点击显示 收起
Department of Experimental Medicine and Biochemical Sciences,1 Department of Biology,3 Department of Internal Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome,4 Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, Policlinic of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome,2 Clinica San Raffaele, Velletri, Italy5
Received 29 January 2003/ Returned for modification 30 March 2003/ Accepted 24 May 2003
ABSTRACT |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
INTRODUCTION |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
The most advocated therapy, triple therapy, often includes clarithromycin (1, 11). However, failure to eradicate H. pylori occurs due to resistance to antibiotics, in particular to macrolides, whose prevalence is increasing (1, 2, 10). The mechanisms of clarithromycin resistance have been elucidated and consist of a mutation in the functional domains of the 23S rRNA in H. pylori, which is most frequently located in domain V, as well as that in domain VI. In particular, the main 23S rRNA mutations are an adenine-to-guanine transition at positions 2142 and 2143, an adenine-to-cytosine transversion at position 2142, and a thymine-to-cytosine transition at position 2717. All these mutations confer resistance by altering the ribosome target (7, 25, 26). These single point mutations also generate specific restriction sites, namely BsaI, MboII, and HhaI, which can be used for the rapid screening of clarithromycin resistance.
However, at present the only way to assess clarithromycin resistance is either by testing H. pylori isolates cultured from gastric biopsies or by PCR methods performed directly on gastric specimens (7, 14, 26). In both cases, this means subjecting patients to invasive procedures such as gastric duodenoendoscopy. The aim of the present study was the rapid assessment of clarithromycin resistance, in particular the development of a noninvasive technique combining the advantage of use on stool samples (with the excellent performance of the PCR) with rapid screening oforclarithromycin resistance of H. pylori from infected patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in order to confirm, with the traditional culturing method, the results of restriction analysis of the PCR products. In particular, three biopsies for each patient, taken from the antrum, the gastric body, and the duodenal mucosa with a disinfected endoscope, were placed in 0.1 ml of sterile saline solution and microbiologically processed within 2 h. A rapid test for the detection of urease activity was also performed on biopsy samples (8, 16).
Bacteria and culture conditions and antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates. Biopsy samples were cultured and H. pylori isolates were identified as previously described by us (6, 7). All the H. pylori isolates obtained by culturing biopsy samples were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility with the agar dilution methodology approved by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (19, 21). Isolates were classified as clarithromycin resistant if the MIC exceeded 1 µg/ml (18, 19). In the study, positive controls for the 2142 and 2143 single point mutations (associated with a high level of clarithromycin resistance) were introduced. For these strains, coming from our collection, the presence of the mutation was confirmed by sequence analysis.
Stool sample collection and processing. Fresh fecal specimens were collected from all patients enrolled in the study. All samples were analyzed within 2 h of collection; otherwise they were held at -20°C until processing.
DNA purification from stool samples. Rapid DNA purification from both fresh and frozen fecal samples was performed with the QIAamp DNA stool minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In order to optimize DNA purification yield, 220 mg of fecal samples was used as starting material. Following lysis, 100 µl of eluate was obtained from each sample. Each eluate was then purified, eliminating any RNA residue, by the addition of 5 µl of RNase A (10 mg/ml) followed by incubation at 60°C for an hour (7). Then 5 µl of eluate was used for the seminested PCR, while the remainder was stored at -20°C.
H. pylori detection in stool samples: PCR conditions. H. pylori was detected with the seminested PCR amplification method for a portion of the 23S rRNA gene. The reaction was performed directly on eluates obtained from stool sample purification. Two microliters of QIAamp-purified DNA was added to each PCR amplification reaction. The reaction was performed with a couple of outer primers whose nucleotide sequence was derived from a known sequence of the 23S rRNA gene: HP1 forward (5'-CCACAGCGATGTGGTCTCAG-3') (1820 to 1840; GenBank accession number U27270) and Hp2 reverse (5'-TGT-GTA-GCT-ACC-CAG-CGA-TGC-TC-3') (2811 to 2790; GenBank accession number U27270) in the first reaction.
Amplification reaction mixtures (50 µl) contained 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 9.0), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.), 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix, 12.5 pmol of each primer, and 5 µl of eluate from stool sample. Amplification was carried out in a DNA Thermal Cycler 9700 (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Norwalk, Conn.). Thirty cycles, each consisting of 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 65°C, and 45 s at 72°C, were performed after 2 min of denaturing at 95°C. Cycles were followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 4 min. The PCR product resulted in 993 bp. Then 2 µl of the PCR product obtained from the first reaction was added to the mixture of the second PCR employing a second set of primers (one of which represents an inner sequence of the first PCR product): HP4 forward (2028 to 2048; 5'-GTCGGTTAAATACCGACCTG-3') and HP2 reverse. The second PCR, utilizing both the same reaction mixture and the same PCR conditions as described above, furnished a 783-bp PCR product.
A 10-µl portion of the PCR product was then analyzed by electrophoresis in a 2.0% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer and stained with ethidium bromide. The PCR products were examined in parallel with molecular size markers, the Gene Ruler 100-bp DNA ladder (MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania).
A positive control for the PCR assay, a crude lysate of H. pylori ATCC 43504, prepared as follows, was used. Bacteria were cultivated on nonselective medium until confluent growth had been reached. Cells collected from the surface of a plate cultured for 3 days were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline solution and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 x g (6). The supernatant was then discarded, and 300 µl of extraction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.5% Tween 20) was added to the pellet. The pellet was resuspended, and 7.5 µl of proteinase K solution (10 mg/ml) was added. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 60°C. Finally, the proteinase was inactivated by heating the samples at 98°C for 10 min (7, 16). Ten microliters of supernatant of this crude lysate was added to each PCR amplification reaction.
Sequence analysis of amplicons. All 125 PCR products from positive samples as well as the positive controls were analyzed for their nucleotide sequence. The PCR product was purified by spin column QIAQuick (Qiagen) and cycle sequenced with the ABI Prism Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). DNA sequences were determined with an ABI Prism 310 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The resulting nucleotide sequence of the 783-bp region of the 23S rRNA gene was aligned with the Sequence Navigator software package (Applied Biosystems).
Restriction analysis of PCR products. The amplicons of the 783-bp region obtained from the seminested PCRs subsequently underwent restriction analysis in order to identify clarithromycin-resistant strains (7, 26). Three aliquots of 10 µl for each PCR product were digested with 5 U HhaI (Amersham Pharmacia) for T2717C mutation detection. Digestion was performed at 37°C for 2 h, as recommended by the manufacturer; 5 U of MboII (Amersham Pharmacia) was used for detection of the A2142C/G mutation, and digestion was performed at 37°C for 2 h according to the manufacturer's instructions; and 5 U of BsaI (Amersham Pharmacia) was used for detection of A2143G mutation, and digestion was performed at 50°C for 1 h according to the manufacturer's instructions. The digestion patterns of the PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 2.0% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, in TAE buffer, and compared with the reference control (H. pylori ATCC 43504) as well as with the Gene Ruler 100-bp DNA ladder size markers (MBI Fermentas).
Sensitivity of the new method. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the new method for the rapid detection of clarithromycin resistance in fecal samples, a stool sample previously demonstrated to be H. pylori free was artificially inoculated with H. pylori obtained from a 3-day-old culture on nonselective medium. In particular, a suspension of cultured H. pylori, equivalent to 0.5 opacity on the MacFarland scale (corresponding to 1.5 x 106 CFU/ml) was prepared in sterile H2O, and 10 µl of this suspension, 10 µl of a 10-fold dilution (15,000 CFU) of this suspension (1,500 CFU), and finally 10 µl of a 100-fold dilution of the suspension (150 CFU) were added to fecal samples (each of them weighing 220 mg). Following the additions, the samples were better homogenized and analyzed following the PCR protocol described above. In order to investigate the stability of H. pylori DNA during storage, samples which were optimal for the amplification method were also frozen for a day and then thawed and subsequently analyzed by PCR.
Specificity assay. To avoid any possible false-positive results caused by our technique, we performed an experiment for control of specificity. The assay utilizes crude lysates from strains which can colonize the gastric mucosa, such as Helicobacter heilmannii ATCC 49286, Campylobacter jejunii subsp. jejunii ATCC 33291, and other strains which can be present in fecal samples, such as Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923. Crude strain lysates were prepared as reported above, and also in this case 10 µl of supernatant of this crude lysate was added to each PCR amplification reaction. The PCR protocol was that described previously.
Amplification assay. To exclude the possibility that some stool specimens could be negative due to the presence of inhibitors, all negative samples were subjected to a second PCR assay with the purpose of amplifying the conserved gene for human ß-actin (22). The PCR was performed according to Ponte et al. and performed directly on 2 µl of eluate obtained from stool sample purification of QIAamp-purified DNA.
RESULTS |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
|
The specificity of our method has been proved by performing the specificity assay, by which we have demonstrated that the PCR did not produce amplicons for any of the control strains, some of which can be present in the gut (Fig. 2). This result allowed us to exclude the possibility that a fecal specimen could be a false-positive sample.
|
Restriction analysis of 125 PCR products showed that only two samples contained clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori, their amplified products being susceptible to HhaI digestion. A positive control for the single point mutation at either position 2142 or 2143 was added to the study, but none of the 125 amplicons contained these mutations. Figure 3 is a comparison of restriction analysis (with BsaI, MboII, and HhaI) of some amplicons corresponding to the susceptible phenotype as well as the restriction pattern obtained from clarithromycin-resistant phenotypes defined by our method or introduced as positive controls. The study of antimicrobial susceptibilities performed on H. pylori isolates obtained by culturing biopsy samples from the same patients whose stool specimens had previously been analyzed by PCR confirmed the results of the restriction analysis. None of the 125 isolates expressed a high level of clarithromycin resistance, while only two strains were clarithromycin resistant, expressing a MIC of 1 µg/ml (18, 19, 21).
|
DISCUSSION |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References |
---|
In the past, Versalovic et al. developed a method (utilizing rapid restriction analysis of the amplicon obtained from H. pylori) which avoided the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the H. pylori isolates, and subsequently Marais et al. and Oleastro et al. developed systems which could detect either H. pylori or clarithromycin resistance of the microorganism directly on gastric biopsy by a PCR method (14, 20, 26). Moreover, Monteiro et al. developed a system to detect H. pylori directly on stool samples by PCR (16, 17). These represent a great effort to change the H. pylori diagnostic algorithm, particularly because the authors propose a strategy to remove the inhibitors present in fecal material that represent the main problem in performing the amplification procedure in stool specimens (4, 17). However, to date none of the methods described have combined the benefits of avoiding an invasive procedure in the assessment of the H. pylori status of the patient with the usefulness of rapidly obtaining complete information concerning the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the microorganism, particularly those regarding clarithromycin resistance. This was the goal of the present work.
We have in fact developed a simple, rapid, and cost-effective procedure which can detect H. pylori in patient stool specimens with good sensitivity and evaluate the clarithromycin resistance of the microorganism. Also in our case, removal of inhibitors has been our main objective and was achieved with a commercial system of purification, which is simple to use, extremely rapid, and requires only a few steps, reducing the risk of contamination by foreign DNA (4). The second aspect in the development of this procedure has been the combination of knowledge concerning all restriction sites associated with 23S rRNA mutations (those associated with high and low resistance phenotypes) and therefore clarithromycin resistance (1, 22, 26). The result has been rapid endonuclease restriction analysis of the amplicons which is easy to perform and does not present any difficulty in interpretation.
In conclusion, our PCR detection of H. pylori in stool specimens is reliable and easy to perform and can provide additional information specifically related to the macrolide susceptibility of the microorganism. Therefore, the extensive use of this method not only reduces the use of invasive procedures in order to isolate H. pylori infecting the patient, but also allows direction of the first eradication therapy or evaluation of the outcome of previous eradication regimens (with a consequent reduction in cost). Finally, the advisable widespread use of this procedure will allow a reduction in the use of gastroduodenal endoscopy, which is expensive and not always advisable in some patients, such as the pediatric population.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
REFERENCES |
---|
Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Rsults Discussion References |
---|