点击显示 收起
Aug. 7, 2008 -- Is your city a haven for restaurant health hazards?
A consumer group has ranked 20 U.S. cities for restaurant health. Austin, Texas, and Boston rank worst, while Tucson, Ariz., and San Francisco rank best.
But it's not at all clear whether diners are dirtiest in Austin and Boston, or whether these towns simply have the toughest inspectors -- or if inspectors in Tucson?and San Francisco are more lenient.
The report, "Dirty Dining," comes from the consumer group the Center for Science in the Public Interest. CSPI food-safety attorney Sarah Klein, JD, is co-author.
"How do you know whether it is a robust inspection force really uncovering the bad practices, or whether restaurants in that city have poor health practices?" Klein tells WebMD.
The CSPI ranking considers how often city inspectors found five major health hazards and five less critical concerns in 30 high-end, medium-range, and fast-food eateries in each city.
The major health hazards:
Less serious concerns include:
Can rodents and roaches really be less of a concern than, say, improper food temperature? Yes, Klein asserts.
"The presence of rodents and insects is certainly disgusting and certainly shows a restaurant is not focusing on food safety," she says. "But the things most dangerous to consumers are the things we would never see. Unless we had the tools and the training, even if we went into the kitchen we would not be able to see the things that would really harm us."
That is why the CSPI urges every city and state to adopt a restaurant grading program. As is done in Los Angeles County, restaurants would be required to post -- in their front window -- a letter grade from inspectors showing whether they got an A, B, or C. Lower grades would result in the restaurant being closed.