Literature
首页医源资料库在线期刊美国临床营养学杂志2004年79卷第3期

Taste preferences and body weight changes in an obesity-prone population

来源:《美国临床营养学杂志》
摘要:ABSTRACTBackground:Tastepreferencesforhighlypalatablefoodsrichinsugarandfatmayunderliethecurrentepidemicofobesity。Objective:ThisstudyaimedtodeterminewhetherthehedonicresponsetosweetandcreamysolutionsdiffersbetweenwhitesandPimaIndiansandwhetherapreferenc......

点击显示 收起

Arline D Salbe, Angelo DelParigi, Richard E Pratley, Adam Drewnowski and P Antonio Tataranni

1 From the Clinical Diabetes and Nutrition Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ (ADS, ADP, REP, and PAT), and the Nutritional Sciences Program, University of Washington, Seattle (AD)

2 Supported by NIH grant CA61680 (to AD)

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to AD Salbe, NIH/NIDDK/CDNS, 4212 North 16th Street, Room 541, Phoenix, AZ 85016. E-mail: arline_salbe{at}nih.gov.


ABSTRACT  
Background: Taste preferences for highly palatable foods rich in sugar and fat may underlie the current epidemic of obesity.

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the hedonic response to sweet and creamy solutions differs between whites and Pima Indians and whether a preference for these tastes predicts weight gain.

Design: One hundred twenty-three Pima Indian and 64 white volunteers taste tested solutions of nonfat milk (0.1% fat), whole milk (3.5% fat), half and half (11.3% fat), and cream (37.5% fat) containing 0%, 5%, 10%, or 20% sugar by weight. Solutions were rated for perceived sweetness, creaminess, and pleasantness (hedonic response) on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Follow-up body weight was measured in 75 Pima Indians 5.5 ± 3.0 y ( Results: The Pima Indians had a significantly (P = 0.006) lower hedonic response than did the whites (repeated-measures analysis of variance). Neither body size (P = 0.56) nor adiposity (P = 0.86) was a significant predictor of the hedonic response. There was a positive correlation (r = 0.28, P = 0.01) between the maximal hedonic response at baseline and subsequent weight gain in the Pima Indians.

Conclusion: Although the Pima Indians liked sweet and creamy solutions less than the whites did, a heightened hedonic response for these solutions among the Pima Indians was associated with weight gain.

Key Words: Taste perceptions • hedonic responses • obesity • Pima Indians • palatability and weight gain • food intake


INTRODUCTION  
Food choices are influenced by a broad range of economic, social, and behavioral variables, including food availability. However, the desire to select one food over another is more closely linked to taste and other sensory properties of foods. Hedonic value results from the interaction between the reward value of a particular food and the immediate psychological and physiologic status of the organism (1-3).

The hedonic reward value of food is closely linked to the perception of taste, and for many individuals, taste is the driving force behind food consumption (4). As commonly defined, taste encompasses the chemical senses of taste and olfaction as well as the oral perception of texture (4). Identification of the sweet (5), bitter (6), and umami (7) taste receptors and the location of the genes encoding these receptors has recently been published. In contrast, fat is generally thought to be recognized in the mouth not by its taste but by the textural properties it imparts or mouth feel (8). Recent studies suggest, however, that there may be a taste component in human fat perception, although a specific fat taste receptor in humans has not yet been identified (9).

The increasing prevalence of obesity in the United States (10) has been paralleled by an increase in energy intake (11, 12). Two highly palatable dietary ingredients, sugar and fat, account for almost 60% of the daily energy content of the typical American diet: sugar accounts for 22% and fat accounts for 37% (13). Although it has been suggested that a preference for these highly palatable food components may underlie the current epidemic of obesity (14), the data are somewhat conflicting (15-21).

Early studies among obese women reported that body mass index (BMI) was inversely related to hedonic ratings for sweet solutions but positively related to hedonic ratings for fat (15). Further investigation showed that whereas women appeared to prefer high-fat, high-sugar foods, men preferred high-fat, high-protein foods (16). This observation was confirmed in a more recent study by Blundell’s group in which BMI was positively correlated with the consumption of high-fat, high-sugar foods in women, whereas the reverse was true for men (17). However, habitual consumption of low- or high-fat foods was not found to be related to a taste preference for fat (18). Mela and Sacchetti (19) reported that a sensory preference for fat correlated with adiposity in lean subjects, but no consistent relation was found between fat taste preference and dietary fat intake. Finally, neither hedonic ratings for foods chosen freely (20) nor hedonic ratings assigned to 50 common foods (21) were significantly different between lean and obese consumers. The question of whether hedonic preferences for sweet or fat tastes actually predispose individuals to weight gain was not addressed in these studies.

The current study was undertaken to determine whether Pima Indians, a population highly prone to the development of obesity (22), have a greater preference for sweet and creamy solutions than do whites. In addition, we hypothesized that a preference for sweet and creamy solutions would predict weight gain among Pima Indians.


SUBJECTS AND METHODS  
Subjects
From 1991 to 2001, 187 volunteers participating in clinical research studies on the pathophysiology of obesity and type 2 diabetes at the National Institutes of Health in Phoenix, AZ, underwent taste testing. Pima Indian subjects (70 men, 53 women) were recruited from the Gila River Indian Community located in Sacaton, AZ, 64 km (40 miles) southeast of Phoenix. White subjects (37 men, 27 women) were recruited from the greater Phoenix area through advertisements. Before participation, all subjects were screened through a medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests and were found to be healthy. Because type 2 diabetes is known to affect hedonic responses to sweet and fat foods (23), subjects with diabetes (as determined by a 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance test; 24) were not included in the present study. All subjects were informed as to the aim, nature, and risks of the study before giving their written informed consent. These studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the Tribal Council of the Gila River Indian Community.

Methods
After =" BORDER="0">3 d of a weight-maintenance diet and an overnight fast, the subjects were given a standard breakfast consisting of scrambled eggs and low-fat cheese wrapped in a flour tortilla and accompanied by orange juice. The breakfast was calibrated to contain 25% of the subject’s daily weight-maintenance calorie needs. Pepper, spicy sauces, coffee, and tea were not permitted. Moreover, the subjects were allowed to rinse their mouths after breakfast but not to brush their teeth or use mouthwash.

Ninety minutes after breakfast, the subjects were presented with a tray of 16 randomly ordered solutions consisting of nonfat milk (0.1% fat), whole milk (3.5% fat), half and half (11.3% fat), and cream (37.5% fat) and containing 0%, 5%, 10%, or 20% sugar by weight. The subjects were instructed in the "sip-and-spit" technique, whereby they first rinsed their mouth with fresh water, took a mouthful of the first solution, swirled it in their mouth, rated the solution, expectorated, and used the same procedure on the next highest numbered solution (15). The subjects rated the solutions for sweetness, creaminess, and pleasantness (the hedonic response) by using a 100-mm visual analogue scale anchored with the descriptors "not at all" and "extremely" (sweet, creamy, or pleasant).

Body composition was determined by using hydrodensitometry with determination of residual lung volume by helium dilution (25) or by total-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DPX-L; Lunar Corporation, Madison, WI; 26). Percentage body fat, fat mass, and fat-free mass were calculated as previously described (27), and a conversion equation (28) was used to make the measurements comparable between the 2 methods.

Follow-up weight and height data were collected in 75 Pima Indian subjects (41 men, 34 women) =" BORDER="0">3 mo after the baseline taste test. Rate of change in weight (kg/y) was calculated by dividing change in weight (weight at follow-up - weight at initial visit) by years of follow-up. The subjects included in this longitudinal analysis were known to be free of diabetes at both baseline and follow-up. Follow-up taste testing was conducted in 18 Pima Indian subjects (8 men, 10 women) after a mean (±SD) follow-up interval of 2.4 ± 3.2 y to determine whether changes in hedonic response were related to changes in weight.

Statistical analyses
All procedures were carried out by using SAS for WINDOWS (version 8; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Linear regression (PROC GLM) was used to assess racial and sex differences in the anthropometric variables. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess within-subject differences due to sugar and fat content; these analyses were conducted by using general linear models that controlled for between-subject differences due to race, sex, age, BMI, and percentage body fat. The response surface method, calculated by using the SAS RSREG procedure, was used to approximate a maximal hedonic response and the corresponding sugar and fat concentrations at this maximum (29). The procedure determines an optimal quadratic response surface by least-squares regression by using the hedonic values of all combinations of sugar and fat concentrations. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess hedonic influences on longitudinal weight change with the maximal hedonic response obtained from the response surface method calculations.


RESULTS  
The Pima Indians were significantly (P = 0.05) younger than the whites (Table 1). Although the men were significantly heavier than the women, there were no racial differences in body weight. Because the Pima Indians were significantly (P < 0.0001) shorter than the whites, BMI was significantly (P = 0.01) higher in the Pima Indians (data not shown). Adiposity was significantly higher in the women than in the men (P = 0.0001), and, as previously observed (30), significantly (P = 0.05) higher in the Pima Indians than in the whites. Although there were no racial differences in fasting plasma glucose concentrations, the Pima Indians had significantly (P = 0.05) higher 2-h plasma glucose concentrations than did the whites. There were no significant race-by-sex interactions in the anthropometric variables.


View this table:
TABLE 1. Physical and metabolic characteristics of the white and Pima Indian subjects

 
The major predictor of the sweetness response was the sugar content (P < 0.0001) of the solutions (Figure 1); ratings increased as the solutions became sweeter. Using repeatedmeasures analysis of variance, we found that the Pima Indians rated the solutions as tasting sweeter than the whites did (P = 0.05), and the women rated the sweetness of these solutions higher than did the men (P = 0.01). Even though the Pima Indians were younger than the whites and the sweetness ratings were inversely related to age (P = 0.04), there was no interaction between race and age as a predictor of the sweetness response (P = 0.82). Neither adiposity (percentage body fat; P = 0.62) nor body size (BMI; P = 0.53) was a significant predictor of the sweetness response.


View larger version (29K):
FIGURE 1.. Mean (±SEM) sweetness ratings by sugar content of solutions containing 0%, 3.5%, 11.3%, and 37.5% fat in 64 whites (solid black bars) and 123 Pima Indians (hatched bars). The data were analyzed by using repeated-measures ANOVA. The Pima Indians rated the solutions as tasting sweeter than did the whites (P = 0.05), and the women rated the sweetness of the solutions higher than did the men (P = 0.01). Even though the Pima Indians were younger than the whites and the sweetness ratings were inversely related to age (P = 0.04), there was no interaction between race and age on the sweetness response.

 
The mean creaminess ratings for all solutions increased with increasing fat content of the solutions (P < 0.0001); however, creaminess ratings generally increased with increasing sugar content as well (P < 0.02; Figure 2). Race (P = 0.37), sex (P = 0.62), body size (P = 0.94), adiposity (P = 0.99), and age (P = 0.33) did not significantly affect the creaminess ratings.


View larger version (27K):
FIGURE 2.. Mean (±SEM) creaminess ratings by fat content of solutions containing 0%, 5%, 10%, and 20% sugar in 64 whites (solid black bars) and 123 Pima Indians (hatched bars). The data were analyzed by using repeated-measures ANOVA. The creaminess ratings for all solutions increased with increasing fat content (P < 0.0001) and with increasing sugar content (P < 0.02).

 
Race (P = 0.006) was the only significant predictor of the hedonic response. Age (P = 0.69), body size (P = 0.56), and adiposity (P = 0.86) were not significant predictors of the hedonic response. Significant within-subject effects for the hedonic response included sugar concentration (P = 0.001) and interactions between fat content and race (P = 0.0007), sugar content and race (P = 0.0002), and sugar content and sex (P = 0.001): the whites preferred sweeter and creamer solutions than did the Pima Indians, and the men preferred sweeter solutions than did the women.

The hedonic response surface curves for the Pima Indian and white men and women are shown in Figure 3. For both the Pima Indian men and women, the quadratic response surface model was significant (P < 0.0001), and the model identified a peak with the following coordinates: for men, hedonic response = 51.3 mm, sugar concentration at this response = 7.9%, and fat concentration at this response = 1.0%; for women, hedonic response = 46.9 mm, sugar concentration at this response = 1.3%, and fat concentration at this response = 0.7%. In contrast, in the white men and women, the quadratic response surface model was not significant (P = 0.45 and P = 0.57, respectively) and a peak could not be identified.


View larger version (53K):
FIGURE 3.. Response surface curves mapping the maximal hedonic response (P; z axis) and the sugar (S; x axis) and fat (F; y axis) concentrations (log10 transformed) at the maximum in 64 whites (37 men, 27 women) and 123 Pima Indians (70 men, 53 women). In both the Pima Indian men and women, the quadratic response surface model was significant (P < 0.0001), and the model identified a peak with the following coordinates: men, P = 51.3 mm, S = 7.9%, F = 1.0%; women, P = 46.9 mm, S = 1.3%, F = 0.7%. In the white men and women, the quadratic response surface model was not significant and a peak could not be identified.

 
Prospective data were obtained in 75 Pima Indian subjects (41men, 34 women) after a mean (±SD) follow-up time of 5.5 ± 3.0 y; the mean rate of change in weight for these 75 subjects was 1.9 ± 2.3 kg/y (Table 2). The rate of change in weight was significantly correlated (r = 0.28, P = 0.01; Figure 4) with the maximum hedonic response predicted from the quadratic response surface model at baseline.


View this table:
TABLE 2. Prospective data in Pima Indian subjects3

 

View larger version (11K):
FIGURE 4.. The rate of change in weight was significantly correlated (r = 0.28, P = 0.01; Spearman rank correlation coefficients) with the maximum hedonic response predicted from the quadratic response surface model at baseline in 41 Pima Indian men () and 34 Pima Indian women ().

 
The longitudinal results tracking changes in taste test responses in 18 Pima Indians (8 men, 10 women) who gained weight over time are shown in Figure 5. The subjects underwent repeated taste tests over a mean of 2.4 ± 3.2 y; at both time points, body weights were also measured. There was no indication of an effect of weight gain on the hedonic response.


View larger version (11K):
FIGURE 5.. Longitudinal results tracking changes in taste-test responses in 8 Pima Indian men () and 10 Pima Indian women () who gained weight over time. The subjects underwent repeated taste tests over a mean (±SD) of 2.4 ± 3.2 y; body weights were measured at the first visit and at the follow-up. There was no indication of an effect of weight gain on the hedonic response.

 

DISCUSSION  
In the present study, the Pima Indians had a significantly lower hedonic response to sweet and creamy solutions than did the whites. Neither body size nor adiposity was a significant covariate of the hedonic response. There was a positive correlation between the hedonic response to sweet and creamy solutions measured at baseline and weight gain 5 y later in the Pima Indians.

Previous reports suggested an inverse relation between the hedonic response to sweetened solutions and weight, especially among women (15, 16). In the present study, the hedonic response was not related to body size, adiposity, or sex; however, there was a significant racial effect such that the hedonic response of Pima Indians was lower than that of whites. Moreover, the Pima Indians rated these solutions as tasting sweeter than did the whites, and the hedonic response among the Pima Indians decreased as the solutions became sweeter. This is inconsistent with our hypothesis that Pima Indians would express a greater preference for sweet and creamy solutions because of their diet-induced obesity. However, several explanations for this inconsistency are possible.

The hedonic response may be elevated in persons at risk of obesity but may decline once the phenotype develops. Previous reports in Pima Indians documented similar effects for other risk factors for obesity (31). For example, individuals who are insulin sensitive are at greater risk of weight gain, but the development of obesity is accompanied by a decline in insulin sensitivity (32). Our prospective analysis in Pima Indians indicates that a high hedonic response to sweet and creamy solutions is associated with weight gain 5 y later. This finding is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to lend support to the hypothesis that a preference for highly palatable food components is associated with the development of obesity. Although the amount of variability in the change in body weight explained by the hedonic response is admittedly small (8%), it is not very different from many of the risk factors for obesity identified in this Native American population (31). Unlike most of the previously identified risk factors, however, the hedonic response does not seem to consistently decrease in response to weight gain, and this mechanism cannot be invoked to explain the lower hedonic response in the Pima Indians than in the whites.

Pima Indians may not express a greater hedonic response for any class of tastants or any other pleasurable stimuli compared with whites if they suffer from some form of generalized hypohedonism. The dopaminergic system is chiefly involved in modulating the reward properties of many stimuli, including taste (33). It was recently shown that dopamine D2 receptor availability is diminished in the brain of obese individuals (34), and we previously reported that the serine to cysteine mutation at amino acid 311 (Ser311Cys) of the dopamine D2 receptor gene is frequent among Pima Indians (35). However, if a lower number or impairment of the dopamine D2 receptor results in a reward deficiency condition, one would expect a low, not a high, hedonic response to predict weight gain among Pima Indians. Furthermore, we were unable to identify an effect of the Ser311Cys mutation on the taste-test responses of participants in the present study (data not shown).

Typical food choices among Pima Indians do not include many sweet items; breakfast generally consists of eggs, bacon, and fried potatoes, whereas Mexican and Southwestern-style dishes such as tacos, burritos, chili, and bean stews are popular lunch and dinner choices (36). Although regular consumption of sweet-tasting foods such as fruit and desserts is reportedly infrequent in the population, consumption of sweetened beverages such as Kool-Aid (Kraft Foods) and soda pop containing 10-12% sugar (37) is widespread (ADS, unpublished observation, 1999).

There are limitations to the use of dairy liquids for assessing taste preferences that should be mentioned. Because fat perception in liquid stimuli is largely attributable to the textural properties fat imparts (8), the sensory preference for fat in liquid stimuli may not be equivalent to that in solid foods (38). However, sugar preferences reportedly remain constant across food types (38). In addition, whereas lactose intolerance to dairy products in the United States is reportedly 15% among whites, 53% among Mexican Americans, and 80% among blacks (39), the prevalence among Native Americans is unknown. Although we did not specifically test for lactose intolerance, none of the subjects included in the present study population reported lactose intolerance in their medical history.

Taste preferences for highly palatable ingredients such as sugar and fat may be important indicators of a desire for an energy-dense diet, but because food intake is influenced by many factors, including economic, demographic, psychological, and sociocultural variables, the role of taste preference in predicting weight gain may be difficult to discern. To be effective, dietary advice to obese individuals attempting control their weight should account for taste preferences.

In conclusion, we showed that even though the Pima Indians liked the sweet and creamy solutions less than the whites did, a heightened hedonic response for these solutions among the Pima Indians was associated with weight gain. This finding lends support to the hypothesis that a preference for highly palatable foods is associated with the development of obesity.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  
We thank John Graves and the dietary staff and Carol Massengill and the nursing staff of the NIH Clinical Unit. We are also indebted to Eric Ravussin and Enette Larson for initiating the study and to Robert Hanson, Robert Lindsay, Norbert Stefan, and Michael Stumvoll for assistance in statistical analysis. Most of all, we thank the volunteers for their participation in the study.

ADS was responsible for the design of the experiment, collection and analysis of the data, and writing of the manuscript. ADP was responsible for significant advice and consultation. REP was responsible for the design of the experiment, analysis of the data, and significant advice and consultation. AD was responsible for analysis of the data and significant advice and consultation. PAT was responsible for the design of the experiment, analysis of the data, and writing of the manuscript. None of the authors had a financial or personal interest involved in the sponsorship of this research study.


REFERENCES  

  1. Mela DJ. Determinants of food choice: relationships with obesity and weight control. Obes Res 2001;9(suppl):249S-55S.
  2. Nestle M, Wing RR, Birch L, et al. Behavioral and social influences on food choice. Nutr Rev 1998;56(suppl):S50-74.
  3. Blundell JE, Gillett A. Control of food intake in the obese. Obes Res 2001;9(suppl):263S-70S.
  4. Drewnowski A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annu Rev Nutr 1997;17:237-53.
  5. Nelson G, Hoon MA, Chandrashekar J, Zhang Y, Ryba NJP, Zuker CS. Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell 2001;106:381-90.
  6. Chandrashekar J, Mueller KL, Hoon MA, et al. T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell 2000;100:702-11.
  7. Nelson G, Chandrashekar J, Hoon MA, et al. An amino acid taste receptor. Nature 2002;416:199-202.
  8. Berk Z. Braverman’s introduction to the biochemistry of foods. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, 1976:182-3.
  9. Mattes RD. The taste of fat elevates postprandial triacylglycerol. Physiol Behav 2001;74:343-8.
  10. Flegal KM, Troiano RP. Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:807-18.
  11. Harnack LJ, Jeffrey RW, Boutelle KN. Temporal trends in energy intake in the United States: an ecologic perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:1478-84.
  12. Nielsen SJ, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake in the US between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obes Res 2002;10:370-8.
  13. Drewnowski A. Energy intake and sensory properties of food. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62(suppl):1081S-5S.
  14. Blundell JE, King NA. Overconsumption as a cause of weight gain: behavioural-physiological interactions in the control of food intake (appetite). Ciba Found Symp 1996;201:138-58.
  15. Drewnowski A, Brunzell JD, Sande K, Iverius PH, Greenwood MRC. Sweet tooth reconsidered: taste responsiveness in human obesity. Physiol Behav 1985;35:617-22.
  16. Drewnowski A, Kurth C, Holden-Wiltse J, Saari J. Food preferences in human obesity. Appetite 1992;18:207-21.
  17. Macdiarmid JI, Vail A, Cade JE, Blundell JE. The sugar-fat relationship revisited: differences in consumption between men and women of varying BMI. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:1053-61.
  18. Cooling J, Blundell JE. High-fat and low-fat phenotypes: habitual eating of high- and low-fat foods not related to taste preference for fat. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;55:1016-21.
  19. Mela DJ, Sacchetti DA. Sensory preferences for fats: relationships with diet and body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:908-15.
  20. Cox DN, Perry L, Moore PB, Vallis L, Mela DJ. Sensory and hedonic associations with macronutrient and energy intakes of lean and obese consumers. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:403-10.
  21. Cox DN, van Galen M, Hedderley D, Perry L, Moore PB, Mela DJ. Sensory and hedonic judgments of common foods by lean consumers and consumers with obesity. Obes Res 1998;6:438-47.
  22. Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Saad MF, et al. Obesity in the Pima Indians: its magnitude and relationship with diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53(suppl):1543S-51S.
  23. Laitinen JH, Tuorila HM, Uusitupa MLJ. Changes in hedonic response to sweet and fat in recently diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients during diet therapy. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991;45:393-400.
  24. World Health Organization. Diabetes mellitus: report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1985;17:45-51.
  25. Goldman RF, Buskirk ER. A method for underwater weighing and determination of body density. In: Brozek J, Herschel A, eds. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1961:78-106.
  26. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for total body and regional bone mineral and soft tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;51:1106-12.
  27. Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Herschel A, eds. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1961:223-44.
  28. Tataranni PA, Ravussin E. Use of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in obese individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:730-4.
  29. Drewnowski A. New techniques: multidimensional analyses of taste responsiveness. Int J Obes 1984;8:599-607.
  30. Weyer C, Snitker S, Rising R, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Determinants of energy expenditure and fuel utilization in man: effects of body composition, age, sex, ethnicity and glucose tolerance in 916 subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:715-22.
  31. Ravussin E, Swinburn BA. Metabolic predictors of obesity: cross-sectional versus longitudinal data. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993;17(suppl):S28-31.
  32. Swinburn BA, Nyomba BL, Saad MF, et al. Insulin resistance associated with lower rates of weight gain in Pima Indians. J Clin Invest 1991;88:168-73.
  33. Meguid MM, Fetissov SO, Varma M, et al. Hypothalamic dopamine and serotonin in the regulation of food intake. Nutrition 2000;10:843-57.
  34. Wang G-F, Volkow ND, Logan J, et al. Brain dopamine and obesity. Lancet 2001;357:354-7.
  35. Jenkinson CP, Hanson R, Cray K, Wiedrich C, et al. Association of dopamine D2 receptor polymorphisms Ser311Cys and TaqIA with obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus in Pima Indians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1233-8.
  36. Smith CJ, Schakel SF, Nelson RG. Selected traditional and contemporary foods currently used by the Pima Indians. J Am Diet Assoc 1991;91:338-41.
  37. Matthews RH, Pehrsson PR, Farhat-Sabat M. Sugar content of selected foods: individual and total sugars. Washington, DC: Human Nutrition Information Service, 1987. (USDA Home Economics Research Report no. 48.)
  38. Drewnowski A, Shrager EE, Lipsky C, Stellar E, Greenwood MR. Sugar and fat: sensory and hedonic evaluation of liquid and solid foods. Physiol Behav 1989;45:177-83.
  39. Vesa TH, Marteau P, Korpela R. Lactose intolerance. J Am Coll Nutr 2000;19(suppl):165S-75S.
Received for publication July 22, 2003. Accepted for publication August 14, 2003.


作者: Arline D Salbe
医学百科App—中西医基础知识学习工具
  • 相关内容
  • 近期更新
  • 热文榜
  • 医学百科App—健康测试工具