Literature
首页医源资料库在线期刊美国临床营养学杂志2005年81卷第6期

Waist circumference and abdominal adipose tissue distribution: influence of age and sex

来源:《美国临床营养学杂志》
摘要:sABSTRACTBackground:Theinfluenceofageandsexonthedistributionofabdominaladiposetissueforagivenwaistcircumference(WC)isunclear。Objective:Theobjectivewastoinvestigatetheinfluenceofageandsexontotal(TAAT),visceral(VAT),andabdominalsubcutaneous(ASAT)adipose......

点击显示 收起

Jennifer L Kuk, SoJung Lee, Steven B Heymsfield and Robert Ross

1 From the School of Physical and Health Education (JLK, SL, and RR) and the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism (RR), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada, and the Obesity Research Center, St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (SBH)

2 Supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MT 13448) and Mars Corporation (to RR) and by National Institutes of Health grants RR-00645 and DK-42618 (to SBH).

3 Address reprint requests to R Ross, School of Physical and Health Education, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6. E-mail: rossr{at}post.queensu.ca.s


ABSTRACT  
Background: The influence of age and sex on the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue for a given waist circumference (WC) is unclear.

Objective: The objective was to investigate the influence of age and sex on total (TAAT), visceral (VAT), and abdominal subcutaneous (ASAT) adipose tissue for a given WC.

Design: Body composition was assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in 147 younger men (< 50 y), 83 older men, 171 younger (premenopausal) women, and 80 older (postmenopausal) women with a wide range (16–40; in kg/m2) of body mass indexes.

Results: Within each sex, the regression lines between WC and TAAT were not significantly different (P > 0.1) between younger and older groups. Collapsed across age groups, women had more TAAT for a given WC than did men; however, this difference was significantly reduced with increasing WC (P < 0.05). Within each sex, regression lines derived for WC and ASAT were not significantly different between younger and older groups (P > 0.1). Collapsed across age groups, women had 1.8 kg more ASAT for a given WC (P < 0.05) than did men across the range of WCs. Within each sex, older men and women had a significantly greater increase in VAT for a given WC (P < 0.05) than did younger men and women. Furthermore, independent of age group, the slopes for WC and VAT were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in men than in women.

Conclusions: There are significant sex differences in TAAT, VAT, and ASAT for a given WC. Furthermore, the relation between WC and VAT is substantially influenced by age.

Key Words: Visceral fat • abdominal subcutaneous fat • sex • menopause • age • magnetic resonance imaging


INTRODUCTION  
Previous studies have reported that, for a given waist circumference (WC), premenopausal (1) and postmenopausal (2) women have more abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT) than do men. However, it is unclear how sex alters the association between visceral AT (VAT) accumulation and WC. Pouliot et al (1) suggest that men and women have similar amounts of VAT for a given WC. In contrast, Schreiner et al (2) report that although older men generally have more VAT than do older women, this difference is diminished with increasing WC. Whether the disparate findings between these studies are explained by differences in age is unknown.

It is well known that age is positively associated with an increase in VAT, independent of sex (3, 4). The age-related increase in VAT is greater in men than in women; however, in women VAT accumulation increases rapidly after menopause to a rate similar to that of men (3). In contrast, subcutaneous AT has been reported to decrease with age in men (3). Whether this remains true in women is unclear because some studies have reported an age-related decrease in ASAT (4), whereas others have not (3). Accordingly, age-associated changes in abdominal AT distribution are not always reflected by a change in total abdominal AT (TAAT) or WC (4).

WC is a strong predictor of both VAT and ASAT (5). Given the independent contributions of VAT (6) and subcutaneous AT (7) in the development of metabolic risk, it is important to understand the influence of sex and age on abdominal AT distribution and its surrogate measure, WC. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence of sex and age on the relation between WC and abdominal AT accumulation in a large sample of Caucasian men and women with a wide range of age and adiposity. We hypothesized that advanced age would be associated with greater VAT deposition for a given WC independent of sex. Further, we speculated that men would have greater VAT and less ASAT than women for a given WC.


SUBJECTS AND METHODS  
Subjects
Subjects consisted of 483 healthy white men (n = 232) and premenopausal (n = 171) and postmenopausal (n = 80) women who participated in various body-composition studies at Queen's University (Kingston, Canada) and St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital (New York). The subjects varied widely in age (18–84 y) and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2: 16–40). Three hundred forty-five subjects from Queen's University and 136 subjects from Columbia University were recruited from among hospital employees, students at local universities, and the general public through posted flyers and the local media. Menopausal status was determined by self-report. The men were divided into younger (n = 147) and older (n = 83) groups by using a cutoff age of 50 y to facilitate comparisons between older men and (postmenopausal) women and younger men and (premenopausal) women across a similar age range. All participants gave informed consent before participation in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the respective institutional review boards.

Anthropometric measurements
Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a calibrated balance. Standing height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm with a wall-mounted stadiometer. WC was taken at the level of the last rib to the nearest 0.1 cm after a normal expiration.

Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging
Whole-body tissue quantification was determined by using magnetic resonance imaging data acquired with a General Electric 1.5-Tesla magnet (Milwaukee, WI) by using an established protocol described in detail elsewhere (8). Once acquired, the data were analyzed with an image analysis program (TomoVision, Montreal, Canada) as described previously (8, 9); 41 equidistant images (1-cm-thick images, 4-cm spaces between images) were used to determine the tissue volumes. VAT and ASAT were calculated by using the 5 images extending from 5 cm below to 15 cm above L4–L5. Volume units (L) were converted to mass units (kg) by multiplying the volumes by the assumed density constants for AT (0.92 kg/L) (10).

Statistical analyses
Group data are presented as group means ± SDs. Analysis of variance was used to determine group differences in subject characteristics. Bonferroni adjustments were used for all post hoc multiple-group comparisons. General linear modeling was used to determine group-specific multivariate regressions between the various study variables. Sex, age, WC, and the interaction effects were used in the multiple regression analyses. Quadratic terms were also tested in the model for WC. Models were tested first for significant age group, sex, and WC interactions. If the three-factor interaction effect was significant, further analyses were conducted within each sex separately. If the three-factor and age interaction terms were not significant, a single model was used to determine sex differences in slope and intercept collapsed across age group. The study variables were normally distributed, and residual analyses were performed to determine significant points of influence in the final models. Significant outliers with large jackknife residuals and high leverage were excluded from the analyses. To allow for comparisons between premenopausal and postmenopausal women, values were age standardized to 50 y of age. To allow for comparisons between the younger men and women, the figures and tables were standardized to 25- and 40-y-old men and women. All statistical procedures were performed by using SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).


RESULTS  
Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. BMI was not significantly different (P > 0.05) between any of the 4 groups. As expected, both groups of women had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) percentage body fat but a lower WC and less VAT than did the men. Although the older men had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) WC and more VAT than did the younger men, the younger and older women did not differ significantly in any of the body-composition measures.


View this table:
TABLE 1. Subject characteristics1

 
Age was positively associated with WC, VAT, and ASAT only in the younger groups of men and women (data not shown). Therefore, statistical adjustment for age was restricted to sex comparisons between the younger men and women.

The three-factor interaction (age x sex x WC) effect was not significant (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant sex effect but no age-group interaction effect (P > 0.05) on the relation between WC and TAAT (P < 0.05). Collapsed across the age groups, women had more abdominal AT for a given WC than did men; however, this difference was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) with increasing WC (Figure 1). Age was not a significant covariate (P > 0.05) in any of the models for WC and abdominal AT.


View larger version (20K):
FIGURE 1.. Sex differences in the association between waist circumference (WC) and total abdominal adipose tissue (TAAT). The three-factor interaction (age x sex x WC) was not significant (P > 0.05). There was a significant sex x WC interaction (P < 0.05) but no age x WC interaction (P > 0.05). The solid line represents the regression line for men (; n = 230) and the broken line that for women (; n = 251). TAATmen (kg) = –14.5 + 0.21(WC). TAATwomen (kg) = –10.1 + 0.18(WC).

 
The three-factor interaction (age x sex x WC) effect was not significant for ASAT (P > 0.05). There was a significant sex effect but no age-group interaction effect (P > 0.05) on the relation between WC and ASAT (P < 0.05). Collapsed across the age groups, women had 1.8 kg more (P > 0.05) ASAT for a given WC than did men across the range of WC values (Figure 2).


View larger version (21K):
FIGURE 2.. Sex differences in the association between waist circumference (WC) and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT). The three-factor (age x sex x WC) and 2-factor (age x WC and sex x WC) interactions were not significant (P > 0.05). There was a significant main effect of sex (P < 0.05). The solid line represents the regression line for men (; n = 230) and the broken line that for women (; n = 251). ASATmen (kg) = –7.57 + 0.11(WC). ASATwomen (kg) = –5.74 + 0.11(WC).

 
There was a significant three-factor interaction (age x sex x WC) effect (P < 0.05); thus, VAT analyses were performed within each sex separately. Within each sex, the slope of the regression lines between WC and VAT were significantly greater in the older men and women than in the younger men and women (P < 0.05). Thus, for a given increase in WC, men had a greater increase in VAT than did the women. Furthermore, independent of age group, the slope of the regression line between WC and VAT was higher (P < 0.05) in men than in women (Figure 3, A and B). After age was included in the model, younger men continued to have a higher slope for the association between WC and VAT than did younger women (Figure 3C).


View larger version (22K):
FIGURE 3.. Sex differences in the association between waist circumference (WC) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The three-factor interaction (age x sex x WC) was significant (P < 0.05). A: Relation between WC and VAT mass in 83 older men (solid line; ) and 80 older women (broken line; ). VATolder men (kg) = –11.12 + 0.145(WC). VATolder women (kg) = –6.25 + 0.091(WC). B: Relation between WC and VAT mass in 147 younger men (solid line; ) and 171 younger women (broken line; ). VATyounger men (kg) = –6.59 + 0.092(WC). VATyounger women (kg) = –3.74 + 0.058(WC). C: Relation between WC and VAT mass standardized to 25 (solid line) and 40 (broken line) y of age in 147 younger men (black lines) and 171 younger women (gray lines). VATmen (kg) = –1.69 + 0.026(WC) – 0.109(age) + 0.0015(age x WC). VATwomen (kg) = 0.58 –0.0024(WC) – 0.109(age) + 0.0015(age x WC). D: Relation between WC and VAT in premenopausal and postmenopausal women standardized to 50 y of age. There was a significant menopausal status x WC interaction (P < 0.05). The solid line represents premenopausal women (n = 171) and the broken line represents postmenopausal women (n = 80). VATpre women (kg) = –0.14 + 0.0045(WC) – 0.099(age) + 0.0014(age x WC). VATpost women (kg) = –8.01 + 0.115(WC) + 0.050(age) + 0.0006(age x WC).

 
The postmenopausal women continued to have a greater increase (P < 0.05) in VAT for a given increase in WC (ie, higher slope) after control for age, and the difference increased with increasing WC. The relation between WC and VAT standardized to 50 y of age is shown in Figure 3D.

The predicted VAT mass values for WC cutoffs associated with increased health risk in men and women are given in Table 2. Given the common use of the L4–L5 landmark for determination of abdominal AT deposition with the use of radiographic methods, VAT values (cm2) at L4–L5 are also provided.


View this table:
TABLE 2. Visceral adipose tissue predicted from waist circumference (WC) cutoffs associated with increased health risk1

 

DISCUSSION  
The findings of this study show that significant sex differences exist in TAAT, VAT, and ASAT deposition for a given WC. Although our findings confirmed that women have significantly more ASAT than do men for a given WC, in contrast with the findings of others, we observed that VAT deposition was significantly higher in men than in women. Furthermore, we showed that menopausal status influences VAT deposition for a given WC beyond that of age per se. Moreover, the influence of age on VAT deposition is different between older and younger persons. These findings suggest that, for a given WC, sex, age, and menopausal status need to be considered when predicting abdominal AT distribution and associated health risks.

Contrary to previous observations (1, 2), we observed that, independent of age, VAT deposition is significantly higher in men than in women for a given WC, and the difference was magnified with increasing WC. Pouliot et al (1) report that younger men and women have similar amounts of VAT for a given WC. In older men and women, Schreiner et al (2) report a curvilinear relation between WC and VAT, wherein men generally have more VAT than do women, although the difference is attenuated with increasing WC. The discrepant findings are not readily explained but may be due in part to differences in the landmark used for the WC measurement, because WC was determined at the last rib in this study, at the waist narrowing in the study by Pouliot et al (1), and at the umbilicus in the study by Schreiner et al (2). Wang et al (11) report that although the difference between WC measurement sites is relatively small in men (1 cm), in women a difference of 5 cm is observed between the smallest (minimal waist) and largest (iliac crest) measurement sites. Thus, differences in the WC measurement site may have influenced the sex differences in the pattern of VAT deposition observed. Nevertheless, it is clear that the influence of sex on the relation between VAT and WC requires further investigation.

That menopausal status influences the relation between WC and VAT distribution in women beyond the effect of age per se is noteworthy. In other words, for a given WC, postmenopausal women have more VAT than do premenopausal women even after age is controlled for. This is in contrast with a study by Han et al (12) that failed to show a difference in VAT deposition for a given WC in a small cohort of women above (n = 19) and below (n = 15) 50 y of age. Nevertheless, several other studies have also shown a preferential accumulation in VAT in postmenopausal women (3, 4, 13). It is suggested that these body-composition changes are in part due to alterations in sex hormone concentrations that are associated with menopause (14-16). Indeed, ovarian hormone–deficient women have a significantly higher rate of fatty acid uptake in the VAT depot than do premenopausal women (16). Furthermore, it has been reported that hormone replacement therapy attenuates the propensity to increase VAT (15). Together, these findings suggest that menopausal status should be considered when developing WC cutoffs for abdominal obesity–related metabolic risk.

It is known that WC is a strong predictor of metabolic risk, independent of BMI (17). Current evidence suggests that a WC > 102 cm in men and of 88 cm in women is associated with increased health risk (18-20). It has also been shown that WC is a strong independent predictor of visceral adiposity (5), which conveys a significant health risk (21, 22). Current health-related WC cutoffs do not consider the influence of age on the assessment of metabolic risk (20). Indeed, this study clearly shows that the amount of VAT associated with a given WC is markedly affected by the age and sex of the individual. For example, an older man (>50 y of age) with a WC of 102 cm would be expected to have 70% more VAT than would a 25-y-old man with the same WC (Table 2). Thus, it is clear that differences in VAT and ASAT distribution may not be reflected by differences in its surrogate measure, WC (4, 12). Whether the prediction of metabolic risk within each sex by WC is improved by establishing age-specific cutoffs is unknown.

Limitations of this study warrant mention. First, our findings are restricted to white men and women. Because racial differences in body fat distribution are clearly established (23), it is unclear whether the pattern or magnitude of sex and age-related differences in abdominal AT deposition for a given WC would be similar in other races. Second, this study did not control for differences in cardiorespiratory fitness. It has been shown that, for a given WC, fit men have lower amounts of visceral adiposity than do unfit men (24). Because this was a cross-sectional study, we cannot make causal or temporal inferences about the pattern of ASAT or VAT deposition for a given increase in WC. It is also unclear whether our results were influenced by a selection bias, because individuals who continued to increase abdominal adiposity throughout their life span may have developed disease and would have been excluded from participation in this study.

In summary, our findings showed that, for a given WC, abdominal AT distribution differs between the sexes. We confirmed that, for a given WC, women tend to have more ASAT than do men, independent of age. Contrary to previous observations, men have more VAT than do women for a given WC. Furthermore, we showed that VAT accumulation for a given WC is also influenced by age and menopausal status. These findings suggest that AT distribution for a given WC is altered substantially by age and sex. Whether age-related changes in VAT influence the interpretation of health risk for a given WC is unknown.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  
JLK and SL performed the data analysis. JLK, SL, and RR wrote the manuscript. SBH aided in the interpretation and presentation of the results. None of the authors declared any conflicts of interest.


REFERENCES  

  1. Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S, et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:460–8.
  2. Schreiner PJ, Terry JG, Evans GW, Hinson WH, Crouse JR III, Heiss G. Sex-specific associations of magnetic resonance imaging-derived intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat areas with conventional anthropometric indices. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:335–45.
  3. Kotani K, Tokunaga K, Fujioka S, et al. Sexual dimorphism of age-related changes in whole-body fat distribution in the obese. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994;18:207–2.
  4. Zamboni M, Armellini F, Milani MP, et al. Body fat distribution in pre- and post-menopausal women: metabolic and anthropometric variables and their inter-relationships. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992;16:495–504.
  5. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Kotler DP, Ross R. Body mass index and waist circumference independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:683–8.
  6. DeNino WF, Tchernof A, Dionne IJ, et al. Contribution of abdominal adiposity to age-related differences in insulin sensitivity and plasma lipids in healthy nonobese women. Diabetes Care 2001;24:925–32.
  7. Kelley DE, Thaete FL, Troost F, Huwe T, Goodpaster BH. Subdivisions of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000;278:E941–8.
  8. Ross R, Rissanen J, Pedwell H, Clifford J, Shragge P. Influence of diet and exercise on skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue in men. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:2445–55.
  9. Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:115–22.
  10. Snyder WS, Cooke MJ, Mnassett ES, Larhansen LT, Howells GP, Tipton IH. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon Press, 1975.
  11. Wang J, Thornton JC, Bari S, et al. Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:379–84.
  12. Han TS, McNeill G, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of stature. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997;21:587–93.
  13. Toth MJ, Tchernof A, Sites CK, Poehlman ET. Effect of menopausal status on body composition and abdominal fat distribution. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:226–31.
  14. Guthrie JR, Dennerstein L, Taffe JR, et al. Central abdominal fat and endogenous hormones during the menopausal transition. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1335–40.
  15. Sumino H, Ichikawa S, Yoshida A, et al. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on weight, abdominal fat distribution, and lipid levels in Japanese postmenopausal women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:1044–51.
  16. Tchernof A, Desmeules A, Richard C, et al. Ovarian hormone status and abdominal visceral adipose tissue metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:3425–30.
  17. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:379–84.
  18. Han TS, van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample. BMJ 1995;311:1401–5.
  19. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2074–9.
  20. Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1855–67.
  21. Pascot A, Lemieux S, Lemieux I, et al. Age-related increase in visceral adipose tissue and body fat and the metabolic risk profile of premenopausal women. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1471–8.
  22. Despres JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Bouchard C. Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis 1990;10:497–511.
  23. Hill JO, Sidney S, Lewis CE, Tolan K, Scherzinger AL, Stamm ER. Racial differences in amounts of visceral adipose tissue in young adults: the CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:381–7.
  24. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R, et al. Fitness alters the associations of BMI and waist circumference with total and abdominal fat. Obes Res 2004;12:525–37.
Received for publication August 11, 2004. Accepted for publication January 20, 2005.


作者: Jennifer L Kuk
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具