Literature
Home医源资料库在线期刊美国呼吸和危急护理医学2005年第171卷第8期

Interleukin-10 Gene Expression in Acute Virus-induced Asthma

来源:美国呼吸和危急护理医学
摘要:SemiquantitativeCytokineGeneExpressionbyReal-TimePCRPCRprimersandprobesfornumerousinflammatorymediatortargets(IL-8,IL-10,IL-5,eotaxin-1,RANTES,andMIP-1)wereobtainedasproprietarypreoptimizedreagents(AppliedBiosystems)andcombinedwiththereferencegeneeukaryotic18......

点击显示 收起

    School of Medical Practice and Population Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan
    Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute
    Immunology and Infectious Diseases Unit, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton
    Picornaviral Research Unit, Royal Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle
    John Hunter Children's Hospital, Kaleidoscope, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia

    ABSTRACT

    Rationale: Virus-induced asthma is characterized by marked neutrophil influx and eosinophil degranulation, suggesting a mode of immunopathogenesis different from that of allergen-induced asthma. Objectives: This study compared induced sputum cytokine responses in subjects with severe asthma exacerbation and respiratory virus infection with those of patients with stable asthma, healthy control subjects, and virus-infected nonasthmatic subjects. Methods: Subject infection status and pulmonary history were established on the basis of common cold and asthma questionnaires, and lung function and atopy tests were performed. Respiratory virus infection was diagnosed by cell culture and direct polymerase chain reaction, using induced sputum. The induced sputum cellular profile was examined and cytokine gene expression was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: A respiratory virus was detected in 78% of subjects with acute asthma. Specific viruses detected were rhinovirus (83%), influenza (15%), enterovirus (4%), and respiratory syncytial virus (2%). Virus-infected subjects with acute asthma or no asthma had increased RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 messenger RNAs compared with other groups. Interleukin (IL)-10 mRNA was significantly increased in virus-infected acute asthma and reduced on recovery from acute asthma. IL-5, eotaxin, and IL-8 mRNA transcripts were similar across groups. Conclusions: Asthma exacerbation triggered by respiratory virus infection is characterized by increased IL-10 gene expression that may explain the suppressed eosinophil influx in acute asthma. Airway neutrophilia due to respiratory virus infection is associated with chemokine gene expression involving RANTES and macrophage inflammatory protein-1.

    Key Words: asthma; cytokines; gene expression; viruses

    Viral respiratory tract infections frequently lead to significant exacerbations of asthma (1), characterized by marked neutrophil infiltration together with eosinophil degranulation (2eC9). This contrasts with allergen-induced asthma, in which there is an interleukin (IL)-5eCmediated eosinophil infiltrate that leads to increases in asthma symptoms, airflow obstruction, and airway responsiveness (10eC12). These observations suggest that the immunopathogenesis of virus-induced asthma exacerbation is different from that of allergen-induced asthma (13). However, the clinical situation is further complicated by a potential interaction between virus infection, allergic sensitization, and allergen exposure that is linked to hospitalization for episodes of acute asthma (14). Identification of cytokine response patterns in episodes of acute virus-induced asthma may provide insight into the pathogenesis of these events.

    Human rhinovirus, which results in a nonlytic upper respiratory tract infection, is the dominant cause of virus-induced asthma exacerbations (1, 15, 16). However, all virus types that induce asthma episodes have been associated with airway epithelial cell activation and chemokine release (17, 18). The chemokines that are potentially involved include members of both the CC and CXC families (e.g., IL-8; regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted ; macrophage-inflammatory protein-1 [MIP-1]; and eotaxin-1) that have activity on both eosinophils and neutrophils. Whereas the eosinophil activation pathway is well characterized in asthma, the pathway leading to neutrophil influx and activation in asthma is less well understood. In allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, a severe complication of asthma with both eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation (19), the neutrophil influx is accompanied by increased IL-8 gene expression and protein release (20). It is unclear whether virus-induced asthma represents a superimposed virus-induced epithelial/chemokine response that is superimposed over an eosinophil-driven asthmatic response, or whether there is interaction between both pathways. Any such interaction could involve augmentation or suppression of one pathway, or a mechanism that is specific to virus-induced asthma. Elucidating these mechanisms is important for understanding disease mechanisms and may have treatment implications given the increasing number of specific cytokine and chemokine inhibitors that are available.

    This study was undertaken to examine the immunopathogenesis of virus-induced asthma by investigating messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in airway cells obtained by sputum induction. To control for the effects of virus infection and asthma, we compared subjects with acute virus-induced asthma with stable noninfected subjects with asthma, healthy control subjects, and virus-infected subjects without asthma.

    METHODS

    See the online supplement for an extended version of these methods.

    Subjects

    Fifty-nine patients admitted to John Hunter Hospital (Newcastle, Australia) experiencing an acute exacerbation of asthma between February 2001 and October 2002 were recruited and induced sputum was collected after ultrasonic nebulization of isotonic saline as previously described (7, 21, 22). The only selection criteria applied were the presence of acute asthma, age greater than 7 years, and FEV1 greater than 40% predicted. A subgroup (n = 25) was also studied on recovery, 4 weeks later. Comparison groups were subjects with stable asthma, healthy subjects without asthma, and subjects without asthma with virus respiratory infection that was suspected clinically and confirmed by microbiology. Participants completed asthma history, asthma control (23), and common cold questionnaires (24), provided nasal/throat swabs, and underwent skin allergen prick testing and spirometry. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study, which was approved by the Hunter Area Health Service and University of Newcastle Research Ethics Committees.

    Specimen Processing

    Selected portions of induced sputum were allocated to (1) a lytic solution (buffer RLT; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for RNA extraction and subsequent mRNA expression analysis and virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR), (2) in vitro culture in virus-permissive human epithelial cell lines (HEL and HEp-2) for outgrowth of respiratory viruses, and (3) sequential dithiothreitol and phosphate-buffered saline for cellular dispersion and profiling as previously described (22, 25). Nasal swabs and throat swabs were also immersed in buffer RLT, and extraction and purification of sputum and clarification of in vitro culture supernatant and swab RNA were performed with an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was then reverse transcribed to total cDNA, using random primers and a SuperScript II reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

    Virus Detection

    Induced sputum, respiratory swab, and clarified in vitro culture supernatant cDNA was assayed for human rhinovirus, enterovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and metapneumovirus RNA transcripts by agarose gel PCR (ThermoCycler; Thermo Electron Molecular Biology, Middlesex, UK) (26eC28) and for human influenza types A and B (29) by real-time PCR (ABI Prism 7700 sequence detector; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

    Semiquantitative Cytokine Gene Expression by Real-Time PCR

    PCR primers and probes for numerous inflammatory mediator targets (IL-8, IL-10, IL-5, eotaxin-1, RANTES, and MIP-1) were obtained as proprietary preoptimized reagents (Applied Biosystems) and combined with the reference gene eukaryotic 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) in duplex real-time PCRs. Relative quantitation of mRNA expression was determined by a modification of the method of Pfaffl (30), whereby expression of the target gene in samples is compared with that of a calibrator source. Assay protocols are described in full detail in the online supplement.

    Statistical Analyses

    Analysis was performed with Stata 7 (Stata, College Station, TX), with results presented as medians (interquartile range) or means (SD) as appropriate. Post hoc analysis was applied to all significant (p < 0.05) variables.

    RESULTS

    Clinical Characteristics

    Subjects with acute asthma were divided into those with virus detected (n = 46) and those where no virus was detected (n = 13). They were compared with the following control groups: stable asthma without virus infection (n = 14), subjects without asthma with a viral respiratory infection (n = 15), and healthy, uninfected control subjects (n = 16). The demographic characteristics of these groups are shown in Table 1. The asthma groups had a higher prevalence of atopy than did the nonasthmatic control groups. The acute asthma groups included 28 children, whose data were combined with adult data for analysis as there were no differences between children and adults in any of the outcome measures (p > 0.05; data not shown). The stable and acute asthma groups had similar background disease and maintenance treatment requirements. The subjects with asthma had more severe airflow obstruction compared with control subjects without asthma (Table 2), and in acute asthma with virus infection the mean FEV1 was 67% predicted compared with 87% predicted in stable asthma.

    Subjects with acute asthma had higher asthma control scores than did subjects with stable asthma, indicating the presence of more asthma symptoms during the exacerbations (Table 2). The common cold questionnaire scores were significantly increased in subjects with virus infection (virus infection and no asthma, 9.3; virus infection acute asthma, 9.4; Table 2). There was also an elevation in common cold score among subjects with acute asthma in whom no virus was detected. This may reflect lack of specificity of the questionnaire or failure to detect virus in these exacerbations. These 13 subjects tended to have a longer duration of cold symptoms (5eC8 days) compared with the virus-positive acute asthma group (2eC9 days, p = 0.131; Table 2). They also tended to have increased prevalence of prior smoking. These factors may have contributed to failure to detect virus or to the exacerbation.

    Virus Detection

    Respiratory viruses were detected from the majority of subjects with acute asthma (46 of 59, 77.9%; Figure 1). The comparative detection rates in children 7 to 16 years of age and adults with acute asthma were 86.2 and 70.0%, respectively (p > 0.05). Rhinovirus was the virus most frequently detected by reverse transcriptaseeCPCR (n = 38, 83%; Figure 1), followed by influenza (n = 7, 15.3%), enterovirus (n = 2, 4.4%), and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 1, 2.2%). Metapneumovirus was not detected in subjects with acute asthma. In the virus-infected control group, rhinovirus was detected most often (n = 12, 80%) followed by influenza (n = 2, 14.2%), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 2, 13.3%), enterovirus (n = 1, 6.7%), and metapneumovirus (n = 1, 6.7%). Three of the control subjects had a dual infection with influenza type A and rhinovirus. Picornavirus was isolated by virus culture in 35 of 66 subjects (53.0%), and by direct sputum PCR in 51 of 67 subjects (76.1%). The cultured viruses were characterized as rhinovirus in 25 of 35 subjects (71.4%) and as enterovirus in 13 of 35 subjects (37.1%), using reverse transcriptaseeCPCR (26).

    Induced Sputum

    Sputum quality was good, with a median (interquartile range) quality score of 17 (interquartile range, 14eC19) out of a possible score of 23 (21). There was minimal squamous contamination for all groups and good cell viability at 73.3% (interquartile range, 50.0eC91.7%). Virus infection was accompanied by an increase in induced sputum total cell counts in acute asthma (4.9 x 106/ml) and in nonasthmatic subjects (7.9 x 106/ml; Table 3). Neutrophils (percentage and absolute) were significantly elevated in acute asthma with virus infection, and also in nonasthmatic subjects with virus infection. Induced sputum eosinophil percentage was significantly elevated in stable asthma (Figure 2). Absolute eosinophils were elevated in all groups compared with control subjects (Table 3).

    Cytokine Gene Expression

    Virus infection in both the subjects with and without asthma was associated with significantly increased gene expression for RANTES (p < 0.005; Figure 3). RANTES expression in stable asthma and acute asthma without virus infection was similar to that of noninfected control subjects (p > 0.05). Gene expression for other chemokines (IL-8 and MIP-1) tended to be increased in virus infection, but these results failed to reach significance (Figure 3). IL-10 gene expression was significantly increased in acute asthma with virus infection when compared with virus-infected control and uninfected control subjects and subjects with stable asthma (p < 0.005; Figure 4). Messenger RNA transcripts for IL-5 and eotaxin-1 were not expressed at consistently detectable levels in induced sputum.

    Recovery

    A subgroup (n = 25) of the virus-infected subjects with acute asthma was studied 4 weeks later, on recovery from the exacerbation. There was significant improvement in lung function, asthma control, and common cold score (Table 4). Induced sputum showed a reduction in neutrophils, an increase in eosinophils, and a significant reduction in IL-10 gene expression (Figure 5).

    DISCUSSION

    This study establishes a cytokine profile associated with virus-induced acute asthma, in which there is significantly increased gene expression for the chemokine RANTES and for the cytokine IL-10 and trends for increases in other chemokines. These changes could help explain the characteristic inflammatory responses in virus-induced asthma whereby RANTES promotes eosinophil degranulation and neutrophil influx, and IL-10 suppresses eosinophil cellular infiltration. With recovery from the exacerbation, IL-10 levels fell and the sputum eosinophilia typical of asthma returned. The chemokine response in acute asthma showed significance for RANTES although there were trends for increased expression of MIP-1. This appeared to be an effect of virus infection because subjects without asthma with virus infection also expressed increased RANTES mRNA with a significantly increased percentage of neutrophils and a trend for increased MIP-1. In contrast, increased IL-10 mRNA expression occurred in virus-infected subjects presenting with acute asthma and was not raised in the group with stable asthma.

    Epithelial activation with chemokine release is a recognized feature of respiratory virus infection. RANTES (now designated CCL5) is a broad-acting chemokine that has an established role in the recruitment of CD4+ T cells, monocytes (31), and eosinophils (32, 33) into inflammatory sites, and is upregulated in patients with asthma (34, 35). Produced by numerous lung cell types including CD8+ T cells and bronchial epithelial cells, RANTES is also a potent activator of eosinophils (36), and this is consistent with the observations of increased levels of eosinophil cationic protein in airway secretions in association with viral infection (6). A role for CC chemokine family members such as RANTES in the chemotaxis of lung neutrophils is less clear, with chemokines from the CXC family (e.g., IL-8/CXCL8 and ENA-78/CXCL5) more commonly associated with chemotaxis and activation of neutrophils (37). However, a study in transgenic mice overexpressing human RANTES in the lungs resulted in a preferential increase in neutrophils, but not eosinophils, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (38). This was associated with increased mRNA for another potent CXC neutrophil chemoattractant, MIP-2. This suggests that RANTES overexpression promotes lung neutrophilia, possibly as a result of increased MIP-2 expression. These results implicate RANTES in the eosinophil activation and neutrophil influx that accompanies viral respiratory tract infection.

    The association of respiratory virus infection and exacerbations of asthma is well known, and numerous unrelated RNA viruses, such as picornavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza, are recognized triggers of the disease (39, 40). A common attribute of many of these single-stranded RNA viruses is the creation of a short-lived replicative intermediate, double-stranded RNA during the process of intracellular replication. Rhinovirus double-stranded RNA has been shown to specifically enhance the secretion of RANTES in airway epithelial cells (41, 42). Several pathways have been proposed that might lead to upregulated RANTES production, involving such diverse molecules as double-stranded RNAeCdependent protein kinase, Toll-like receptor 3, and members of the nuclear factor-B and interferon regulatory factor families. In concert with virus-associated RANTES expression, innate immune and helper T-cell type 1 cytokines such as IFN- can enhance RANTES production in airway epithelial cells, although the mechanism is unclear (43). Upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on the infected cell surface to increase rhinovirus binding has been proposed.

    In this study, mRNA for IL-10 was detectable in each subject group, with a significant increase in acute asthma due to virus infection compared with all nonacute asthma groups. This was a synergistic effect of virus infection and acute asthma, because increased IL-10 mRNA was not observed in virus infection without asthma, in acute asthma without virus infection, or in stable asthma (Figure 4). Furthermore, on recovery from acute asthma, IL-10 gene expression returned to normal levels. Thus, IL-10 gene expression from airway cells appeared to be a feature of virus-induced acute asthma. IL-10 is produced by a wide variety of cells, including macrophages (44), monocytes, dendritic cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, neutrophils, and epithelial cells. It is now also viewed as a potent immunoregulatory cytokine that is produced by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and functions to suppress immune responses broadly, reducing morbidity in an infectious animal model (45). Levels of IL-10 in asthma have variably been reported to be either decreased or increased. Dysregulation of IL-10 gene expression is seen in chronic inflammation when effector mechanisms are inadequate (46). Consequently, IL-10 mRNA is increased in bronchial biopsies from asthmatic airways, and also in gut mucosa from individuals with allergic asthma. Viral infection has been reported to increase IL-10 protein levels in the nose (47, 48), and also in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. IFN-, a potent antiviral cytokine, leads to increased IL-10 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (49) and provides a mechanism for virally induced IL-10 gene expression. Allergen exposure in atopic individuals also increases IL-10 (50), and prior exposure to corticosteroids such as fluticasone potentiates allergen-induced IL-10 production from CD4+CD25+ T regulator cells (51). Acute severe asthma occurs in response to viral infection, possibly in synergy with allergen exposure (14), and often in subjects using inhaled corticosteroids. Thus, each of these factors could contribute to the increased IL-10 gene expression observed in acute severe asthma.

    The consequences of increased IL-10 in acute asthma may impact on both inflammatory cells and airway responsiveness. In our study, absolute eosinophils were lower in acute asthma with virus infection compared with nonasthmatic virus infection and stable asthma. Eosinophil influx is a key feature of the immunopathology of allergen-induced asthma and the relatively suppressed eosinophil influx in acute viral asthma is likely to be an active phenomenon. IL-10 has an established antieosinophilic function (52), and in allergen-induced asthma, IL-10 is negatively correlated with sputum eosinophils (12). We observed suppressed eosinophils in acute asthma and a reemergence of sputum eosinophilia on recovery from the exacerbation. Thus, the increased IL-10 gene expression in acute viral asthma may explain the relatively suppressed eosinophilia in this setting and this is further supported by the observed return of eosinophilia when IL-10 gene expression was reduced on recovery from acute asthma.

    Airway hyperresponsiveness is a key feature of acute asthma, and in experimental models is enhanced by both allergen exposure and virus infection. Animal models define a role for IL-10 in the induction of airway hyperresponsiveness because IL-10eCdeficient mice fail to develop airway hyperresponsiveness (53, 54) and reconstitution of the IL-10 gene restores hyperresponsiveness but suppresses eosinophilia (55). Furthermore, antieCIL-10 antibody abrogates airway hyperresponsiveness in mice (56). Thus the changes in IL-10 expression may contribute to both the inflammatory phenotype and the changes in airway function that are seen in acute virus-induced asthma.

    In conclusion, this study describes cytokine gene expression patterns and cellular profiles of induced sputum from virus-induced exacerbations of acute asthma. The results identify that in virus-induced asthma there are different mechanisms operating than those described in allergen-induced asthma. There is a potent chemokine response with RANTES associated with viral infection, where it was a likely mediator of the inflammatory infiltrate observed. IL-10 was a feature of viral infections in subjects with asthma, possibly functioning as an immunoregulatory and antieosinophilic cytokine in this setting.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank clinical staff Joanne Smart and Philippa Talbot and laboratory technicians Naomi Timmins and Kellie Fakes. The assistance of Glenda Walker for virus culture is also gratefully acknowledged.

    This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

    REFERENCES

    Johnston SL, Pattemore PK, Sanderson G, Smith S, Lampe F, Josephs L, Symington P, O'Toole S, Myint SH, Tyrrell DA, et al. Community study of role of viral infections in exacerbations of asthma in 9eC11 year old children. BMJ 1995;310:1225eC1229.

    Busse WW, Vrtis RF, Dick EC. The role of viral infections in intrinsic asthma: activation of neutrophil inflammation. Agents Actions Suppl 1989;28:41eC56.

    Jarjour NN, Gern JE, Kelly EA, Swenson CA, Dick CR, Busse WW. The effect of an experimental rhinovirus 16 infection on bronchial lavage neutrophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:1169eC1177.

    Teran LM, Johnston SL, Schroder JM, Church MK, Holgate ST. Role of nasal interleukin-8 in neutrophil recruitment and activation in children with virus-induced asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1362eC1366.

    Wark PA, Johnston SL, Moric I, Simpson JL, Hensley MJ, Gibson PG. Neutrophil degranulation and cell lysis is associated with clinical severity in virus-induced asthma. Eur Respir J 2002;19:68eC75.

    Norzila MZ, Fakes K, Henry RL, Simpson J, Gibson PG. Interleukin-8 secretion and neutrophil recruitment accompanies induced sputum eosinophil activation in children with acute asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:769eC774.

    Twaddell SH, Gibson PG, Carty K, Woolley KL, Henry RL. Assessment of airway inflammation in children with acute asthma using induced sputum. Eur Respir J 1996;9:2104eC2108.

    Grunberg K, Smits HH, Timmers MC, de Klerk EP, Dolhain RJ, Dick EC, Hiemstra PS, Sterk PJ. Experimental rhinovirus 16 infection: effects on cell differentials and soluble markers in sputum in asthmatic subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:609eC616.

    Pizzichini MM, Pizzichini E, Efthimiadis A, Chauhan AJ, Johnston SL, Hussack P, Mahony J, Dolovich J, Hargreave FE, Teran LM, et al. Asthma and natural colds: inflammatory indices in induced sputum—a feasibility study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1178eC1184.

    De Monchy JG, Kauffman HF, Venge P, Koeter GH, Jansen HM, Sluiter HJ, De Vries K. Bronchoalveolar eosinophilia during allergen-induced late asthmatic reactions. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;131:373eC376.

    Wark PA, Simpson J, Hensley MJ, Gibson PG. Airway inflammation in thunderstorm asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32:1750eC1756.

    Gauvreau GM, Watson RM, O'Byrne PM. Kinetics of allergen-induced airway eosinophilic cytokine production and airway inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:640eC647.

    Menzies-Gow A, Robinson DS. Eosinophils, eosinophilic cytokines (interleukin-5), and antieosinophilic therapy in asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2002;8:33eC38.

    Green R, Custovic A, Sanderson G, Hunter J, Johnston S, Woodcock A. Synergism between allergens and viruses and risk of hospital admission with asthma: case-control study. BMJ 2002;324:763.

    Carlsen KH, Orstavik I, Leegaard J, Hoeg H. Respiratory virus infections and aeroallergens in acute bronchial asthma. Arch Dis Child 1984;59:310eC315.

    Mosser AB, Vrtis R, Burchell L, Lee W-M, Dick CR, Weisshaar E, Bock D, Swenson CA, Cornwell RD, Meyer KC, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of rhinovirus infection in bronchial tisues. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:645eC651.

    Teran LM, Seminario MC, Shute JK, Papi A, Compton SJ, Low JL, Gleich GJ, Johnston SL. RANTES, macrophage-inhibitory protein 1, and the eosinophil product major basic protein are released into upper respiratory secretions during virus-induced asthma exacerbations in children. J Infect Dis 1999;179:677eC681.

    Oh JW, Lee HB, Park IK, Kang JO. Interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-11, and interferon- levels in nasopharyngeal aspirates from wheezing children with respiratory syncytial virus or influenza A virus infection. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2002;13:350eC356.

    Wark PA, Saltos N, Simpson J, Slater S, Hensley MJ, Gibson PG. Induced sputum eosinophils and neutrophils and bronchiectasis severity in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Eur Respir J 2000;16:1095eC1101.

    Gibson PG, Wark PA, Simpson JL, Meldrum C, Meldrum S, Saltos N, Boyle M. Induced sputum IL-8 gene expression, neutrophil influx and MMP-9 in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Eur Respir J 2003;21:582eC588.

    Gibson PG, Wlodarczyk JW, Hensley MJ, Gleeson M, Henry RL, Cripps AW, Clancy RL. Epidemiological association of airway inflammation with asthma symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness in childhood. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:36eC41.

    Wark PA, Simpson JL, Hensley MJ, Gibson PG. Safety of sputum induction with isotonic saline in adults with acute severe asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2001;31:1745eC1753.

    Juniper E, O'Byrne P, Guyatt G, Ferrie P, King D. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J 1999;14:902eC907.

    Nicholson KG, Kent J, Ireland DC. Respiratory viruses and exacerbations of asthma in adults. BMJ 1993;307:982eC986.

    Cai Y, Carty K, Henry RL, Gibson PG. Persistence of sputum eosinophilia in children with controlled asthma when compared with healthy children. Eur Respir J 1998;11:848eC853.

    Atmar RL, Georghiou PR. Classification of respiratory tract picornavirus isolates as enteroviruses or rhinoviruses by using RT-PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2544eC2546.

    Simpson JL, Moric I, Wark PA, Johnston SL, Gibson PG. Use of induced sputum for the diagnosis of influenza and infections in asthma: a comparison of diagnostic techniques. J Clin Virol 2003;26:339eC346.

    Peret T, Boivin G, Li Y, Couillard M, Humphrey C, Osterhaus A, Erdman D, Anderson L. Characterization of human metapneumoviruses isolated from patients in North America. J Infect Dis 2002;185:1660eC1663.

    van Elden LJR, Nijhuis M, Schipper P, Schuurman R, van Loon AM. Simultaneous detection of influenza viruses A and B using real-time quantitative PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:196eC200.

    Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:e45.

    Schall TJ, Bacon K, Toy KJ, Goeddel DV. Selective attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes of the memory phenotype by cytokine RANTES. Nature 1990;347:669eC671.

    Kameyoshi Y, Dorschner A, Mallet AI, Christophers E, Schroder JM. Cytokine RANTES released by thrombin-stimulated platelets is a potent attractant for human eosinophils. J Exp Med 1992;176:587eC592.

    Lukacs NW, Strieter RM, Warmington K, Lincoln P, Chensue SW, Kunkel SL. Differential recruitment of leukocyte populations and alteration of airway hyperreactivity by CeCC family chemokines in allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol 1997;158:4398eC4404.

    Teran LM, Noso N, Carroll M, Davies DE, Holgate S, Schroder JM. Eosinophil recruitment following allergen challenge is associated with the release of the chemokine RANTES into asthmatic airways. J Immunol 1996;157:1806eC1812.

    Rojas-Ramos E, Avalos AF, Perez-Fernandez L, Cuevas-Schacht F, Valencia-Maqueda E, Teran LM. Role of the chemokines RANTES, monocyte chemotactic proteins-3 and -4, and eotaxins-1 and -2 in childhood asthma. Eur Respir J 2003;22:310eC316.

    Sannohe S, Adachi T, Hamada K, Honda K, Yamada Y, Saito N, Cui CH, Kayaba H, Ishikawa K, Chihara J. Upregulated response to chemokines in oxidative metabolism of eosinophils in asthma and allergic rhinitis. Eur Respir J 2003;21:925eC931.

    Qiu Y, Zhu J, Bandi V, Atmar RL, Hattotuwa K, Guntupalli KK, Jeffery PK. Biopsy neutrophilia, neutrophil chemokine and receptor gene expression in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:968eC975.

    Pan ZZ, Parkyn L, Ray A, Ray P. Inducible lung-specific expression of RANTES: preferential recruitment of neutrophils. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;279:L658eCL666.

    Jartti T, Lehtinen P, Vuorinen T, Osterback R, van den Hoogen B, Osterhaus AD, Ruuskanen O. Respiratory picornaviruses and respiratory syncytial virus as causative agents of acute expiratory wheezing in children. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1095eC1101.

    Azevedo AM, Durigon EL, Okasima V, Queiroz DA, de Moraes-Vasconcelos D, Duarte AJ, Grumach AS. Detection of influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus during asthma attacks in children older than 2 years old. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2003;31:311eC317.

    Gern JE, French DA, Grindle KA, Brockman-Schneider RA, Konno S, Busse WW. Double-stranded RNA induces the synthesis of specific chemokines by bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003;28:731eC737.

    Ieki K, Matsukura S, Kokubu F, Kimura T, Kuga H, Kawaguchi M, Odaka M, Suzuki S, Watanabe S, Takeuchi H, et al. Double-stranded RNA activates RANTES gene transcription through co-operation of nuclear factor-B and interferon regulatory factors in human airway epithelial cells. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:745eC752.

    Konno S, Grindle KA, Lee WM, Schroth MK, Mosser AG, Brockman-Schneider RA, Busse WW, Gern JE. Interferon- enhances rhinovirus-induced RANTES secretion by airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:594eC601.

    Efthimiadis A. IL-10 in induced sputum of asthmatics during a viral infection . Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:A63.

    Hesse M, Piccirillo CA, Belkaid Y, Prufer J, Mentink-Kane M, Leusink M, Cheever AW, Shevach EM, Wynn TA. The pathogenesis of schistosomiasis is controlled by cooperating IL-10-producing innate effector and regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2004;172:3157eC3166.

    Tournoy KG, Kips JC, Pauwels RA. Endogenous interleukin-10 suppresses allergen-induced airway inflammation and nonspecific airway responsiveness. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30:775eC783.

    Corne JM, Lau L, Scott SJ, Davies R, Johnston SL, Howarth PH. The relationship between atopic status and IL-10 nasal lavage levels in the acute and persistent inflammatory response to upper respiratory tract infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1101eC1107.

    Papadopoloulos N, Stanciu L, Papa A, Holgate S, Johnston S. A defective type 1 response to rhinovirus in atopic asthma. Thorax 2002;57:328eC332.

    Simon HU, Seelbach H, Ehmann R, Schmitz M. Clinical and immunological effects of low-dose IFN- treatment in patients with corticosteroid-resistant asthma. Allergy 2003;58:1250eC1255.

    Bettiol J, Sele J, Henket M, Louis E, Malaise M, Bartsch P, Louis R. Cytokine production from sputum cells after allergenic challenge in IgE-mediated asthma. Allergy 2002;57:1145eC1150.

    Dao Nguyen X, Robinson D. Fluticasone propionate increases CD4CD25 T regulatory cell suppression of allergen-stimulated CD4CD25 T cells by an IL-10-dependent mechanism. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114:296eC301.

    Takanaski S, Nonaka R, Xing Z, O'Byrne P, Dolovich J, Jordana M. Interleukin 10 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced survival and cytokine production by human peripheral blood eosinophils. J Exp Med 1994;180:711eC715.

    Makela M, Kanehiro A, Borish L, Dakhama A, Loader J, Joetham A, Xing Z, Jordana M, Larsen G, Gelfand E. IL-10 is necessary for the expression of airway hyperresponsiveness but not pulmonary inflammation after allergic sensitization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:6007eC6012.

    Justice J, Shibata Y, Sur S, Mustafa J, Fan M, Van Scott M. IL-10 gene knockout attenuates allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in C57BL/6 mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2001;280:L363eCL368.

    van Scott M, Justice J, Bradfield J, Enright E, Sigounas A, Sur S. IL-10 reduces Th2 cytokine production and eosinophilia but augments airway reactivity in allergic mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;278:L667eCL674.

    Matsumoto K, Inoue H, Tsuda M, Honda Y, Kibe A, Machida K, Yoshiura Y, Nakanishi Y. Different roles of interleukin-10 in onset and resolution of asthmatic responses in allergen-challenged mice. Respirology 2005;10:18eC26.

作者: Terry V. Grissell, Heather Powell, Darren R. Shafr 2007-5-14
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具