点击显示 收起
【关键词】 Potentiation
Divalent cations promote activation of several nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) subtypes, presumably by lowering the energetic barrier between open and closed conformations. In wild-type 7 AChRs, binding of calcium to a particular part of the extracellular domain is required for potentiating activation. McLaughlin et al. (p. 16) tested the hypothesis that movements involved in agonist activation and calcium modulation involve a nearby sheet by linking strands within this sheet through disulfide bonds formed by replacing adjacent amino acids with cysteines to alter its mobility. These studies are helping to reveal how movements initiated by agonist binding to ACh binding sites are propagated through the extracellular domain of AChRs to regulate opening of the cation channel through the membrane.The Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel (LGIC) family of neurotransmitter receptors includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) as well as A type receptors for GABA, glycine receptors, and type 3 serotonin receptors (5HT-3R) (Lindstrom, 2000; Lester et al., 2004; Sine and Engel, 2006). All of these receptors are formed by five homologous or identical subunits arranged to form a central ion channel. The subunits consist of a large N-terminal extracellular domain, three closely spaced transmembrane domains, of which the second (M2) contributes to the lining of the channel, a large cytoplasmic domain, and a fourth transmembrane domain that leads to a short extracellular C-terminal sequence.
A model for the overall structure of these receptors is provided by the low resolution crystal structure of the muscle type 1 AChR found in Torpedo marmorata electric organs (Unwin, 2005) (Fig. 1). High resolution crystal structures of acetylcholine binding proteins secreted by mollusk glia provide detailed models for the structure of the extracellular domain of AChRs and other related LGICs (Brejc et al., 2001; Celie et al., 2004; Bourne et al., 2005; Hansen et al., 2005) (Fig. 1). Many approaches are being taken using these static structures to understand how the binding of agonists, antagonists, and modulators to the extracellular domain produce movements in the protein. These movements are propagated through the receptor structure to regulate opening of distant ion channel gates, resulting in the rapid dynamics of activation and desensitization that characterize the electrophysiological properties of these receptors. The implications of these structural and functional considerations for human muscle AChRs on neuromuscular transmission are being revealed by analysis of AChR mutations that cause congenital myasthenias (Sine and Engel, 2006).
Fig. 1. A, a side view of the structure of T. marmorata AChR highlighting the 1 and subunits at whose interface one of the two ACh binding sites in this heteromeric (1)21 AChR is formed. This part of the figure is from Unwin (2005). B, a top view of the structure of AChBP in its resting and agonist bound conformations. AChBPs, like 7 AChRs, are homomeric with five identical ACh binding sites. The C loop is open in the resting state and closed in the agonist-bound active and desensitized states. This part of the figure is from Hansen et al. (2005). Figures reproduced with the permission of the authors.
Movements of the extracellular domain near the ACh binding sites at the subunit interfaces in AChBPs have been revealed by comparing the crystal structures with agonists bound versus those with antagonists bound. By far, the biggest movements are associated with the C loop near the ACh binding site (Fig. 1). This contributes to smaller movements that propagate from the binding site to the channel gate. In the resting unliganded state, the C loop is open. It remains open when a small antagonist is bound and is wedged even more widely open by binding of the large antagonist cobratoxin (Bourne et al., 2005; Hansen et al., 2005). In the active or desensitized conformations caused by binding of small agonists such as nicotine or epibatidine, the C loop slams shut over the ACh binding site (Celie et al., 2004; Hansen et al., 2005).
The conformation changes observed with ligand-bound AChBP reflect those in intact AChRs because a chimera with the extracellular domain of an AChBP and the remainder of a 5HT-3 subunit produces electrophysiologically active AChRs (Bouzat et al., 2004). To insure communication between these two components, three loops in the AChBP at the interface with the 5HT-3 subunit had to be changed to their 5HT-3 counterparts. Two of these loops, the Cys loop (for which the family is named) and the 1-2 loop, straddle opposite sides of the M2-M3 linker of the pore domain in electric organ AChRs, suggesting that movements of the ligand binding domain might produce a twist that is propagated through these three meshing gear teeth to produce a twist in the pore domain to cause the cation channel to open (Bouzat et al., 2004; Unwin, 2005). Electrostatic linkage between peripheral and inner sheets from the extracellular domain positions them to engage with the top of the M2-M3 linker and pivot with respect to M1 (Lee and Sine, 2005).
Interactions between the cholinergic ligand binding to the extracellular domain and the cation channel of AChRs are in delicate, reciprocal balance. 7 AChR leucine 247 is conserved in other LGICs. Mutation to threonine (L247T) causes some small antagonists like curare and dihydro--erythroidine to behave as agonists, but the large antagonist -bungarotoxin remains an antagonist (Bertrand et al., 1992). In addition, this mutation prevents the rapid desensitization characteristic of wild-type 7 AChRs. This mutation was initially proposed to promote formation of an open channel-desensitized state (Bertrand et al., 1992), but a likely alternate explanation is that this mutation simply alters gating to favor the open state (Filatov and White, 1995; Labarca et al., 1995).
Calcium potentiates the responses of many AChR subtypes, and there is evidence for several categories of calcium binding sites in the extracellular domain of 7 AChRs (Galzi et al., 1996). Mutation of 7 glutamate 172 or its homolog in the 5HT-3 receptor can prevent potentiation by calcium. Calcium potentiation was proposed to result from promoting the transition from the resting to the active state. 7 glutamate 172 was proposed not to play a role in cholinergic ligand binding, but its homolog in AChR subunits was proposed to also contribute to ligand binding (Czajkowski et al., 1993).
McLaughlin et al. (2006) chose to study the 7 L247T mutant described by Bertrand et al. (1992) because of its simple homomeric structure, large responses, ease of activation (even by some small antagonists), and because Galzi et al. (1996) had already mapped calcium binding sites on 7 AChRs. The detailed structures available for AChBPs allowed them to re-examine potentiation of 7 AChR function by divalent cations.
Previously, they reasoned that because the 9 strand had Glu172 (which is involved in Ca2+ modulation) at its N terminus and the ACh binding site at its C terminus, agonist binding might involve movement of 9 (Lyford et al., 2003). Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method developed by Karlin and Akabas (1998), they replaced single amino acids in 9, such as Glu172, with cysteines and found that binding of agonists, but not antagonists, inhibited the rate of binding of methanethiosulfonate reagents to these cysteines, indicating that 9 participates in conformational changes triggered by ligand binding. Glu172, through which calcium increases the potency and efficacy of agonists, is at the N terminus of 9, which is located in the lumen of the channel vestibule adjacent to the top of the transmembrane domain (Eddins et al., 2001, 2002). It is affected by permeant but not impermeant divalent cations.
In this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, McLaughlin et al. (2006) further investigate the movements of strands in the extracellular domain associated with activation by agonists and potentiation by divalent cations. Adjacent positions on 7 and 10 strands were stapled together with disulfide bonds to test how this would alter function. These positions were identified using a model of the 7 extracellular domain based on the structure of AChBP. One pair, K144C/T198C, permitted divalent cations alone to activate 7 L247T AChRs; this was blocked by the antagonist methyllycaconitine. This supports the idea that the 7/9/10 sheet moves together similarly under the influence of agonists and/or divalent cations. The L247T mutant, which favors transition to the open state, permits cations alone to act as full agonists, whereas the K144C/T198C link on a wild-type background still required both agonist and divalent cations to act together to cause activation.
Zn2+ inhibits wild-type 7 AChRs, but low concentrations of Zn2+ activate the L247T mutant and high concentrations block the mutant channel (Palma et al., 1998). A unique LGIC found in humans and dogs but not rodents has 15% amino acid identity with 7, exhibits spontaneous activation, is activated by Zn2+, and is inhibited by curare (Davies et al., 2003). Zn2+ and curare might act on this LGIC at sites homologous to those proposed for divalent cations and ACh on 7 AChRs by McLaughlin et al. (2006).
ABBREVIATIONS: LGIC, Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel; AChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; 5HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; AChBP, acetylcholine binding protein.
【参考文献】
Bertrand D, Devillers-Thiery A, Revak F, Galzi J-L, Hussy N, Mulle C, Bertrand S, Ballivet M, and Changeux J-P (1992) Unconventional pharmacology of a neuronal nicotinic receptor mutated in the channel domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 1261-1265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bourne Y, Talley T, Hansen S, Taylor P, and Marchot P (2005) Crystal substructure of a Cbtx-AChBP complex reveals essential interactions between snake neurotoxins and nicotinic receptors. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 24: 1512-1522.
Bouzat C, Gumilar F, Spitzmaul G, Wang H-L, Rayes D, Hansen S, Taylor P, and Sine S (2004) Coupling of agonist binding to channel gating of an ACh-binding protein linked to an ion channel. Nature (Lond) 430: 896-900.
Brejc K, van Dijk W, Klaassen R, Schuurmans M, van der Oost J, Smit A, and Sixma T (2001) Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors. Nature (Lond) 411: 269-276.
Celie P, Rossum-Fikkert S, van Dijk W, Brejc K, Smit A, and Sixma T (2004) Nicotine and carbamylcholine binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as studied in AChBP crystal structures. Neuron 41: 907-914.
Czajkowski C, Kaufman C, and Karlin A (1993) Negatively charged amino acid residues in the nicotine receptor subunit that contribute to the binding of acetylcholine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 6285-6289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Davies P, Wang W, Hales T, and Kirkness E (2003) A novel class of ligand-gated ion channel is activated by Zn2+. J Biol Chem 278: 712-717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Eddins D, Lyford L, Lee J, Desai S, and Rosenberg R (2001) Permeant but not impermeant divalent cations enhance activation of nondesensitizing 7 nicotinic receptors. Am J Physiol 282: C796-C804.
Eddins D, Sproul A, Lyford L, McLaughlin J, and Rosenberg R (2002) Glutamate 172, essential for modulation of L247T 7 ACh receptors by Ca2+, lines the extracellular vestibule. Am J Physiol 283: C1454-C1460.
Filatov G and White M (1995) The role of conserved leucines in the M2 domain of the acetylcholine receptor in channel gating. Mol Pharmacol 48: 379-384.
Galzi J-L, Bertrand S, Corringer P-J, Changeux J-P, and Bertrand P (1996) Identification of calcium binding sites that regulate potentiation of a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 15: 5824-5832.
Hansen S, Sulzenbacher G, Huxford T, Marchot P, Taylor P, and Bourne Y (2005) Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 24: 3635-3646.
Karlin A and Akabas M (1998) Substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Methods Enzymol 293: 123-145.
Labarca C, Nowak M, Zhang H, Tang L, Deshpande P, and Lester H (1995) Channel gating governed symmetrically by conserved leucine residues in the M2 domain of nicotinic receptors. Nature (Lond) 376: 514-516.
Lee W and Sine S (2005) Principal pathway coupling agonist binding to channel gating in nicotinic receptors. Nature (Lond) 438: 243-247.
Lester H, Dibas M, Dahan D, Leite J, and Dougherty D (2004) Cys-Loop receptors: new twists and turns. Trends Neurosci 27: 329-336.
Lindstrom J (2000) The structure of neuronal nicotinic receptors, in Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors (Clementi F, Fornasari D, and Gotti C eds) Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 144, pp 101-162, Springer, New York.
Lyford L, Sproul A, Eddins D, McLaughlin J, and Rosenberg R (2003) Agonist-induced conformational changes in the extracellular domain of 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 64: 650-658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
McLaughlin JT, Fu J, Sproul AD, and Rosenberg RL (2006) Role of the outer -sheet in divalent cation modulation of 7 nicotinic receptors. Mol Pharmacol 70: 16-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Palma E, Maggi L, Miledi R, and Eusebi F (1998) Effects of Zn2+ on wild and mutant neuronal 7 nicotinic receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 10246-10250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sine S and Engel A (2006) Recent advances in Cys-loop receptor structure and function. Nature (Lond) 440: 448-454.
Unwin N (2005) Refined structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 4 ? resolution. J Mol Biol 346: 967-989.
作者单位：Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania