation was introduced solely in p66, solely in p51, or in both p66 and p51 subunits.
Preparation of Escherichia coli Extracts. Expression of recombinant RT was performed as described previously (Jonckheere et al., 1994). Luria broth (800 ml) containing 100 e蘥/ml ampicillin and 10 e蘥/ml tetracycline was inoculated with an overnight culture of E. coli JM109 transformed with both plasmids of the coexpression system and started at an optical density (at 600 nm) of 0.1. The culture was grown at 37°C, induced with 1 mM final concentration of isopropyl -D-thiogalactoside for expression of RT, and after centrifugation the pellet was stored at eC20°C. Later, the bacterial cell pellet was resuspended in 15 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 5 mM -mercaptoethanol, 0.9% glucose, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 e蘥/ml pepstatin, 10 e蘥/ml leupeptin, and 10% glycerol) and passed through an SLM Aminco French Pressure Cell Press (Beun de Ronde, La Abcoude, The Netherlands). The lysate was centrifuged for 20 min at 17,000g.
Purification of Wild-Type and Mutant Recombinant HIV-1 RT. The purification of RT was performed as described previously (Pelemans et al., 1998). In brief, the supernatant of the lysed bacterial cell culture was incubated with Ni-NTA resin (QIAGEN, Westburg, Leusden, The Netherlands). After sedimentation of the Ni-NTA resin with the bound His6-tagged proteins, a column was formed and washed twice with a sodium phosphate buffer containing 10 mM imidazole. Then, the RT was eluted from the column with a sodium phosphate buffer containing 125 mM imidazole. The imidazole-containing buffer was exchanged with a Tris-HCl buffer and the eluate was concentrated to 2 ml using Ultrafree-15 centrifugal filtration devices (Millipore, Brussels, Belgium). The His6-tagged RT was further purified to approximately 98% purity over a Hitrap Heparin column (Amersham Biosciences, Roosendaal, The Netherlands). All fractions containing heterodimer RT were pooled and stored in a 50% glycerol buffer at eC20°C. Protein concentrations in these stock solutions were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Nazareth Eke, Belgium) with bovine serum albumin as standard.
Reverse Transcriptase Assay. For the determination of IC50 values for the test compounds against HIV-1 RT, the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase assay was performed as follows: the reaction mixture (50 e蘬) contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 300 e glutathione, 500 e EDTA, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1.25 e蘥 of bovine serum albumin, a fixed concentration of the labeled substrate [3H]dGTP (1.6 e, 1 e藽i; specific activity, 12.6 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences), a fixed concentration of the template/primer poly(rC) · oligo(dG)12eC18 (0.1 mM; Amersham Biosciences), 0.06% Triton X-100, 5 e蘬 of inhibitor solution [containing various concentrations (10-fold dilutions) of the compounds], and 5 e蘬 of the RT preparations that correspond to 0.85, 17, 12, 162, 51, 7, 27, 26, and 29 ng of enzyme (protein) for the wild-type and the N136A, N136Q, N136Y, N136K, N136T, N136S, N136L, and N136D mutant RTs, respectively. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 30 min, at which time 200 e蘬 of yeast RNA (2 mg/ml) and 1 ml of trichloroacetic acid (5%, v/v) in water were added. The solutions were kept on ice for at least 30 min, after which the acid-insoluble material was filtered over Whatman GF/C glass-fiber filters and washed with 5% trichloroacetic acid in H2O and ethanol. The filters were then analyzed for radioactivity in a liquid scintillation counter (Canberra Industries, Zellik, Belgium). The IC50 value for each test compound was determined as the compound concentration that inhibited HIV-1 RT activity by 50%.
To determine the Km value of the template/primer against HIV-1 RT in the presence of different concentrations of urea, the RT activity was measured as described above in the presence of 10, 14, 20, 33, 50, 67, 100, and 140 e poly(rC) · oligo(dG) for HIV-1 RT (WT), 14, 20, 33, 50, 67, and 100 e poly(rC) · oligo(dG) for mutant N136T HIV-1 RT, and 20, 33, 50, 67, 100, and 140 e poly(rC) · oligo(dG) for mutant N136L HIV-1 RT. The amounts of urea varied between 0.3 and 1.5 M.
Catalytic Activity of Wild-Type and Mutant Heterodimer HIV-1 RTs in the Presence of Urea and Acetonitrile. Denaturation curves were plotted by preincubation of RT with different concentrations of urea ranging from 0.0625 to 2.0 M or acetonitrile ranging from 2 to 14% for 30 min at 37°C in 50 e蘬 of reaction buffer (containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 0.06% Triton X-100, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 150 mM KCl, 0.3 mM glutathione, 1.25 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1.4 mM poly(rC) · oligo(dG); Amersham Biosciences). The polymerase reaction was initiated by adding [8-3H]dGTP (0.1 mM, 1 mCi/ml) (Amersham Biosciences) as substrate. After incubating for 10 min at 37°C, the reactions were terminated by addition of 1 ml of ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA) 5% in 200 mM Na4P2O7 and 200 e蘬 of yeast RNA (2 mg/ml, pH 8.0). Reaction products were incubated on ice for 30 min and were precipitated on a Whatman GF/C filter (Whatman, Clifton, NJ). The filters were washed with 20 ml TCA 5% and dried with 2 ml of ethanol. The amount of incorporated radioactive substrate was analyzed in a TR-2500 liquid scintillation counter (PerkinElmer NV Life Sciences, Zaventem, Belgium) by adding 4 ml of HiSafe2 (PerkinElmer). Polymerase activity was determined as the amount of nucleotide incorporated at each urea concentration relative to the amount of nucleotide incorporation in the absence of denaturant. The percentage of polymerase activity was plotted versus the urea concentration, and the data were fitted to a curve using the program SigmaPlot Version 8.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) to determine the concentration of urea at the midpoint of the denaturation curve.
Construction and Expression of Wild-Type and Mutant HIV-1 RT Fusion Plasmids in Bacterial Expression Vectors. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged p51 mutant subunits containing either the N136Q, N136T, N136Y, or N136K substitutions were constructed by subcloning an NsiI/KpnI restricted fragment from the p51-encoding portion of the above-described pKRT51 containing the desired mutation (glutamine, threonine, tyrosine, or lysine) at position 136 into the NsiI/KpnI-digested pGEX51H [previously constructed by Auwerx et al. (2002)]. Expression and purification of the wild-type and mutant N-terminal GST-tagged p51 subunits and N-terminal His6-tagged p66 were performed as described previously (Auwerx et al., 2002).
FPLC Size-Exclusion Chromatography. Size-exclusion chromatography was performed using a 10 x 300-nm Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (Amersham Biosciences). Freshly prepared RT samples or RT samples that were left in elution buffer for 24, 72, or 336 h after elution from a Ni-NTA column and that contain 5 to 10 e蘥 of protein were applied on the size-exclusion column and eluted with 200 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, at the flow rate of 0.5 ml as described previously (Restle et al., 1990).
CD Spectroscopy. CD spectra of wild-type and mutant N136T and N136L RTs in the far-UV region (190eC260 nm) were acquired at 25°C on a Jasco J-600A spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) using a cuvette of 1 ml. Protein solutions were 0.17 and 0.25 e in 0.75 mM EDTA, 0.75 mM DDT, 2% glycerol and 7.5 mM Tris at pH 7.8. The data were expressed as residual ellipticity [] (deg cm2 · dmoleC1) using 114.75 as the mean residue weight for HIV-1 RT. The spectra were obtained with a 1-nm bandwidth, a 1-s time constant, and a data density of 10 points/nm. To estimate the fractions of the different types of secondary structure, analysis of CD data was performed with the CDNN program (Bhm et al., 1992).
Results
Catalytic DNA Polymerase Activity of HIV-1 RT Mutated at Amino Acid Position Asn136. To investigate the influence of changes at the amino acid residue Asn136 of HIV-1 RT activity, we constructed eight recombinant RTs by site-directed mutagenesis: 136A, 136L, 136Y, 136K, 136D, 136S, 136T, and 136Q. In this way, the different types of amino acid side chains were represented: an aliphatic side chain in alanine and leucine, an aromatic side chain in tyrosine, a protonated amino group in the positively charged lysine, a carboxylate in the negatively charged aspartic acid, and a polar uncharged group in serine, threonine, and glutamine. The above-mentioned mutations were introduced in both p66 and p51 subunits of the RT heterodimer, and all mutant recombinant RTs were purified to 98% homogeneity through Ni-NTA- and heparin-containing affinity columns.
To perform RT assays that could reliably measure the catalytic activity of the different mutant enzymes, the following enzyme (protein) amounts were used in the 50-e蘬 reaction mixture: wild-type Asn136 RT, 0.87 ng; N136A RT, 17 ng; N136Q RT, 12 ng; N136Y RT, 162 ng; N136K RT, 51 ng; N136T RT, 7 ng; N136S RT, 27 ng; N136L RT, 26 ng; and N136D RT, 29 ng. Under the experimental conditions, between 5000 dpm (for the highest amounts of RT protein) and 60,000 dpm (for the lowest amounts of RT protein) [8-3H]dGTP was incorporated into the template/primer poly(rC) · oligo(dG) after a 30-min incubation period. As a rule, the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase (RDDP) activities of all mutant enzymes were impaired severely (Fig. 2). The catalytic activity of the mutant enzymes ranged between 0.07 and 2.1% of wild type. The catalytically most active mutant RT contained the N136T mutation (2.1% activity of wild type), and the presence of the N136Y, N136L, and N136D amino acid mutations in HIV-1 RT resulted in mutant enzymes endowed with the poorest catalytic activity (0.1%). Thus, mutating Asn136 of HIV-1 RT to other amino acids results in severely compromised RTs possessing a very low catalytic RDDP activity.
The mutant N136T RT had the highest catalytic activity among all the mutant Asn136 RTs studied. In this enzyme, the N136T mutation was present in both p66 and p51 subunits. To assess the role of the subunit location of the N136T mutation in the decreased catalytic activity of the mutant RT, two additional mutant RTs were constructed in which the N136T mutation was introduced in either solely the p66 or solely the p51 subunit of the heterodimeric RT enzyme. Although the mutant RT enzyme in which N136T was solely present in the p51 subunit had a catalytic activity that was 8.4 ± 3.7% of wild-type enzyme, the heterodimeric enzyme at which N136T was solely present in p66 had a catalytic activity of 71 ± 23% of the wild-type enzyme. Thus, the exclusive presence of the N136T mutation in p51 had a much more deleterious effect on the catalytic activity of the mutant enzyme than when it was solely present in p66.
Inhibitory Activity of NNRTIs and ddGTP against Wild-Type and Mutant Asn136 Recombinant HIV-1 RTs. The mutant enzymes were evaluated for their sensitivity to the inhibitory activity of a variety of NNRTIs and the NRTI derivative ddGTP (Table 2). The inhibitory activity of both NNRTIs and ddGTP against wild-type RT, expressed as an IC50 value, ranged between 0.022 and 0.45 e, depending on the nature of the compound. The N136T RT mutant that was endowed with the highest catalytic activity among all RT mutants tested kept pronounced sensitivity to all NNRTIs and ddGTP. In addition, the mutant N136D RT reasonably kept its sensitivity to the drugs (decrease of the inhibitory activity of the NNRTIs ranged between 1.4- to 6-fold). In contrast to the susceptibility of the mutant N136T and N136D RTs to the inhibitory effect of the NNRTIs, the other mutant Asn136 RT enzymes substantially lost between 10- and >25-fold sensitivity to some of the evaluated drugs, depending on the nature of the drug and the introduced amino acid mutation. It is interesting that efavirenz, which was among the most potent inhibitors of the wild-type RT enzyme, only lost its inhibitory potential by 6-fold at most. It is remarkable that the inhibitory potential of the NRTI derivative ddGTP against one or several of the mutant RT enzymes in most cases decreased at least 10-fold and in some cases even 50- to 100-fold. The N136L RT mutant was quite resistant to most of the NNRTIs and to ddGTP. It should be noted that different enzyme (protein) concentrations were required to reliably obtain the above-mentioned drug-inhibition values. The protein amounts used in the assays ranged between 0.87 ng for wild-type RT and 162 ng for mutant N136Y RT (see Materials and Methods). However, when expressed in nanomolarity, wild-type enzyme was present at 0.15 nM, and the (least catalytically efficient) mutant N136Y RT was present at 30 nM in the assay mixture. Thus, the enzyme concentrations used were well below those of the compounds that showed an inhibitory effect against the wild-type and mutant enzymes. Moreover, under these experimental conditions, it was ascertained that the IC50 values of the test compounds were not affected when enzyme concentrations (i.e., wild-type RT) in the assay had been varied by at least 100-fold (data not shown). Thus, although the drug inhibition data were obtained in the presence of a wide variety of mutant enzyme concentrations, the IC50 values depicted in Table 2 can be reliably compared with one another.
Data are the mean (± S.D.) of at least three to four independent experiments.
When the NNRTIs and ddGTPs were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against the HIV-1 RT heterodimers that contained the N136T mutation solely in either the p66 or the p51 subunit, no marked differences were noted compared with the wild-type or mutant RTs that contained this mutation in both subunits (Fig. 3).
Effects of Exposure of Urea and Acetonitrile on Mutant Asn136 RT Activity. Wild-type and four mutant Asn136 HIV-1 RTs (i.e., N136T, N136K, N136Y, and N136L) were exposed to a wide variety of urea (or acetonitrile for N136T and N136L) concentrations, and the catalytic activity of the urea- (and acetonitrile) exposed enzymes was measured (Fig. 4, A and B). For the wild-type enzyme, the RT activity gradually decreased in the presence of increasing urea concentrations (Fig. 4A). A urea concentration as low as 0.20 M slightly decreased the catalytic activity of wild-type RT, and 2.0 M urea abolished its catalytic activity almost completely. Half of the RT catalytic activity was retained at around 1.0 M urea. However, when the mutant Asn136 RT enzymes were exposed to the different concentrations of urea, the enzymes had invariably gained a markedly higher sensitivity to the denaturing activity of urea. Although the urea IC50 value shifted from 1 M for wild-type enzyme to 0.6 M for the N136T mutant RT, the urea IC50 was further decreased to 0.25 and 0.20 M for the mutants N136Y and N136K RT, respectively. The N136Q RT mutant showed an intermediate sensitivity to urea (IC50 0.4 M). An equally increased sensitivity to urea was observed for mutant N136T RT when the N136T mutation was solely introduced in p51 (Fig. 4A, curve compared with curve), whereas the sensitivity to urea was not markedly increased when the N136T mutation was solely introduced in the p66 subunit of the enzyme (data not shown). Such a markedly increased sensitivity of the Asn136 RT mutants toward urea was not observed for mutant Y318H, Y318L, or Y318W RTs whose catalytic activity was also compromised compared with wild-type RT (i.e., 1.6, 4.4, and 73% of the wild-type RT, respectively) (Pelemans et al., 1998) but for which the amino acid mutation is located in the p66 thumb area of and not at the p66/p51 interface (data not shown).
Acetonitrile also had a more pronounced effect on inactivation of the catalytic activity of the Asn136 mutant enzymes than on that of the wild-type RT enzyme. Indeed, whereas 6.7% acetonitrile was required to decrease the wild-type enzyme activity by 50%, lower concentrations of acetonitrile (i.e., 5.0 and 3.2%) were sufficient to afford a comparable (50%) decrease in catalytic activity for the mutant N136T and N136L RT enzymes, respectively (Fig. 4B).
It was also striking that there was a very close correlation between the catalytic activity of the mutant Asn136 RTs and the urea concentration required to decrease RT activity by 50%. The r2 value of the regression line was as high as 0.996 (Fig. 5). Such correlation was absent for the Tyr318 mutant RTs in which the Tyr318 is located near the thumb domain of RT, and that also results in compromised catalytic activity when mutated (Pelemans et al., 1998).
Determination of Km Values of Template/Primer for Wild-Type and Mutant HIV-1 RTs in the Presence or Absence of Urea. The Km values of the template/primer poly(rC) · oligo(dG) for wild-type and mutant N136T and N136L HIV-1 RTs were determined in the presence or absence of different urea concentrations (Fig. 6 and Table 3). The Km value of template/primer was lowest for wild-type RT (10 e) and increased for the mutant enzymes as a function of their more pronounced compromised catalytic activity; thus, the Km value was 1.5-fold higher than wild-type for mutant N136T RT (15 e) and was highest for mutant N136L RT (33 e). It is interesting that in all cases (wild-type, N136T RT, and N136L RT), the presence of urea further dose-dependently increased the Km value of the enzymes for the template/primer (4.7-, 2.5-, and 3-fold, respectively) at the highest urea concentrations tested (1.5 M for WT RT, 0.9 M for N136T RT, and 0.45 M for N136L RT, respectively). The different urea concentrations chosen for the individual (wild-type and mutant) enzymes corresponded to comparably inactivating effects of these urea concentrations on the wild-type and mutant enzymes.
Data are the mean of three to four independent experiments. The Km values were calculated from the average Lineweaver-Burk plots shown in Fig. 7. The amounts of WT, N136T, and N136L RT enzyme used in the 50-e蘬 assays were 0.85, 7.0, and 26 ng of protein, respectively.
Analysis of Monomer Content of Wild-Type and Mutant Asn136 Heterodimer RTs at Different Time Points after Isolation. Wild-type and mutant N136T and N136Y HIV-1 RT heterodimers [consisting of N-terminal His6-tagged p66 and GST-tagged p51 mutant subunits] were isolated from an Ni-NTA column. The fraction that corresponded to each p66/p51 heterodimer (as ascertained by subsequent gel electrophoresis) was then left in the elution solution at eC20°C and analyzed on a size-exclusion FPLC column after 24, 72, and 336 h (14 days). Whereas >99% of wild-type RT enzymes still existed as a p66/p51 heterodimer at all time points measured, the mutant N136T RT heterodimer consisted of a mixture of p66/p51 heterodimer plus p66 and p51 monomers after 24 h. After 72 h, the formation of monomers in the mixture had proceeded still further (Fig. 7). The ratio of monomer/heterodimer content of the mutant N136Y RT was even higher than that observed for the mutant N136T RT after 24 and 72 h (Fig. 7). Thus, the lower the catalytic activity of the enzyme, the higher the ratio of free monomer/heterodimer in the enzyme preparation at 24 h after isolation of the enzyme. The earlier apparent retention time (9.3 min) of WT RT heterodimer than mutant heterodimer RT (retention time, 10.2 ml) is probably an artifact in the FPLC running. The nature of the peak that seems to appear between the heterodimer and monomer fraction upon longer incubation times is currently unknown. However, its appearance might be caused by the action of a specific contaminating protease activity, because the samples do not contain any protease inhibitor.
CD Spectra of Wild-Type and Mutant HIV-1 RTs. To reveal whether the mutations at amino acid 136 had an effect on the general structure and conformation of the HIV reverse transcriptase, the CD spectra of wild-type and the mutant N136T and N136L RTs were determined and compared (Fig. 8).
The CD spectrum of wild-type HIV-1 RT exhibits a broad and prominent band of negative ellipticity between 260 and 202 nm, with a peak at 212 nm and a shoulder at 226 nm. The ellipticity becomes positive in the region of 202 to 190 nm. The CD spectrum of the mutant N136T RT is also dominated by a negative ellipticity band, but compared with the WT HIV-1 RT, it is considerably blue-shifted, with a peak at 204 nm, a shoulder at 220 nm, and a crossover at 196 nm. The overall shape of the spectrum of the mutant N136L RT is similar to that of the mutant N136T RT but with a slightly increased negative and positive ellipticity and a crossover at 198 nm (Fig. 8). Both mutant RTs display CD spectra typical of a considerable amount of -helical structures, with a positive band at 190 nm and a double minimum in the region of 205 to 220 nm. These spectra, therefore, show a similar secondary structure, however, that is clearly different from that of the wild-type RT. To quantify the observed spectral changes, the contribution of the various secondary structural elements to the measured CD spectra was determined using the CDNN program of Bhm et al. (1992). The results obtained with this deconvolution program are listed in Table 4 and confirm the increased -helical content in the mutants. Thus, the substitution of Asn136 by threonine or leucine induces structural effects in HIV-1 RT that are observed as an increase in the number of -helices (11eC13%) and a slight decrease of both random coil (8%) and -sheet (3%).
Discussion
X-ray crystallographic analyses have revealed subtle structural differences in a large number of complexes of HIV-1 RT with different NNRTIs (Kohlstaedt et al., 1992; Ding et al., 1995; Esnouf et al., 1995; Ren et al., 1995; Hopkins et al., 1996). The energetics of dimerization have also been studied computationally, and the contributions of individual residues to the surface area that is buried upon dimer association have been dissected (Rodriguez-Barrios et al., 2001). The segment from Ile135 to Pro140 in p51, which is part of the 7eC8 loop and essential for the catalytic activity of the p66 subunit (Pandey et al., 2001, 2002), has been identified as a "hot spot" of binding energy (Rodriguez-Barrios et al., 2001) (Fig. 9). Of these amino acids, Asn136 is the most buried (Rodriguez-Barrios et al., 2001) and engages its side-chain carboxamide group in two hydrogen bonds to the backbone of His96 in the p66 subunit (Fig. 1). It is interesting that Asn136 is highly conserved among all known lentiviral RTs (Table 1), and our site-directed mutagenesis studies now reveal that none of the mutant Asn136 enzymes shows significant catalytic RT activity. It is noteworthy that the N136T RT mutant, which was endowed with the highest catalytic activity among all HIV-1 RT mutants tested in this study, is the most prevalent enzyme mutant found in patients infected with HIV-1 who have been treated with NNR-TIs, with a prevalence of <1% (12 of 1556 patients) (Ceccherini-Silberstein et al., 2005). Although it is somewhat surprising that this mutation appeared in patients treated with NNRTIs because Asn136 does not make direct contact with the exposed drugs, it should be mentioned that the mutations at amino acid 136 are not the sole amino acid mutations present in the RT of the drug-treated patients infected with HIV-1; rather, they are accompanied by several other amino acid changes that may affect not only drug resistance, but also fitness (by increasing replication competence) of these mutant virus strains.
Asn136 in the p66 subunit is located in the solvent-exposed 7eC8 loop structure that is found markedly distant from both the substrate active site and the NNRTI-binding pocket. Instead, Asn136 in the p51 subunit is located right at the interface between p66 and p51 and contributes to the formation of the bottom of the NNRTI pocket (Fig. 1). Therefore, it was inferred that the heavily compromised catalytic activity of Asn136-mutated HIV-1 RT is predominantly caused by the effect of the mutated amino acid in the p51 subunit. Indeed, when the N136T mutation was solely introduced in the p66 subunit, the RDDP activity was substantially restored (71% of wild-type), whereas the mutation solely in p51 resulted in only 8% of wild-type RT activity.
The observed effect of the mutated amino acid at position 136 in p51 of the HIV-1 RT catalytic activity is in full agreement with the findings of Pandey et al. (2001), who demonstrated that the 7eC8 loop of p51 is a key structural element for RT dimerization (Pandey et al., 2002). It is clear that Asn136 in HIV-1 RT must fulfill a crucial structural function in the p51 7eC8 loop to preserve the catalytic activity of the heterodimer. The observed decreased affinity of the mutant enzymes for the template/primer (the lower the catalytic activity of the mutant RT, the higher the Km value for the template/primer) and the further decreased apparent affinity for the template/primer in the presence of urea are in full agreement with the requirement of an intact 7eC8 loop of p51 for loading the p66 subunit on the template primer (Harris et al., 1998).
There are three major contact areas between the p66 and the p51 subunits of RT (Becerra et al., 1991b; Wang et al., 1994). The most intensively studied interface area between p66 and p51 is the tryptophan-rich amino acid stretch in the connection subdomain of both RT subunits consisting of six tryptophan residues at codons 398, 401, 402, 406, 410, and 414. Mutagenesis studies at these amino acid locations revealed an important role in RT dimerization. It is interesting that the effect of these amino acids on dimerization proved to be mediated mainly through the p66 subunit. Thus, mutation at Trp401 and Trp414 in p66 resulted in a complete lack of RT activity (Tachedjian et al., 2003). Such mutations impaired RT subunit dimerization by altering the proper positioning of these structural elements against those residues in p51 that make important contacts with p66. A second stretch suggested to be involved in dimerization contains a leucine hepta-repeat motif (Leu282 to Leu310) (Becerra et al., 1991a). This region in p66 has been shown to be instrumental in protein-protein interactions required for p66/p51 RT dimerization (Baillon et al., 1991; Goel et al., 1993). From the crystallographic analyses of HIV-1 RT both in the apo form and in complex with inhibitors, it is apparent that Asn136 is located in the middle of the third major contact area at the interface between p66 and p51. Likewise, we believe that Asn136 in the 7eC8 loop of HIV-1 RT p51 may also perform a function in p66/p51 heterodimerization comparable with that of the tryptophans in the 398 to 414 amino acid stretch of p66 and that of Leu289 in the leucine hepta-repeat stretch of p66. Indeed, it was found by FPLC size-exclusion chromatography that, after mixing equal amounts of p66 and p51 subunits, mutant N136T and N136Y RTs consisted of markedly less intact p66/p51 heterodimer and much more free p66 and p51 subunits than wild-type after 24 h (Fig. 7). These observations are strongly suggestive of a less optimal association of the p66 and p51 subunits in the mutated enzymes than in the wild-type RT. This disturbed binding efficiency between p66 and p51 can be related to the structural changes the mutations at Asn136 afford on RT (increased amount of -helices and less random coil according to CD analysis of the mutant RT enzymes) (Fig. 8 and Table 4). The pronounced effect of the Asn136 mutation on the RT p66/p51 interface also has a clear effect on the efficiency of DNA binding, because the Km value of the mutant enzymes for template/primer is higher than the Km for wild-type enzyme. This observation is in full agreement with the instrumental role of the p51 subunit in the loading of DNA onto the heterodimeric enzyme.
When mutant Asn136 RT enzymes were exposed to a variety of urea concentrations, we found that the lower the catalytic activity of the mutant enzymes, the more easily they were denatured by urea (Fig. 4). These findings may point to a less tight association between both RT subunits at the dimerization interface in the mutant Asn136 enzymes and, again, to the crucial role of this highly conserved asparagine at this location in p51 for maintaining two hydrogen bonds with the main chain of His96 of p66, thus ensuring tight subunit association (Fig. 1). Indeed, Sluis-Cremer and co-workers (2002) reported that in the presence of relatively low urea concentrations (< 2 M), loss of RT activity is a direct result of the dissociation of the heterodimeric RT and is not a result of a conformational change in protein secondary structure. Their studies and also those of Meneendez-Arias et al. (2001) also implied that no significant structural changes (or unfolding events) are associated with the dissociation of the RT heterodimer subunits at the urea concentrations used in our studies.
In contrast with the first-generation NNRTIs (i.e., nevirapine and delavirdine), the second-generation NNRTIs (i.e., efavirenz and quinoxaline) kept a marked inhibitory potential against the mutant enzymes irrespective of the nature of the mutation at amino acid 136. It is interesting that the very potent efavirenz, which is known to enhance RT dimerization (Tachedjian et al., 2001; Tachedjian and Goff, 2003), and the quinoxaline derivative GW420867 retain pronounced inhibitory activity against all Asn136-mutated RT enzymes. Therefore, the impact of a mutation at Asn136 in the p51 of the HIV-1 p66/p51 RT heteroduplex on the sensitivity of the mutant enzymes to second-generation NNRTIs seems to be relatively minor.
Our study now suggests that designing Asn136 mimetics, possibly possessing a similar carboxamide group, might become a novel strategy to develop drugs that interfere with the 7eC8 dimerization interface. Another unexplored possibility, given the relative proximity of Asn136 to the NNRTI binding pocket, would be to rationally design modifications of existing NNRTIs to additionally target this highly conserved amino acid in the p51 subunit to improve their resistance profile and suppressive effect on wild-type HIV-1 strains.
In conclusion, Asn136 represents a highly conserved amino acid whose role in HIV-1 RT is shown here to be severely compromised upon mutation to other amino acids. Natural mutations at this amino acid site of RT will lead to a virtually inactive enzyme (and thus poorly replicating virus, if viable at all) that nevertheless will still be sensitive to several second-generation NNRTIs, including the clinically used efavirenz. Therefore, it is very unlikely that mutations at position 136 in HIV RT will appear under selective pressure of these drugs. Asn136 therefore could become an attractive target for the design of novel NNRTIs with improved potency and increased ability to suppress development of drug-resistant viruses.
Acknowledgements
We thank Kristien Minner, Ria Van Berwaer, and Lizette van Berckelaer for excellent technical assistance and Christiane Callebaut for fine editorial help.
doi:10.1124/mol.105.012435.
References
Arion D, Fletcher RS, Borkow G, Camarasa M-J, Balzarini J, Dmitrienko GI, and Parniak MA (1996) Differences in the inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase DNA polymerase activity by analogs of nevirapine and [2',5'-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-3'-spiro-5''-(4''-amino-1'',2''-oxathiole-2'',2''-dioxide] (TSAO). Mol Pharmacol 50: 1057eC1064.
Auwerx J, North TW, Preston BD, Klarmann GJ, De Clercq E, and Balzarini J (2002) Chimeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and feline immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptases: role of the subunits in resistance/sensitivity to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Mol Pharmacol 61: 400eC406.
Baillon JG, Nashed N, Kumar A, Wilson SH, and Jerina DM (1991) A leucine zipper-like motif may mediate HIV reverse transcriptase subunit binding. New Biol 3: 1015eC1019.
Balzarini J (1999) Suppression of resistance to drugs targeted to human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase by combination therapy. Biochem Pharmacol 58: 1eC27.
Balzarini J, Karlsson A, Vandamme A-M, Peerez-Peerez MJ, Zhang H, Vrang L, berg B, Backbro K, Unge T, San-Feelix A, et al. (1993) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains selected for resistance against the HIV-specific [2',5'-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-3'-spiro-5''-(4''-amino-1'',2''-oxathiole-2'',2''-dioxide)]--D-pentofuranosyl (TSAO) nucleoside analogues retain sensitivity to HIV-1-specific nonnucleoside inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 6952eC6956.
Balzarini J, Kleim JP, Riess G, Camarasa M-J, De Clercq E, and Karlsson A (1994) Sensitivity of (138 GlyLys) mutated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) to HIV-1-specific RT inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 201: 1305eC1312.
Becerra SP, Kumar A, Lewis MS, Widen SG, Abbotts J, Karawya EM, Hughes SH, Shiloach J, and Wilson SH (1991a) Structure/function studies of HIV-11 reverse transcriptase: dimerization-defective mutant L289K. Biochemistry 30: 11708eC11719.
Becerra SP, Kumar A, Lewis MS, Widen SG, Abbotts J, Karawya EM, Hughes SH, Shiloach J, Wilson SH, and Lewis MS (1991b) Protein-protein interactions of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: implications of central and C-terminal regions in subunit binding. Biochemistry 30: 11707eC11719.
Bhm G, Muhr R, and Jaenicke R (1992) Quantitative analysis of protein far-UV circular dichroism spectra by neural networks. Protein Eng 5: 191eC195.
Boyer PL, Ding J, Arnold E, and Hughes SH (1994) Subunit specificity of mutations that confer resistance to nonnucleoside inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38: 1909eC1914.
Buckheit JRW, Fliakas-Bolz V, Decker WD, Roberson JL, Stup TL, Pyle CA, White EL, McMahon JB, Currens MJ, Boyd MR, et al. (1995) Comparative anti-HIV evaluation of diverse HIV-1-specific reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant virus isolates demonstrates the existence of distinct phenotypic subgroups. Antiviral Res 26: 117eC132.
Camarasa M-J, San-Feelix A, Velequez S, Peerez-Peerez M-J, Gago F, and Balzarini J (2004) TSAO compounds: the comprehensive story of a unique family of HIV-1-specific inhibitors of reverse transcriptase. Curr Top Med Chem 4: 945eC963.
Ceccherini-Silberstein F, Gago F, Santoro M, Gori C, Svicher V, Rodre猤uez-Barrios F, D'Arrigo R, Ciccozzi M, Bertoli A, d'Arminio Monforte A, et al. (2005) High sequence conservation of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase under drug pressure despite a continuous appearance of mutations. J Virology, in press.
D'Aquila RT and Summers WC (1989) HIV-1 reverse transcriptase/ribonuclease H: high level expression in Escherichia coli from a plasmid constructed using the polymerase chain reaction. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2: 579eC587.
De Clercq E (2000) Reverse transcriptase inhibitors as anti-HIV drugs, in Antivirals against AIDS (Unger RE, Kreuter J, and Re筨samen-Waigmann H eds) pp 107eC150, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
De Clercq E (2002) Strategies in the design of antiviral drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1: 13eC25.
Ding J, Das K, Moereels H, Koymans L, Andries K, Janssen PA, Hughes SH, and Arnold E (1995) Structure of HIV-1 RT/TIBO R86183 complex reveals similarity in the binding of diverse nonnucleoside inhibitors. Nat Struct Biol 2: 407eC415.
Esnouf R, Ren J, Ross C, Jones Y, Stammers D, and Stuart D (1995) Mechanism of inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by non-nucleoside inhibitors. Nat Struct Biol 2: 303eC308.
Goel R, Beard WA, Kumar A, Casas-Finet JR, Strub M-P, Stahl SJ, Lewis MS, Bebenek K, Becerra S, Kunkel TA, et al. (1993) Structure/function studies of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: dimerization-defective mutant L289K. Biochemistry 32: 13012eC13018.
Harris D, Lee R, Misra HS, Pandey PK, and Pandey VN (1998) The p51 subunit of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase is essential in loading the p66 subunit on the template primer. Biochemistry 37: 5903eC5908.
Hopkins AL, Ren J, Esnouf RM, Willcox BE, Jones EY, Ross C, Miyasaka T, Walker RT, Tanaka H, Stammers DK, et al. (1996) Complexes of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase with inhibitors of the HEPT series reveal conformational changes relevant to the design of potent non-nucleoside inhibitors. J Med Chem 39: 1589eC1600.
Jonckheere H, Taymans JM, Balzarini J, Velequez S, Camarasa M-J, Desmyter J, De Clercq E, and Annee J (1994) Resistance of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase against [2',5'-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-3'-spiro-5''-(4''-amino-1'',2''-oxathiole-2'',2''-dioxide) (TSAO) derivatives is determined by the mutation Glu138Lys on the p51 subunit. J Biol Chem 269: 25255eC25258.
Kohlstaedt LA, Wang J, Friedman JM, Rice PA, and Steitz TA (1992) Crystal structure of 3.5 resolution of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an inhibitor. Science (Wash DC) 256: 1783eC1790.
Meneendez-Arias L, Abraha A, Quinones-Mateu ME, Mas A, Camarasa M-J, and Arts EJ (2001) Functional characterization of chimeric reverse transcriptases with polypeptide subunits of highly divergent HIV-1 group M and O strains. J Biol Chem 276: 27470eC27479.
Pandey PK, Kaushik N, Singh K, Sharma B, Upadhyay AK, Kumar S, Harris D, and Pandey VN (2002) Insertion of a small peptide of six amino acids into the 7-8 loop of the p51 subunit of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase perturbs the heterodimer and affects its activities. BMC Biochem 3: 18eC31.
Pandey PK, Kaushik N, Talele TT, Yadav PN, and Pandey VN (2001) The beta7eCbeta8 loop of the p51 subunit in the heterodimeric (p66/p51) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase is essential for the catalytic function of the p66 subunit. Biochemistry 40: 9505eC9512.
Pelemans H, Esnouf R, Jonckheere H, De Clercq E, and Balzarini J (1998) Mutational analysis of Tyr-318 within the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor binding pocket of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 reverse transcriptase. J Biol Chem 273: 34234eC34239.
Ren J, Esnouf R, Garman E, Somers D, Ross C, Kirby I, Keeling J, Darby G, Jones Y, Stuart D, et al. (1995) High resolution structures of HIV-1 RT from four RT-inhibitor complexes. Nat Struct Biol 2: 293eC302.
Ren J, Milton J, Weaver KL, Short SA, Stuart DI, and Stammers DK (2000) Structural basis for the resilience of efavirenz (DMP-266) to drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Structure Fold Des 8: 1089eC1094.
Restle T, Muller B, and Goody RS (1990) Dimerization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase. A target for chemotherapeutic intervention. J Biol Chem 265: 8986eC8988.
Rodriguez-Barrios F, Peerez C, San-Feelix A, Camarasa M-J, Pelemans H, Balzarini J, and Gago F (2001) Identification of a putative binding site for TSAO-T derivatives at the p51/p66 interface of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J Med Chem 44: 1853eC1865.
Schinazi RF, Larder BA, and Mellors JW (2001) Mutations in retroviral genes associated with drug resistance: 2000eC2001 update. Int Antiviral News 8: 65eC91.
Sluis-Cremer N, Arion D, and Parniak MA (2002) Destabilization of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dimer upon interaction with N-acyl hydrazone inhibitors. Mol Pharmacol 62: 398eC405.
Sluis-Cremer N, Dmitrienko GI, Balzarini J, Camarasa M-J, and Parniak MA (2000) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase dimer destabilization by 1-[spiro[4''-amino-2'',2''-dioxo-1'',2''-oxathiole-5'',3'-[2',5'-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)--D-ribofuranosyl]]]-3-ethylthymine. Biochemistry 39: 1427eC1433.
Tachedjian G, Aronson H-EG, de los Santos M, Seehra J, McCoy JM, and Goff SP (2003) Role of residues in the tryptophan repeat motif for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dimerization. J Mol Biol 326: 381eC396.
Tachedjian G and Goff SP (2003) The effect of NNRTIs on HIV reverse transcriptase dimerization. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 4: 966eC973.
Tachedjian G, Orlova M, Sarafianos SG, Arnold E, and Goff SP (2001) Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are chemical enhancers of dimerization of the HIV type 1 reverse transcriptase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 7188eC7193.
Wang J, Smerdon SJ, Jager J, Kohlstaedt LA, Rice PA, Friedman JM, and Steitz TA (1994) Structural basis of asymmetry in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase heterodimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 7242eC7246.